The _funeral car_ of Henry VIII. was a noble affair:--

"There was ordained for the corps a sumptuous and valuable chariot of four

wheels, very long and large, with four pillars, overlaid with cloth of

gold at the four corners, bearing a pillow of rich cloth of gold and

tissue, fringed with a goodly deep fringe of blew silk and gold; and

underneath that, turned towards the chariot, was a marvellous excellent

cloth of majesty, having in it a doom artificially wrought, in fine gold

upon oyl: and at the nether part of the said Chariot was hanged with blew

velvet down to the ground, between the wheels, and at other parts of the

chariot, enclosed in like manner with blew velvet." Ibid. 295.

"The next day early, the 14 February, the chariot was brought to the court

hall door; and the corps with great reverence brought from the _herse_ to

the same, by mitred prelats and others, temporal lords." Ibid. 598.

Then, over the area of thirteen remaining pages, the record contains the

minute particulars of the monarch's obsequies, which, though full of

interest, are no farther to our present purpose.

No. CIV.

Bull--I speak not of Ole, but of John--Bull, when the teazle of opposition

has elevated the nap of his temper, is a pestilent fellow: whatever the

amount--and there is enough--of the milk of human kindness within him,

there is, then, but one way, known among men, of getting it out, and that

is, by giving Bull a bloody nose; whereupon he comes to his senses

directly, and to a just appreciation of himself and his neighbors. True

indeed it is, Bull is remarkably oblivious; and it sometimes becomes

necessary to give him another, which is invariably followed, by the same

happy result.

_Qui haeret in cortice_ will never come at the milk of a cocoa nut. It is

necessary to strip off its rough coat, and punch sundry holes in its

_wooden walls_, and give it a regular cracking. It is precisely so with

Bull. When the fit is upon him, Bull is terrible. He is the very Bull of

Crete--the Bull of Claudian, in his rape of Proserpine--

Dictaeus quatiens mugitibus urbes

Taurus--------------------------

Bull is a prodigious fellow;

Nations tremble at his bellow.

There seems to have existed a strange, political hallucination, in regard

to Bull and Jonathan. We are clearly, all of us, of one and the same

family--a Bull-begotten people; and have a great deal of pleasure, in

believing, that old madam Bull was the mother of us all. A goodly number

of highly respectable Bulls came over the water, of old, and were well

contented with the green pastures of the New World. They differed, upon

some points, from the Bulls they had left behind. They did not believe,

that there was a power or right, to bellow louder than the rest, vested in

any particular Bull, which power came down from Bull to Bull, in unbroken

succession, from the Bull of Bashan. Such a belief, in their opinion,

would have been a terrible Bull. Well; all at once, the trans-atlantic

Bulls began to call the cis-atlantic Bulls--_Jonathans_. A very good name

it was--a great deal better than _Bulls_. There could be no objection to

the name, in the abstract.

But, unfortunately, it was bestowed, as a diminutive, and in derision; and

the old Bulls, ere long, began to beat their flanks with their tails, and

paw up the earth, and look unutterable things, about Jonathan's cowardice;

and they came over the water in droves, and began to roar awfully; and

tore up the earth, under our very noses: and, after doing all, in our

power to spare the world the miserable spectacle of a conflict, among

Bulls, that were brothers, of the whole blood, we went to work, _ex

necessitate_, with hoofs and horns; and tossed up such a terrible dust, at

Lexington, and Concord, and Bunker's Hill, and Long Island, and White

Plains, and upon the Lakes, and at Sheensborough, and Albany, and

Brandywine, and Saratoga, and Bennington, and Germantown, and Rhode

Island, and Briar's Creek, and Camden, and Broad River, and Guilford, and

Hobkirk's Hill, and the Eutaw Springs, and York Town, and at fifty places

beside, that the old Bulls were perfectly astonished; and so very severely

gored withal, that their roaring sunk, at last, into something like

Snug's, when he became fearful of frightening the ladies. The old

Bulls--those that survived--went _back again_, like Sawney, out of the

peach orchard; and the mammoth Bull, in London, publicly acknowledged,

that we were as independent a set of Bulls, as ever he saw, or heard of.

