If there is anywhere a royal road to learning, it is the fifty-mile-long

one which meanders up the Santa Clara Valley, for there are more

schoolhouses scattered along it than there are milestones, and they’re

not the little red schoolhouses of which our grandfathers brag, either.

Every time our motor-car swung around the corner of a prune orchard we

were pretty certain to find a schoolhouse of concrete, usually in the

overworked mission style of architecture, with roses and honeysuckle and

wistaria clambering over the door. The youngster who wants to travel the

royal road to knowledge can commence his journey in one of the concrete

schoolhouses at Gilroy, which is at the southern portal of the valley;

the second stage will take him up to the great high school at San José,

which is so extensive and handsome and completely equipped that it would

make certain famous Eastern colleges feel shamefaced and embarrassed; the

final stage along this intellectual highway is only eighteen miles in

length and ends at Palo Alto, amid whose live-oaks rise the yellow towers

and red-tiled roofs of that great university which Leland Stanford,

statesman and railway builder, founded in memory of the son he lost,

and which he endowed with the whole of his enormous fortune. He gave

the eight thousand acres of his famous stock-farm for the purpose, and

to-day white-gowned “co-eds” wander, book in hand, where the paddocks

once stood, and spike-shod sprinters dash down the track, where the great

mare Sunol used to put close on half a mile a minute behind her spinning

sulky wheels. It is one of the great universities of the world, is Leland

Stanford, Jr., and, with its cloistered quadrangles, its wonderful mosaic

façades, and its semitropical surroundings, certainly one of the most

beautiful. It stands, fittingly enough, at the valley’s northern gateway

and at the end, both literally and metaphorically, of the royal road to

learning; so that the valley-bred youth who passes through its doors with

his sheepskin in his pocket finds himself on the threshold of that great

outside world for which, without leaving his native valley, he has been

admirably prepared.

Speaking of roads, they have built one running the length of the State

and, therefore, of the Santa Clara Valley, which would cause Mr. John

MacAdam, were he still in the land of the living, to lift his hat in

admiration. It is really a restoration of El Camino Real, that historic

highway which the Spanish conquistadores built, close on a century and

a half ago, for the purpose of linking up the one-and-twenty missions

which the indefatigable Padre Serra flung the length of California as

outposts of the church, and which did more to open up the Pacific Coast

to civilisation and colonisation and commerce than any undertaking save

the construction of the Southern Pacific. Were this highway in the East I

am perfectly sure that they would cheapen it by calling it the Shore Road

or the State Pike, but it speaks well for California’s appreciation of

the picturesque and the appropriate that she has decided to cling to the

historic name of El Camino Real—the Royal Road—the King’s Highway.

Although the Santa Clara Valley, properly speaking, ends at Palo Alto,

the ultrafashionable colonies of Burlingame, San Mateo, and Hillsboro

may, for the purposes of this chapter, at least, be considered as within

its compass. These are to the Pacific Coast what Lenox and Tuxedo are

to the Eastern world of fashion: places where the rich dwell in great

country houses set far back in splendid parks, with none but their fellow

millionaires for neighbours and with every convenience for sport close at

hand. Full of colour and animation are the scenes at their ivy-covered

stations when the afternoon trains from San Francisco pull in; for here,

at least, the motor-car has not ousted the horse from his old-time

popularity, and the gravelled driveways are alive with tandem carts and

runabouts and spider phaetons, with smart grooms in whipcord liveries and

leather gaiters standing rigidly at the heads of the horses. Probably

the finest examples of architecture in California are to be seen in the

neighbourhood of Burlingame and San Mateo, the only other communities

which can rival them in this respect being Montecito, near Santa Barbara,

Oak Knoll, outside of Pasadena, and Hollywood, a suburb of Los Angeles.

