CHAPTER V.

THE BASTILLE.

Absolute Power of the King.--_Lettres de Cachet._--The

Bastille.--Cardinal Balue.--Harancourt.--Charles of

Armanac.--Constant de Renville.--Duke of Nemours.--Dungeons

of the Bastille.--_Oubliettes._--Dessault.--M. Massat.--M.

Catalan.--Latude.--The Student.--Apostrophe of Michelet.

The monarchy was now so absolute that the king, without any regard to

law, had the persons and the property of all his subjects entirely at

his disposal. He could confiscate any man's estate. He could assign any

man to a dungeon for life without trial and even without accusation. To

his petted and profligate favorites he was accustomed to give sealed

writs, _lettres de cachet_, whose blanks they could fill up with any

name they pleased. With one of these writs the courtiers could drag

any man who displeased them to one of the dungeons of the Bastille,

where no light of the sun would ever gladden his eyes again. Of these

sealed writs we shall speak hereafter. They were the most appalling

instruments of torture despotism ever wielded.

_The Bastille._ At the eastern entrance of Paris stood this

world-renowned fortress and prison. In gloomy grandeur its eight towers

darkened the air, surrounded by a massive wall of stone nine feet thick

and a hundred feet high. The whole was encircled by a ditch twenty-five

feet deep and one hundred and twenty feet wide. The Bastille was an

object exciting universal awe. No one could ever pass beneath its

shadow without thinking of the sighs which ceaselessly resounded

through all its vaults. It was an ever-present threat, the great

upholder of despotic power, with its menace appalling even the boldest

heart. It is easy to brave death from the bullet or the guillotine;

but who can brave the doom of Cardinal Balue, who, for eleven years,

was confined in an iron cage, so constructed that he could find no

possible position for repose; or the fate of Harancourt, who passed

fifteen years in a cage within the Bastille, whose iron bars required

in their riveting the labors of nineteen men for twenty days? To be

thus torn from wife, children, and home, and to be consigned for life

to the unearthly woe of such a doom must terrify even the firmest soul.

It is painful to dwell upon these details, but they must be known in

explanation of the scenes of violence and blood to which they finally

gave birth.

Charles of Armanac, for no crime whatever of his own, but because

his _brother_ had offended Charles XI., was thrown into prison. For

fourteen years he lingered in the dungeon, until his reason was

dethroned and his spirit was bewildered and lost in the woes of the

maniac. Constant de Renville, a Norman gentleman, was accused, while

in exile in Holland, of writing a satirical poem against France. For

eleven years he was immured in one of the most loathsome dungeons of

the Bastille. He appears to have been a man of true piety, and upon

his release wrote an account of the horrors of his prison-house, which

thrilled the ear of Europe.

The Duke of Nemours was accused of an intrigue against Louis XI. He

was dragged from the presence of his wife, exciting in her such terror

that she fell into convulsions and died. After two years' imprisonment

he was condemned to be executed. A scaffold was erected with openings

beneath the planks, and his three children were placed beneath the

planks, bareheaded, clothed in white robes, and with their hands bound

behind their backs, that the blood of their beheaded father might

drop upon them, and that his anguish might be increased by witnessing

the agony of his children. The fearful tragedy being over, these

tender children, the youngest of whom was but five years of age, were

again locked up in one of the gloomiest vaults of the Bastille, where

they remained for five years. Upon the death of Louis XI. they were

released. The two eldest, however, emaciate with privation and woe,

soon died. The youngest alone survived.

Imagination can not conceive of an abode more loathsome than some of

these horrible dens. The cold stone walls, covered with the mould of

ages, were ever dripping with water. The slimy floor swarmed with

reptiles and all kinds of vermin who live in darkness and mire. A

narrow slit in the wall, which was nine feet thick, admitted a few

straggling rays of light, but no air to ventilate the apartment where

corruption was festering. A little straw upon the floor or upon a plank

supported by iron bars fixed in the wall afforded the only place for

repose. Ponderous double doors, seven inches thick and provided with

enormous locks and bolts, shut the captive as effectually from the

world and from all knowledge of what was passing in the world as if

he were in his grave. His arrest was frequently conducted so secretly

that even his friends had no knowledge of what had become of him; they

could make no inquiries at the gloomy portals of the Bastille, and the

unhappy captive was left to die unknown and forgotten in his dungeon.