No man, in his senses, marvels, that a contemptuous, and supercilious

sentiment, towards us, in our days of small things, should have been

indulged, by the vulgar and unphilosophical, among the English people. It

is matter for surprise, nevertheless, that so much ignorance of the

American character should have existed, in the higher ranks of British

society--such disparaging estimates of men and _materiel_, on this side

the water--such mistaken conceptions--such a general belief of almost

universal pusillanimity, among men, who were not a whit the less

Englishmen, than their revilers; as though there were something,

particularly enervating, in breathing the bracing air of America, and

listening to the thorough bass of the wild waters, breaking on our

original walls of granite; and in struggling, with our horny hands, along

the precipices, for bread--such an awful miscalculation of probabilities,

as resulted at last, in the loss to King George of thirteen inestimable

jewels, of the fairest water.

The impressions, entertained of the Americans, by the English people, or a

great majority of them, about that period, were truly amusing. It is

scarcely worth while to comment on the abuse of us, by the early

reviewers, and the taunting inquiry, long--long ago, what American had

ever produced an epic?--Unluckily, Joel did, at last.--This question, thus

early and impudently propounded, was quite as sensible, as it might be, to

ask men, who, by dint of industry and thrift, are just getting plain

shirts to their backs--who among them ever had lace ruffles? We have

improved since that time; and _halmost hevery man in the ole population

can hutter imself hin werry decent Henglish_.

Josiah Quincy, _then_ junior, father of the late President of Harvard

University, has noted some curious facts, in his journal, as reported by

Gordon, i. 438. In a conversation between him and Col. Barre, who, though

he opposed the Stamp Act, in 1765, supported the Boston Port Bill, in

1774. Col. Barre said to Mr. Quincy--"About fourteen or fifteen years ago,

I was through a considerable part of your country; for, in the expedition

against Canada, my business caused me to pass by land, through

Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, and Albany; and, when I returned again

to this country, I was often speaking of America, and could not help

speaking well of its climate, soil, and inhabitants; for you must know,

sir, America was always a favorite with me. But, will you believe it, sir,

yet I assure you it is true, more than two thirds of this island, at this

time, thought the Americans were all negroes." Mr. Quincy replied that he

did not in the least doubt it, for, if he was to judge by the late acts of

Parliament, he should suppose, that a great majority of the people of

Great Britain still thought so, for he found that their representatives

still treated them as such.

The ministry had decided, that "_the punishment of a few of the worst

sort of traitors, such as Hancock and his crew, might be sufficient to

teach the rest their duty, in future_."--"Some men of rank in the army,"

says Gordon, i. 457, "treated all idea of resistance, by the Americans,

with the utmost contempt. They are neither soldiers, nor ever can be made

so, being naturally of a pusillanimous disposition, and utterly incapable

of any sort of order or discipline; and by their laziness, uncleanliness,

and radical defect of constitution, they are disabled from going through

the service of a campaign. Many ludicrous stories, to that purport, were

told, greatly to the entertainment of the house."

Jonathan turned out, at the end of the Bull baiting, to have been neither

a fool nor a coward: and the American Congress received a memorable

compliment from Lord Chatham--"_For genuine sagacity, for singular

moderation, for manly spirit, for sublime sentiments, and simplicity of

language, for everything respectable and honorable, the Congress of

Philadelphia shines unrivalled_."

In the war of 1812, Bull was the very identical Bull, that he had been

before: Frenchmen were frogs; Yankees were cowards--there was nobody that

could fight, on the land or the sea, but Bull.

