Would not you fain know what this angel looked like? I have always

grievously wanted, from childhood upwards, to know that; and

gleaned diligently every word written by people who said they had

seen angels: but none of them ever tell me what their eyes are like,

or hair, or even what dress they have on. We dress them, in pictures,

conjecturally, in long robes, falling gracefully; but we only continue

to think that kind of dress angelic, because religious young girls,

in their modesty, and wish to look only human, give their dresses

flounces. When I was a child, I used to be satisfied by hearing

that angels had always two wings, and sometimes six; but now nothing

dissatisfies me so much as hearing that; for my business compels me

continually into close drawing of wings; and now they never give me

the notion of anything but a swift or a gannet. And, worse still, when

I see a picture of an angel, I know positively where he got his wings

from--not at all from any heavenly vision, but from the worshipped

hawk and ibis, down through Assyrian flying bulls, and Greek flying

horses, and Byzantine flying evangelists, till we get a brass eagle,

(of all creatures in the world, to choose!) to have the gospel of

peace read from the back of it.

Therefore, do the best I can, no idea of an angel is possible to

me. And when I ask my religious friends, they tell me not to wish

to be wise above that which is written. My religious friends, let

me write a few words of this letter, not to my poor puzzled workmen,

but to you, who will all be going serenely to church to-morrow. This

messenger, formed as we know not, stood above the shepherds, and the

glory of the Lord lightened round them.

You would have liked to have seen it, you think! Brighter than the

sun; perhaps twenty-one coloured, instead of seven-coloured, and as

bright as the lime-light: doubtless you would have liked to see it,

at midnight, in Judæa.

You tell me not to be wise above that which is written; why, therefore,

should you be desirous, above that which is given? You cannot see the

glory of God as bright as the lime-light at midnight; but you may see

it as bright as the sun, at eight in the morning, if you choose. You

might, at least, forty Christmases since: but not now.

You know I must antedate my letters for special days. I am actually

writing this sentence on the second December, at ten in the morning,

with the feeblest possible gleam of sun on my paper; and for the

last three weeks the days have been one long drift of ragged gloom,

with only sometimes five minutes' gleam of the glory of God, between

the gusts, which no one regarded.

I am taking the name of God in vain, you think? No, my religious

friends, not I. For completed forty years, I have been striving to

consider the blue heavens, the work of His fingers, and the moon

and the stars which He hath ordained: but you have left me nothing

now to consider here at Denmark Hill, but these black heavens, the

work of your fingers, and the blotting of moon and stars which you

have ordained; you,--taking the name of God in vain every Sunday,

and His work and His mercy in vain all the week through.

"You have nothing to do with it--you are very sorry for it--and Baron

Liebig says that the power of England is coal?"

You have everything to do with it. Were you not told to come out and

be separate from all evil? You take whatever advantage you can of the

evil work and gain of this world, and yet expect the people you share

with, to be damned, out of your way, in the next. If you would begin

by putting them out of your way here, you would perhaps carry some of

them with you there. But return to your night vision, and explain to

me, if not what the angel was like, at least what you understand him

to have said,--he, and those with him. With his own lips he told the

shepherds there was born a Saviour for them; but more was to be told:

"And suddenly there was with him a multitude of the heavenly host."

People generally think that this verse means only that after one angel

had spoken, there came more to sing, in the manner of a chorus; but

it means far another thing than that. If you look back to Genesis you

find creation summed thus:--"So the heavens and earth were finished,

and all the host of them." Whatever living powers of any order, great

or small, were to inhabit either, are included in the word. The host

of earth includes the ants and the worms of it; the host of heaven

includes,--we know not what;--how should we?--the creatures that are

in the stars which we cannot count,--in the space which we cannot

imagine; some of them so little and so low that they can become flying

poursuivants to this grain of sand we live on; others having missions,

doubtless, to larger grains of sand, and wiser creatures on them.

