AMERICAN VICTIMS.

Thus far I have followed the efforts of European nations, and the

struggles of European victims of White Slavery. I pass now to America,

and to our own country. In the name of fellow-countryman there is a

charm of peculiar power. The story of his sorrows will come nearer

to our hearts, and, perhaps, to the experience of individuals or

families among us, than the story of distant Spaniards, Frenchmen, or

Englishmen. Nor are materials wanting.

In earliest days, while the Colonies yet contended with savage Indians,

families were compelled to mourn the hapless fate of brothers, fathers,

and husbands doomed to slavery in distant African Barbary. Five years

after the landing at Plymouth, a returning ship, already "shot deep

into the English Channel," was "taken by a Turks man-of-war and carried

into Sallee, where the master and men were made slaves," while a

consort ship with Miles Standish aboard narrowly escaped this fate.[89]

In 1640, "one Austin, a man of good estate," returning discontented

to England from Quinipiack, now New Haven, on his way "was taken by

the Turks, and Austin and his wife and family were carried to Algiers,

and sold there for slaves."[90] Under date of 1671, in the diary of

Rev. John Eliot, first minister of Roxbury and devoted apostle to the

Indians, prefixed to the records of the church in that town, and still

preserved in manuscript, these few words tell a story of sorrow: "We

heard the sad and heavy tidings concerning the captivity of Captain

Foster and his son at Sallee." From further entries it appears

that they were redeemed after a bondage of three years. The same

record shows other victims for whom the sympathies of the church and

neighborhood were enlisted. Here is one: "20 10 1674. This Sabbath we

had a public collection for Edward Howard, of Boston, to redeem him out

of his sad Turkish captivity, in which collection was gathered 12_l._

18_s._ 9_d._ which by God's favor made up the just sum desired." Not

long after, at a date left uncertain, it appears that William Bowen

"was taken by the Turks"; a contribution was made for his redemption,

"and the people went to the public box, young and old, but, before the

money could answer the end for which the congregation intended it,"

tidings came of the death of the unhappy captive, and the contribution

was afterwards "improved to build a tomb for the town to inter their

ministers."[91] Money collected for emancipation built the tomb of the

Roxbury ministers.

[89] Morton, New England's Memorial, p. 62.

[90] Winthrop's Journal, Vol. II. p. 12.

[91] Records of First Church in Roxbury, MS.

Instances now thicken. A ship, sailing from Charlestown, in 1678, was

taken by a corsair, and carried into Algiers, whence its passengers and

crew never returned. They probably died in slavery. Among these was

Daniel Mason, a graduate of Harvard University, and the earliest of

that name on the Catalogue; also, James Ellson, the mate. The latter,

in a testamentary letter to his wife, dated at Algiers, June 30, 1679,

desires her to redeem out of captivity two of his companions.[92] At

the same period, William Harris, a person of consequence in the Colony,

an associate of Roger Williams in the first planting of Providence,

and now in the sixty-eighth year of his age, sailing from Boston for

England on public business, was also taken by a corsair and carried

into Algiers. On the 23d February, 1679, this veteran,--older than the

slaveholder Cato, when he learned Greek,--together with all the crew,

was sold into slavery. The fate of his companions is unknown; but Mr.

Harris, after bearing his doom more than a year, was redeemed at the

cost of twelve hundred dollars, called by him "the price of a good

farm." The feelings of the Colony, touched by these disasters, are

concisely expressed in a private letter dated at Boston, November 10,

1680, where it is said: "The Turks have so taken our New England ships,

richly loaden, homeward bound, that it is very dangerous to goe. Many

of our neighbors are now in captivity in Argeer. The Lord find out some

way for their redemption!"[93] This prayer may be repeated still.

[92] Middlesex Probate Files, MS.

[93] William Gilbert to Arthur Bridge, MS.