The East and, for that matter, all of the rest of America owe

California a debt of gratitude for her development of a native domestic

architecture. The first true homes for folk of real culture but moderate

incomes were produced on the Pacific Coast. In the type of house that

abounds to-day in California comfort, tradition, and art have been

skilfully and interestingly combined. Based on the old missions, which

in their turn drew inspiration from the ideals of the Spaniard and the

Moor, modern Californian architecture has nevertheless made servants, not

masters, of those traditions. Though drawing from the romantic background

of the conquistadores and the _padres_ the sturdy spirit, the simple

lines, and the practical details of the old frontier buildings, the

main virtue of these Californian homes is that they possess a definite

relation to the soil and climate and the habits of the people. But,

though back of each design lurks the motive of the Spanish missions,

there is no monotony, no sameness; but, on the contrary, a remarkable

variety of design. Each possesses the characteristic features of the

Californian home: the low, wide-spreading roof lines, the solid walls,

generally of concrete or plaster, the frank use of structural beams,

the luxurious spaces of veranda and balcony, the tiled terraces and

pottery roofs, the cool, inviting patios, and the quiet loveliness of

the interiors. It is true, of course, that many house-builders have been

unable to resist the temptation of Colonial, Norman, Dutch, and Tudor,

but, as their culture increases, Californians are fast realising that an

architecture designed for inhospitable climates is utterly incongruous in

California’s semitropical surroundings.

It rained one of the days that I spent in San José, and my genial host

was so apologetic about it that I actually felt sorry for him. Though

rain is seldom unwelcome in a horticultural country, the residents

don’t like to have it come down in bucketfuls when visitors whom they

are anxious to impress with the perfection of their climate are around.

They are as proud of their climate in the Santa Clara Valley as a boy

is of “his first long pants,” and to back up their boasts the residents

carry in their pockets the blue slips of the Government Weather Bureau’s

monthly reports to show the stranger. I’m not fond of figures, unless

they happen to be on cheques drawn in my favour, but I was impressed by

the fact, nevertheless, that in 1913 the valley had only fifty-eight

cloudy days, sixty-four which were overcast, and two hundred and

thirty-four in which there was not a cloud to dim the turquoise of the

sky. Carrying my investigations a little further, I found that during the

greater part of February, which is the coldest month of the year, the

mercury remained above 55, only four times dropping as low as 33, while

there were only four days in August when the thermometer needle crept up

to 79, and once in the same month it fell as low as 42, thus giving a

solar-plexus blow to the idea stubbornly held by most Easterners that in

summer California is an anteroom to Hades.

To this unvarying geniality of the climate and to the careless,

happy-go-lucky, pleasure-loving strain handed down from the Spanish and

Argonaut pioneers are due the invincible gaiety and the passionate love

for the out-of-doors which are among the most likeable characteristics

of the Californians. One of the first things that strikes an Eastern

visitor is the fact that the Californians can always find time for

amusement, and they enter into those amusements with the enthusiasm and

the whole-souled gaiety of children. On the Pacific Coast recreation is

considered quite as important as business—and business does not suffer,

either. There is about these Californian merrymakings an abandon, a

joyousness, a childlike freedom from restraint which is in striking

contrast to the restrained, self-conscious pleasures of the older, colder

East. To the colourful _fiestas_ of the Spanish and Mexican eras may be

traced the out-of-door festivities which play so large a part in the life

of the people on the Pacific Coast, such as the midwinter Tournament of

Roses at Pasadena, the Portola Festival with which the San Franciscans

celebrate the discovery of San Francisco Bay, the Feast of the Blossoms

held each spring in the Santa Clara Valley, the Battle of Flowers which,

until very recently, was a feature of life at Santa Barbara, but which,

for some unexplainable reason, has been abandoned, the Rose Festival at

Portland, the Potlatch at Seattle. Under much the same category are the

classic plays given in the wonderful Greek Theatre at the University

of California, the sylvan masks produced by the colony of authors and

artists at Carmel-by-the-Sea, and the Bohemian Club’s celebrated Grove

Play.

