CHAPTER XXV

THE EASTER WEEK REBELLION AND AFTERWARDS

A world preoccupied with the tremendous movements of mighty armies

woke up one morning and rubbed its eyes in amazement to read that a

rebellion had broken out in the capital of Ireland. How did it happen?

What did it mean? What was the cause of it? These and similar

questions were being asked, and those who were ready with an answer

were very few indeed. The marvellous thing, a matter almost incredible

of belief, is that it caught the Irish Government absolutely unawares.

Their Secret Service Department might as well not have been in

existence. For the first time probably in Irish history an Irish

movement had come into being which had not a single "informer" in its

ranks. This in itself was a remarkable thing and to be noted. The

leaders and their officers had accomplished the remarkable achievement

of discriminating against the Secret Service agent.

Although everything was clouded in a mist of conjecture and obscurity

at the time, the causes of the Rebellion of Easter Week are now fairly

clear, and may be shortly summarised. From the moment that the

Redmondite Party had imposed their conditions on the Committee of the

Irish Volunteers the vast bulk of the Volunteers who were not also

"Mollies" were thoroughly dissatisfied with the arrangement. This

discontent increased when the recruiting campaign in Ireland was

conducted with calculated offence to Nationalist sentiment and

self-respect, and eventually developed into a split. The members of

the original Committee as a result summoned a Volunteer Convention for

25th November 1914, at which it was decided to declare: "That Ireland

cannot with honour or safety take part in foreign quarrels otherwise

than through the free action of a National Government of her own; and

to repudiate the claim of any man to offer up the blood and lives of

the sons of Irishmen and Irishwomen to the service of the British

Empire while no National Government which could act and speak for the

people of Ireland is allowed to exist."

The new body, or rather the old, resumed the original title of the

Irish Volunteers. There were also a number of other bodies entirely

out of harmony with the policy of the Parliamentary Party, such as

Sinn Feiners, the Republicans, and the Citizen Army of Dublin's

workers organised in connection with Liberty Hall. These were all

opposed to recruiting, and the extremists amongst them advocated total

separation from England as the cardinal article of their faith. A new

Separatist daily newspaper was published in Dublin under the title

_Eire--Ireland_. Its attitude towards the war was that Ireland

had no cause of quarrel with the German people, or just cause of

offence against them; and it was not long before the Irish Volunteers

came to be regarded by the British authorities as a "disaffected"

organisation. Its organs in the Press were promptly suppressed, only

for others as promptly to take their place. Its officers began to be

deported without charge preferred or investigation of any sort. Fenian

teachings became popular once more and "the Old Guard" of Ireland, who

had remained ever loyal to their early Fenian faith, must have felt a

pulsing of their veins when they saw the doctrines of their hot youth

take shape again. The eyes of a small but resolute minority of Irish

Nationalists began to see in red revolution the only hope of Irish

freedom. Physical force may appear a hopeless policy but it was at

least worth preparing for, and it may be also it would be worth the

trial. This was their creed and this the purpose that animated them.

There can be no doubt that through the medium of the old Irish

Republican Brotherhood, which had never quite died out in Ireland,

communications were kept up with the Clan-na-Gael and other extreme

organisations in the United States, and through these avenues also

probably with Germany. Indeed the German Foreign Office, quite early

in the war, at the instigation of Sir Roger Casement had declared

formally "that Germany would not invade Ireland with any intentions of

conquest or of the destruction of any institutions." If they did land

in the course of the war, they would come "inspired by good will

towards a land and a people for whom Germany only wishes national

prosperity and freedom."

The avowedly revolutionary party gained a great accession of strength

when Mr P.H. Pearse and Mr James Connolly composed certain differences

and united the workers in the Citizen Army with the Irish Volunteers.

Mr Pearse was now the leader of the latter organisation--a man of high

intellectual attainments, single-minded purpose, and austere

character. "For many years," writes Mr Henry, "his life seems to have

been passed in the grave shadow of the sacrifice he felt that he was

called upon to make for Ireland. He believed that he was appointed to

tread the path that Robert Emmet and Wolfe Tone had trodden before

him, and his life was shaped so that it might be worthy of its end."

Separation as the only road to independence was the burden of Pearse's

teaching. It was his definite purpose to do something which, by the

splendour of the sacrifice involved, would rouse Ireland out of its

national apathy and national stupor. He and his associates believed,

as a writer in _Nationality_ declared: "We have the material, the

men and stuff of war, the faith and purpose and cause for

revolution.... We shall have Ireland illumined with a light before

which even the Martyrs' will pale: the light of Freedom, of a deed

done and action taken and a blow struck for the Old Land." It was in

this faith they went forth to their sacrifice. "On Palm Sunday 1916,"

writes Mr Henry, "the Union of Irish Labour and Irish Nationality was

proclaimed in a striking fashion. In the evening of that day Connolly

hoisted over Liberty Hall, the headquarters of the Citizen Army, the

Irish tricolour of orange, white, and green, the flag designed by the

Young Irelanders in 1848 to symbolise the union of the Orange and

Green by the white bond of a common brotherhood. On Easter Monday the

Irish Republic was proclaimed in Arms in Dublin."

