CHAPTER IV

LIFE IN SEOUL (_CONTINUED_)

The winter and spring of 1907 in Korea were, from the point of view of

one interested in this kind of politics, a very lively period, even

for a country traditionally accustomed to similar performances. Four

attempts at assassination of the Ministry—one of which was successful;

daily disclosures of intrigue, plot and counter-plot; revolts against

the country magistrates which took the form of refusal to pay taxes, of

attacks upon the police, and of highway robbery; plans for plundering

the resources of the nation under plausible pretence of schemes for

“promoting” the nation’s resources; foolish excitements selfishly

fostered by writers for the press who had their own interests to secure;

and quite as foolish, but less selfish, endeavors for increase of

public welfare, by those benevolently inclined; secret arrangements for

the despatch of the unfortunate delegation to the Hague, accompanied

by stealings from the impoverished royal treasury to the extent of

several hundred thousand _yen_; and, finally, a change, not only in the

_personnel_ of the Ministry but in its very constitution and mode of

procedure, which amounted to a bloodless revolution—these and other like

events were crowded into this one half-year. Meantime, especially after

the return of the Resident-General, the foundations of a new industrial

and educational development were being laid; and the arrangements for a

systematic administration of law and justice were quietly made ready. An

extensive religious revival was in progress—with phenomena corresponding

to those familiar to students of such subjects, when the moral power of a

higher religion first makes itself felt among a people who are ignorant

devil- and spirit-worshippers and are habitually negligent or corrupt in

respect of the manliest virtues. All this ferment was both caused, and

pervaded in its characteristics, by the Korean national hatred of the

race that was destined to subdue and, as we hope, redeem them.

During Marquis Ito’s absence in Japan those opposed to the workings

of the recently established Japanese Protectorate over Korea were

indeed busily engaged. Their various enterprises took the several forms

mentioned above. As to assassination, one unsuccessful attempt had

been made some time before the Marquis’ return to Korea. A beautiful

box of nickel was sent as a present to acting Prime Minister Pak. No

one of the Korean Court, being wise in their generation, ventured to

examine its contents or even to raise the lid of the box. Subsequently

the Resident-General examined it himself. It proved to be an ingenious

contrivance by which the turning of the key and lifting the lid would

pull the trigger of a pistol and explode the powder with which the

box was filled. Both box and pistol were of American manufacture. The

intention of the pretended present, which it was doubtless hoped would

be the more eagerly accepted and naïvely dealt with, since it ostensibly

came from so “friendly” a country, needs no investigation. The precise

source of the murderous gift will perhaps never be accurately known.

The day but one before our arrival in Seoul another unsuccessful attempt

at political murder was made—this time in daylight and upon one of the

principal thoroughfares. The object of attack was Mr. Kwon, the Minister

of War, who was riding in a jinrikisha surrounded by his official guard.

The following account is taken from the _Seoul Press_ of Friday, March

29th:

The Korean Minister of War had a narrow escape on Monday from

a daring attempt on his life. The would-be assassins—there

were two or probably more—succeeded in getting away from the

Japanese policeman in the Korean service, who seems to have had

a most desperate struggle with them and some people who came to

their assistance (that is, the assistance of the assassins).

He, however, succeeded in taking the pistol, which had been

fired twice upon the Minister, happily without any effect.

One of the accomplices was shortly after arrested by another

Japanese policeman in the Korean service in the vicinity of

the Minister’s residence. According to a statement made by

this prisoner, he belongs to a band of eighteen men from South

Korea, who are alleged to have recently entered Seoul for the

purpose of assassinating the Cabinet Ministers. These men are

further alleged to be the remnants of the so-called “volunteer”

insurgents of last year. There seems, however, reason to

suspect the truth of this statement; it is not unlikely that

motives of a political character have been adduced to cover a

crime prompted by personal enmity or rivalry. Such things have

constantly occurred in this country in recent years. Rumors are

rife as to the true origination of the dastardly attempt on

Mr. Kwon’s life, but we do not consider it necessary to take

any notice of them; they are mostly of such an extraordinary

character that they will certainly be dismissed as utterly

inconceivable by anybody not accustomed to the peculiar ways of

politics in Seoul.

One remark should be added to complete this public account; and one other

to enable the observer to read between the lines. There were Korean

body-guards and policemen and citizens at hand; but only one Japanese

policeman made any attempt to save the Minister’s life or to arrest the

assassins. The rumors rife, so inconceivable to “anybody not accustomed”

to the “politics” of Seoul, suggested, as usual, that it would be

well not to examine too closely into the plot, lest some one might be

uncovered who stood “higher up” in the court circles of Korea.

