CHAPTER VII.

IMPORT OF THE GREAT COMMISSION.

The Founder of the church was a missionary. The church is a _missionary

band_, professedly aiming to carry out the design of its Founder, in the

wide field of the WORLD. The commission to the apostles is the

commission to Christ's ministers in every age. This commission, it is to

be feared, is losing much of its force from misinterpretation.

That a construction somewhat incorrect is placed by some ministers on

the commission which they hold, seems to be evident; for how otherwise

should an impression obtain, that there is something _peculiar_ about

the office of the missionary--that his commission is quite different

from that of other ministers of Christ.

Let the commission of both the minister at home and missionary abroad be

exhibited and read. The terms, word for word, are the same. It is

unhappy, extremely so, that a _peculiarity_ is thrown about the word

_missionary_, since the New Testament authorizes no such distinction.

Both ministers at home and those abroad claim to be successors of the

apostles or first missionaries, whose letter of instructions, short but

explicit, reads thus: "Go ye into all the world, and preach the Gospel

to every creature." This is the commission of every ambassador, and no

one, at home or abroad, can consistently hold his office any longer than

he continues to act in accordance with its import.

The Saviour is all-wise, and knew precisely what commission to give. He

carefully chose every word in which it is expressed. The apostles showed

by their conduct how they understood it--that they knew what was meant

by "all the world" and "every creature." Now, I ask, how can such a

construction be placed on these obvious phrases, as to make it

consistent for about eleven thousand eight hundred ministers out of

twelve thousand to stay in the United States, and about the same

proportion in Great Britain? The apostles showed by their conduct what

they understood by the word "Go." By what reasoning, I ask, has it been

made to mean, in fifty-nine cases out of sixty, _send, contribute_,

_and educate young men_? If an inhabitant of another planet should visit

this earth, and see ministers clustered together in a few favored spots,

could you make him believe that they hold in their hands the commission

first delivered to the apostles?

Would it be thought dutiful, in military officers, to treat the orders

of their commander-in-chief as we do the command of our Master; or in

mercantile agents, to interpret thus loosely the instructions of their

employers? The perversion, however, has become so familiar to us, that

we are insensible of it; and the fact may be numbered among other

wonders of a like kind, which the experience of a few past years has

exhibited. A few years since, good men were in the use of intoxicating

drinks without dreaming it a sin; and so now we may be shaping our

course very wide from the command of our Saviour, and yet think not of

the guilt we incur.

The misconstruction has become so universal, and so firmly

established--the true and obvious interpretation buried so deep in the

rubbish of things gone by--that all books written on ministerial duty,

which I have seen, take it for granted that the persons addressed, for

the most part at least, are to preach and labor among a people who have

long had the Gospel. And may I not inquire--and I would do it with due

deference and respect--Do not lectures on pastoral theology in the

schools of the prophets take it too much for granted, that the hearers

are to labor in Christian lands? Is not the business of going into all

the world, and preaching the Gospel to every creature, regarded,

practically at least, as an _exception_, for which there need be no

provision in books or lectures? If Paul were to write or lecture on

pastoral theology, would he not give more prominence to the duties that

might devolve upon his students in foreign lands? Would he not, indeed,

make the work of missions stand forth as _the_ work, and not as an

exception or a peculiarity?

Few men, in these last days, can quiet their consciences, and yet live

in entire neglect of the heathen. Almost all professed Christians feel

that they must have some interest in the great enterprise. To begin to

act just as the last command of Christ requires, in its plain literal

import, as the apostles understood it, would be a hard and self-denying

service. What then shall they do? Will they operate _by proxy_? This is

the charming suggestion, by which often conscience is lulled to sleep

and the heathen are left to perish.

