TRAVELLING IN ENGLAND.

I suppose that the history of travelling in this country, from the

Creation to the present time, may be divided into four periods--those

of no coaches, slow coaches, fast coaches, railways. Whether balloons,

or rockets, or some new mode which as yet has no name, because it has

no existence, may come next, I cannot tell, and it is hardly worth

while to think about it; for, no doubt, it will be something quite

inconceivable.

The third, or fast-coach period was brief, though brilliant. I doubt

whether fifty years have elapsed since the newest news in the world of

locomotive fashion was, that--to the utter confusion and defacement of

the "Sick, Lame, and Lazy," a sober vehicle so called from the nature

of its cargo, which was nightly disbanded into comfortable beds at

Newbury--a new post-coach had been set up which performed the journey

to Bath in a single day. Perhaps the day extended from about five

o'clock in the morning to midnight, but still the coach was, as it

called itself, a "_Day_-coach," for it travelled all day; and if it

did somewhat "add the night unto the day, and so make up the measure,"

the passengers had all the more for their money, and were incomparably

better off as to time than they had ever been before. But after this

many years elapsed before "old Quicksilver" made good its ten miles

an hour in one unbroken trot to Exeter, and was rivalled by "young

Quicksilver" on the road to Bristol, and beaten by the light-winged

Hirondelle, that flew from Liverpool to Cheltenham, and troops of

others, each faster than the foregoing, each trumpeting its own fame

on its own improved bugle, and beating time (all to nothing) with

sixteen hoofs of invisible swiftness. How they would have stared if

a parliamentary train had passed them, especially if they could have

heard its inmates grumbling over their slow progress, and declaring

that it would be almost quicker to get out and walk whenever their

jealousy was roused by the sudden flash of an express.

Certainly I was among those who rejoiced in the increased expedition

of the fast-coach period; not because I loved, but because I hated,

travelling, and was glad to have periods of misery abridged. I used to

listen with delight to the stories of my seniors, and to marvel that

in so short a space of time so great an improvement had been made. One

friend told me that in earlier life he had travelled from Gloucester

to Hereford in a coach, which performed the journey of about thirty

miles between the hours of five in the morning and seven in the

evening. I took it for granted that they stopped on the road to dine,

and spent a long afternoon in smoking, {34} napping, or playing at

bowls. But he would not acknowledge anything of the kind, and the

impression on his mind was that they kept going (such going as it

was), except during the time necessarily expended in baiting the

horses, who, I think, were not changed--unless indeed it were from bad

to worse by fatigue. Another friend, a physician at Sheffield, told me

that one of the first times (perhaps he may have said, the first) that

a coach started for London, he was a passenger. Without setting out

unreasonably early in the morning, or travelling late at night they

made such progress, that the first night they lay at Nottingham, and

the second at Market Harborough. The third morning they were up early,

and off at five o'clock; and by a long pull and a strong pull through

a long day, they were in time to hear Bow Church clock strike eleven

or twelve (I forget which) as they passed through Cheapside. In fact

such things have always seemed to me to be worth noting, for you never

can tell to what extent, or even in what direction, they may throw

some little ray of light on an obscure point of history. On this

principle I thought it worth while to copy an original bill which

lately fell into my hands. Many such have been reprinted, but I am

not aware that this one has; and as what is wanted is a series, every

little may help. It is as follows:--

"YORK Four Dayes

"Stage-Coach

"Begins on Monday the 18 of March 1678.

"All that are desirous to pass from London to York, or return from

York to London or any other Place on that Road; Let them Repair to

the Black Swan in Holborn in London and the Black Swan in Cony-Street

in York.

"At both which places they may be received in a Stage-Coach every

Monday, Wednesday and Friday, which performs the whole journey in

Four days (if God permit) and sets forth by Six in the Morning.

"And returns from York to Doncaster in a Forenoon, to Newark in a day

and a half, to Stamford in Two days, and from Stamford to London in

Two days more.

