It is convenient to introduce the zero; thus

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

0 1 2 3 4 5

indicates that after getting to 4 we make a fresh start from 4 as our

zero.

To subtract, we may proceed in either of two ways. The subtraction of 4

from 9 may mean either "What has to be added to 4 in order to make up a

total of 9," or "To what has 4 to be added in order to make up a total

of 9." For the former meaning we count forwards, till we get to 4, and

then make a new count, parallel with the continuation of the old series,

and see at what number we arrive when we get to 9. This corresponds to

the concrete method, in which we have 9 objects, take away 4 of them,

and recount the remainder. The alternative method is to retrace the

steps of addition, i.e. to count backwards, treating 9 of one (the

standard) series as corresponding with 4 of the other, and finding which

number of the former corresponds with 0 of the latter. This is a more

advanced method, which leads easily to the idea of negative quantities,

if the subtraction is such that we have to go behind the 0 of the

standard series.

32. _Mixed Quantities._--The application of the above principles, and of

similar principles with regard to multiplication and division, to

numerical quantities expressed in any of the diverse British

denominations, presents no theoretical difficulty if the successive

denominations are regarded as constituting a varying scale of notation

(S 17). Thus the expression 2 ft. 3 in. implies that in counting inches

we use 0 to eleven instead of 0 to 9 as our first repeating series, so

that we put down 1 for the next denomination when we get to twelve

instead of when we get to ten. Similarly 3 yds. 2 ft. means

yds. 0 1 2 3

ft. 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2

The practical difficulty, of course, is that the addition of two numbers

produces different results according to the scale in which we are for

the moment proceeding; thus the sum of 9 and 8 is 17, 15, 13 or 11

according as we are dealing with shillings, pence, pounds (avoirdupois)

or ounces. The difficulty may be minimized by using the notation

explained in S 17.

(iii.) _Multiples, Submultiples and Quotients._

33. _Multiplication_ and _Division_ are the names given to certain

numerical processes which have to be performed in order to find the

result of certain arithmetical operations. Each process may arise out of

either of two distinct operations; but the terminology is based on the

processes, not on the operations to which they belong, and the latter

are not always clearly understood.

34. _Repetition and Subdivision._--_Multiplication_ occurs when a

certain number or numerical quantity is treated as a _unit_ (S 11), and

is taken a certain _number_ of times. It therefore arises in one or

other of two ways, according as the unit or the number exists first in

consciousness. If pennies are arranged in groups of five, the total

amounts arranged are successively once 5d., twice 5d., three times 5d.,

...; which are written 1 X 5d., 2 X 5d., 3 X 5d., ... (S 28). This

process is _repetition_, and the quantities 1 X 5d., 2 X 5d., 3 X 5d.,

... are the successive _multiples_ of 5d. If, on the other hand, we have

a sum of 5s., and treat a shilling as being equivalent to twelve pence,

the 5s. is equivalent to 5 X 12d.; here the multiplication arises out of

a _subdivision_ of the original unit 1s. into 12d.

Although multiplication may arise in either of these two ways, the

actual process in each case is performed by commencing with the unit and

taking it the necessary number of times. In the above case of

subdivision, for instance, each of the 5 shillings is separately

converted into pence, so that we do in fact find in succession once

12d., twice 12d., ...; i.e. we find the multiples of 12d. up to 5

times.

The result of the multiplication is called the _product_ of the unit by

the number of times it is taken.

35. _Diagram of Multiplication._--The process of multiplication is

performed in order to obtain such results as the following:--

If 1 boy receives 7 apples,

then 3 boys receive 21 apples;

or

If 1s. is equivalent to 12d.,

then 5s. is equivalent to 60d.

The essential portions of these statements, from the arithmetical point

of view, may be exhibited in the form of the diagrams A and B:--

A B

+--------+-----------+ +-----+------+

| 1 boy | 7 apples | | 1s. | 12d. |

+--------+-----------+ +-----+------+

| 3 boys | 21 apples | | 5s. | 60d. |

+--------+-----------+ +-----+------+

or more briefly, as in C or C' and D or D':--

C C' D D'

+---+-----------+ | +---+------+ |

| 1 | 7 apples | | 7 apples | 1 | 12d. | | 12d.

+---+-----------+ ---+----------- +---+------+ ---+------

| 3 | 21 apples | 3 | 21 apples | 5 | 60d. | 5 | 60d.

