All the Caffre people are pastoral in habits, and have large herds of

cows. Agriculture is practised on a limited scale. Their temperament

is turbulent and warlike, and many of them are cannibals. Their social

organization is military, but slavery is unusual. Singular to say, they

do not know the bow and arrow, their weapons being the war-club and a

lance called an _assegai_. Their religion is a fetichism, and polygamy

is universal. On the whole, they are on a higher level of culture than

the Negroes of the Sudan. All the Bantu tribes are mono-glottic, that

is, they speak dialects traceable to one original stem. These have a

peculiar alliteration, and form their words by means of prefixes of

elements placed before the root, this being their special method of

agglutination. It is divided into three principal dialects, and is the

most widely extended of any of the African linguistic stocks, except

the Libyan.

The vast basin of the Congo river, including over two million square

miles, is now mostly included in the “Congo Independent State.” Its

native inhabitants are connected by language with the Negroids of the

Bantu group, and several of them retain traditions of their immigration

into the districts they now inhabit. The Waganda, for instance, report

that their ancestors came from the northeast, the Watuta and Masiti

from near the Zambesi river. Many of them are of a light, bright brown,

and are devoid of the peculiar odor of the true negro. All the tribes

from Lake Tanganyika to the Atlantic speak dialects manifestly akin.

They are divided into independent nations, some of large extent, and

are subject to chiefs, who rule with despotic power. Their religion is

fetichistic, and though they generally are agricultural, and possess a

certain degree of culture, cannibalism is or was frequent among them.

Slavery also existed in some of its most deplorable forms, and up to

a very recent date, if not still, there was a regular trade in young

slaves to be fattened, killed and eaten on certain solemn occasions.

_General Observations on the Race._--Although the true Negroes

occupied but a small portion of the African continent, the infusion

of their blood into their Hamitic and Semitic neighbors, resulting in

the Negroid type, was to such a degree that these mixed stocks became

assimilated in character much more to the black than to the white race,

and were brought approximately to the mental level of the former.

Neither the Negroes nor the Negroids ever carried out a conquest of

lands occupied by the Hamites or Semites. We have vague histories of

bloody wars on a large scale among themselves, and the erection of

apparently powerful monarchies, but which soon fell to pieces.[126]

The low intellectual position of the Austafrican race is revealed by

the facts that in no part of the continent did its members devise the

erection of walls of stone; that they domesticated no animal, and

developed no important food-plant; that their religions never rose

above fetichism, their governments above despotism, their marriage

relations above polygamy. It is true that many of them practise

agriculture and the pastoral life, but it is significant that the

plants which they especially cultivate, the “durra” or sorghum, millet,

rice, yams, manioc, and tobacco, were introduced from Asia, Europe or

America.[127] Their cattle and sheep are descended from the ancient

stocks domesticated by the Egyptians, and differ from those represented

on the early monuments of Assyria and India. The brick-built cities of

the Sudan were constructed under Arab influence, and the ruins of stone

towers and walls in the gold-bearing districts of South Africa show

clear traces of Semitic workmanship.[128] The knowledge of smelting and

forging iron is of ancient date throughout Africa, and they can temper

steel with skill, but the art of the smith is regarded as degrading,

and their long acquaintance with this most useful of metals has not

lifted them from a condition of barbarism.[129]

In many of the useful arts they reveal considerable skill. The weaving

of grass into mats and cloth, the tanning and working of leather, the

preparation of salt and soap, dyeing and pottery, are occupations which

are wide spread. The true negroes are passionately fond of music,

singing and dancing, and the invention of one instrument, the marimba,

which is played by beating wooden keys with a stick, is attributed to

them.

The tendency of the negro race in Africa is that which we observe among

negro children in the public schools of the United States. Their powers

develop quite as rapidly as those of white children up to a certain

point, up to the age of thirteen or fourteen; but then there comes

a diminution, often a cessation, of their mental development. The

physical overslaughs the psychical, and they turn away from the pursuit

of culture. They are unwilling to undertake, they are unequal to, the

more arduous intellectual tasks.

I have already remarked that the Austafricans never of their own

volition made any serious inroad into the territory of the white race.