But the vision of their multitude means at least this; that all the

powers of the outer world which have any concern with ours became

in some way visible now: having interest--they, in the praise,--as

all the hosts of earth in the life, of this Child, born in David's

town. And their hymn was of peace to the lowest of the two hosts--peace

on earth;--and praise in the highest of the two hosts; and, better

than peace, and sweeter than praise, Love, among men.

The men in question, ambitious of praising God after the manner

of the hosts of heaven, have written something which they suppose

this Song of Peace to have been like; and sing it themselves,

in state, after successful battles. But you hear it, those of

you who go to church in orthodox quarters, every Sunday; and will

understand the terms of it better by recollecting that the Lordship,

which you begin the Te Deum by ascribing to God, is this, over all

creatures, or over the two Hosts. In the Apocalypse it is "Lord,

All governing"--Pantocrator--which we weakly translate "Almighty";

but the Americans still understand the original sense, and apply it so

to their god, the dollar, praying that the will may be done of their

Father which is in Earth. Farther on in the hymn, the word "Sabaoth"

again means all "hosts" or creatures; and it is an important word

for workmen to recollect, because the saying of St. James is coming

true, and that fast, that the cries of the reapers whose wages have

been kept back by fraud, have entered into the ears of the Lord of

Sabaoth; that is to say, Lord of all creatures, as much of the men

at St. Catherine's Docks as of Saint Catherine herself, though they

live only under Tower-Hill, and she lived close under Sinai.

You see, farther, I have written above, not "good will towards men,"

but "love among men." It is nearer right so; but the word is not easy

to translate at all. What it means precisely, you may conjecture best

from its use at Christ's baptism--"This is my beloved Son, in whom I

am well-pleased." For, in precisely the same words, the angels say,

there is to be "well-pleasing in men."

Now, my religious friends, I continually hear you talk of acting for

God's glory, and giving God praise. Might you not, for the present,

think less of praising, and more of pleasing Him? He can, perhaps,

dispense with your praise; your opinions of His character, even

when they come to be held by a large body of the religious press,

are not of material importance to Him. He has the hosts of heaven to

praise Him, who see more of His ways, it is likely, than you; but you

hear that you may be pleasing to Him, if you try:--that He expected,

then, to have some satisfaction in you; and might have even great

satisfaction--well-pleasing, as in His own Son, if you tried. The

sparrows and the robins, if you give them leave to nest as they choose

about your garden, will have their own opinions about your garden;

some of them will think it well laid out,--others ill. You are not

solicitous about their opinions; but you like them to love each

other; to build their nests without stealing each other's sticks,

and to trust you to take care of them.

Perhaps, in like manner, if in this garden of the world you would leave

off telling its Master your opinions of Him, and, much more, your

quarrelling about your opinions of Him; but would simply trust Him,

and mind your own business modestly, He might have more satisfaction

in you than He has had yet these eighteen hundred and seventy-one

years, or than He seems likely to have in the eighteen hundred and

seventy-second. For first, instead of behaving like sparrows and

robins, you want to behave like those birds you read the Gospel from

the backs of,--eagles. Now the Lord of the garden made the claws of

eagles for them, and your fingers for you; and if you would do the

work of fingers, with the fingers He made, would, without doubt,

have satisfaction in you. But, instead of fingers, you want to have

claws--not mere short claws, at the finger-ends, as Giotto's Injustice

has them; but long claws that will reach leagues away; so you set to

work to make yourselves manifold claws,--far-scratching;--and this

smoke, which hides the sun and chokes the sky--this Egyptian darkness

that may be felt--manufactured by you, singular modern children of

Israel, that you may have no light in your dwellings, is none the

fairer, because cast forth by the furnaces, in which you forge your

weapons of war.

A very singular children of Israel! Your Father, Abraham, indeed,

once saw the smoke of a country go up as the smoke of a furnace;

but not with envy of the country.

Your English power is coal? Well; also the power of the Vale of Siddim

was in slime,--petroleum of the best; yet the Kings of the five cities

fell there; and the end was no well-pleasing of God among men.