The third attempt at assassination was limited to the discovery and

immediate flight of the intruder as he was trying to climb the wall of

the enclosure of acting Prime Minister Pak. But the fourth attempt did

not terminate so harmlessly. In brief, the history of this political

murder was as follows (its date was April 21st):

On Sunday evening, Mr. Pak Yong-hwa, Director of the Audit

Bureau of the Imperial Household Department, was assassinated

at his house. On that evening Mr. Pak had nearly a dozen

visitors, and while he was conversing with them shortly after

ten o’clock, the card of another visitor, not known to him,

was brought in. Mr. Pak saw the man in a separate room, and

no sooner had he begun to talk with him than another man

rushed into the room through a window and stabbed Mr. Pak in

the right breast, inflicting a wound four inches deep. Seeing

their victim drop mortally wounded, the assassins hurriedly

left, discharging a few shots from their revolvers to prevent

pursuit. They are said to have been attired in foreign dress,

and from their accent it is inferred that they are most

probably from Keng-Sang-do.

The unfortunate Minister died from his wound while in the palanquin on

the way to the Japanese hospital. Marquis Ito, supposing from the news

received by telephone that acting Prime Minister Pak was the victim,

started at once for the hospital; but learning, before reaching there,

of the real name of the victim, and of his death, he returned to the

Residency. The next day H. M. the Emperor caused a chamberlain to pay

a visit of condolence to Mr. Pak’s residence; but the city of Seoul

and the country of Korea went about its business of intrigue or its

work of tilling the fields, as though nothing unusual had happened. The

distinction between such events here and in Russia should be borne in

mind by one trying to estimate their significance. In Korea there is

no immediate tangible interest, affecting life, liberty, or property,

for the individual, at stake, to justify violence. Where the real

reasons are not thoroughly selfish and corrupt—as indeed in most cases

they are—a misguided patriotism, with a large mixture of hypocritical

sentimentality, is the motive for the political murders of Korea. The

real patriots, if their feeling is intense enough and their courage

sufficient, commit suicide; and those of less degree of intensity refuse

to accept office under a foreign protectorate!

In general, it had hitherto been only the court officials themselves

who much cared as to what persons were selected by the Emperor for the

different high offices in Seoul itself. They, too, had been chiefly

interested in the more serious question as to who it is of these

officials that gets himself assassinated. The peasants and pedlers, who

are the travelling merchants in the country districts, care only about

the local magistrates and about the bearable amount of their “squeezes.”

But under the administration of Marquis Ito assassination of officers

whose character and official acts sustain such important relations to

the vital interests of both Japan and Korea, cannot now be allowed its

traditional impunity. Investigation into the authors and promoters of

this plot, therefore, quietly began and was carried as far upward as

seemed desirable or necessary. According to the _Korean Daily News_, the

three Koreans—La In-yung, Aw Ki-ho, and Kim In-sik—who on April 1st “went

to the Supreme Court in Seoul and gave themselves up, stating that they

were the ones who had tried to kill the Minister of War,” “seem to have

been actuated by no selfish impulses.” The same paper calls attention to

the claim that the plan was to kill all the five Cabinet Ministers “who

signed the last treaty with Japan”; and also to the fact that these same

men had been to Japan to memorialize the Japanese Emperor with reference

to the condition of Korea under the protectorate of the empire whose

head was His Majesty himself. This is as far as the paper cared to go at

this time in apologizing for the attempt at wholesale murder; but there

is no doubt that the attempt itself was not at all displeasing to the

court officials of the other party than the one in power or to the people

generally.

The truer story is as follows: The searchings of the police after

those who attempted the assassination of the Minister of War resulted

in picking up a number of them from various quarters. These rascals

were cross-questioned and one of them confessed and implicated as

back of the plot financially, no less important a personage than the

ex-Minister of the Imperial Household, Yi Yong-tai. This is the man who

was once prevented by foreign influence, on account of his thoroughly

evil reputation, from going to Washington as Minister from Korea. He is

known as a past-master in all kinds of craft and corruption, thoroughly

untrustworthy; although he had formerly been elevated by the Emperor to

the position of Minister of the Interior. Now, it so happened that at

the very time of the examination of the assassins, this same gentleman

was in an adjoining room where he and those with him could easily hear

everything said in answer to the cross-questioning. It is no wonder,

then, that Mr. Yi Yong-tai confessed that he himself was indeed one of

the band of patriots who had attempted the gallant measure of paying

hired assassins to make way with their political rivals—as I have already

said, a recognized, legitimate political measure throughout Korean

history.