+---+-----------+ | +---+------+ |

the general arrangement of the diagram being as shown in E or E':--

E E'

+--------+---------+ |

| 1 | Unit | | Unit

+--------+---------+ --------+---------

| Number | Product | Number | Product

+--------+---------+ |

Multiplication is therefore equivalent to completion of the diagram by

entry of the product.

36. _Multiple-Tables._--The diagram C or D of S 35 is part of a complete

table giving the successive multiples of the particular unit. If we take

several different units, and write down their successive multiples in

parallel columns, preceded by the number-series, we obtain a

_multiple-table_ such as the following:--

+---+---+----+----+----------+---------------+-------+-----

| 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 1s. 5d. | 3 yds. 2 ft. | 17359 | ...

+---+---+----+----+----------+---------------+-------+-----

| 2 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 2s. 10d. | 7 yds. 1 ft. | 34718 | ...

+---+---+----+----+----------+---------------+-------+-----

| 3 | 3 | 6 | 27 | 4s. 3d. | 11 yds. 0 ft. | 52077 | ...

+---+---+----+----+----------+---------------+-------+-----

| 4 | 4 | 8 | 36 | 5s. 8d. | 14 yds. 2 ft. | 69436 | ...

+---+---+----+----+----------+---------------+-------+-----

| 5 | 5 | 10 | 45 | 7s. 1d. | 16 yds. 1 ft. | 86795 | ...

+---+---+----+----+----------+---------------+-------+-----

| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | ...

| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | ...

| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | ...

| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | ...

It is to be considered that each column may extend downwards

indefinitely.

37. _Successive Multiplication._--In multiplication by repetition the

unit is itself usually a multiple of some other unit, i.e. it is a

product which is taken as a new unit. When this new unit has been

multiplied by a number, we can again take the product as a unit for the

purpose of another multiplication; and so on indefinitely. Similarly

where multiplication has arisen out of the subdivision of a unit into

smaller units, we can again subdivide these smaller units. Thus we get

successive multiplication; but it represents quite different operations

according as it is due to repetition, in the sense of S 34, or to

subdivision, and these operations will be exhibited by different

diagrams. Of the two diagrams below, A exhibits the successive

multiplication of L3 by 20, 12 and 4, and B the successive reduction of

L3 to shillings, pence and farthings. The principle on which the

diagrams are constructed is obvious from S 35. It should be noticed that

in multiplying L3 by 20 we find the value of 20.3, but that in reducing

L3 to shillings, since each L becomes 20s., we find the value of 3.20.

A B

+----+-------+ +-------+--------+

| 1 | L3 | | 1d. | 4f. |

+-----+----+-------+ +------+-------+--------+

| 1 | 20 | L60 | | 1s. | 12d. | |

+---+-----+----+-------+ +----+------+-------+--------+

| 1 | 12 | | L720 | | L1 | 20s. | | |

+---+-----+----+-------+ +----+------+-------+--------+

| 4 | | | L2880 | | L3 | 60s. | 720d. | 2880f. |

+---+-----+----+-------+ +----+------+-------+--------+

38. _Submultiples._--The relation of a unit to its successive multiples

as shown in a multiple-table is expressed by saying that it is a

submultiple of the multiples, the successive submultiples being

_one-half, one-third, one-fourth_, ... Thus, in the diagram of S 36, 1s.

5d. is one-half of 2s. 10d., one-third of 4s. 3d., one-fourth of 5s.

8d., ...; these being written "1/2 of 2s. 10d.," "1/3 of 4s. 3d.," "1/4

of 5s. 8d,"...

The relation of submultiple is the converse of that of multiple; thus if

a is 1/5 of b, then b is 5 times a. The determination of a submultiple

is therefore equivalent to completion of the diagram E or E' of S 35 by

entry of the unit, when the number of times it is taken, and the

product, are given. The operation is the converse of repetition; it is

usually called _partition_, as representing division into a number of

equal shares.

39. _Quotients._--The converse of subdivision is the formation of units

into groups, each constituting a larger unit; the number of the groups

so formed out of a definite number of the original units is called a

_quotient_. The determination of a quotient is equivalent to completion

of the diagram by entry of the number when the unit and the product are

given. There is no satisfactory name for the operation, as distinguished

from partition; it is sometimes called measuring, but this implies an

equality in the original units, which is not an essential feature of the

operation.

