ESSENCE OF PARLIAMENT.

_Monday, March 15th_. The great Food-prices debate hardly justified

its preliminary advertisement. Mr. MCCURDY took sure ground when he

argued that high prices were mainly due to world-shortage; and,

though he entered more disputable territory when he declared that the

Profiteering Act was not primarily intended to punish profiteers,

Mr. ASQUITH did not seriously attempt to dislodge him. Indeed, the

EX-PREMIER'S speech was mainly composed of truisms, his only excursion

into the speculative being an assertion--with which not all economists

will agree--that inflation of currency is a consequence and not a

cause of high prices.

An ex-Food Controller, Mr. GEORGE ROBERTS, defended the Government

against charges of extravagance, and ventured to remind Labour--as

THOMAS DRUMMOND reminded Irish landlords--that it had duties as well

as rights.

Early in the evening the PRIME MINISTER, who had sat through many

speeches in readiness for the threatened attack, folded his notes and

silently stole away.

On the adjournment General PAGE CROFT accused the Ministry of

Munitions of unfair treatment to one of its employees. The peroration

to Mr. KELLAWAY'S spirited defence deserves quotation: "The decision

taken by the Ministry is a decision that will stand." That's the stuff

to give 'em.

_Tuesday, March 16th_.--"The LORD CHANCELLOR was so unusually

apologetic in his exposition of the War Emergency Laws (Continuance)

Bill that none of the Peers had the heart seriously to oppose him.

Lord SALISBURY took note of the Government's admission that they

were anxious to say Good-bye to D.O.R.A. and only complained that the

farewell ceremony was so long-drawn-out. Lord BUCKMASTER failed to

understand why D.O.R.A. should have a longer life in Ireland than in

England, and was so carried away by his own eloquence as to declare

that all the crimes attributed to the Sinn Feiners had been due

"to misguided attempts to enforce special legislation against a

misunderstood and a gallant people." Lord BIRKENHEAD replied that

there was at least a plausible case for the contention that the boot

was on the other leg.

[Illustration: "CONTROLLERS" CONTROLLED.

Punch or the London Charivari, Volume 158, March 24, 1920. · 第 19 / 35 题