The progress and result of the investigations into this plot of

assassination are so significant that this summary account from the

_Seoul Press_ is well worthy of reflective consideration:

The authors of the late unsuccessful attempt on the life of

Mr. Kwon, the War Minister, have at last been established. The

plot is of much greater magnitude than originally supposed,

and more than thirty men are now under arrest. The leaders of

the conspiracy are two South Chul-la-do men, La In-yung and

Aw Ki-ho by name. It is stated that they are men of learning

and command some respect among their neighbors. Some days ago

they surrendered themselves to the Supreme Court and confessed

all that had happened. From their own statements it appears

that the events which led them to the dastardly attempt are

rather historical than temporary. Since the days of the

Japan-China war they have been imbued with the idea that the

peace of Korea could be preserved only through the separate

independence of Japan, China, and Korea. Guided by this idea

they did all things in their power to prevent Russia from

gaining ascendancy in this country after that war; and on the

outbreak of the Russo-Japanese war they prayed, so they say,

for the victory of Japan, as her Imperial declaration of war

made reference to the maintenance of the territorial integrity

of the peninsula. In June, 1905, the two men, with one Yi, a

school teacher, went over to Tokyo and made representations to

the Household Department and Cabinet Ministers, petitioning

for Korea’s independence. On learning from the Japanese press

that the conclusion of a treaty was on the _tapis_ between

Japan and Korea, which would transfer the conduct of Korean

foreign affairs into the hands of the former, they immediately

wired to Mr. Pak, the Premier, requesting him not to sign the

Convention, even if his life were threatened. The Convention,

however, soon became an accomplished fact in November, 1905,

and the three left Tokyo for home in the next month. But

they soon found it impossible to enjoy tranquillity at home.

Japan began steadily to perform that which the Convention of

November, 1905, provided for, and they again crossed to Japan,

in April, 1906. They vainly attempted to persuade some Japanese

politicians to start a movement for the realization of their

cherished ideal. Discouraged by another failure, they once

more returned to Seoul, and on the initiative of La In-yung,

they came to the terrible decision that the Premier and four

Ministers of State, who were responsible for the conclusion of

the Convention, should be assassinated in order to admit of

the present Government being replaced by a new administration,

composed of men of greater ability and capable of forcing

Japan to restore to Korea the conduct of her own affairs. They

were thus awaiting the advent of a good opportunity.

On the other hand, a survivor of the Chi Ik-hyun rebellion,

named Pak Tai-ha, with Kim Tong-pil, arrested on Tuesday,

and a few others discontented with the present _régime_,

were conspiring here to raise another rebellion; and La and

Aw, happening to come in contact with these men, a special

friendship was soon contracted between them. Pak and his

associates were prevailed upon by La and Aw to abandon their

own plan and join the plot against the Government in power.

Here stepped in another person, by name Kim In-sik, hailing

from North Chul-la-do. Having many acquaintances among the

officials of the Government, especially among those now

out of power, Kim was asked to raise a fund necessary for

the achievement of their common cause; and he succeeded in

drawing a sufficient sum from the discontents. Yi Yong-tai,

ex-Minister of the Imperial Household, now under arrest, headed

the subscription list by contributing 1,700 _yen_, and this

was followed by 1,200 _yen_ by Min Hyung-sik, Vice-Minister

of Education, who was arrested on Thursday night, through

the medium of Chi Ik-chin, Chief of the Accounts Section of

the Imperial Guards Bureau in the Household Department, who,

in turn, was also arrested on Thursday night. A few minor

contributions were made by ex-officials, making a total of

3,400 _yen_.

The date originally fixed for the assassination of the

five Ministers was the 1st of the first moon, when all

the high dignitaries proceed to the Palace to offer their

congratulations to the Emperor. They hired a number of men in

Chul-la-do and Kyöng-sang-do for the purpose; but the plan

miscarried owing to the belated arrival of these men. The 25th

of May was then chosen. Some fifty men came up to town in

time from the above two provinces, and five bands, each under

the command of a leader, were posted along the roads leading

to the Palace from the respective residences of the Premier,

Ministers of the Interior, War, Education and Justice, and Mr.

Yi Kun-tak. The company commanded by Aw Ki-ho, which was to do

away with Mr. Pak, failed through the hesitation of the hired

men; but Yi Hong-tai’s company, charged with the killing of

the War Minister, had courage enough to make an attempt. Their

efforts, however, proved abortive, and led to the detection of

the plot.

An analysis of this group of Korean officials and commoners, bent on

wholesale political murder of their own countrymen in office, because the

latter were avowedly committed to a reform of the economical and judicial

condition of Korea, without distinction as to the ill success, or even,

in certain particular cases, the unfaithfulness of these “reformers”

shows it to have been composed of three classes of persons. There were,

first, the high-class officials who, with one exception, were themselves

at the time among the party of the “outs”; and who undoubtedly found

in this fact the chief crime of the Japanese administration against

themselves. There were, second, the misguided patriots who, beginning

with an honorable but vain unwillingness to admit the incapacity of

their country to manage its own affairs, had sunken to the condition of

prejudice and hatred which made them plan to murder their own cabinet

ministers, because the latter had, however reluctantly, admitted this

incapacity and acted accordingly. And there was, third, that basest of

all criminals, the cold-blooded, unprincipled, hired assassin.

