FELLOW-CITIZENS, FRIENDS OF FREEDOM:--

Grateful for this cordial welcome, I must consider it offered, not to

myself, but to the cause, whose humble representative I am. It is the

cause, the good old cause of Freedom, so familiar to early echoes of

this hall, which justly awakens your regards, irrespective of men. We

are nothing; the cause is everything.

And why, in this nineteenth century, are we assembled here in Faneuil

Hall, to vow ourselves to Freedom? Because Freedom is now in danger.

The principles of our fathers, of Washington, Franklin, and Jefferson,

nay, the self-evident truths of the Declaration of Independence, are

assailed. Our Constitution, which was the work of Freedom-loving men,

which was watched by Freedom's champions, which, like the Ark of the

Covenant, was upborne by the early patriarchs of our Israel, is now

prostituted to the uses of Slavery. A body of men, whose principle of

union was unknown to the authors of the Constitution, have seized the

government, and caused it to be administered, not in the spirit of

Freedom, but in the spirit of Slavery. This combination is known as the

Slave Power.

The usurpation has obtained sway in both the great political factions.

I say _factions_; for what are factions, but combinations whose

sole cement is selfish desire for place and power, in disregard of

principles? Whatever may be said of individuals belonging to these

opposing combinations, it would be difficult to say whether Whigs

or Democrats, in their recent conduct as national parties, had most

succumbed to this malign influence. The late Conventions held at

Baltimore and Philadelphia were controlled by it. At Baltimore the

delegation of the most important State in the Union, known to be in

favor of the Wilmot Proviso, was refused admission to the Convention.

At Philadelphia the Wilmot Proviso itself was stifled, amidst cries of

"Kick it out!" General Cass was nominated at Baltimore, pledged against

its whole principle. At Philadelphia, General Taylor, without any

pledge on this all-important question, was forced upon the Convention

by the Slave Power; nor were principles of any kind declared by this

body of professing Whigs. These two candidates, apparently representing

opposite parties, both concur in being representatives of Slavery.

They are but leaders of the two contending factions into which the

Slave Power is divided. And this was fully proved by the action of the

Conventions at Baltimore and Philadelphia.

In marked contrast was the recent Convention at Buffalo, where were

represented the good men of all the parties,--Whigs, Democrats, and

Liberty men,--forgetting alike all former differences, and uniting in

common opposition to the Slave Power. There, by their delegates, was

the formidable and unsubdued Democracy of New York; there also was the

devoted, inflexible Liberty party of the country; there, too, were the

true-hearted Whigs and Democrats of all the Free States, who in this

great cause of Freedom are, among the faithless, faithful found; there

likewise were welcome delegates from the Slave States, from Maryland

and Virginia, anxious to join in this new and holy alliance. In

uncounted multitude, mighty in numbers, mightier still in the harmony

and unity of their proceedings, this Convention consummated the object

for which it was called. It has presented to the country a platform of

principles, and _candidates who are the exponents of these principles_.

The representatives of the parties there assembled, Whigs, Democrats,

and Liberty men, all united. In the strength and completeness of

this union I am reminded of the Mississippi, Father of Rivers, where

the commingling waters of the Missouri and Ohio are lost in a broad,

united, irresistible current, descending in one channel to the sea.

The principles which caused this union are already widely received,

and will be proclaimed by this vast assembly. Look at them. They are

frankly and explicitly expressed. They were solemnly and deliberately

considered by a large committee, and enthusiastically adopted in the

Convention. They propose not only to guard the Territories against

Slavery, but to relieve the National Government from all responsibility

therefor everywhere within the sphere of its constitutional powers.

On the subject of Slavery they adopt substantially the prayer of

Franklin, who by formal petition called upon the first Congress under

the Constitution to "step to the very verge of the power vested in

them _for discouraging_ every species of traffic in the persons of our

fellow-men."[272] They propose to bring back the government to the

truths of the Declaration of Independence and to the principles of the

fathers, so that it shall be administered no longer in the spirit of

Slavery, but in the spirit of Freedom.

[272] Annals of Congress, 1st Cong. 2d Sess., 1198.

Other important subjects received attention: cheap postage for the

people; retrenchment of the national patronage; the abolition of

unnecessary offices; the election of civil officers by the people in

all practicable cases; improvement of rivers and harbors; free grant

to actual settlers of the public lands; and, lastly, payment of the

national debt by means of a tariff. But these matters are all treated

as subordinate to the primal principle of opposition to Slavery and

the Slave Power. No longer will banks and tariffs occupy the foremost

place, and, sounding always with the chink of dollars and cents, give

their tone to the policy of the country. Henceforward PROTECTION TO

MAN will be the true AMERICAN SYSTEM.