If by any happy chance he was liberated, he was first compelled to take

an oath never to repeal what he had seen, or heard, or suffered within

the walls of the Bastille.

Thus any person who became obnoxious to the king or any of his

favorites was immediately transferred to these dungeons of despair.

Cardinal Richelieu filled its cells with the victims of his tyranny.

The captive immediately received the name of his cell, and his real

name was never uttered within the precincts of the Bastille.

The Bastille was often full to overflowing, but there were other

Bastilles in France sufficiently capacious to meet all the demands of

the most inexorable tyranny.

It is the more necessary to dwell upon these details since the Bastille

was the mailed hand with which aristocratic usurpation beat down all

resistance and silenced every murmur. The Bastille, with its massive

walls and gloomy towers and cannon frowning from every embrasure,

was the terrific threat which held France in subjection. It was the

demon soul of demoniac despotism. So awful was the terror inspired,

that frequently the victim was merely enjoined by one of the warrants

bearing the seal of the king to go himself to the dungeon. Appalled

and trembling in every nerve, he dared not for one moment disobey.

Hastening to the prison, he surrendered himself to its glooms,

despairingly hoping, by prompt obedience, to shorten the years of his

captivity.

There were vaults in the Bastille and other prisons of France called

_oubliettes_, into which the poor victim was dropped and left to die

forgotten. These were usually shaped like a bottle, with a narrow

neck and expanding beneath. In one of these tombs of massive stone,

twenty-two feet deep and seventeen or eighteen feet in diameter,

with a narrow neck through which the captive could be thrust down,

the inmate was left in Egyptian darkness amid the damp and mould of

ages, and, trampling upon the bones of those who had perished before

him, to linger through weary hours of starvation and woe until death

came to his relief. Sometimes he thus lingered for years, food being

occasionally thrown down to him.

There were twenty bastilles in France. In Paris, besides the Bastille,

there were thirty prisons, where people might be incarcerated without

sentence, trial, or even accusation. The convents were amply supplied

with dungeons. All these prisons were at the disposal of the Jesuits.

They were instruments of torture. The wretched victim, once consigned

to those cells, was enshrouded by the oblivion of the tomb. The rich

man was robbed of his wealth and taken there to be forgotten and to

die. Beauty, whose virtue bribes could not destroy, was dragged to

those apartments to minister to the lust of merciless oppressors. The

shriek of despair, smothered by walls of stone and doors of iron,

reached only the ear of God.[35]

During the reign of Louis XV. one hundred and fifty thousand of these

_lettres de cachet_ were issued, making an average of two thousand five

hundred annually.[36] The king could not refuse a blank warrant to his

mistress or to a courtier. All those who had influence at court could

obtain them. They were distributed as freely as in this country members

of Congress have distributed their postage franks. St. Florentin alone

gave away fifty thousand. These writs were often sold at a great price.

Any man who could obtain one had his enemy at his disposal. One can

hardly conceive of a more awful despotism. Such were "_the good old

times of the monarchy_," as some have insanely called them. Even during

the mild reign of Louis XVI. fourteen thousand _lettres de cachet_ were

issued. Let us enter the prison and contemplate the doom of the captive.

A gentleman by the name of Dessault offended Richelieu by refusing to

execute one of his atrocious orders. At midnight a band of soldiers

entered his chamber, tore him from his bed, and dragged him through

the dark streets to the Bastille, and there consigned him to a living

burial in one of its cold damp tombs of iron and stone. Here in silence

and solitude, deprived of all knowledge of his family, and his family

having lost all trace of him, he lingered eleven years.

"Oh, who can tell what days, what nights he spent

Of tideless, waveless, sailless, shoreless woe!"

At last his jailer ventured to inform him that Richelieu was on a dying

bed. Hoping that in such an hour the heart of the haughty cardinal

might be touched with sympathy, he wrote to him as follows:

"My lord, you are aware that for eleven years you have subjected me

to the endurance of a thousand deaths in the Bastille--to sufferings

which would excite compassion if inflicted even upon the most disloyal

subject of the king. How much more then should I be pitied, who am

doomed to perish here for disobeying an order, which, obeyed, would

have sent me to the final judgment with blood-stained hands, and would

have consigned my soul to eternal misery. Ah! could you but hear the

sobs, the lamentations, the groans which you extort from me, you

would quickly set me at liberty. In the name of the eternal God, who

will judge you as well as me, I implore you, my lord, to take pity

on my woe, and, if you wish that God should show mercy to you, order

my chains to be broken before your death-hour comes. When that hour

arrives you will no longer be able to do me justice, but will persecute

me even in your grave."

