VII. _Emancipation in Maryland: its difficulties._

If we are driven to the conclusion that Slavery in Maryland must

terminate, under the operation of tendencies now at work, it becomes a

matter of great importance to know something about the manner in which

so extensive a change is to be accomplished. Undoubtedly it will not

do to remain entirely passive on this subject. I am persuaded that the

general sentiment in Maryland is fixed in the conviction that Slavery,

here at least, is an evil, and that in some way or other it must be

removed.

There are two main difficulties which here present themselves.

In the first place the negroes amongst us, whether emancipated or

enslaved, must remain a distinct class, a servile class, separated from

the whites by differences of color, race and civilization.

In considering Slavery where such bars of separation between the

classes are not found, one may very well imagine how the system may

be changed without confusion or disorder; how the enslaved class,

gradually admitted to the privileges of freedom, may, after a while,

become incorporated with the general body of society; how, thus, all

distinctions may be finally destroyed, and how the power, resources,

and energy of the State may be vastly increased by the addition of

so much active material to her industrial and moral forces. In Rome

the sons of freedmen were citizens. Europe could alter her system of

Slavery which existed in the middle ages, and which still exists in

Poland, Hungary and Russia; she could admit her serfs to some of the

rights of citizens, though still withholding many of those rights;

she could do this without danger, because serfs and lords were of one

complexion, and of one race. The descendant of a peasant might himself

in time become a lord.

But when a servile population, emancipated, stands marked by its

peculiarities of race and color, so that it can not be drawn into

the social and political sphere, its position inevitably becomes

hostile. In the midst of the community, but not of it; the old bond of

connection ruptured, with no basis whatever upon which a new one can be

established--what but feelings of suspicion, of distrust, of aversion

and repugnance can prevail between the two classes so far removed and

so entirely dissimilar.

Nor can any thing be done by the superior class to elevate the

condition of the other; because that would be to strengthen an adverse

power. All efforts to improve an humble population must have reference

to their ultimate admission to a participation in social and political

rights. Of course this could not be contemplated for a moment in any

community where the number of the black population might be at all

considerable. And this brings me, without dwelling farther on this

point, to the second difficulty which has to be considered by us in

Maryland, in view of future emancipation.

When it was determined to abolish Slavery in Pennsylvania, the thing

could be done easily enough, because of the small number of slaves in

that commonwealth, in comparison with the bulk of the population. The

slaves were a mere handful. They could be set free in the midst of the

general community without the danger of their forming a large class

remaining distinct from the rest of the population, to infect society

by their idleness, or to excite commotion by the rivalry of their labor

with that of the whites. It made no great difference in the social

condition of Pennsylvania, whether the negroes within her borders were

individually slaves or not. Their numbers were too small to affect the

general current of things one way or another.

But in Maryland the case is otherwise. It would be a serious business

to set free as large a slave population as we have, and leave them

floating among us with a careless disregard of the future. The black

population of Maryland is about one third of the whole population. In

1840 it amounted to 151,556; the white population numbered 316,011. In

an aggregate population, then, of 467,567 the blacks number 151,556.

Of these the slaves are about ninety thousand; the free blacks, about

sixty thousand.

The question, it may be said, relates not to the aggregate number of

the black population, but only to the slave portion. Sixty thousand

and more are free already; emancipation would affect only the ninety

thousand.

The latter number would be sufficient to make it a serious business.

But in fact the matter relates to the whole number. For emancipation

would make them all of one class as they are now of one race--would add

the ninety thousand to the sixty thousand and upwards, constituting

altogether a vast heterogeneous element in the social sphere which

could not be assimilated, and which would be too great to remain

unassimilated without great disorder.

No; the moment the interests of this race are disintegrated from those

of the whites, the two will come into collision, and the weaker must be

sacrificed. The only safety of the black is in the swallowing up of his

personality--the merging of himself and his being, in the overpowering

existence of the master race.

Why will not those who call themselves the friends of the black people

think of this?

The ninety thousand slaves of Maryland have now protectors; these

slaves constitute part and parcel of a great interest which their

masters represent. Set them free, and where will they find protectors?

They will not be able to protect themselves; for their freedom would

give them no participation in the political franchise--nor would such

participation avail them if it were given.

In the competition which arises now between slave labor and free white

labor in our slaveholding counties, the latter is obliged to give

way--because the slave and the master are of one interest, and that

the predominant interest. The laboring white man removes; or, if he

remains, he succumbs to the overpowering force, and, though conscious

of the degradation, he submits to it.

But if the slave is separated from the master and left to stand alone,

then is he not only deprived of the support which upheld him, but the

very power which protected is now turned against him; the stamp of his

race is upon him; he is isolated. Cut off from the sympathies of the

whites, without any part or lot in the political life of the State,

forming no part of the frame work of society, he is like a parasite

plant torn from the stock to which it clung. The slaveholding interest

is no more; where is the slave-protecting interest to spring up?

The competition between white labor and that of the blacks, Slavery

being abolished, would now assume a new appearance. The negroes

would have none to befriend them; every white laborer, actually or

prospectively a voter, would bring with him into the competition the

whole force of his connection with the social and political system.

Apart from this, the value of white labor would be greater than that of

negro labor, in almost any pursuit. The conflict of this competition

might be dangerous to domestic peace; it might prove suddenly

destructive to the race which sooner or later it would inevitably

overwhelm.