It is true that many, and perhaps most, must aid in the work by

proxy--by training up others, by sending them forth, by encouraging

them, and by furnishing the necessary means. But the error is, that all,

with the exception of perhaps one minister out of sixty, and one layman

out of three thousand, are inclined so to act. It is wonderful with what

electrical rapidity the soothing suggestion has spread abroad. It is so

insidious and speciously good, that it has found its way, like an angel

of light, to the best hearts and holiest places. Indeed, it is a point

very difficult to be determined; and many judge no doubt with perfect

correctness, when they decide to act in this way. The danger consists in

the eager rush and universal resort. To be sensible that there is such a

rush, begin and enumerate. Directors and officers of various

societies--and they are not few--of theological seminaries too, and of

colleges, think they are employed in furnishing the requisite men, the

requisite means, and the requisite instrumentalities, and so are

preaching to the heathen by proxy. Among ministers, the talented and

eloquent, the learned and the influential, think they must labor in the

important field at home; keep the churches in a state to operate upon

the world, and so preach to the heathen by proxy. Ministers generally,

about eleven thousand eight hundred out of twelve thousand, are zealous

for training up young men, and think in that way of preaching to the

heathen by proxy. Pious men of wealth, and those who are in

circumstances to acquire wealth, or imagine that they have a talent to

acquire it, profess to be accumulating the necessary means, and to be

thus preaching to the heathen by proxy. Sabbath-school teachers, fathers

and mothers, are fond of the notion of raising up children to be

missionaries, and of thus preaching by proxy. Proxy is the universal

resort. Now _some_ proxy effort, and much indeed, is proper and

indispensable; but must it not strike every mind, that such a universal

and indiscriminate resort to it is utterly unreasonable?

How often do we hear the exhortation, "Let mothers consecrate their

children to the missionary work in their earliest infancy. Let them be

taught, as they grow up, that to labor among the heathen is the most

glorious work on earth. Let teachers in Sabbath-schools impart such

instructions, and ministers in their pulpits. Let ministers and elders

search out young men, urge them to engage in the work of missions, and

let the churches educate them for that end, and pray for them that their

zeal fail not. Let no pains be spared and no efforts be wanting, to

raise up and send forth a large body of young men to labor for the

heathen."

Now in regard to such an effort, every reflecting mind can see that it

must be insufficient, if not hopeless. To succeed thus, as I have

already said, precept must become more powerful than example. Commit the

work of converting the world to your children, and they will commit it

to your grandchildren. Try instruction in the nursery, try instruction

in the Sabbath-school, try instruction from the pulpit: it will fall

powerless as a ray of moonlight on a lake of ice, while contradicted by

the _example_ of mothers, of Sabbath-school teachers, and of ministers.

Urge young men into the missionary field without going yourselves? A

general might as well urge his army over the Alps without leading them.

Consecrate them to the work? Would it not be an unholy consecration--a

consecration at the hands of those who were not themselves consecrated?

The command does not say, _send_, but "Go." Let us then go, and urge

others to _come_. We shall find this mode of persuasion the most

effectual.

Let us commit to proxy that work which is pleasant and easy, and betake

ourselves in person to those kinds of labor that are more self-denying,

and to those posts that are likely to be deserted. This is the only

principle of action that will secure success in any enterprise within

the range of human efforts. Suppose the opposite principle is acted

upon--that every one seeks for himself the most easy and pleasant work,

and the most delightful and honorable station, and leaves for others the

most obscure, the most self-denying, and the most perilous. Discover

such a spirit in any enterprise, secular or religious, and it requires

not the gift of prophecy to predict a failure. Practical and business

men understand full well the truth and force of this remark. The true

method is this: if there is a work that is likely to be neglected on

account of its obscurity or self-denial, let every one, first of all,

see that _that_ service is attended to. And if there is a post likely to

be left deserted on account of its hardships or its perils, let every

one be sure, first of all, that _that_ post is occupied. Let there be an

emulation among all to do the drudgery of the service, and to man the

Thermopylæ of danger. Then you shall read in the vigor and nerve of the

action the certainty of success.

In this way Bonaparte conquered Europe. If a portion of his army was

likely to fall back, there the general pressed forward in person,

inspiring courage and firmness. If all others shrunk from the deadly

breach, thither he rushed, at once, with the flower of his army.

This principle of action is not more indispensable in the conquests of

war, than in the great enterprise of the world's conversion. And how

truly glorious, how sublime by contrast, to exhibit this principle of

action, not in destroying mankind, but in laboring for their salvation!

Let all Christians be filled with this spirit, let every redeemed sinner

adopt in practice this rule of action, _to do the most self-denying, the

most difficult and perilous work in person, and to commit the easiest to

proxy_, then there would be a sight of moral sublimity that earth has

not seen--all the elements in action that are needed, under God, to

usher in the millenial day.