40. _Division._--From the commutative law for multiplication, which

shows that 3 X 4d. = 4 X 3d. = 12d., it follows that the number of pence

in one-fourth of 12d. is equal to the quotient when 12 pence are formed

into units of 4d.; each of these numbers being said to be obtained by

_dividing_ 12 by 4. The term _division_ is therefore used in text-books

to describe the two processes described in SS 38 and 39; the product

mentioned in S 34 is the _dividend_, the number or the unit, whichever

is given, is called the _divisor_, and the unit or number which is to be

found is called the _quotient_. The symbol [:] is used to denote both

kinds of division; thus A [:] n denotes the unit, n of which make up A,

and A [:] B denotes the number of times that B has to be taken to make

up A. In the present article this confusion is avoided by writing the

former as 1/n of A.

Methods of division are considered later (SS 106-108).

41. _Diagrams of Division._--Since we write from left to right or

downwards, it may be convenient for division to interchange the rows or

the columns of the multiplication-diagram. Thus the uncompleted diagram

for partition is F or G, while for measuring it is usually H; the vacant

compartment being for the unit in F or G, and for the number in H. In

some cases it may be convenient in measuring to show both the units, as

in K.

F G H K

+--------+---------+ +--------+---------+ +---------+---+ +------+-----+

| 1 | | | Number | Product | | Unit | 1 | | 12d. | 1s. |

+--------+---------+ +--------+---------+ +---------+---+ +------+-----+

| Number | Product | | 1 | | | Product | | | 60d. | |

+--------+---------+ +--------+---------+ +---------+---+ +------+-----+

42. _Successive Division_ may be performed as the converse of successive

multiplication. The diagrams A and B below are the converse (with a

slight alteration) of the corresponding diagrams in S 37; A

representing the determination of 1/20 of 1/12 of 1/4 of 2880 farthings,

and B the conversion of 2880 farthings into L.

A B

+---+--------+ +------+----+

| 4 | 2880f. | | 20s. | L1 |

+----+---+--------+ +-------+------+----+

| 12 | 1 | 720f. | | 12d. | 1s. | |

+----+----+---+--------+ +--------+-------+------+----+

| 20 | 1 | | 60f. | | 4f. | 1d. | | |

+----+----+---+--------+ +--------+-------+------+----+

| 1 | | | 3f. | | 2880f. | 720d. | 60s. | L3 |

+----+----+---+--------+ +--------+-------+------+----+

(iv.) _Properties of Numbers._

(A) Properties not depending on the Scale of Notation.

43. _Powers, Roots and Logarithms._--The standard series 1, 2, 3, ... is

obtained by successive additions of 1 to the number last found. If

instead of commencing with 1 and making successive additions of 1 we

commence with any number such as 3 and make successive multiplications

by 3, we get a series 3, 9, 27, ... as shown below the line in the

margin. The first member of the series is 3; the second is the product

of two numbers, each equal to 3; the third is the product of three

numbers, each equal to 3; and so on. These are written 3^1 (or 3), 3^2,

3^3, 3^4, ... where n^p denotes the product of p numbers, each equal to

n. If we write n^p = N, then, if any two of the three numbers n, p, N

are known, the third is determinate. If we know n and p, p is called the

_index_, and n, n^2, ... n^p are called the _first power, second power,

... pth power_ of n, the series itself being called the _power-series_.

The _second power_ and _third power_ are usually called the _square_ and

_cube_ respectively. If we know p and N, n is called the _pth root_ of

N, so that n is the _second_ (or _square_) _root_ of n^2, the _third_

(or _cube_) _root_ of n^3, the _fourth root_ of n^4, ... If we know n

and N, then p is the _logarithm_ of N to _base_ n.

0 1 = 3^0 n^0

------------------

1 3 = 3^1 n^1

2 9 = 3^2 n^2

3 27 = 3^3 n^3

4 81 = 3^4 n^4

: : : :

: : : :

The calculation of powers (i.e. of N when n and p are given) is

_involution_; the calculation of roots (i.e. of n when p and N are

given) is _evolution_; the calculation of logarithms (i.e. of p when n

and N are given) has no special name.

Involution is a direct process, consisting of successive

multiplications; the other two are inverse processes. The calculation of

a logarithm can be performed by successive divisions; evolution requires

special methods.

