Chopin: Fantasie Impromptu, Op. 66

Among other manuscripts found on Chopin’s writing-table after his death

was the original of this composition, complete in every detail, but

written across the back, in his own trembling hand, were the words, “To

be destroyed when I am gone.”

It is difficult to account for this injunction, except upon the theory

that he feared that both the form and the content of the work were too

original, too subtle and complex, and too wholly unfamiliar to the

musical world of his day, to be readily comprehended, and that it would

either suffer from incorrect rendition or be condemned and ignored. So

he preferred a quick death by fire for this child of his sad later days,

to a slow death by mutilation or cruel neglect.

Fortunately the request was disregarded by his friends. The work was

published and has become one of his most beloved, as it is one of his

most faultlessly beautiful compositions. The peculiarity of form

referred to is familiar to all who have attempted the study of this

impromptu. The whole first movement, consisting of a continuous rapid

figure of four notes in the right hand against three in the left, is one

of the most unusual and difficult musical problems to solve

satisfactorily, and only to be mastered by long and special practice—a

case, as I have often said, where it is well to remember the biblical

injunction, “let not thy right hand know what thy left hand doeth.” But

when smoothly played, it produces just that sinuous, interwoven, flowing

effect which the composer desired, and which could not have been

obtained, in such perfection, in any other way.

The content of this composition, like that of many of Chopin’s smaller

works, is purely emotional, like a strictly lyric poem, by his literary

counterpart Tennyson, for instance; it is a wholly subjective expression

of a mental state, an emotional condition, not of any scene or any

action. It touches the minor key and sounds the plaintive harmonies to

which his heart-strings were tuned and vibrating at the time when it was

written. It voices a soft summer twilight mood, half sad, half tender,

full of vague regrets, of indefinite longings and aspirations, of

fluttering hope, never destined to be realized, and bright fleeting

memories that rise and pass, dimmed by intervening clouds of sorrow and

disappointment, like the shifting forms and hues of a kaleidoscope seen

through a misty glass, or the luminous phantoms of dead joys and shadowy

suggestions of the “might have been,” against the gray background of a

sad present and an uncertain, promiseless future. It is a strange,

delicately complex mood, a mood of life’s sunset hour, colored by the

pathetic glories of the dying day, and the depressing, yet tranquilizing

shadows of the coming night—a mood well-nigh impossible to express, but

perfectly embodied in the music.

The following simple little verses, in which, as will be seen, has been

made a somewhat free use of the suggestive symbolism of nature, may

serve to illustrate, though by no means to the writer’s satisfaction,

his conception of the artistic significance of this composition:

Descriptive Analyses of Piano Works For the Use of Teachers, Players, and Music Clubs · 第 33 / 82 题