PREFACE.

These essays originally appeared in _The Musical Standard_, for which

paper they were written.

While admitting that the author has at times been carried away by his

exuberant fancy, it is impossible to deny that he possesses in a very

high degree those powers of analysis without which it is impossible

to do justice to, or even approximately to understand, Beethoven.

Music is verily the language of the soul--higher, finer, more

delicate in its methods, and more ethereal in its results, than

anything to which the tongue can give utterance; expressing what

speech cannot speak, and affecting, as no mere talking can, the

invisible player who manipulates the keyboard of the human intellect,

and whom we call _The Soul_. Music is truly of such a nature, and

appeals so powerfully and mysteriously to that soul, that the words

of Jean Paul seem quite justified,--

_Ich glaube, nur Gott versteht unser Musik._

Beethoven wrote such music as few even among those calling themselves

musicians can understand, as the word is generally used; and which,

in Jean Paul's sense of the word, is understood not at all. Like the

ocean, or Mont Blanc, we can feel its power, while at the same time

we are conscious that explanation would be almost desecration. We do

not want Beethoven's music explained, but would rather be left alone

with that which we can only feel, but cannot understand while

hampered with "this mortal coil." Under the spell of such music, we

can only explain the emotions it produces in us, and we can only do

this in a fashion far from complete. Mr. Teetgen has only attempted

an explanation of Beethoven's symphonies in this latter sense; and so

far from feeling his little book as an impertinence--which any

attempt to explain Beethoven's music (his soul, _id est_) would

be--we feel helped in our endeavours to understand something of the

means by which the greatest tone-poet worked his incantations and

wove his spells.

We cannot always agree with Mr. Teetgen in his estimate of other

composers--notably, Mendelssohn, whom he holds in much lighter esteem

than we do, and we could not endorse all he says of Mozart, either;

he does not worship his great hero too much, but the others too

little. Of his most intense admiration for Beethoven, however, none

can doubt; and those who read this little work will, we think, agree

with us in saying that Mr. Teetgen's analytical and descriptive

powers, in dealing with the symphonies, are on a par with his

veneration for the great master whom we all delight to honour, and

who realised his own ideal--some of us, at least, think so--"There is

nothing higher than this--to get nearer the Godhead than other men,

and thence diffuse its beams over mankind." Fashions change in music

as in other things; but Beethoven's music has in it that truth which,

being eternal, cannot change; and we cannot conceive a state of

culture so advanced that these Symphonies shall be deemed

old-fashioned. If ever that condition is reached, it will be reached

not by progression, but retrogression.

Beethoven's symphonies critically discussed · 第 12 / 53 题