Yet there are to-day probably more than twenty millions of them,

including the mulattoes, living among the whites, seven millions of

whom are in the United States. This extraordinary condition is the

result of the enormous deportation of the blacks as slaves, which has

been going on for thousands of years.

The origin of the negroes in the United States may be traced partly

by the physical appearance, partly by the few words of their mother

tongues which have survived the acquisition by them of the English

language. These words are generally connected with the Mande stem

of tongues spoken by the Mandingoes and their neighbors, whom I

have already referred to as dwelling in Senegambia and the Western

Sudan.[130] They were a nation of some importance, and having early

become in great part adherents of the Mohammedan faith, established

the monarchy of Melli, which in the thirteenth century extended from

Timbuctoo to the coast, and forced many of the subjected tribes to

learn the Mande tongue.

_Scheme of the Asian Race._

{ 1. Chinese Group. Chinese.

I. Sinitic { 2. Thibetan. Thibetans, Ladakis, Nepalese, Bhotanese.

Branch.

{ Birmese, Siamese, Annamese, Cambodians,

{ 3. Indo-Chinese Group. { Cochin-Chinese, Tonkinese.

{ 1. Tungusic Group. Tungus, Manchus.

{ 2. Mongolic Group. Mongols, Kalmucks.

II. Sibiric { 3. Tartaric Group. { Turcomans, Yakouts, Turks (Osmanli),

Branch. { Usbeck, Kirghis, Cossacks, Huns.

{ Finns, Lapps, Esthonians, Ugrians,

{ 4. Finnic Group. { Magyars, Mordvins, Samoyeds, Ostyaks,

{ Voguls, Livonians, Karelians.

{ 5. Arctic Group. { Chukchis, Koraks, Kamschatkans,

{ Namollos, Ghiliaks, Ainos.

{ 6. Japanese Group. Japanese, Koreans.

LECTURE VII.

THE ASIAN RACE.

CONTENTS.--Physical geography of Asia. Physical traits of the Race.

Its branches.

I. THE SINITIC BRANCH. Sub-divisions. 1. The Chinese. Origin

and early migrations. Psychical elements. Arts. Religions.

Philosophers. Late migrations. 2. The Thibetan Group. Character.

Physical traits. Tribes. 3. The Indo-Chinese Group. Members.

Character and culture.

II. THE SIBIRIC BRANCH. Synonyms. Location. Physical appearance.

1. The Tungusic Group. Members. Location. Character. 2. Mongolic

Group. Migrations. 3. The Tartaric Group. History. Language.

Customs. 4. The Finnic Group. Origin and migrations. Physical

traits. Boundaries of the Siberic Peoples. The “Turanian” theories.

5. The Arctic Group. Members. Location. Physical traits. 6. The

Japanese Group. Members. Location. History. Culture. The Koreans.

If you observe the relief of the continent of Asia, you will note

that from the lofty plateau of Pamir, called by the orientals “The

Roof of the World,” two tremendous mountain chains diverge, the one

to the northeast, finally reaching the sea of Ochotsk, the other to

the southeast, meeting the southern ocean on the west of the bay of

Bengal. The region between them is one of high and arid table lands,

intersected by mountain ranges, and giving birth to streams which flow

in circuitous courses to the eastern sea. Along the coast the land

sinks to alluvial plains, and north of this triangle, the endless

forests, steppes, and “tundras” of Siberia and Turkestan continue to

the Arctic sea.

The region thus described is the continent of Asia in the proper

geological and zoölogical sense; the valleys of the Oxus, of

Mesopotamia, and the land to the west of them, properly belong to

Europe, and in fact, are included by naturalists in that continent,

under the name “Eurasia.”[131]

Asia proper is thus divided into two contrasted geographical areas,

that of the table-lands and mountains on the south, and that of the

plains on the north. These features have been decisive in directing

the migrations of its inhabitants, and to some extent in modifying

their traits. The vast majority, however, are distinctly recognizable

members of one race, which has been variously termed the Asiatic, the

Mongolian, or the Yellow race.