The candidates selected as exponents of these principles have claims

upon your support, in forgetfulness of all former differences of

opinion. They were brought forward, not because of _the Past_, but

_the Present_; I may add, they were sustained by many persons in the

Convention _notwithstanding_ the Past: Martin Van Buren, the New York

Democrat, and Charles Francis Adams, the Massachusetts Whig. But these

designations can no longer denote different principles. Those to whom

they are applied, whether Democrat or Whig, concur in making opposition

to Slavery and the Slave Power the paramount principle of political

action. The designations may now be interchanged: Mr. Adams may be

hailed as a New York Democrat, and Mr. Van Buren as a Massachusetts

Whig.

Many here, once connected with the Whig party, like myself, have

voted on former occasions against Mr. Van Buren, and regard some

portions of his career with anything but satisfaction. Mr. Adams is a

younger man; but there are some, doubtless, once connected with the

Democratic party, who have voted against him. These differences, and

the prejudices they have engendered, are all forgotten, absorbed, and

lost in entire sympathy with their present position. Time changes,

and we change with it. He has lived to little purpose, whose mind and

character continue, through the lapse of years, untouched by these

mutations. It is not for the Van Buren of 1838 that we are to vote,

but for the Van Buren of _to-day_,--the veteran statesman, sagacious,

determined, experienced, who, at an age when most men are rejoicing

to put off their armor, girds himself anew, and enters the lists as

champion of Freedom. Putting trust in the sincerity and earnestness of

his devotion to the cause, and in his ability to maintain it, I call

upon you, as you love Freedom, and value the fair fame of your country,

now dishonored, to render him your earnest and enthusiastic support.

Of Mr. Adams I need say nothing in this place, where his honorable

and efficient public service and his private life are so familiar.

Standing, as I now do, beneath the images of his father and

grandfather, it will be sufficient, if I say that he is heir not only

to their name, but to the virtues, the abilities, and the indomitable

spirit that rendered that name so illustrious.

Such are our principles, and such our candidates. We present them

fearlessly. Upon the people depends whether their certain triumph

shall be immediate or postponed: for triumph they must. The old and

ill-compacted party organizations are broken, and from their ruins is

now formed a new party, _The Party of Freedom_. There were good men who

longed for this, and died without the sight. John Quincy Adams longed

for it. William Ellery Channing longed for it. Their spirits hover over

us, and urge us to persevere. Let us be true to the moral grandeur of

our cause. Have faith in Truth, and in God, who giveth the victory.

Fellow-citizens, seeing the spirit which animates your faces, I am

tempted to exclaim, that the work is already done to-night,--that the

victory is achieved. But I would not lull you to the repose which

springs from too great confidence. Rather would I arouse you to renewed

and incessant exertion. A great cause is staked upon your constancy:

for, except you, where among us would Freedom find defenders?

The sentiment of opposition to the Slave Power, to the extension of

Slavery, and to its longer continuance, wherever under the Constitution

the National Government is responsible for it, though recognized by

individuals, and adopted by a small and faithful party, is now for the

first time the leading principle of a broad, resolute, and national

organization. It is, indeed, as Mr. Webster lately said, no new idea;

it is old as the Declaration of Independence. But it is an idea now for

the first time proclaimed by a great political party: for, if the old

parties had been true to it, there would have been no occasion for our

organization. It is said, our idea is sectional. How is this? Because

the slaveholders live at the South? As well might we say that the

tariff is sectional, because the manufacturers live at the North.

It is said that we have but one idea. This I deny. But admitting that

it is so, are we not, with our one idea, better than a party with no

ideas at all? And what is our one idea? It is the idea which combined

our fathers on the heights of Bunker Hill,--which carried Washington

through a seven years' war,--which inspired Lafayette,--which with

coals of fire touched the lips of Adams, Otis, and Patrick Henry. Ours

is an idea at least noble and elevating; it is an idea which draws in

its train virtue, goodness, and all the charities of life, all that

makes earth a home of improvement and happiness.

"Her track, where'er the goddess roves,

Glory pursue, and generous Shame,

The unconquerable Mind, and Freedom's holy flame."

We found now a new party. Its corner-stone is Freedom. Its broad,

all-sustaining arches are Truth, Justice, and Humanity. Like the

ancient Roman Capitol, at once Temple and Citadel, it shall be the fit

shrine for the genius of American institutions.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 02 (of 20) · 第 87 / 98 题