The administration of justice in an even-handed manner is peculiarly

difficult in Korea; and, indeed, until recently no serious attempt at

such a thing has ever been made. In the case of this complicated plot

for assassinating the entire Korean Cabinet, it should be borne in mind

that several of its chief promoters were very highly connected; they

were, indeed, connected well up towards His Imperial Majesty on his

throne. Considering this fact, the issue when reached showed a marked

improvement already established in judicial affairs. It was indeed

rumored—and perhaps correctly—that Mr. Min Hyung-sik, the Vice-Minister

of Education, underwent preliminary examination, in the old-fashioned

Korean style, by being cruelly beaten. And the anti-Japanese press tried

to make it count against Marquis Ito’s measures for judicial reform that

he had not prevented the traditional Korean mode of torturing suspects!

But this way of examining criminals was still legal in Korea. It was

also said that Mr. Yi Yon-yung, chief of the Supreme Court, sent in his

resignation, on the ground that, as his younger brother was one of the

five ministers who were doomed to death by the assassins, it would not be

fair for him to try the case.

At the time of our leaving Seoul the trial of these conspirators was

not finished. But on Wednesday, July 3d, at 4 P. M., the Supreme

Court returned judgment upon twenty-nine persons who had been tried

and convicted of connection with the plot to assassinate those Korean

officials who took part in the Japanese-Korean Convention of November,

1905. Three of the hired murderers who, besides this crime, were found to

have been previously guilty of armed robbery, were sentenced to death.

The others received sentences of exile (a penalty feared more than death

by many Korean officials), for periods of from five to ten years. Among

those to whom the longest sentence of exile was measured out, were the

notable names of Yi Yong-tai, ex-Minister of the Imperial Household;

Soh Chang-sik, ex-Minister Resident, and my auditor at the lectures on

education, Min Hyung-sik, Vice-Minister of Education.

Even while the examination of this group of assassins was going on, and

after the change in the Ministry had been effected, another plot against

the lives of the same men was discovered. This conspiracy was, however,

less important as respects the rank of the persons involved and less

extensive in the number of those participating. Most of the ten Koreans

thought to be concerned in it belonged to the Yang-ban class, or the

“gentry,” and all were followers of Confucianism. The opinion prevailed

that the motive of these conspirators was scarcely to any degree

patriotic; but that their principal object was to collect money from the

disappointed political groups of the capital. At all events, seven of

the criminals were arrested, the plot broken up thoroughly, and another

lesson given to Korean officialdom that assassination is no longer to be

so sure a path to official promotion and Imperial influence as it has too

often been in the past history of the country.

An amusing but significant incident illustrative of Korean official

procedure came under my own observation. Prince Tokugawa, who had been

staying somewhat more than a week at Miss Sontag’s, before leaving

Korea, gave an “at home” to about one hundred and fifty invited guests.

Soon after the company had assembled, and while the ladies were in the

drawing-room and the gentlemen in the large outer, enclosed verandah,

suddenly the electric lights went out and the company were left in

total darkness. The gentleman with whom I was conversing at the moment

and I looked through the glass doors of the verandah and observed that

the electric lights outside were still burning. At this discovery my

companion, who had had some experience in the ways of Seoul diplomacy,

became somewhat disturbed, and remarked: “Such things sometimes happen

by previous arrangement.” Almost immediately after the sudden darkness

came on, a servant emerged from the dining-hall with a lighted taper, and

crossing to the drawing-room proceeded to light the numerous candelabra.

At the heels of the servant followed Prince Eui Wha, pale with fright,

on his way from the verandah to the drawing-room, where he slipped

behind a barricade of ladies and planted himself against the wall. It

should be remembered in explanation of so singular behavior that this

Prince, although he is the Emperor’s son by a concubine, is hated by

no fewer than three different parties; these are the Min family, who

favor the succession of the son of the Queen; the party of Lady Om, who

would gladly see her young son come to the throne; and the violently

anti-Japanese crowd who believe that Prince Eui Wha is too much under

Japanese influences. It had been rumored previously that a letter had

threatened him with assassination. However this may be, the present was

not the expected occasion; for examination showed that the burning-out of

a fuse was the real cause of the sudden darkness: and a servant repaired

the connection so that, just as a workman hastily summoned from the

electric plant, entered the front door, the lights as suddenly came on

again.

The plots for assassination undoubtedly contributed to the causes which

had already for some time been at work to make necessary a change in the

Ministry. In spite of the enmity which the existing Cabinet had excited

on account of its unwilling part in the Convention of November, 1905,

it had held together for a remarkably long period of time. Not all its

members, however, were equally sincere or efficient in carrying out

the reforms to which they had pledged themselves; at least one of its

members had been accused of a notable attempt at the old-time manner of

corrupt administration of office. The Il Chin-hoi people, or members

of a numerous so-called “Independence Society,” had been “heckling the

Cabinet Ministers” by accusing them of venality and incapacity. In a

memorial forwarded to the Government by its committee, the beginning

read: “We herewith write you and enumerate your faults”; the memorial

ended with the amusingly frank declaration: “The only thing for you

Cabinet Ministers to do is to resign your posts and retire into private

life. Your armed body-guards are entirely useless. If you do your

duties assiduously and honestly, every one will love you; but if you

pursue idle and vicious courses, every man’s hand will be against you.”