Emmanuel! God with us!--how often, you tenderly-minded Christians, have

you desired to see this great sight,--this Babe lying in a manger? Yet,

you have so contrived it, once more, this year, for many a farm in

France, that if He were born again, in that neighbourhood, there would

be found no manger for Him to lie in; only ashes of mangers. Our clergy

and lawyers dispute, indeed, whether He may not be yet among us; if not

in mangers, in the straw of them, or the corn. An English lawyer spoke

twenty-six hours but the other day--the other four days, I mean--before

the Lords of her Majesty's most Honourable Privy Council, to prove

that an English clergyman had used a proper quantity of equivocation

in his statement that Christ was in Bread. Yet there is no harm in

anybody thinking that He is in Bread,--or even in Flour! The harm is,

in their expectation of His Presence in gunpowder.

Present, however, you believe He was, that night, in flesh, to any

one who might be warned to go and see Him. The inn was quite full;

but we do not hear that any traveller chanced to look into the

cow-house; and most likely, even if they had, none of them would have

been much interested in the workman's young wife, lying there. They

probably would have thought of the Madonna, with Mr. John Stuart Mill,

('Principles of Political Economy,' 8vo, Parker, 1848, vol. ii., page

321,) that there was scarcely "any means open to her of gaining a

livelihood, except as a wife and mother;" and that "women who prefer

that occupation might justifiably adopt it--but, that there should

be no option, no other carrière possible, for the great majority of

women, except in the humbler departments of life, is one of those

social injustices which call loudest for remedy."

The poor girl of Nazareth had less option than most; and with her

weak "be it unto me as Thou wilt," fell so far below the modern

type of independent womanhood, that one cannot wonder at any degree

of contempt felt for her by British Protestants. Some few people,

nevertheless, were meant, at the time, to think otherwise of her. And

now, my working friends, I would ask you to read with me, carefully,

for however often you may have read this before, I know there are

points in the story which you have not thought of.

The shepherds were told that their Saviour was that day born to them

"in David's village." We are apt to think that this was told, as of

special interest to them, because David was a King.

Not so. It was told them because David was in youth not a King;

but a Shepherd like themselves. "To you, shepherds, is born this

day a Saviour in the shepherd's town;" that would be the deep sound

of the message in their ears. For the great interest to them in the

story of David himself must have been always, not that he had saved

the monarchy, or subdued Syria, or written Psalms, but that he had

kept sheep in those very fields they were watching in; and that his

grandmother [36] Ruth had gone gleaning, hard by.

And they said hastily, "Let us go and see."

Will you note carefully that they only think of seeing, not of

worshipping? Even when they do see the Child, it is not said that

they worshipped. They were simple people, and had not much faculty of

worship; even though the heavens had opened for them, and the hosts of

heaven had sung. They had been at first only frightened; then curious,

and communicative to the bystanders: they do not think even of making

any offering, which would have been a natural thought enough, as it

was to the first of shepherds: but they brought no firstlings of their

flock--(it is only in pictures, and those chiefly painted for the

sake of the picturesque, that the shepherds are seen bringing lambs,

and baskets of eggs). It is not said here that they brought anything,

but they looked, and talked, and went away praising God, as simple

people,--yet taking nothing to heart; only the mother did that.

They went away:--"returned," it is said,--to their business, and never

seem to have left it again. Which is strange, if you think of it. It

is a good business truly, and one much to be commended, not only in

itself, but as having great chances of "advancement"--as in the case

of Jethro the Midianite's Jew shepherd and the herdsman of Tekoa;

besides that keeper of the few sheep in the wilderness, when his

brethren were under arms afield. But why are they not seeking for some

advancement now, after opening of the heavens to them? or, at least,

why not called to it afterwards, being, one would have thought, as

fit for ministry under a shepherd king, as fishermen, or custom-takers?

Can it be that the work is itself the best that can be done by simple

men; that the shepherd Lord Clifford, or Michael of the Green-head

ghyll, are ministering better in the wilderness than any lords or

commoners are likely to do in Parliament, or other apostleship; so

that even the professed Fishers of Men are wise in calling themselves

Pastors rather than Piscators? Yet it seems not less strange that

one never hears of any of these shepherds any more. The boy who made

the pictures in this book for you could only fancy the Nativity,

yet left his sheep, that he might preach of it, in his way, all his

life. But they, who saw it, went back to their sheep.