Now there are many considerations that could be usefully discussed in

relation to the Easter Week Rebellion, but this is not the time or

place for them. Let it be made clear, however, that the Rising was not

the work of Sinn Fein, but of the leaders of the Irish Volunteers and

the Citizen Army. It would be a pretty subject of inquiry to know how

Sinn Fein got the credit for the Rising and why the title was given to

the new movement that came into being afterwards. My own view is that

the British journalists who swarmed into Ireland are chiefly

responsible for the designation. _Sinn Fein_ was a fine mouthful

for their British readers to swallow, and so they gave it to them. Be

this as it may, the Rebellion came to be referred to as the Sinn Fein

Rebellion, and the movement to which it gave birth has ever since

assumed the same name. It is not my intention to dwell on the grave

incidents that followed, the prolonged agony of "the shootings of the

Rebel leaders," the assassination of Mr Sheehy-Skeffington, the

indecent scenes in the House of Commons when the Nationalist members

behaved themselves with sad lack of restraint--cheering Mr Birrell's

prediction that "the Irish people would never regard the Dublin

Rebellion with the same feelings with which they regarded previous

rebellions," cheering still more loudly when, in response to Sir

Edward Carson's invitation to Mr Redmond to join him in "denouncing

and putting down those Rebels for evermore," Mr Redmond expressed, to

the amazement of all Nationalist Ireland, his "horror and detestation"

of Irishmen who, however mistaken they may be--and history has yet to

decide this--at least "poured out their blood like heroes--as they

believed and as millions of their countrymen now believe for Ireland"

(Mr William O'Brien). Mr Dillon, needless to say, flung his leader

overboard on this occasion without the slightest truth. He declared he

had never stood on a recruiting platform (which was not true!) and

that he never would do so, and accused the Government and the soldiers

of washing out the life-work of the Nationalists in "a sea of blood."

The Government were at their wits' end what to do. Mr Birrell, the

amiable and inefficient Chief Secretary, had to go. Mr Asquith went

over to Ireland on a tour of investigation and returned to Westminster

with two dominant impressions: (1) the breakdown of the existing

machinery of Irish Government; (2) the strength and depth, almost the

universality, of the feeling in Ireland that there was a unique

opportunity for the settlement of outstanding problems and for a

combined effort to obtain an agreement as to the way in which the

government of Ireland was to be carried on for the future. He

announced that Mr Lloyd George had undertaken, at the request of his

colleagues, to devote his time and energy to the promotion of an Irish

settlement.

Undoubtedly "the machinery of Government had broken down." But the

Government of England had taken no account of what was happening in

Ireland--of the veritable wave of passion that swept the country

after, the "executions" of the Rebel leaders, of the manner in which

this passion was fanned and flamed by the arrest and deportation of

thousands of young men all over the country, who were believed to be

prominently identified with the Volunteer Movement, of the unrest that

was caused by the reports that a number of the peaceable citizens of

Dublin were deliberately shot without cause by the troops during the

military occupation of the city. What wonder that there was a strong

and even fierce revulsion of feeling! And this was not reserved

altogether for the Government. The Irish Parliamentarians had their

own fair share of it. The process of disillusionment now rapidly set

in. That portion of the country that had not already completely lost

faith in the Party and in Parliamentary methods was fast losing it. It

only required that the Party should once again give its unqualified

assent, as it did, to Mr Lloyd George's "Headings of Agreement," which

provided for the partition of Ireland and the definite exclusion of

the six counties of Down, Antrim, Londonderry, Armagh, Monaghan and

Tyrone, to send it down into the nethermost depths of popular favour

and the whole-hearted contempt of every self-respecting man of the

Irish race. The collapse of Parliamentarianism was now complete. There

was no Nationalist of independent spirit left in Ireland who would

even yield it lip service. Irish public bodies which a year or two

previously were the obedient vehicles of Party manipulation were now

unanimous in denouncing any form of partition. The proposals for

settlement definitely failed, and the machinery of Irish Government

which had "broken down" was set up afresh and the discredited

administration of Dublin Castle fully restored by the appointment of

Mr Duke, a Unionist, as Chief Secretary for Ireland.

The war was not going at all well for the Allies. America was still

hesitating on the brink as to whether she would come in or remain

steadfastly aloof. The Asquithian Ministry had been manoeuvred out of

office under circumstances which it will be the joy of the historian

to deal with when all the documents and facts are available. That

interesting and candid diarist, Colonel Repington, under date 3rd

December 1916, writes:

"Last Friday began a great internal crisis, when L.G. [Lloyd George]

wrote to the P.M. [Asquith] that he could not go on unless our methods

of waging war were speeded up. He proposed a War Council of three,

including himself, Bonar Law and Carson. The two latter are with him,

which means the Unionists too."

Asquith resigned, the Coalition Ministry was formed, and it is

probably more than a surmise that the part played by Sir Edward Carson

in bringing about this result and in elevating Mr Lloyd George into

the Premiership explains much of the power he has exercised over him

ever since. Mr Redmond and Sir Edward Carson were both invited to join

the Coalition. The former declined, the latter accepted, and from his

position of power within the Cabinet was able to torpedo Home Rule at

will.

And thus came to an end in Ireland as gross a tyranny perpetrated in

the sacred name of Nationality as ever disgraced our annals. The Party

which had so long held power had destroyed themselves by years of

selfish blundering. The country was growing weary of the men who

killed land purchase, constituted themselves the mere dependents of an

English Party in exchange for boundless jobbery, intensified the alarm

of Ulster by transferring all power and patronage to a pseudo-Catholic

secret organisation, and crowned their incompetence by accepting a

miserably inadequate Home Rule Bill (with Partition twice over thrown

in). The country which had been shackled into silence by the terrorist

methods of the Board of Erin (which made the right of free meeting

impossible by the use of their batons, bludgeons and revolvers) was

emancipated by the Dublin Rising. And in the scale of things it must

be counted, for the young men who risked their lives in Easter Week,

not the least of their performances that they gave back to the people

of Ireland the right of thinking and acting for themselves. How well

they used this right to exact a full measure of retribution from the

Party that had betrayed them the General Election of 1918 abundantly

shows.

Ireland Since Parnell · 第 25 / 28 章