No account of Californian festivals is in any way complete without at

least a brief description of the last named, which is characterised

by a beauty of production and a dignity of treatment that make it in

many respects an American Bayreuth. For forty years the Bohemian Club

of San Francisco has gone into the California redwoods each summer for

a fortnight’s outing. This famous club, founded in 1872 by a coterie

of actors, newspaper men, and artists, now has a membership of upward

of thirteen hundred, representing all that is best in the art, music,

literature, drama, and science of the West. No one may become a member

who has not achieved a distinction of sorts in one of these fields, the

anticommercial spirit which animates the club being aptly expressed by

the quotation at the top of its note-paper: “Weaving spiders come not

here.” The Bohemian Grove, which consists of about three hundred acres

of forest and contains some of the finest redwood giants in California,

stands on the banks of the Russian River, ninety miles to the north of

San Francisco. The stately redwoods stand in a gentle ravine whose

floor and slopes in the rainless midsummer are bright with the canvas

of the club encampment, which resembles a sort of sylvan Durbar; for

the camps, many of which are elaborately arranged and furnished, are

made of canvas in the gayest colours—scarlet and white, green and white,

blue and yellow—with flags and banners and gorgeous Oriental lanterns

everywhere. Here, during the first two weeks in every August, congregate

close on a thousand men who have done things—authors of “best sellers,”

builders of bridges and dams and lighthouses and aqueducts, painters

whose pictures hang on the line at the Paris Salon or on the walls of

the Luxembourg, composers of famous operas, writers of plays which have

made a hit on Broadway, presidents of transcontinental railway systems,

celebrated singers, men who have penetrated to the remotest corners of

the earth—wearing the dress of the woods, calling each other “Bill” or

“Jim” or “Harry” as the case may be, and becoming, for the time being,

boys once more. A steep side of the ravine forms the “back-drop” of the

forest stage, the spectators—no woman has ever taken part in the play

or witnessed an original performance—sitting on redwood logs under the

stars. The Grove Play is an evolution from a simpler programme, which was

originally known as “High Jinks.” It is now a serious composition, with

music, largely symbolical in character, created entirely by members of

the club, in which many artists of international fame have taken part,

always in the amateur spirit.

But to return to our Valley of the Santa Clara. In the Panhandle of

Texas a ranch usually means anywhere from five thousand acres upward

of uncultivated land; in the Santa Clara a ranch means anywhere from

five acres upward of the most highly cultivated soil in the world. East

of the Sierra Nevada, where scientific fertilisation and intensive

cultivation are still wearing short dresses, five acres are scarcely

worth considering, but five acres in California, properly planted and

cared for, ofttimes supports a family in something akin to luxury. I had

pointed out to me in the Santa Clara Valley at least a score of small

holdings which yield their owners annually in the neighbourhood of five

hundred dollars an acre. All of these hardy pioneers have telephones and

electric lights and electric power for pumping and daily newspaper and

mail deliveries. When they have any business in town, instead of going

down to the corral and roping a bronco, they either stroll through the

orchard and hail an electric car or they crank up the family automobile.

While I was in the Santa Clara Valley I asked a number of those questions

to which every prospective home seeker wants to know the answers. I

found that improved land, planted to prune, apricot, or peach trees old

enough to bear, can be had all the way from four hundred to seven hundred

dollars an acre, according to its location. At a conservative estimate

this land, so I was told by a banker whose business it is to lend

money on it (and you can trust a banker for never being oversanguine),

can be depended upon to yield an income of from one hundred to three

hundred dollars an acre, it being by no means an unusual thing for a

well-managed ranch to pay for itself in two or three years. I found

that a ten-acre orchard—which is quite large enough for one man to

handle—could be had for five thousand dollars, the purchaser paying,

say, two thousand dollars down and carrying the balance on a mortgage

at seven per cent, which is the legal rate of interest in California.

The local building and loan associations would lend him two thousand

dollars to build with, which he could repay, at the rate of twenty-four

dollars a month, in ten years. Two thousand dollars, I might add, will

build an extremely attractive and comfortable six-room bungalow, for the

two chief sources of expense to the Eastern home builder—cellars and

furnaces—are not necessary in California. Such a place, provided its

owner has horse sense, is not afraid of work, and knows good advice when

he hears it, should yield from fifteen hundred to two thousand dollars a

year, in addition to which the whole family can find ready employment,

at excellent wages, in the orchards or packing-houses during the fruit

season. For this work a man receives from two dollars to two dollars and

a half a day and can count on fairly steady employment through at least

eight months of the year, while many women and girls, whose deft fingers

make them particularly valuable in the work of wrapping and packing

the finer grades of fruit, can earn as high as twenty dollars a week

during the busy season. This work, I might add, attracts an altogether

exceptional class of people, for university and high-school students and

the wives and daughters of small ranchers eagerly avail themselves of

this opportunity to add to their incomes, the fruit orchards, during the

picking season, looking less like a hive of workers than like a gigantic

picnic among the shaded orchard rows, in which the whole countryside is

taking part.