Some days later, another kind of persons came. On that first day,

the simplest people of his own land;--twelve days after, the wisest

people of other lands, far away: persons who had received, what you

are all so exceedingly desirous to receive, a good education; the

result of which, to you,--according to Mr. John Stuart Mill, in the

page of the chapter on the probable future of the labouring classes,

opposite to that from which I have just quoted his opinions about the

Madonna's line of life--will be as follows:--"From this increase of

intelligence, several effects may be confidently anticipated. First:

that they will become even less willing than at present to be led,

and governed, and directed into the way they should go, by the mere

authority and prestige of superiors. If they have not now, still less

will they have hereafter, any deferential awe, or religious principle

of obedience, holding them in mental subjection to a class above them."

It is curious that, in this old story of the Nativity, the greater

wisdom of these educated persons appears to have produced upon them

an effect exactly contrary to that which you hear Mr. Stuart Mill

would have "confidently anticipated." The uneducated people came

only to see, but these highly trained ones to worship; and they have

allowed themselves to be led, and governed, and directed into the way

which they should go, (and that a long one,) by the mere authority

and prestige of a superior person, whom they clearly recognize as a

born king, though not of their people. "Tell us, where is he that is

born King of the Jews, for we have come to worship him."

You may perhaps, however, think that these Magi had received a

different kind of education from that which Mr. Mill would recommend,

or even the book which I observe is the favourite of the Chancellor

of the Exchequer--'Cassell's Educator.' It is possible; for they were

looked on in their own country as themselves the best sort of Educators

which the Cassell of their day could provide, even for Kings. And

as you are so much interested in education, you will, perhaps, have

patience with me while I translate for you a wise Greek's account of

the education of the princes of Persia; account given three hundred

years, and more, before these Magi came to Bethlehem.

"When the boy is seven years old he has to go and learn all about

horses, and is taught by the masters of horsemanship, and begins to

go against wild beasts; and when he is fourteen years old, they give

him the masters whom they call the Kingly Child-Guiders: and these are

four, chosen the best out of all the Persians who are then in the prime

of life--to wit, the most wise man they can find, and the most just,

and the most temperate, and the most brave; of whom the first, the

wisest, teaches the prince the magic of Zoroaster; and that magic is

the service of the Gods: also, he teaches him the duties that belong

to a king. Then the second, the justest, teaches him to speak truth

all his life through. Then the third, the most temperate, teaches him

not to be conquered by even so much as a single one of the pleasures,

that he may be exercised in freedom, and verily a king, master of all

things within himself, not slave to them. And the fourth, the bravest,

teaches him to be dreadless of all things, as knowing that whenever

he fears, he is a slave."

Three hundred and some odd years before that carpenter, with his

tired wife, asked for room in the inn, and found none, these words

had been written, my enlightened friends; and much longer than that,

these things had been done. And the three hundred and odd years

(more than from Elizabeth's time till now) passed by, and much fine

philosophy was talked in the interval, and many fine things found out:

but it seems that when God wanted tutors for His little Prince,--at

least, persons who would have been tutors to any other little prince,

but could only worship this one,--He could find nothing better than

those quaint-minded masters of the old Persian school. And since then,

six times over, three hundred years have gone by, and we have had a

good deal of theology talked in them;--not a little popular preaching

administered; sundry Academies of studious persons assembled,--Paduan,

Parisian, Oxonian, and the like; persons of erroneous views carefully

collected and burnt; Eton, and other grammars, diligently digested; and

the most exquisite and indubitable physical science obtained,--able,

there is now no doubt, to extinguish gases of every sort, and explain

the reasons of their smell. And here we are, at last, finding it still

necessary to treat ourselves by Cassell's Educator,--patent filter of

human faculty. Pass yourselves through that, my intelligent working

friends, and see how clear you will come out on the other side.

