LETTER I.

DODON, March 12th, 1845.

DEAR SIR,--A short time before the October election, I heard some one

say that it was your intention to devote much of your time, should

you be elected to the House of Delegates, to the subject of the black

population of our State, and to promote, if possible, measures for

their gradual emancipation. It gave me, a slaveholder and citizen of

Maryland, infinite pleasure to hear it; and it was with the deepest

regret I learned soon after that you were not returned to the house.

If I have been correctly informed, I beg leave to say I honor you for

your sentiment, and I hope you will not allow so good a resolution to

die, but will kindle it anew, and seek some other equally practical

means of bringing this subject fully and fairly before the public. It

is one that has long occupied much of my thoughts, and I have watched

anxiously for some one to show his hand in this cause. At this moment

my attention has been more distinctly called to it, by the manly,

high-minded letter of Mr. C. M. Clay, addressed to the people of

Kentucky. There is not a sentiment or a political principle expressed

by him to his fellow citizens that does not with equal force apply

to our noble little State, and every prediction applies _to us_ as

forcibly as it does to them. The time has come, there can be no doubt

of it, to take the needful steps; slaveholders themselves are anxious

for it, and will not be displeased to see the subject _fairly_ taken

into consideration. I have been a planter for five years, and have had

an opportunity of discussing these points with slaveholders of all

parties, and I do not remember a single instance in which objection

was made to the principle of emancipation; some difference, it is

true, exists as to the manner and time, but none as to the necessity.

Heretofore this whole subject has been wrapt in a mystery, as imposing

as the secrets of Free Masonry, and no one, not a member of the order

of slaveholders, has been allowed to open his mouth and say any thing

about it; it is a dangerous question--it is an exciting subject--it

is a matter that belongs to slaveholders themselves--have been the

usual and repeated injunctions laid upon all who honestly and humanely

have desired to inquire into the merits and demerits of this cause. Is

this as it should be? Is it the course that should be pursued by an

educated people, who have at command the means to defend the truth and

expose error? Certainly not. If our State is laboring under an evil,

let the cause and nature of the malady be investigated, and then let

us apply the remedy. If, on the contrary, none can be shown to exist,

at least _agitation_ will receive a check that will be grateful to all

lovers of peace and order. Firmly convinced that such a course will be

displeasing to but few, and that it may promote the general welfare of

Maryland, I beg leave to propose to you the establishment of a paper

devoted to the cause of Emancipation in our State, on the principles of

policy, humanity, and self-interest. I know no one to whom so delicate

a subject could be so safely confided as yourself. Your popularity

as an editor, your established character for sound doctrine and

moderation, are all guarantees for the judicious and successful conduct

of such an undertaking, and, for my own part, I have not the least

doubt of its ultimate success. It would be idle in me to suggest to

you any particulars on this subject; I doubt not it has passed through

your brain long since, and received a due share of your consideration.

I shall therefore conclude, by begging you to excuse the liberty I have

taken in addressing you on so slight a personal acquaintance, and by

hoping, if I am premature in what I have said, that you will impute it

solely to the strong feelings I entertain upon this interesting matter.

With great respect, I remain

Your obedient servant,

R. S. STEWART.

JOHN L. CAREY, ESQ., _Baltimore_.

Slavery in Maryland briefly considered · 第 3 / 35 题