Moreover, the acting Prime Minister Pak, although of good intentions,

had not developed the ability to lead and control his colleagues, and he

was probably acting wisely when he insisted on having his resignation

accepted. The resignation of their chief involved the resignations of

all and the formation of a new Ministry—although not necessarily of a

Ministry composed wholly of new members.

On returning to “Maison Sontag” about ten o’clock (Wednesday, May 22d)

from dining out we found our hostess rather worn in body and mentally

disturbed; she had herself just reached home after some seven hours of

continuous service in the Palace. Mademoiselle also appeared anxious

about the comfort and health of the Marquis Ito, who had himself been

there during a similar long period, and who had eaten and drunk nothing

except a sandwich and a glass of claret sent in by her to His Excellency.

The resignation of Premier Pak had been tendered on the Monday previous.

The next morning but one, the _Seoul Press_, published the following

announcement:

Marquis Ito’s audience with the Emperor of Korea on Wednesday

was a protracted one, it being nearly ten o’clock in the

evening before His Excellency left the palace. During the

five hours that he was with His Majesty, the old cabinet was

dismissed and a new one called into existence. The new Ministry

thus formed is composed as follows:

Prime Minister, Yi Wan-yong.

Minister of Justice, Yi Ha-yong.

Minister of Finance, Min Yong-ki.

Minister of the Interior, In Sun-jun.

Minister of War, Yi Pyong-mu.

Minister of Education, Yi Chai-kon.

As the same paper subsequently remarked, this change of government, which

had taken place with a quite unequalled promptitude and quiet, followed

upon a conversation in which the “Resident-General spoke to the Emperor

on the general situation in a remarkably frank and outspoken manner.”

The substance of this conversation between Marquis Ito and the Korean

Emperor in this memorable interview was probably somewhat as follows: His

Majesty was reminded of the Marquis’ regret that a change of Ministry had

become necessary; for under existing circumstances it was desirable to

avoid as much as possible the friction likely to accompany such a change.

But Minister Pak insisted on resigning and the others, of course, must

follow his example. Now the history of the country showed, as the Emperor

well knew, that changes in the Cabinet were a signal for all manner of

confusion in the Government, caused by the intrigue of parties contending

for the control. Promptness of action would alone prevent this. His

Excellency wished to remain in the palace until the new Ministry was

constituted. Under existing circumstances it was most desirable that

the new Prime Minister should be a man who could be trusted; and that,

in order to secure internal harmony and freedom from intrigue within

the Cabinet itself, he should have a choice in the selection of his

colleagues. He should also have a policy, should explain it to the

others, and thus secure their intelligent and hearty co-operation and

support. In His Excellency’s opinion, Mr. Yi Wan-yong, the then acting

Minister of Education, was the man, of all others, most suitable for the

position of Premier. This advice—accompanied, as it doubtless was, by

words of plain but friendly warning as to the consequences of continuing

the old-time policy of intrigue, deceit, and submission to the counsels

of base-born and unscrupulous fellows, who were always planning to

deceive and rob the Emperor in order to profit themselves—was finally

followed.

The Ministry of Agriculture, Commerce and Industry, which for practical

importance stood next to that of the Prime Minister, and which had been

rather unworthily filled by its previous occupant, was for the time

being combined with the Prime Minister’s. Soon after, the Minister of

Justice and the Minister of Finance of the new Cabinet insisted upon

resigning, and Mr. Cho Chung-yung and Mr. Ko Yong-hui were appointed to

the vacant positions. At the same time the vacant portfolio which had

been temporarily left in the hands of the Prime Minister was given to Mr.

Song Pyong-chun. With these changes and this additional appointment a

new Cabinet was arranged in the briefest possible time, without popular

excitement, and without opportunity for corrupt intrigue.

An analysis of the _personnel_ of the new Ministry shows that it was

composed of comparatively young men and of men who had, on the whole,

previously sustained a fair reputation. It also was much more obviously

a reform Cabinet; its material was both more mouldable and more

homogeneous. The Home Minister had been the President of “Song-kyun

College” (a Confucian institution); the War Minister, who was speedily

made a Major-General, had received a thorough military education in Japan

and had been director of the Korean Military Academy. The new Minister of

Education had at one time been Vice-Minister in the same department.