The air in the Santa Clara Valley is said to be the clearest in the

world, though they tell you exactly the same thing at Colorado Springs,

and in the Grand Cañon of Arizona, and at Las Vegas, N. Mex. The Santa

Clara air is clear enough, however, for all practical purposes. In fact,

its extraordinary clarity sometimes lends itself to extraordinary uses. I

have a friend whose residence is set on a hillside high on the valley’s

eastern rim. One day, idly scanning the distant landscape through his

field-glasses, he noted that the field hands employed on the ranch of a

neighbour on the opposite hillside, twenty odd miles away, knowing that

they could not be observed by their employer, were loafing in the shade

instead of working. My friend called up his neighbour by telephone and

told him that his men were soldiering, whereupon that gentleman rode up

the hillside and gave his astonished employees such a tongue-lashing that

when the six-o’clock whistle blew that night they had blisters on their

hands.

Lack of labour is one of the most serious problems with which the

fruit-growers of California have had to contend, though it is believed

that this will be remedied, in some measure at least, by the flood of

European immigration which will pour through the Panama Canal. Twenty

years ago the labour problem was solved by the Chinaman, who was the most

industrious and dependable labourer California has ever had, but with the

agitation which resulted in closing our doors to the Celestial most of

the Chinese in California entered domestic service and now command such

high wages—fifty dollars a month is the average wage of a Chinese house

boy or cook—that only the well-to-do can afford to employ them. Time

and again I have heard clear-headed Californians of all classes assert

that the admission, under certain restrictions, of a hundred thousand

selected Chinese would prove an unqualified blessing for California. The

relentless war waged by California—or, rather, by the labour element

of California—against the admission of Chinese immigrants was based on

the difference in the standard of living. The yellow man could live in

something very akin to luxury on about a tenth of the ration required for

a white man’s support. In other words, the Chinaman could outstarve the

white man; therefore the Chinaman must go. And there has never been any

one to take his place.

Outside of the Pacific Coast the impression seems to prevail that the

Chinaman’s place has been taken by the Japanese. This is not so. To

begin with, Japanese labour is not cheap labour. The Japanese do not

work for less pay than white men, unless it be temporarily, so as

to obtain the white man’s job. Japanese house cleaners and gardeners

demand and receive a minimum wage of thirty-five cents an hour, and

in California, where most people of modest means are compelled to do

their own housework because of the scarcity of and exorbitant wages

demanded by domestic servants, housewives are thankful to get Japanese

by the day at any price. Their standard of living is as high as that of

other nationalities; much higher, in fact, than that of peoples from

southern Europe. There is no pauperism among them and astonishingly

little crime. They dress well, eat well, spend money lavishly for

entertainment. But the Jap, unlike the Chinaman, “talks back.” He is not

in the least impressed by the American’s claim of racial superiority.

In fact, he considers himself very much better than the white man and,

if the opportunity presents itself, does not hesitate to say so. He is

patronising instead of patronised. He has proved that he is the white

man’s equal in every line of industry and in some his superior. Three

times in succession a Japanese grower has virtually cornered the potato

crop of the Pacific Coast. The Japanese has driven the Greek and the

Portuguese out of the fishing industry, in which they believed that they

were impregnably intrenched. As a result of these things he steps off the

sidewalk for no one. He knows that back of him stands a great empire,

with a powerful fleet and one of the most efficient armies in existence,

and he takes no pains to disguise this knowledge in his relations with

the white man.

