Tennyson's eloquent alcaics on Milton--

"O mighty-mouth'd inventor of harmonies,

O skill'd to sing of Time or Eternity"--

the rest of which have been already quoted, seems not inapplicable to

Beethoven and this his symphony. Many others would do as well, or

better. Of general application--when we _think_ of its melodious rush

of ideas (one of the distinguishing features between it and the first

two symphonies), great republican spirit (in the highest sense),

Sun-god beauty, and Jove-like power; of its intellect, superior to

that of Bach's (it seems to us), as Carlyle well says Shakespeare's

was to that of the author of "_Novum Organum_," and of its grace and

sweetness, profounder than, not only of Haydn's and Mozart's, but any

other composer's, then the beautiful words of Dante, at the head of

this chapter, may apply.

The Prime Mover turns joyfully unto him, and, surpassing nature,

breathes into him a new spirit, replete with virtue and power. THE

FUNERAL MARCH.

Beethoven was a gloomily profound soul;--herein differentiated from

Shakespeare, who was pellucidly, cheerfully profound; and unlike

Schopenhauer (whom he otherwise rather suggests), who was profoundly

gloomy--one of the most so who ever lived; therefore he composed a

"_Marcia Funèbre_" specially _con amore_, and therefore it is

specially characteristic of him. In the present instance, this, as it

were, unfathomably profound inspiration, gains, as in every other

case, if we interpret it liberally rather than literally, and

consider it to depict and deplore rather the death of a great

Principle (such as Faith, Virtue, Truth,) than a great man; or the

great man, the hero, _plus_ the heroic, buried with him, _ultimus

Romanorum_. If we would realize the depths of this utterance--as it

were almost speechless--choked with tears--we shall think of it in

connection with such words as the following:--

"Tired with all these, for restful death I cry--

As to behold desert a beggar born,

And needy nothing trimm'd in jollity,

And purest faith unhappily forsworn,

And gilded honour shamefully misplaced,

And maiden virtue rudely strumpeted,

And right perfection wrongfully disgraced,

And strength by limping sway disabled,

And art made tongue-tied by authority,

And folly (doctor-like) controlling skill,

And simple truth miscall'd simplicity,

And captive good attending captain ill;

Tired with all these, from these I would be gone,

Save that, to die, I leave my love alone."

Speaking of Schopenhauer, the difference between him and Beethoven

seems to be this:--the latter shows us Optimism _victorious_ over

Pessimism; his works, indeed, seem specially and wonderfully to

mirror the struggle, as indeed, the whole of this century at least is

profoundly tinctured, nay seems almost characteristically stamped by

Pessimism; but Beethoven does not, and will not give way to, and end

in the rayless paralysis of Pessimism; he fights through, and soars

triumphant; in Mr. Picton's words, _re_ Materialism, "comes out at

the other side." In this, methinks, the deadly struggle betwixt

Optimism and Pessimism around us and within us; but the victory of

the former, and the triumph of Immortality over Doubt and Denial, we

have the key to Beethoven's music (of course unconsciously, and, as

we say, so much the better; it would have been worse expressed had it

been conscious). At a moment when Pessimism was uppermost, he might

have sat down to write this Dead March: that it was to celebrate

Napoleon Buonaparte was never the case, though it might have been to

celebrate the Napoleon of Beethoven's imagination, a _Hero_, to

bewail whose departure from among us no tones can be too pregnant and

profound, especially if we think we have "fallen on evil times," and

that we shall "never look upon his like again." And here a word about

Beethoven's (the true hero) immortal act, when he heard that Napoleon

had made himself crowned--(the other hero we spoke of refused a

crown, and hid himself); was not _that_ a repudiation of Tyranny and

Quackery? was not _that_ a royal piece of Iconoclasm? to me it is one

of the highest private scenes of History. Summon it up one

moment:--Beethoven's eye flashing fire; the lion locks almost shaking

flames, as he tears the superscription in half (and Napoleon's fame

with it), and dashes the "carefully written out" symphony on the

floor, "put his foot down on _that_." _So_, I should like to see

Beethoven painted; or still better, sculptured. Dr. Nohl has taken

occassion to draw an elaborate parallel or comparison between

Beethoven and another great contemporary of his, Goethe--(we would

draw it also to the advantage of the former;) Carlyle has done so,

between Napoleon and Goethe; we would do so between Napoleon and

Beethoven, and call the latter in our great Sage's words, a "still

white light shining far into the centuries," while the other was

meteoric flame and volcanic glare--not wholly, solely, for he too was

an instrument--an able, and necessary one, but in comparison. Let

anyone ask himself how he feels at the mention of the two names. Is

he not expanded, cheered, comforted, and made better--unconsciously

made surer of goodness, truth, immortality, and all high things, at

the name of Beethoven; and is he not repelled, if dazzled, by that of

Napoleon? The good was not buried with Beethoven's bones. Think of

the amount he has done after his death (like Handel and his

"Messiah"); think of his industrious great life and character--so

originally grand; and contrast it with the portentous mass of lies

and murders, the conflagrations and widow's tears, the hideous

battle-fields of the heartless, semi-conscious, semi-quack,

diabolically selfish Napoleon, and the good _he_ has done after him.

No! the good Wolfe had rather have been Gray than the victor of

Quebec, and we would rather have been Beethoven than Napoleon--whose

very genius, moreover, is over-rated; for we decidedly think with

Madame de Stäel, that had he met with an able and honest adversary

early, he would have been checked or defeated; nay, he _was_, when he

met Sydney Smith at Acre; and, curiously enough, after, when he met

_another_ Briton, who was never defeated--Wellington. Napoleon will

always be marvelled at and written about, but it will never be said

of him--"in his works you will find enrichers of the fancy,

strengtheners of virtue, a withdrawing from all selfish and mercenary

thoughts, a lesson of all sweet and honourable thoughts and actions,

to teach them courtesy, benignity, generosity, humanity; for, of

examples teaching these virtues, his pages are full;"--as it was said

of the author of "Hamlet," and as it is here repeated of the mighty

composer of this "Dead March," with its wails from the deepest and

strains from the highest thing known--the heart of man.

Beethoven's symphonies critically discussed · 第 25 / 53 题