Section 19 should, in my opinion, be canceled. It is retroactive

in its character. Definite contracts have been entered into

between authors and the public with respect to matters already

copyrighted, and it would impair the obligations of those

contracts to provide any renewal or extension of such copyrights.

It has already been agreed between such authors and the public at

what time their copyrighted works shall pass into the public

domain.

Recurring to lines 3 and 4 of page 15, I submit that they should

be canceled, so that the copyright shall extend for a definite

number of years after the date of original entry. There seems to

be no sound reason for giving an author a longer copyright, longer

by a year, if he makes his entry on the 2d of January, than

another author will have who enters his copyright on the 30th of

December preceding.

Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906. · 第 10 / 26 章