To tell the truth, the prohibition of land ownership, the segregation of

school children are but pretexts put forward by a jealous and resentful

white population to teach the yellow man his place. The assertion that

Japanese ownership of land is a menace to white domination is the veriest

nonsense, and every Californian knows it. There are ninety-nine million

acres in California and of this area the Japanese own or lease barely

thirty thousand acres, or _twelve hundredths of one per cent_. The

fifty-eight thousand Japanese in California form but two and one half per

cent of the total population. These figures, which are authoritative,

are not very menacing, are they? The bulk of the Japanese reside in

Los Angeles County and in the delta of the Sacramento and San Joaquin

Rivers, where they work gigantic potato fields and truck-gardens and

asparagus beds. Now, Los Angeles, mind you, has never demanded Japanese

exclusion. Protests poured into Sacramento from the white settlers of

the delta country against the passage of the anti-alien land laws. Why,

then, you ask, does the entire Pacific Coast, including British Columbia,

exhibit such intense dislike for the Jap? Because, as I have said, he

has shown that he can beat the white man at his own game; because he is

not in the least meek and humble as befits an alien and “inferior” race;

because he believes in his heart that in an armed conflict Nippon could

whip the United States as thoroughly as she whipped China and Russia;

because, as a result of this belief, he perpetually swaggers about

with his hat cocked on one side and a chip perched invitingly on his

shoulder; because, in short, his very manner is a constant irritation to

the Californians. And until the status of the Japanese upon the Pacific

Coast is definitely and finally established by international treaty this

irritation may be expected to continue and to increase.

* * * * *

I wonder if sometimes, at that sunset hour when the lengthening shadows

of the hills fall athwart the blossoming orchards, there do not

wander through the Santa Clara those whom the eyes of mortals cannot

see—Portola, swart of face under his steel cap, come back to feast his

eyes once more, from the top of yonder hill, on that fertile valley

which he was the first white man to see; Father Serra, mild-mannered

and gentle-voiced, trudging the dusty highroad in his sandals and

woollen robe, pausing to kneel in prayer as the bells boom out the

Angelus from that mission which he founded; Captain Jedediah Smith, the

first of the pathfinders, a strange and romantic figure in his garb of

fringed buckskin, leaning on his long rifle as he looks down on the

homesteads of the thousands who followed by the trail he blazed across

the ranges; Stanford, who linked the oceans with twin lines of steel,

pacing the campus of that great seat of learning which he conceived and

built—guardian spirits, all, of that valley for which they did so much

and which they loved so well.

VIII

THE MODERN ARGONAUTS

“For once you’ve panned the speckled sand and seen the bonny dust,

Its peerless brightness blinds you like a spell;

It’s little else you care about; you go because you must,

And you feel that you could follow it to hell.

You’d follow it in hunger, and you’d follow it in cold;

You’d follow it in solitude and pain;

And when you’re stiff and battened down let some one whisper ‘Gold,’

You’re lief to rise and follow it again.”

VIII

THE MODERN ARGONAUTS

I once knew an Englishman and his wife who were possessed with a mania

for things Egyptian. Some people were unkind enough to say that they

were “dotty” on the subject, but that was an exaggeration. They knew all

there was to know about Egyptian customs from the days of Amenhotep to

those of Abbas Hilmi; they had delved in the sand-smothered ruins across

the river from Luxor; they could converse as fluently in the degraded

patois of the native coffee-houses as in the classic Arabic spoken at the

University of El Azhar. Their chief regret in life was that they had not

been born Egyptians. Their names were—but never mind; it is enough to say

that they had coronets on their visiting cards and owned more fertile

acres in Devonshire than an absentee landlord has any right to possess.

Whenever they came to Cairo, which they did regularly at the beginning

of the cold weather, they could never be induced to take the comfortable

motor-bus which the management of Shepheard’s Hotel thoughtfully provides

for its guests—at ten piastres the trip. Instead, they would wire ahead

to have a couple of camels meet them at the station, and, perched atop

of these ungainly and uncomfortable beasts, would amble down the Sharia

Kamel, which is the Fifth Avenue of Cairo, and dismount with great pomp

and ceremony in front of their hotel to the delectation of the tourists

assembled upon its terrace. I once asked them why they chose this

outlandish mode of conveyance when there were a score or so of perfectly

good taxicabs whose vociferously importunate drivers were only awaiting

a signal to push down their little red flags and set their taximeters

whirring.

The end of the trail · 第 12 / 28 段