Almost immediately the new Cabinet, in accordance with the significant

decision to hold a Council every Tuesday at the official residence of

the Resident-General, met to shape a more definite public policy. A full

report of the speech made to them on this occasion by Marquis Ito, and of

the response made by Premier Yi, was published for Korea, Japan, and all

the world to read. In this address the Marquis claimed that he had now,

since his arrival one year ago, acted in perfect good faith, with the

immovable intention to do all in his power to cement friendship between

Japan and Korea, and to develop the latter’s resources. The most urgent

need for Korea at present was a reformed administration. Reviewing the

history of the past thirty years in the Far East, with which his own

experiences had made him particularly familiar, he recalled before them

his persistent advocacy of peaceful measures as opposed to those of a

punitive war. But it was for Korea herself to say whether such measures

should prevail as would insure her independence in home affairs and

peaceful self-development, or not. If the present Cabinet did not agree

with him, let them frankly and bravely say, No! If they concurred in

his opinion, let them free themselves of selfish motives and unite in

bringing about the common good. To this address of Marquis Ito, Mr. Yi,

the Premier, replied in behalf of his colleagues. After thanking the

Resident-General for his advice, he promised that the new Ministry would

unite under his guidance, and “despite all obstacles and in the face of

any dangers that might lie in the way, would endeavor to attain their

object—the best good of their country.”

Other measures followed rapidly, all of which tended to constitute

a Cabinet which should be a really effective administrative body,

relatively free from court intrigue and from the fear of internal

treachery. These measures, taken together, secured a new official system,

the beginnings of real government for the first time in the history of

Korea, as the following quotation will show:

According to the new system the present Council of State is

to be called hereafter the Cabinet, and the President of the

Council of State the Prime Minister. The respective Ministers

of State shall give their advice to the Emperor, and be

responsible for the management of important matters of State.

All laws, imperial edicts, the budget, the final account, any

and all expenditure that is not provided for in the budget, the

appointment, dismissal and promotion of Government officials

and officers, amnesty and pardon, and other affairs of State,

shall require the deliberation and consent of all the Ministers

of State as well as the counter-signature of them all. In

short, the new system aims at the enlargement of the power of

the Government in order to enable it to stand independent of

outward influence.

How complete a bloodless revolution was accomplished in this quiet and

almost unnoticed way will be made more apparent later on when it can be

viewed in its larger historical and political settings. That His Majesty

the Korean Emperor did not like the change, needs scarcely to be said.

The enlargement of the power of the Government meant the diminishing of

the Imperial power to dispose of the offices, the possessions, not only

of the Crown but also of individuals and of the nation, and the lives of

the subjects, without regard to law, order, justice, or the semblance of

equity. There is equally little need to say that the Yang-bans and the

corrupt courtiers and local magistrates, as well as the court-eunuchs and

sorceresses, were in the opposition. But only by such changes is to be

constituted the true “Passing of Korea,” in a manner to commend itself

to every genuine patriot and to all foreigners who honestly care for the

good of the Koreans and for the welfare of the Far East.

The Emperor at first was reported to have attacks of being “indisposed,”

which prevented his seeing the Ministers when they came for consultation,

or for the imperial sanction to their acts under the new _régime_. But,

on the whole, his health gradually so improved that he was able to accept

the situation with more apparent acquiescence, if not inner complacency.

And the fright which soon arose over the serious consequences that were

to follow his alleged Commission of Koreans and their “foreign friend”

to enter formal protest against Japan at The Hague Peace Conference, at

least for the time being made the humiliations suffered from his own

subjects at home the easier to be borne.

According to unfailing Korean custom, it was to be expected that

the ex-Ministers would become at once opponents of their successors

in office and powerful factors in the intrigues designed to destroy

the influence of the latter with the Emperor. The success of the new

Ministry, especially in the matter of those reforms which made Marquis

Ito’s administration so obnoxious to the ruling classes, was therefore in

peril from the Ministry that had resigned. But influence of a private and

suspicious character with His Majesty had become, under the new _régime_,

less important and less likely to be profitable; and the ex-Ministers

were not only to be rendered innocuous, even if any of them might at any

time be disposed to do harm, but were also themselves to be committed by

motives of personal interest to a more responsible, relatively reformed

mode of administering national affairs. The new Korean Government

decided to “create” the office of “Councillor in the Privy Council”; the

ex-Ministers were themselves promptly appointed to this office. They

were given comfortable salaries, and three of them—including the one who

had been publicly reported as having put on a coat-of-mail and secreted

himself in his own house, through fear of assassination, at the time of

his resignation—were sent on a tour of inspection to Japan. Here they

were received in audience by His Imperial Majesty the Emperor of Japan,

and so well treated that they might reasonably be expected to return to

their own country with a spirit of hearty co-operation in measures for

reforming the condition of their own country after the Japanese model.

Among the other events of the spring months of 1907 was one which, while

in itself considered, was relatively unimportant, was destined to become

of no small political influence upon the Japanese policy in Korea and

upon the relation of the Emperor and the court circle to that policy.

This was the sudden departure, after selling his effects at auction, of

Mr. Homer B. Hulbert. It does not belong to the story we have to tell, to

speak of the previous history of this gentleman in Korea, or of his views

on historical subjects when involving the character of the Japanese,

except so far as the statement of the facts and truths of history makes

such reference—mostly indirect—indispensable. But on this particular

occasion what transpired of Mr. Hulbert’s transactions with the Emperor

is so intimately connected with the political events of the period that

some special mention of them cannot properly be omitted.

