Section 63 should be amended by striking out the words "sold or

placed on" in line 7, and by inserting "made public, or sold

publicly or privately, or placed on public."

As to section 64, I have to suggest that the present bill is

supposed to be what may be termed a codification of the copyright

law; if so, section 4966 of the Revised Statutes has no proper

place outside of this bill. If there is anything desirable in the

section it should be embodied in the bill at the proper place, and

in doing so it should be made plain that the word "musical" where

it first occurs in section 4966 means "musical-dramatic," meaning

thereby a composition which is dependent upon representation or

performance in the dramatic sense.

I do not believe that the people of this country are aware of what

the musical composers and publishers are attempting to do in the

way of securing monopolies.

If the public were aware that these persons, after having secured

copyrights giving them the exclusive right of copying and

publishing music for sale, and after having sold the copies of

such music are attempting to secure laws by which they may impose

further taxes upon the public for the use of such music by singing

or playing, and are seeking to provide fines and terms of

imprisonment for those members of the public who do not pay the

additional tax, there will be such a storm of protests before your

committees as could not be disregarded.

Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906. · 第 23 / 26 章