The above definitions of logarithms, &c., relate to cases in which n and

p are whole numbers, and are generalized later.

44. _Law of Indices._--If we multiply n^p by n^q, we multiply the

product of p n's by the product of q n's, and the result is therefore

n^(p + q). Similarly, if we divide n^p by n^q, where q is less than p,

the result is n^(p - q). Thus multiplication and division in the

power-series correspond to addition and subtraction in the index-series,

and vice versa.

If we divide n^p by n^p, the quotient is of course 1. This should be

written n^0. Thus we may make the power-series commence with 1, if we

make the index-series commence with 0. The added terms are shown above

the line in the diagram in S 43.

45. _Factors, Primes and Prime Factors._--If we take the successive

multiples of 2, 3, ... as in S 36, and place each multiple opposite the

same number in the original series, we get an arrangement as in the

adjoining diagram. If any number N occurs in the vertical series

commencing with a number n (other than 1) then n is said to be a

_factor_ of N. Thus 2, 3 and 6 are factors of 6; and 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12

are factors of 12.

1 .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

2 2 .. .. .. .. .. ..

3 .. 3 .. .. .. .. ..

4 4 .. 4 .. .. .. ..

5 .. .. .. 5 .. .. ..

6 6 6 .. .. 6 .. ..

7 .. .. .. .. .. 7 ..

8 8 .. 8 .. .. .. 8

9 .. 9 .. .. .. .. ..

10 10 .. .. 10 .. .. ..

11 .. .. .. .. .. .. ..

12 12 12 12 .. 12 .. ..

: : : : : : : :

: : : : : : : :

A number (other than 1) which has no factor except itself is called a

_prime number_, or, more briefly, a _prime_. Thus 2, 3, 5, 7 and 11 are

primes, for each of these occurs twice only in the table. A number

(other than 1) which is not a prime number is called a _composite_

number.

If a number is a factor of another number, it is a factor of any

multiple of that number. Hence, if a number has factors, one at least of

these must be a prime. Thus 12 has 6 for a factor; but 6 is not a prime,

one of its factors being 2; and therefore 2 must also be a factor of 12.

Dividing 12 by 2, we get a submultiple 6, which again has a prime 2 as a

factor. Thus any number which is not itself a prime is the product of

several factors, each of which is a prime, e.g. 12 is the product of 2,

2 and 3. These are called _prime factors_.

The following are the most important properties of numbers in reference

to factors:--

(i) If a number is a factor of another number, it is a factor of any

multiple of that number.

(ii) If a number is a factor of two numbers, it is a factor of their sum

or (if they are unequal) of their difference. (The words in brackets are

inserted to avoid the difficulty, at this stage, of saying that every

number is a factor of 0, though it is of course true that 0.n = 0,

whatever n may be.)

(iii) A number can be resolved into prime factors in one way only, no

account being taken of their relative order. Thus 12 = 2 X 2 X 3 = 2 X 3

X 2 = 3 X 2 X 2, but this is regarded as one way only. If any prime

occurs more than once, it is usual to write the number of times of

occurrence as an index; thus 144 = 2 X 2 X 2 X 2 X 3 X 3 = 2^4 . 3^2.

The number 1 is usually included amongst the primes; but, if this is

done, the last paragraph requires modification, since 144 could be

expressed as 1 . 2^4 . 3^2, or as 1^2 . 2^4 . 3^2, or as 1^p . 2^4 .

3^2, where p might be anything.

If two numbers have no factor in common (except 1) each is said to be

_prime to_ the other.

The multiples of 2 (including 1.2) are called _even_ numbers; other

numbers are _odd_ numbers.

46. _Greatest Common Divisor._--If we resolve two numbers into their

prime factors, we can find their _Greatest Common Divisor_ or _Highest

Common Factor_ (written G.C.D. or G.C.F. or H.C.F.), i.e. the greatest

number which is a factor of both. Thus 144 = 2^4 . 3^2, and 756 = 2^2 .

3^3 . 7, and therefore the G.C.D. of 144 and 756 is 2^2 . 3^2 = 36. If

we require the G.C.D. of two numbers, and cannot resolve them into their

prime factors, we use a process described in the text-books. The process

depends on (ii) of S 45, in the extended form that, if x is a factor of

a and b, it is a factor of pa - qb, where p and q are any integers.

The G.C.D. of three or more numbers is found in the same way.