_Physical Traits of the Asian Race._--As the last mentioned adjective

intimates, the prevailing color is yellowish, tending in different

regions toward a brown or white, but never reaching the clear white of

the western European. The hair is straight, coarse and black, abundant

on the head, scanty on the face, almost absent on the body. The

stature is medium or undersized, the legs thin, and the muscular power

inferior to that of the Eurafrican race. The skull has a tendency to

the globular form (meso- or brachycephalic), the face is round, the

cheek bones prominent, the nose flat at the bridge and depressed at the

extremity, the eyes are small and black, and the lids do not open fully

at the inner angle, giving the peculiar appearance known as the oblique

or Mongolian eye. This last trait is not uncommon in the children of

Europeans, but it is generally outgrown. It is in the adult an arrest

of muscular development, although in some instances it seems related to

the bony confirmation of the orbit.[132]

[Illustration: ETHNIC CHART OF EURASIA AND ASIA.]

_Subdivisions._--These are the general traits of the Asian race,

recurring more or less prominently wherever its members of pure descent

are found. It is divisible, however, into two branches, corresponding

roughly with the two geographical divisions of the continent to which I

have alluded. The first of these branches I call the Sinitic, from the

old Greek form of the word China, the other the Sibiric, an adjective

from the proper orthography of the name Siberia (Sibiria). These

branches are contrasted not only in geographical location, but quite

as much so in language. The Sinitic peoples speak isolating, tonic,

monosyllabic languages, while the tongues of the Sibiric population are

polysyllabic and agglutinative.

I. THE SINITIC BRANCH.

This branch includes the people of the Chinese empire and Farther

India. They are separable into three groups:--

1. The Chinese proper;

2. The Thibetans; and

3. The Indo-Chinese of Siam, Anam, Burmah, and Cochin China.

The languages of all these have peculiar features and such affinities

that they all point to one ancestral stock.

_1. The Chinese._

The population of China as we know it at present is the result of a

fusion of a number of tribes of connected lineage. Those who claim

the purest blood relate that somewhere about five thousand years ago

their ancestors came from the vicinity of the Kuen-lun mountains,

east of the Plateau of Pamir, and following the head waters of the

Hoang-ho and Yang-tse-Kiang entered the northwestern province of China,

Shen-si. Here they found a savage people, the Lolo and the Miaotse,

whom they subjected or drove out, and pursuing the river valleys,

reached the fertile lowlands along the coast. Their authentic annals

begin about 2350 B. C. Even then they had attained a respectable stage

of civilization, being a stable population, devoted to agriculture,

acquainted with bronze, possessing domestic animals, and constructors

of cities. The hoariest traditions speak of the cultivation of the “six

field fruits,” which were three kinds of millet, barley, rice, and

beans. The sorghum, wheat, and oats now common in parts of China are of

comparatively recent introduction.

It is interesting to inquire whether these ancient arts possessed by

the Chinese were self-developed, or were borrowed in part from the

Eurafrican peoples of Iran or Mesopotamia. The former opinion is that

defended by Peschel and some other ethnographers. They claim that the

culture of the Chinese was developed independently in the secluded

and fertile valleys of their great rivers, and owed nothing to the

evolution of other civilizations until commerce and travel brought them

together within historic times. The individual character of Chinese

ancient culture speaks strongly for this view; certainly the Chinese

system of writing is one based entirely on their range and method of

thought; their domestic animals are of varieties formerly unknown in

western Asia; and the growth of many undoubted local industries, silk

for instance, for which they were celebrated in the days of the prophet

Ezekiel, prove an ancient capacity for self-development not inferior to

the Eurafrican race.

On the other hand, their astronomical system, which was in use 2300 B.

C., is practically identical with that of the Arabs and Indo-Aryans,

and points for its origin to the Chaldees of Babylonia. In later

days, that is, since the beginning of our era, undoubtedly much that

has been looked upon as the outcrop of Chinese culture is due to the

Indo-Aryans. My own conclusion is that in all important elements

the ancient Chinese civilization was a home product, a spontaneous

growth of an intellectually gifted people, but one whose capacity of

development was limited, and that later generations were satisfied to

borrow and appropriate from the nations with whom commerce brought them

into contact.