Immediately on my return from Chemulpo, Wednesday, May 8th, I found

the excitement of the day was over the following questions: “What was

Mr. Hulbert’s motive for leaving Seoul so suddenly? Where is he going?

and What is his business?” Now the _Korean Daily News_, the violently

anti-Japanese paper which was currently believed to receive the support

of Mr. Hulbert, in the forms of friendship with its editor, writing

some of its editorials, and interest in its receiving subsidies, had

just published as a despatch from Paris (dated May 3d) the following

illuminating statements: “Korea will also participate in The Hague Peace

Conference”; but then again: “It is reported that Japan will represent

Korea at the Conference.” The conjecture, therefore, was very promptly

made by those in the diplomatic service in Seoul that the Emperor had

again given another large sum of money to the same hands, with the same

hope, as formerly, of procuring foreign assistance or even intervention.

This was, however, hard to credit even by those most suspicious; for,

from the Japanese point of view, such a transaction would have been on

the recipient’s part very like “obtaining money under false pretences,”

and on the giver’s part, a breach of the compact with Japan which might

seriously impair, or even endanger, the imperial interests. That such a

commission was a breach of treaty-obligations will be made perfectly

clear when we come to narrate the true history of the compact made in

November, 1905.

Inquiry resulted only in finding that Mr. Hulbert’s real plans in going,

and even his reasons for going at all, had not been confided to any of

his most intimate friends. His Korean associates, outside of the very few

higher officials that might be in the secret, held the absurd opinion

that he had been bought off from his devotion to them by the Marquis

Ito, to whose official residence he had resorted for a conference and

an agreement as to terms. To the other foreigners he had assigned the

condition of his family affairs as the reason for his removal. To one of

his more intimate friends among the missionaries he had claimed that,

having heard of a wealthy American who might be induced to give a large

sum of money to found an educational institution in Korea, he was going

to try to secure the gift. The only points of agreement were that the

journey was to be made over the Siberian Railway, and that there was

to be a considerable stop in St. Petersburg. In a quite unexpected but

entirely authentic way it became known to me within a few hours that Mr.

Hulbert had indeed gone from Seoul with a large gift of money from His

Majesty and with an important commission to execute. Although the precise

amount of the imperial gift continued for some time to be variously

estimated and reported, and although its precise uses may never be

inquired into—not to say made public; that a Commission appeared at The

Hague, and its fate, are now matters of the world’s political history. As

such, it will be referred to elsewhere.[3]

It would be a great mistake, however, to suppose that Seoul had no

other charms for us as visitors than the opportunity for delivering

lectures and for witnessing, from outside and inside points of view,

the human puppets which suppose themselves to be defeating the plans

of that Supreme Ethical Spirit who shapes the destiny of nations, in

partnership with those who partake of the spirit with which He inspires

the “men of good-will.” The Court intrigues, and even the assassination

of the Ministry, had little disturbing effect upon foreign business or

foreign social life in the capital of Korea. With the former it made no

difference of practical importance beyond the temporary check, perhaps,

to some promoting scheme which depended upon the personality of the Court

favorites for its Imperial support. There was no particular reason why

society should heed such familiar occurrences. The weather was fine;

the luxuriant bloom of the Korean spring and the vivid and changeful

coloring of the mountains surrounding Seoul, invited to out-of-doors

entertainments; and no foreigner’s life was then in any danger. For, as

to the last feature favoring open-air sociability, the foreign visitor

or resident need have little fear within the city walls, so long as the

mob is not aroused and in control. Aside from one or two articles in the

_Seoul Press_, and the grave rebukes of the Resident-General, I neither

heard, nor heard of, any voice raised against the immorality and crime of

political intrigue and political assassination. There was at the time no

Savonarola or Martin Luther in Korea. But, then, in what part of America,

or country of Europe, is such a prophet now to be found? In Korea, as

elsewhere, politics and morals seemed only remotely related, even in the

minds of the teachers of religion.

The foreign society of Seoul, including, of course, the Japanese,

is small, but homogeneous and agreeable. It is, indeed, composed of

several nationalities and of varied occupations—from that of the shrewd

and hardened diplomat to the unsuspecting but devout missionary. But

whatever differences of views and habits, or more important oppositions,

lie hidden beneath, when the gathering is social, there is a cordial

interchange of courtesies and an appearance of good-will. There can be

no doubt that much of this socially-uniting influence has its source

in the will of the Japanese Resident-General; and just as little doubt

that the Japanese Imperial treasury is somewhat heavily drawn upon for

the expenses. But it is worth for Korea all that it costs—and more.