47. _Least Common Multiple._--The _Least Common Multiple_, or L.C.M., of

two numbers, is the least number of which they are both factors. Thus,

since 144 = 2^4 . 3^2, and 756 = 2^2 . 3^3 . 7, the L.C.M. of 144 and

756 is 2^4 . 3^3 . 7. It is clear, from comparison with the last

paragraph, that the product of the G.C.D. and the L.C.M. of two numbers

is equal to the product of the numbers themselves. This gives a rule for

finding the L.C.M. of two numbers. But we cannot apply it to finding the

L.C.M. of three or more numbers; if we cannot resolve the numbers into

their prime factors, we must find the L.C.M. of the first two, then the

L.C.M. of this and the next number, and so on.

(B) Properties depending on the Scale of Notation.

48. _Tests of Divisibility._--The following are the principal rules for

testing whether particular numbers are factors of a given number. The

number is divisible--

(i) by 10 if it ends in 0;

(ii) by 5 if it ends in 0 or 5;

(iii) by 2 if the last digit is even;

(iv) by 4 if the number made up of the last two digits is divisible by 4;

(v) by 8 if the number made up of the last three digits is divisible by 8;

(vi) by 9 if the sum of the digits is divisible by 9;

(vii) by 3 if the sum of the digits is divisible by 3;

(viii) by 11 if the difference between the sum of the 1st, 3rd, 5th, ...

digits and the sum of the 2nd, 4th, 6th, ... is zero or divisible by

11.

(ix) To find whether a number is divisible by 7, 11 or 13, arrange the

number in groups of three figures, beginning from the end, treat each

group as a separate number, and then find the difference between the sum

of the 1st, 3rd, ... of these numbers and the sum of the 2nd, 4th, ...

Then, if this difference is zero or is divisible by 7, 11 or 13, the

original number is also so divisible; and conversely. For example, 31521

gives 521 - 31 = 490, and therefore is divisible by 7, but not by 11 or

13.

49. _Casting out Nines_ is a process based on (vi) of the last

paragraph. The remainder when a number is divided by 9 is equal to the

remainder when the sum of its digits is divided by 9. Also, if the

remainders when two numbers are divided by 9 are respectively a and b,

the remainder when their product is divided by 9 is the same as the

remainder when a.b is divided by 9. This gives a rule for testing

multiplication, which is found in most text-books. It is doubtful,

however, whether such a rule, giving a test which is necessarily

incomplete, is of much educational value.

(v.) _Relative Magnitude._

50. _Fractions._--A _fraction_ of a quantity is a submultiple, or a

multiple of a submultiple, of that quantity. Thus, since 3 X 1s. 5d. =

4s. 3d., 1s. 5d. may be denoted by 1/3 of 4s. 3d.; and any multiple of

1s. 5d., denoted by n X 1s. 5d., may also be denoted by n/3 of 4s. 3d.

We therefore use "n/a of A" to mean that we find a quantity X such that

a X X = A, and then multiply X by n.

It must be noted (i) that this is a definition of "n/a of," not a

definition of "n/a," and (ii) that it is not necessary that n should be

less than a.

51. _Subdivision of Submultiple._--By 5/7 of A we mean 5 times the unit,

7 times which is A. If we regard this unit as being 4 times a lesser

unit, then A is 7.4 times this lesser unit, and 5/7 of A is 5.4 times

the lesser unit. Hence 5/7 of A is equal to (5.4)/(7.4) of A; and,

conversely, (5.4)/(7.4) of A is equal to 5/7 of A. Similarly each of

these is equal to (5.3)/(7.3) of A. Hence the value of a fraction is not

altered by substituting for the numerator and denominator the

corresponding numbers in any other column of a multiple-table (S 36). If

we write (5.4)/(7.4) in the form (4.5)/(4.7) we may say that the value

of a fraction is not altered by multiplying or dividing the numerator

and denominator by any number.

52. _Fraction of a Fraction._--To find 11/4 of 5/7 of A we must convert

5/7 of A into 4 times some unit. This is done by the preceding

paragraph. For 5/7 of A = (5.4)/(7.4) of A = (4.5)/(7.4) of A; i.e. it

is 4 times a unit which is itself 5 times another unit, 7.4 times, which

is A. Hence, taking the former unit 11 times instead of 4 times,

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Arculf" to "Armour, Philip" Volume 2, Slice 5 · 第 44 / 69 题