/ Henry Moulen

"Performed by < Margaret Gardner

\ Francis Gardner."

But I cannot deny that, while I have listened to, and rejoiced in,

these stories, I have had some doubt whether full justice has been

done to the other side of the question. I have always felt as if I had

a sort of guilty knowledge of one contradictory fact, which I learned

between twenty and thirty years ago, and which no one whom I have yet

met with has been able to explain. For this reason I am desirous to

lay it before you and your readers.

Just one hundred years ago--that is to say, on Sunday, the 10th of

August, 1749--two German travellers landed at Harwich. The principal

one was Stephen Schultz, who travelled for twenty years through

various parts of Europe, Asia, and Africa, in the service of the

Callenberg Institution at Halle, of which he was afterwards Director,

being at the same time Pastor of St. Ulrich's Church in that city,

where his picture is (or was about twenty years ago) to be seen

affixed to the great pillar next the organ. It represents him as an

elderly divine in a black cap, and with a grave and prediger-like

aspect; but there is another likeness of him--an engraved print--in

which he looks more like a Turk than a Christian. He is dressed in a

shawl turban, brickdust-red mantle, and the rest of the costume which

he adopted in his Eastern travels. Our business, however, is with his

English adventures, which must, I think, have astonished him as much

as anything that he met with in Arabia, even if he acted all the

Thousand and One Nights on the spot. As I have already said, he and

his companion (Albrecht Friedrich Woltersdorf, son of the Pastor of

St. George's Church in Berlin), landed at Harwich on Sunday, August

10. They staid there that night, and on Monday they walked over

to Colchester. There (I presume the next morning) they took the

"Land-Kutsche," and were _barely six hours_ on the road to London.

This statement seems to me to be so at variance with notorious facts,

that, but for one or two circumstances, I should have quietly set it

down for a mistake; but as I do not feel that I can do this, I should

be glad to obtain information which may explain it. It is no error of

words or figures, for the writer expresses very naturally the surprise

which he certainly must have felt at the swiftness of the horses, and

the goodness of the roads. He was a man who had seen something of {35}

the world, for he had lived five-and-thirty years, thirteen of which

had elapsed since he began his travels. As a foreigner he was under

no temptation to exaggerate the superiority of English travelling,

especially to an extent incomprehensible by his countrymen; and, in

short, I cannot imagine any ground for suspecting mistake or untruth

of any kind.[1]

I have never been at Colchester, but I believe it is, and always was,

full fifty miles from London. Ipswich, I believe, is only eighteen

miles farther; and yet _fifteen years_ later we find an advertisement

(_Daily Advertiser_, Thursday, Aug. 30, 1764), announcing that London

and Ipswich Post Coaches on _steel springs_ (think of that, and think

of the astonished Germans careering over the country from Colchester

without that mitigation), from London to Ipswich in _ten hours_ with

Postillions, set out every morning at seven o'clock, Sundays excepted,

from the Black Bull Inn, in Bishopsgate Street.

It is right, however, to add that the Herr Preniger Schultz and his

companion appear to have returned to Colchester, on their way back to

Germany, at a much more moderate pace. The particulars do not very

exactly appear; but it seems from his journal that on the 16th of

September they dined with the Herr Prediger Pittius, minister of the

German Church in the Savoy, at twelve o'clock (_nach teutscher art_,

as the writer observes). They then went to their lodging, settled

their accounts, took up their luggage, and proceeded to the inn from

which the "Stäts-Kutsche" was to start; and on arriving there found

some of their friends assembled, who had ordered a meal, of which they

partook. How much time was occupied in all this, or when the coach set

out, does not appear; but they travelled the whole night, and until

towards noon the next day, before they got to Colchester. This is

rather more intelligible; but as to their up-journey I really am

puzzled, and shall be glad of any explanation.

Yours, &c.

Notes and Queries, Number 03, November 17, 1849 · 第 3 / 54 题