O, if to angels were committed the instrumentality of the world's

conversion, where would Gabriel speed his way if not to the post of

peril, and to the post of self-denying and toilsome drudgery? I mistake

his character much, if he would not betake himself at once to the most

arduous service. O, how he would delight to come down and labor with the

lowest being on New Holland or New Guinea, and be the instrument of

raising him up to the throne of Jesus! But to angels is not committed

the stewardship of propagating that precious Gospel, which God has

ordained for the world's renovation. The infinite treasure is placed in

our hands, the immense responsibility is thrown upon us. O, let us prove

ourselves worthy of such a trust, and not become traitorous to the

cause, by falling into the general spirit of operating by proxy.

But, in truth, how far do we act on the principle named, that of

performing in person the most arduous service, and of leaving the most

pleasant work for others? Look over the desolate and secluded parts of

the United States; look over the heathen world, and make out an answer.

Let facts speak. Is a residence in Arkansas preferred to a residence in

New-York, or a voyage to New Guinea before one to Europe?

Our blessed Saviour and his apostles did not feel inclined to shrink

from the more self-denying service, and to shift it upon others. If they

had felt so, then we should have continued in a state of darkness, and

have known full well the import of present wretchedness and eternal woe.

Let us suppose, for a moment, that the apostles had made the discovery

of obeying by proxy the Saviour's last command. But I hesitate to make

such a supposition, lest the force of such an immense contrast should

make it to be regarded as a caricature upon the operations of the

present age. In other words, our efforts to convert the world become so

clumsy, slow and inefficient, from a lack of the right spirit and enough

of it, in ministers and in the churches, that to impute the same kind

and degree of effort to the apostles and primitive Christians, might

excite a smile, rather than a sigh; and be deemed an attempt to

ridicule what is at present done, rather than an earnest, serious, and

solemn expostulation. Such a result I should deplore. But if my readers

will believe me to be aiming simply, with weeping eyes and an aching

heart, to illustrate with force my own defects and their short-comings

in duty, by detecting and tracing out a wrong principle of action, I

will venture cautiously to make the supposition.

The words of the last command have fallen from the lips of the ascended

Saviour, and the apostles assemble to deliberate how they shall carry

them into execution. In the first place, Peter delivers an address. It

is an able and thrilling discourse. He seems impatient to wing his way

to foreign lands. After the discourse, they form themselves into a

society. Arrangements being made, and the machinery being complete, they

send forth John to solicit funds. He finds the disciples willing to

contribute on an average, after much urging, about twenty-four cents

each. A pittance of money is obtained, and then they search for a man.

They thought Peter would be ready to go, from the speech he delivered,

but he wishes to be excused: he has a family to support. They then fall

upon various plans: some think of training up young men to go forth,

and others exhort parents to infuse a missionary spirit into their

children. At length, however, it is found that one of the twelve begins

to feel that he has a call to go--but this would be at the rate of one

thousand from the twelve thousand ministers in the United States. This

one man is sent forth to "go into all the world, and to preach the

Gospel to every creature." The rest of the apostles sustain the various

offices of the society, and have charge of important posts in Jerusalem,

and in the cities and villages round about. They meet yearly, to

deliberate upon the missionary enterprise. Some feel much, and humbly

pray, and some say eloquent things about the glorious cause, and tell

how they have found a fulcrum, where to place the lever of Archimides to

elevate the world.

Now I ask most solemnly, and in a spirit of grief and humiliation, how

such a course of conduct would have appeared in the apostles? Would it

have evinced a spirit of obedience? Believe me, in early times, a

readiness to obey supplied a great deal of machinery. Bring back into

the ministers of the present day the spirit of the apostles, and into

the churches the spirit of the early disciples, and operations at once

would be more simple and more efficient. A backwardness in duty--a

disposition, if we do anything for the heathen, to do it by proxy,

_this_ is it that makes the wheels so ponderous and encumbered. "The

letter killeth, but the Spirit giveth life." Give us the spirit, and

annihilate the notion of operating so much by proxy, and we shall soon

see a multitude of angels flying in the midst of heaven, having the

everlasting Gospel to preach to the nations.