The danger of disturbances of tranquillity would arise from the large

mass of the black population amongst us. In the northern States the

negroes are too few to come into competition with the whites; yet even

in those States a hostile feeling is indulged towards them. Witness

the outbreaks in Philadelphia and Cincinnati a few years ago. Here in

Maryland the collision between the two classes of laborers would be

more violent than any which has yet taken place elsewhere. The influx

of foreign laborers, German and Irish, with their superior efficiency,

would add continually to the force pressing upon the negroes. Recollect

that the latter form nearly one-third of our population; and then

consider the probable fate of that multitude of defenceless beings,

aliens in the community, with an active enemy bent on rooting them out,

no sympathies in their favor, no interest to support them, but with

every prejudice of society turned against them.

Again, passing by these certain provocations of disturbance, the

presence of so large a body of free negroes in the State would render

necessary a series of restrictive laws. At this time our legislation

is thought to be very severe towards the free colored people. It is

painful to contemplate the extremes to which our police severities

might be obliged to go in the event of an act of emancipation.

I have used the term “free negroes,” to distinguish the emancipated

blacks from the slaves. But the distinction is scarcely worth a

difference so far as servitude is concerned. The emancipated negro can

not emerge from a servile condition; it is impossible that he should do

so in this country, while the distinctions of race and color remain.

If Slavery were abolished in Maryland, the negroes amongst us would

be slaves to the social system, instead of slaves to individuals; the

restrictions of the laws would be more hard than the control of a

master.

In view, then, of the real facts of our position, as it relates to

our black people, what ought to be our chief concern? To hasten

emancipation? No: that will come at any rate; it may come too soon.

The main thing is to see how we can provide for it so that the new

relations it will bring may be productive of good and not of evil to

both races.

This, then, is the great matter; the public mind should be turned

to it seriously and at once. Maryland has no precedent to follow.

Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, New England had none of her

difficulties. They could emancipate and leave results to take care

of themselves; or they might have refrained from emancipation with

pretty nearly equal indifference. No strong, deeply rooted slaveholding

interest could ever have grown up in those States; for the same reasons

which prevent any such from fastening itself upon western Maryland and

western Virginia. Slavery never could have become ingrained in the

fibre and texture of the communities north of us, as it has grown into

ours. Hence while the putting of it off by them was a mere rejection

of something uncongenial with the system, it will be with us a serious

alterative process to root out a constitutional malady which has crept

into the blood, and blended itself with the very springs of life.

If we should rush precipitately upon emancipation, and rest with that

as though it were every thing--let us see what would come of that. One

hundred and fifty thousand black people, deprived of the guardianship

and control of masters, the bonds of domestic relationship which

united them with the community being rent asunder, and that identity

of interest gone which secured them a definite and harmonious, though

humble sphere in the social organism--shall they be left to the mercy

of stringent laws and police restrictions, and have the life worried

out of them by the incessant fretting of petty persecutions? Poor

unfortunates, thrust forth out of the pale of communion to maintain a

separate existence, with no foundation to rest it upon, with no element

of social or political life wherewith to nourish it, with nothing to

cling to, nothing to be engrafted upon, an existence without entity,

miserable, forlorn, who could be so unfeeling as not to commiserate

their condition! Nor would it be the slowly wasting process of petty

persecutions which they would have alone to encounter. Day by day the

pressure of competition would become more and more grievous, driving

them from every avocation in which they could hope to find employment.

Forced from the city into the country, they would be compelled to seek

refuge from the country in the obscure alleys of the city. I have

alluded to the riots in Cincinnati and Philadelphia a few years ago,

the causes of which are too well known. In the city of New York, if

my information is correct, negroes are excluded from cab driving and

similar occupations. If such things are seen in communities where the

number of blacks is comparatively small, what might not be expected in

a community where the blacks are so numerous as they are in ours?

It may be here remarked that so long as Slavery remains a prominent

institution in a State, its influence upon labor, and upon the

estimation in which labor is held, has the effect of protecting the

class of free negroes to a considerable extent from the competition,

and its results, of white labor. The slaveholding interest is the

bulwark of the whole colored race; it stands between them and

destruction. Here in Baltimore there are no ordinances excluding free

negroes from particular occupations. The competition of white labor,

however, mostly Irish and German, has driven the free negroes from many

sorts of employment on Fell’s Point, especially from the wharves and

coal yards. If Slavery were abolished and the slaveholding interest

extinct, the whole force of an irresistible competition would come

directly upon the colored people, and would overwhelm them utterly.

When we are considering emancipation, therefore, we must consider

other things also, if we would be mindful of our duty as having in

charge a docile inoffensive class, whose fate depends so much upon our

conduct towards them.

One other thing remains to be here mentioned before we pass to the

next and last division of the subject. In the event of emancipation,

if we trust to the action of our domestic policy to drive the black

population into other parts of the Union, it must be borne in mind that

the reactive policy of our neighbor States, both north and south, will

be immediately operative to repel the influx of blacks, likely to be

poured upon them from Maryland. Can it be supposed that Pennsylvania

will open her arms to receive the exiles rejected from our bosom? Ohio

has already raised the barrier of exclusion as against Kentucky. The

slaveholding States will not take our expelled negroes. We could not

expect that; for Maryland at this moment will not take the free negroes

of any other State.

Our condition, then, will be one of isolation, to such a degree, at

least, as to throw us wholly upon our own energies. In other words, if

we emancipate we must not expect to slough off the results upon other

States. We must confront them ourselves; we must meet them on our own

soil, and manage them as best we may. It is probable, however, that

an act of prospective emancipation would induce some slaveholders to

emigrate with their slaves to the south-west; and in this way there

would be some diminution of the mass of the colored population.

Slavery in Maryland briefly considered · 第 10 / 35 题