The iron-hearted minister was unrelenting, and died leaving his victim

still in the dungeon. There Dessault remained _fifty years_ after

the death of Richelieu. He was at length liberated, after having

passed sixty-one years in a loathsome cell but a few feet square. The

mind stands aghast in the contemplation of such woes. All this he

suffered as the punishment of his _virtues_. The mind is appalled in

contemplating such a doom. Even the assurance that after death cometh

the judgment affords but little relief. Michelet, an unbeliever in

Christian revelation, indignantly exclaims, "though a sworn enemy to

barbarous fictions about everlasting punishment, I found myself praying

to God to construct a hell for tyrants."

When we remember that during a single reign one hundred and fifty

thousand were thus incarcerated; that all the petted and profligate

favorites of the king, male and female, had these blank warrants

placed in their hands, which they could fill up with any name at their

pleasure; that money could be thus extorted, domestic virtue violated,

and that every man and every family was thus placed at the mercy of

the vilest minions of the court, we can only wonder that the volcano

of popular indignation did not burst forth more speedily and more

desolatingly. It is true that in many other countries of Europe the

state of affairs was equally bad, if not worse. But in France wealth

and intelligence had made great advances, while in central and northern

Europe the enslaved people were so debased by ignorance that they had

no consciousness of the rights of which they were defrauded.

The court demanded of a rich man, M. Massat, six hundred thousand

livres ($120,000). Stunned by the ruinous demand, he ventured to

remonstrate. He was dragged to the Bastille, where the vermin of his

dungeon could alone hear his murmurs. M. Catalan, another man of

wealth, after experiencing the horrors of such an imprisonment for

several months, was glad to purchase his ransom for six millions of

livres ($1,200,000).[37]

The money thus extorted was squandered in the most shameless

profligacy. The king sometimes expended two hundred thousand dollars

for a single night's entertainment at Versailles. The terrors of the

Bastille frowned down all remonstrances. A "stone doublet" was the

robe which the courtiers facetiously remarked they had prepared for

murmurers.

On the 1st of May, 1749, a gentleman of the name of Latude was arrested

by one of these _lettres de cachet_, and thrown into the Bastille. He

was then but twenty years of age, and had given offense to Madame de

Pompadour, by pretending that a conspiracy had been formed against

her life. For thirty-five years he remained in prison enduring

inconceivable horrors. In 1784, several years after the death of both

the mistress and her subject king, he was liberated and wrote an

account of his captivity. It was a tale of horror which thrilled the

ear of Europe. Eloquently, in view of the letters of Latude, Michelet

represents the people as exclaiming,

"Holy, holy Revolution, how slowly dost thou come! I, who have been

waiting for thee a thousand years in the furrows of the Middle Ages,

what! must I wait still longer? Oh, how slowly time passes! Oh, how

have I counted the hours! Wilt thou never arrive?"

A young man, in a Jesuit College, in a thoughtless hour, composed

a satirical Latin distich, making merry with the foibles of the

professors and of the king. A _lettre de cachet_ was immediately served

upon him, and for _thirty-one years_, until youth and manhood were

giving place to old age, he remained moaning in living burial in one of

the dungeons of the Bastille. One of the first acts of the Revolution

was to batter down these execrable walls and to plow up their very

foundations.

In view of the facts here revealed one can not but be amazed at the

manner in which many have spoken of the French Revolution, as if it

were merely an outburst of human depravity. "Burke had no idea," writes

De Tocqueville, "of the state in which the monarchy, he so deeply

regretted, had left us." Michelet, glowing with the indignation which

inflamed the bosoms of his fathers, exclaims, "Our fathers shivered

that Bastille to pieces, tore away its stones with bleeding hands,

and flung them afar. Afterward they seized them again, and, having

hewn them into a different form, in order that they might be trampled

under foot by the people forever, built with them the Bridge of

Revolution."[38]

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 35: Historical View of French Revolution, by J. Michelet, i.,

66.]

[Footnote 36: History of the Bastille, Chambers' Miscellany.]

[Footnote 37: Old Régime, p. 191.]

The French Revolution of 1789, as Viewed in the Light of Republican Institutions · 第 5 / 40 章