This insufficiency of development is the weak point of Chinese

character, and is strikingly illustrated by the little use they made

of important discoveries. They were acquainted as early as 121 A. D.

with the power of the magnet to point to the north; but the needle was

never used in navigation, but only as a toy. They manufactured powder

long before the Europeans, but only to put it in fire-crackers. They

invented printing with movable type in the eleventh century, but never

adopted it in their printing offices. They have domesticated cattle for

thousands of years, but do not milk the cows nor make butter. Paper

money has been in circulation for centuries, but the scales and weight

still decide the value of gold and silver, coins of these precious

metals being unknown. Their technical skill in the arts is astonishing,

but the inspiration of the beautiful is wholly absent.

These historic facts disclose the psychical elements of Chinese

character. Its fundamental traits are sobriety, industry, common sense,

practicality. The Chinaman regards solely what is visibly useful,

materially beneficial. His arts and sciences, his poems and dramas, his

religions and philosophies, all revolve around the needs and pleasures

of his daily life. Such terms as altruism, the ideal, the universal,

have for him no sort of meaning, and an explanation of them he would

look upon as we do on the emptiest subtleties of the schoolmen--a

_chimera bombinans in vacuo_. Such an action as the martyr dying to

atone for the sins of others he could understand only as the action of

a deranged mind.

Their mental character is well shown in their religions. Originally,

the Chinese combined a simple worship of the powers of nature with that

of the spirits of their ancestors. The principal deity was Tien, the

Heaven or Sky, in union with whom was the Earth, and from this union

all nature proceeded. This natural and sexual dualism extended through

all things. The affairs of life are governed by countless demons and

spirits, whose tempers should be propitiated by offerings and prayers.

Days and seasons are auspicious or the reverse, and most of the rites

at present in use are divinatory rather than devotional.

The Buddhist religion was introduced into China about two centuries

before Christ, and was officially recognized as a state cult by the

Emperor Ming-ti in the year 65 A. D. Its spirit is, however, quite

different from the Buddhism of Ceylon, as it has degenerated into a

polytheism, a worship of the Bodhisattvas, or saints who have reached

the highest stage of perfection, and might enter Nirvana, but do

not, out of compassion for men. In general, it may be said that the

philosophical and moral principles taught in the Buddhistic classics

are not known and would not be admitted as representing their faith by

Chinese Buddhists.[133]

The teachings of the celebrated philosopher, Confucius (Con-fu-tse),

which are a substitute for religion among the most intelligent Chinese,

are in reality wholly agnostic. He declined to express himself on any

question relating to the gods or the possible after life of the soul,

asserting that the practical interests of this life and the duties of

a man to his family and the state are numerous enough and clear enough

to occupy one’s whole time. When asked for some model or code of such

duties, he replied by the sententious expression “When you are chopping

out an axe-handle, the model is near you,” meaning that it is in the

hand, and that in a similar manner in practical life we always have the

rule of right action in our own mind, if we choose to look for it.

The second great philosopher of China was Lao-tse, who lived in the

generation following Confucius (about 500 B. C.). His doctrine was

pantheistic and obscure, and his writings are considered the most

difficult to decipher of all the old Chinese classics. Nor can his

doctrine be called a religion. It was rather a mystical speculation

on the universe. All-Being, he taught, is born of Not-Being, and

existence, therefore, is an illusion.

Practically, all religions are looked upon as equally true. The

Confucian will frequent the Buddhist temples, and the Buddhist priest

will perform rites in the “house of reason,” as the Confucian holy

place is termed; or he will distribute tracts for the Christian

missionaries. The government is absolutely neutral in all religious

questions, and the persecutions which have been carried on against the

Christian missionaries have not been the promptings of fanaticism, but

dislike of foreigners and suspicion of their intentions. The official

documents of the Chinese government speak with equal contempt of every

form of religion, and the rulers would never dream of interfering in

any such question.[134]

Many of the Chinese are Mohammedans, Islam having been introduced

by sea and land within the first century of the Hegira. The Chinese

converts learn to repeat the Koran in Arabic, as it has not been

translated into their tongue; but few understand much of it. Their

rites and doctrines are learned by the verbal instruction of their

religious teachers. The Chinese Mohammedans, however, recognize as

their chief ruler the Khalif or Sultan, and not the Emperor at Pekin,

and hence the bloody revolutions which have from time to time broken

out among them.