Especially true is this, when we consider the effect which is had

in this way upon the Korean upper classes themselves. Indeed, it is

foreign social amenities and decencies, under the brave and efficient

leadership of the lady in whose house we stayed, that have made the

Korean court functions half-way tolerable, and that to this hour prevent

the housekeeping of the Palace from relapsing into an intolerable

condition of filth and disorder. But what the social functions that are

now encouraged by the Resident-General are in a measure doing is chiefly

valuable by way of bringing the Korean upper classes into apparently—and

as, I believe, the event will prove, genuinely—friendly relations with

the Japanese. This effect has already showed itself to a considerable

extent in the case of the Korean gentlemen. Not only those who have been

abroad, and those who are now going abroad (for the most part, to Japan),

but even the others are coming to appreciate the value of more cleanly

and elegant ways of enjoying one’s self socially than were conceivable by

their ancestors. Gluttony, drunkenness, filthy habits and surroundings,

seem less natural and attractive by comparison with a few degrees of

higher social refinement. The hardest crust to break will doubtless be

that which encompasses and crushes the Korean lady. In Japan there has

never been anything quite comparable to the still present degrading

influences bearing upon the womanhood of the upper classes in Korea.

But while we were in Seoul, for the first time so far as known in its

history, a Korean lady walked upon the streets, and after making several

calls in this fashion, rode home in the electric car! Her companion was a

Japanese lady, and the two were selling tickets to a public entertainment

given in behalf of a benevolent enterprise. Being present ourselves at

this same entertainment, we saw to our surprise quite one hundred Korean

women, dressed in their native costume, enter the theatre, and seat

themselves among the Japanese of their own sex. If this thing goes on,

racial hatred is doomed. For soon it is to be hoped, or feared, according

to one’s point of view, that Korean ladies will attend garden parties

and, perhaps, finally, frequent afternoon teas and evening receptions,

at which foreigners of both sexes are present. And this, I am sure, is a

sight never as yet beheld by mortal eyes; at least my eyes saw no sign of

its beginning as yet in the now half-opened “Hermit Kingdom.”

A few days after our arrival our host gave us an afternoon reception

at the Residency House. It was a beautiful day; and the grounds, which

had been decorated as it is difficult for other than the Japanese

professionals to do, were beautiful as was the day. The first two hours

were spent upon the hill above the Residence, from which there are fine

and extensive views of Seoul and its environing mountains. There, in

the several well-situated booths and tea-houses, light refreshments

were served. There, too, we were introduced to the whole of Seoul

“society,” some of whom we were glad to call our “friends,” when we

parted from them nearly two months later. The Japanese officials, the

foreign Consuls, with their wives and daughters, the Korean officials

without their families, the Roman Catholic Archbishop and the Protestant

missionaries, and a few of the leading business people, made up that

sort of a gathering which is most thoroughly human and most interesting.

A collation, with chatting and hand-shaking, in the Marquis’ apartments

closed a delightful afternoon.

Of the various garden parties, luncheons, dinners, and receptions, which

followed and not only enlivened the otherwise somewhat dull life of

lecturing, reading, consulting, and observing, it is not necessary to

speak in detail. The visit of Prince Tokugawa and his party to Seoul,

which was extended for some ten days, was very properly made the occasion

of a series of festivities, at most of which they were the guests of

honor; but at the last of which—a reception given in Miss Sontag’s

house—Prince Tokugawa was himself the host. The unaffected friendly

bearing of these Japanese gentlemen toward the Koreans, with whom they

were thus brought in contact, helped to soften the anti-Japanese feeling;

and since on one, at least, of these occasions, the reception given by

Mr. Megata, not only the foreign diplomats but also a number of the

foreign missionaries were invited, it gave to the latter a somewhat

unaccustomed opportunity to observe at close hand the enlightening fact

that Japan, like all other so-called civilized nations, does not have its

true character best represented by its coolies, low-lived adventurers,

camp-followers, and land-grabbing pioneers.

I close this brief description of our varied experiences in Seoul with

a warning against a very common but, in my judgment, quite fallacious

view of the relation in which the capital city stands to the entire

country of Korea. It is customary to say that “Seoul _is_ Korea” just

as “Paris is France.” But this is even less true in the macrocosm of

Seoul than in the macrocosm of Paris. It is indeed true, as Dr. Jones has

said, that “as the capital of the Empire its political pre-eminence is

undisputed. Intellectually and socially it has ruled Korea with an iron

hand for half a millennium.” But it is also true that the real interests

and undeveloped material and human resources of the nation are in the

country; and that the uneconomical, ignorant, and depressed condition of

the people outside of Seoul is the chief concern of all who really care

for the welfare of Korea. The local magistrates must be reformed, or the

well-nigh hopeless task of reforming the corrupt Court at Seoul would be,

if it could be accomplished, of little value to the nation. And if it

becomes necessary, in order to effect this reform, and so to bring about

the redemption, industrially, educationally, morally and religiously, of

the people of the country, then the “iron hand” which rules them from

Seoul must be either gloved or broken in pieces. But, in truth, the idol

at Seoul which the Koreans worship is an image of clay.

In Korea with Marquis Ito · 第 4 / 19 章