There is _no cheap or easy way of converting the world_. It is to be

feared that some fall into the contrary notion, because they do not wish

to believe that _all_ they possess is needed in the work of the Lord,

and that there is absolute necessity that they themselves go to the

heathen. It is to be feared, that it is for this reason that so many are

ready to imagine that the work is to be done by a few men, and a small

amount of means. It would seem they expect to form lines of these few

men, and encircle the globe in various directions; to place them on

prominent points, like light-houses, and leave each with his single lamp

to dispel the darkness of a wide circumference. They seem to imagine

that nations can be elevated from a degradation many ages deep, and

thoroughly transformed, religiously, morally, mentally and socially, by

the influence of a few missionaries, scattered here and there on some

high eminences of the earth: that a single missionary, under a withering

atmosphere, is to be preacher, physician, teacher, lawyer, mechanic, and

everything that is necessary in raising a whole community from the

inconceivable degradation of heathenism, up to the elevation of an

industrious, intelligent, and Christian people.

Neither are the expectations formed by many, of mission seminaries, less

visionary. A school, with two or three teachers, limited accommodations

and small funds, with all its school-books to make, and the whole

literature to form, is expected to accomplish all the work of the

academy, college, and theological seminary, and speedily to transform

untutored savages into able preachers of the Gospel.

And it is expected, by not a few, of the wife of the missionary--though

living under a burning sun, in a house of poor accommodations, with

unfaithful domestics, or none at all; that notwithstanding, she will

not only attend to the arduous duties of the household and educate her

own children, but teach a school among the people, and superintend the

female portion of the congregation--a task which a minister's wife in a

Christian land, and under a bracing air, does not often attempt.

Now, would it be really a benefit to the church thus to flatter her

indolence and her avarice, and convert the heathen with a fraction of

wealth and a handful of men? Be assured, God loves the church too well

thus to pamper a luxurious and self-indulgent spirit: he will allow no

cheap and easy way of accomplishing the work. The object is worth more:

worthy not only of the combined wealth of Christendom, but worthy also

of the energies, the toil, and the blood if necessary, of the greatest

and holiest men. It will not be in consistence with God's usual

providence that a victory so noble should be achieved, till the

treasures of the church shall be literally emptied in the contest, and

the precious blood of thousands and tens of thousands of her ablest and

best men poured out on the field. The work has already cost the blood

of God's only Son; and the prosecution and finishing of it shall be

through toil, self-denial, entire devotement, and obedience even unto

death.

_Some rules that may be of use in agitating the question of becoming

missionaries._

1. Guard against an _excuse-making_ spirit. This is an age of excuses.

There is no need of seeking for them; they are already at hand, and of

every variety, size and shape. They are kept ready for every occasion.

If one will not suit, another may be tried. Be admonished then, that a

disposition to be excused is not much different from a disposition to

disobey.

2. Guard against _antinomianism_ on the subject of missions. There is a

great tendency in these days to _say and do not_. The thrill of the

missionary theme, like an exhilarating gas, is pleasant to many; but the

sober and humble business of engaging in the work is not so welcome. A

disposition to say much and do little is a feature of the most alarming

kind. It shows an obtuseness of conscience.

3. Remember that Divine direction is better than human wisdom. We are

very much inclined to argue the question, "Where can I do the most

good?" Be assured we can do the most good by _obeying_ the Saviour: by

carrying out the spirit of his last command. Let us keep _close_ to that

command: it is safer than to determine by our own dark and biased

reasoning, and by our very limited foresight, where we can be the most

useful.

4. The nearer you live to Jesus, the more hope will there be of your

coming to a right decision. There is a process of conviction and

conversion before a man becomes a missionary--a serious conflict.

Nothing but nearness to the Saviour will prepare a man to pass through

such a conflict, and keep safely on the side of truth and duty.

5. If, after examining thoroughly and prayerfully the question of

becoming a missionary, the mind waver between conflicting reasons, it

will be safest to lean to the side of the greatest self-denial.

6. In selecting the place of the greatest usefulness in the wide field

of the world, the best rule is, to fly to the post most likely to be

deserted.

7. A kindred principle is, to do in person the more difficult and

unpleasant work, and to commit the more easy and delightful to proxy.

8. Remember the time is short. A few days more, and we shall meet our

Saviour in the presence of a world of souls.

9. Keep in mind the conduct of our blessed Saviour, and be imbued with

his spirit. Feel as he felt, and do as he did, when he beheld us in

misery and in sin.

Thoughts on Missions · 第 7 / 8 章