The Waverley Novels

At the moment when ruin faced him he found himself suddenly in the

possession of a great income from an unexpected source. In 1805 he had

written, almost at a sitting, an instalment of a story of the uprising

of 1745 in a futile attempt to restore the exiled Stuart, Charles

Edward, to the throne. In 1814 he completed the story and published

it anonymously under the title of "Waverley." The novel was written in

what the oarsmen call a "spurt"; not because the novelist was writing

carelessly at breakneck speed for immediate income, but because he

was a tremendous worker and more concerned with the general movement

and human interest of the story in hand than with the details of its

workmanship. To immense energy of mind and body Scott united patience

and methodical habits of work, as he added to a romantic imagination

keen interest in the business of life and in the smallest detail of

practical affairs. His appetite for facts was as marked as his capacity

for sentiment. Scott had breadth and vigor rather than delicacy of

imagination; that is one reason why he is out of fashion at a time

when men want to know not only what people do but why and how they do

it. He saw men and events in the rough; he was interested in striking

historical incidents and events, in strongly-marked characters, in

actions rather than in moods. In a word, Scott was a writer who took

the world as he found it, and described it as he saw it, without

any strong desire to reform it. He was a Tory in politics, a strong

adherent of an ordered society; a good, sound man not haunted by

misgiving and questioning about the general order of things.

Scott's novels were literally poured out during fifteen wonderful

years; and even then the broken man could still apply the whip to his

exhausted and crippled brain. The popular success of the novels was

unprecedented in the history of literature. It is estimated that Scott

earned with his pen not less than three-quarters of a million dollars.

The earlier stories were the best: "The Antiquary," "Old Mortality,"

"Rob Roy," "Heart of Midlothian," "Guy Mannering." These were followed

by the series of semi-historical novels with their brilliant historical

portraits: "Ivanhoe," the most popular though by no means the best of

Scott's stories, "The Monastery," "The Abbot," "Kenilworth," "Quentin

Durward," "The Bride of Lammermoor," "The Talisman."

[Illustration: THE EMPTY CHAIR, ABBOTSFORD

From the painting by Sir W. Allan, R. A., in the Royal Collection]

The defects of these novels and those which came later have been

clearly pointed out since the analytical novel and the novel of purpose

have come into vogue. Scott did not command the constructive skill of

even the second-rate novelist of today; he was often an awkward builder

and clumsy in putting his materials together in a coherent whole; his

style is often loose and diffuse; he dealt largely with the outside

of the spectacle of living; his women have no magic of loveliness,

no mystery of temperament, though they sometimes stand out with great

distinctness; his heroes are rarely heroic, they are often commonplace.

Scott was the chronicler of feudalism, the primitive social order of

the clan, of an aristocratic society. He was as little interested

in Democracy as was Shakespeare; and largely for the same reason:

his age was not anti-democratic, it had not reached the democratic

stage. Bagehot, the famous English critic, put his limitations under

two heads: he gives us the stir of the world but not its soul, and he

leaves the abstract intellect unreported.

His vital interest in the moving spectacle of life has given us an

almost unrivalled report of that world, and of a great group of men and

women whose careers, as Scott reports them, have the reality of fact

and the dramatic interest of fiction. Jeanie Deans, Madge Wildfire,

Diana Vernon, Meg Merrilies, Wandering Willie, Andrew Fairservice,

and a crowd of their companions, are more alive today, after a century

has passed, than most of the people whose names are in the telephone

directories.

Scott was a man of the kind men love to remember. His faults of nature

are as obvious as his faults of art; but his splendid vitality makes

them trivial. He was large hearted, frank, generous, honorable; he made

life seem more noble by the richness of his nature and his splendid

courage. His career was as romantic in achievement and vicissitude as

his most striking novel. In 1826, when he was fifty-five years old, the

two business houses in which he was a partner failed, with obligations

amounting to nearly six hundred thousand dollars. Scott had recently

spent large sums on the enlargement of Abbotsford, in settling his sons

in life, and for other people; and he held the bills of Constable for

four novels to be written in the future; the novels were written, but

the bills were not honored. Four months after the failure Lady Scott

died, and Scott's health was breaking. Two days after the failure he

resumed work on "Woodstock," and set himself to pay the debt of half

a million dollars. In two years he earned for his creditors nearly two

hundred thousand dollars, the major part of which came from the sales

of "Woodstock" and "The Life of Napoleon Bonaparte." If his brain had

not given out he would have discharged the entire indebtedness in a

few years. Working with a disabled brain but with heroic resolution,

he wrote "Count Robert of Paris" and "Castle Dangerous." In five years

more than three hundred thousand dollars had been paid; meantime he had

had a stroke of paralysis. After a second stroke, when "Count Robert"

was practically finished, the publishers objected to the work in the

last volume. "The blow is a stunning one," wrote the broken man. "God

knows I am at sea in the dark, and the vessel leaky.... I often wish I

could lie down and sleep without waking. But I will fight it out if I

can." And he fought it out; he died on July 12, 1832, and on February

21, 1833, the creditors were paid in full. Never was a heroic fight

more nobly won.

On his death-bed Scott called his son-in-law Lockhart, who was to tell

the story of his life in one of the great biographies, to his bedside.

"I have but a minute to speak to you," he said. "My dear, be a good

man.... Nothing else will give you any comfort when you come to lie

here."

[Illustration: THE GRAVE OF SCOTT

At Dryburgh Abbey, Scotland]

The Mentor: Walter Scott, Vol. 4, Num. 15, Serial No. 115, September 15, 1916 · 第 26 / 38 题