Have a moment's patience yet with me, first, while I note for you one

or two of the ways of that older tutorship. Four masters, you see,

there were for the Persian Prince. One had no other business than to

teach him to speak truth; so difficult a matter the Persians thought

it. We know better,--we. You heard how perfectly the French gazettes

did it last year, without any tutor, by their Holy Republican

instincts. Then the second tutor had to teach the Prince to be

free. That tutor both the French and you have had for some time back;

but the Persian and Parisian dialects are not similar in their use of

the word "freedom"; of that hereafter. Then another master has to teach

the Prince to fear nothing; him, I admit, you want little teaching

from, for your modern Republicans fear even the devil little, and

God, less; but may I observe that you are occasionally still afraid

of thieves, though as I said some time since, I never can make out

what you have got to be stolen.

For instance, much as we suppose ourselves desirous of beholding this

Bethlehem Nativity, or getting any idea of it, I know an English

gentleman who was offered the other day a picture of it, by a good

master,--Raphael,--for five-and-twenty pounds; and said it was too

dear: yet had paid, only a day or two before, five hundred pounds

for a pocket-pistol that shot people out of both ends, so afraid of

thieves was he. [37]

None of these three masters, however, the masters of justice,

temperance, or fortitude, were sent to the little Prince at

Bethlehem. Young as He was, He had already been in some practice

of these; but there was yet the fourth cardinal virtue, of which,

so far as we can understand, He had to learn a new manner for His

new reign: and the masters of that were sent to Him--the masters of

Obedience. For He had to become obedient unto Death.

And the most wise--says the Greek--the most wise master of all,

teaches the boy magic; and this magic is the service of the gods.

My skilled working friends, I have heard much of your magic

lately. Sleight of hand, and better than that, (you say,) sleight of

machine. Léger-de-main, improved into léger-de-mécanique. From the

West, as from the East, now, your American and Arabian magicians attend

you; vociferously crying their new lamps for the old stable lantern

of scapegoat's horn. And for the oil of the trees of Gethsemane,

your American friends have struck oil more finely inflammable. Let

Aaron look to it, how he lets any run down his beard; and the wise

virgins trim their wicks cautiously, and Madelaine la Pétroleuse, with

her improved spikenard, take good heed how she breaks her alabaster,

and completes the worship of her Christ.

Christmas, the mass of the Lord's anointed;--you will hear of devices

enough to make it merry to you this year, I doubt not. The increase

in the quantity of disposable malt liquor and tobacco is one great

fact, better than all devices. Mr. Lowe has, indeed, says the Times

of June 5th, "done the country good service, by placing before it,

in a compendious form, the statistics of its own prosperity.... The

twenty-two millions of people of 1825 drank barely nine millions

of barrels of beer in the twelve months: our thirty-two millions now

living drink all but twenty-six millions of barrels. The consumption of

spirits has increased also, though in nothing like the same proportion;

but whereas sixteen million pounds of tobacco sufficed for us in

1825, as many as forty-one million pounds are wanted now. By every

kind of measure, therefore, and on every principle of calculation,

the growth of our prosperity is established." [38]

Beer, spirits, and tobacco, are thus more than ever at your command;

and magic besides, of lantern, and harlequin's wand; nay, necromancy if

you will, the Witch of Endor at number so and so round the corner, and

raising of the dead, if you roll away the tables from off them. But of

this one sort of magic, this magic of Zoroaster, which is the service

of God, you are not likely to hear. In one sense, indeed, you have

heard enough of becoming God's servants; to wit, servants dressed

in His court livery, to stand behind His chariot, with gold-headed

sticks. Plenty of people will advise you to apply to Him for that sort

of position: and many will urge you to assist Him in carrying out His

intentions, and be what the Americans call helps, instead of servants.

Well! that may be, some day, truly enough; but before you can be

allowed to help Him, you must be quite sure that you can see Him. It is

a question now, whether you can even see any creature of His--or the

least thing that He has made,--see it,--so as to ascribe due worth,

or worship to it,--how much less to its Maker?

Fors Clavigera (Volume 1 of 8) Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great Britain · 第 13 / 14 段