Christianity was introduced by the Nestorians in the eighth century,

and now may be freely taught in any part of the realm. It has, however,

had little success. There are perhaps half a million Roman Catholic and

Protestant members. They belong to the lowest classes, and can occupy

no official position, owing to the conflict of their dogmas with the

teachings of Confucius and the agnostic principles of the government.

Within the last generation or two the Chinese have displayed an

unwonted desire for emigration. They have swept down in hundreds of

thousands on the islands of Malasia, Australia, the Sandwich Islands,

Mexico, and the United States. We have as a nation felt so impotent

before them that, in open contradiction to the principles of our

government we have closed our ports to them, and warned them from

our shores. This feeble and ignoble policy is a disgrace to us. Far

better to admit them, and to train earnest men among us in the Chinese

language and customs, so that these foreigners could be brought to a

knowledge of the superiority of our religions and institutions, and

thus be united with us in the advancement of mankind.

_2. The Thibetan Group._

The mountain-ringed land of Thibet is an arid region from 10,000 to

20,000 feet in height, thickly inhabited by a people whose principal

interests in life are religious. It is the centre of northern Buddhism,

and at the holy city of Lhasa the living incarnation of the founder

of that cult is supposed to live. In the numerous monasteries, some

on almost inaccessible mountain sides, tens of thousands of monks

pass their lives in religious exercises. They are vowed to celibacy,

and throughout the land it is looked upon as a distinct degradation

to marry. The natural result is that the relations of the sexes are

relaxed, and their morals debased. Polygamy is not uncommon, and in

Thibet, more than anywhere else, we find the peculiar institution of

polyandry, where a woman has two, three or four recognized husbands.

It is usual for several brothers thus to have the same wife.

The women are small but well made, and exercise an unusual control in

the affairs of life. The physical traits of both sexes are Mongolian,

though the eyes are rarely oblique. The culture is rather low, the

Thibetan not being an ardent agriculturist, but preferring the pastoral

life. He milks his cows and makes butter, which with hides and fleece,

leather and some local fabrics, are his principal articles of trade.

In the Himalayan valleys to the south are several nations in which the

Asian blood dominates, such as the Ladakis of Cashmere, the Nepalese,

the inhabitants of Bhotan and numerous others. They are generally mixed

with Dravidian or Aryac blood, but speak dialects of the Sinitic type.

_3. The Indo-Chinese Group._

The regions we call Farther India and Cochin China are at present

inhabited by peoples speaking tonic, monosyllabic languages, who are,

however, generally of mixed descent. Some of them have crimpled hair

and a dark complexion, suggesting the presence of some Nigritic blood;

others have features more Aryac than Mongolian, hinting at an ancient

fusion of Hindoostanee strains. These form the modern nations of Birma,

Siam, Annam, Cambodia, Tonkin, and Cochin China.

The Birmans have a well marked round head (about 83°), oblique eyes,

prominent cheek bones, and are of medium stature and sturdy. Their

color is a brownish yellow or olive. In religion they are Buddhists,

but they are by no means celebrated for honesty and morality. By a

curious freak of fashion, the dress of the women is open in front, but

it is the height of immodesty to show the naked foot.

The Siamese call themselves “Thai,” under which designation come also

the Laos. They are a mild mannered people, without much energy, but

willing to be taught.

The Annamese and Tonkinese are somewhat superior in culture to their

neighbors, and of well marked Asiatic physiognomy. The Cambodians,

called Khmers, are a mixed people, descended partly from Mongolian

ancestry, partly from Dravidian and Aryac conquerors who occupied their

country about the third century, and left behind remarkable vestiges of

their presence in ruins of vast temples and stone-built palaces.

II. THE SIBIRIC BRANCH.

Races and Peoples: Lectures on the Science of Ethnography · 第 10 / 18 段