"It has always," says that wittiest, and, I fear, wickedest of wags,

William Cobbett, while addressing Lord Liverpool, "been the misfortune of

England, that her rulers and her people have spoken and have thought

contemptuously of the Americans. Was there a man in the country, who did

not despise the American navy? Was there a public writer beside myself,

who did not doom that navy to destruction in a month? Did not all parties

exceedingly relish the description given, in a very august assembly, of

'_half a dozen of fir frigates, with bits of striped bunting tied to their

mast heads_'! Did not the Guerriere sail up and down the American coast,

with her name, written on her flag, challenging those fir frigates? Did

not the whole nation, with one voice exclaim at the affair of the _Little

Belt_--'Only let Rogers come _within reach_ of one of our _frigates_!' If

such was the opinion of the whole nation, with what justice is the Board

of Admiralty blamed, for not sending out the means of combatting this

extraordinary sort of foe? and for issuing a privilege to our frigates to

run away from one of those _fir things with a bit of striped bunting at

its mast head_? The result of the former war, while it enlightened nobody,

added to the vindictiveness of hundreds of thousands; so that we have

entered into this war with all our old stock of contempt, and a vastly

increased stock of rancor. To think that the American republic is to be a

great power is unsupportable. Of the effect of this contempt I know

nobody, who has so much reason to repent, as the officers of his Majesty's

navy. If they had triumphed, it would only have been over half a dozen

_fir things, with bits of bunting at their mast heads_. They were sure to

gain no reputation in the contest; and, if they failed, what was their

lot? The worst of it is, they themselves did, in some measure, contribute

to their own ill fate: for, of all men living, none spoke of poor Jonathan

with so much contempt. There are some people, who are for taking the

American commodores at their word, and ascribing their victories to the

immediate intervention of Providence. Both Perry and McDonough begin their

despatches by saying--"_Almighty God has given us a victory_."

This is keen political satire; and it is well, that it should come to

neighbor Bull's ears, from the mouth of an Englishman. It is more

gracefully administered thus. That it was entirely deserved, no one will

doubt, who has any recollection of Bull's unmeasured and unmitigated

impudence, during the war of 1812, in its earlier stages. May God of his

infinite mercy grant, that Peace Societies may have these matters,

hereafter, very much their own way; though I have a little misgiving, I

confess, as to the expediency of any sudden, or very general conversion of

swords into ploughshares, or spears into pruning hooks.

No. CV.

_Modus in rebus_--an admirable proverb, upon all common occasions--is

inapplicable, of course, to musical matters. No doubt of it. The luxury of

sweet sounds cannot be too dearly bought; and, for its procurement,

mankind may go stark mad, without any diminution of their respectability.

Such I infer to be the popular philosophy of today--_while it is called

today_. The moderns have been greatly perplexed, by the legends, which

have come down to us, respecting the melody of swans. The _carmina

cycnorum_ of Ovid, and the _Cantantes sublime ferent ad sidera cycni_, of

Virgil, are perfectly incomprehensible by us. Cicero also, in his Tusculan

Questions, i. 74, says, they die, _cum cantu et voluptate_. Martial, xiii.

77, asserts the matter, very positively--

_Dulcia defecta modulatur carmina lingua

Cantator cycnus funeris ipse sui._

I no more believe in the power of a living or a dying swan to make melody

of any kind, than I believe in the antiquated hum-bug of immediate

emancipation. Pliny had no confidence in the story, and expresses himself

to that effect, x. 23, _Olorum morte narratur flebilis cantus (falso, ut

arbitror) aliquot experimentis_.

No mortal has done more than Shakspeare, among the moderns, to perpetuate

this pleasant fancy--no bard, when weary of Pegasus, and preferring a

drive to a ride, has harnessed his cygnets more frequently--or compelled

them to sing more sweetly, in a dying hour. A single example may suffice.

When prince Henry is told, that his father, King John, sang, during his

dying frenzy, he says--

"Tis strange, that death should sing--

I am the cygnet to this pale faint swan,

Who chants a doleful hymn to his own death:

And, from the organ pipe of frailty, sings

His soul and body to their lasting rest."

Dealings with the Dead, Volume 2 (of 2) · 第 8 / 90 题