In 1693 the subject found its way before the Governor and Council of

Massachusetts, on a petition from the relations of two inhabitants

"some time since taken by a Sallee man-of-war, and now under Turkish

captivity and slavery," for permission "to ask and receive the charity

and public contribution of well-disposed persons for redeeming them

out of their miserable suffering and slavery." The petition was granted

on the condition, "The money so collected to be employed for the end

aforesaid, unless the said persons happen to die before, make their

escape, or be in any other way redeemed; then the money so gathered to

be improved for the redemption of some others of this Province, that

are or may be in like circumstances, as the Governor and Council shall

direct."[94] Thus was the government of Massachusetts moved at that

early day to emancipation.

[94] Council Records, fol. 323. See Jackson _v._ Phillips, 14

Allen's Rep. 559.

Entering the next century, we meet a curious notice of a captive

Bostonian. Under date of Tuesday, January 11, 1714, Chief-Justice

Samuel Sewall, after describing in his journal a dinner with Mr.

Gee, and mentioning the guests, among whom were Increase and Cotton

Mather, adds: "It seems it was in remembrance of his landing this day

at Boston, after his Algerine captivity. Had a good treat. Dr. Cotton

Mather, in returning thanks, very well comprised many weighty things

very pertinently."[95] Among the many weighty things very pertinently

comprised by this eminent divine, it is hoped, was condemnation of

slavery. Surely, he could not then have shrunk from giving utterance to

that faith which preaches deliverance to the captive.

Leaving the imperfect records of colonial days, I descend at once to

that period, almost in the light of our own times, when our National

Government, justly careful of the liberty of its white citizens, was

aroused to put forth all its power. The war of the Revolution closed

with the acknowledgment of independence. The national flag, then

freshly unfurled, and hardly known to the world, had little power to

protect persons or property against outrages from the Barbary States.

Within three years no less than ten American vessels became their prey.

At one time an apprehension prevailed that Dr. Franklin was captured.

"We are waiting," said one of his French correspondents, "with the

greatest impatience to hear from you. The newspapers have given us

anxiety on your account, for some of them insist that you have been

taken by the Algerines, while others pretend that you are at Morocco,

enduring your slavery with all the patience of a philosopher."[96]

The property of our merchants was sacrificed. Insurance at Lloyd's in

London could be had only at advanced rates, while it was difficult to

obtain freight for American bottoms.[97] The Mediterranean trade was

closed against our enterprise. To a people filled with the spirit of

commerce, and bursting with new life, this in itself was disheartening;

but the sufferings of unhappy fellow-citizens, captives in a distant

land, awoke a feeling of a higher strain.

[95] Journal of Chief-Justice Samuel Sewall, MS.

[96] M. Le Veillard to Dr. Franklin, October 9, 1785: Sparks's

Franklin, Vol. X. p. 230.

[97] Boston Independent Chronicle, April 28, May 12, October 20,

November 3, November 17, 1785; March 2, April 27, 1786.

As from time to time these tidings reached America, a voice of horror

and indignation swelled through the land. The slave-corsairs of African

Barbary were branded sometimes as "infernal crews," sometimes as "human

harpies."[98] This sentiment acquired new force, when, at two different

periods, by the fortunate escape of captives, what seemed to be an

authentic picture of their condition was presented to the world. The

story of these fugitives shows the hardships of their lot, and was at

the bottom of the appeal soon made to the country with such effect.

[98] Ibid., May 18, 1786. Sparks's Franklin, Vol. IX. p. 507.

The earliest of these escapes was in 1788, by a person originally

captured in a vessel from Boston. It appears, that, on being carried

into Algiers, he, with the rest of the ship's company, was exposed

at public auction, whence he was sent to the country-house of his

purchaser. Here for eighteen months he was chained to the wheelbarrow,

and allowed only one pound of bread a day, during all which wretched

period he had no opportunity of learning the fate of his companions.

From the country he was removed to Algiers, where, in a numerous

company of white slaves, he encountered three shipmates and twenty-six

other Americans. After remaining for some time crowded together in the

slave-prison, they were all distributed among the different galleys

of the Dey. Our fugitive and eighteen other white slaves were put on

board a xebec, carrying eight six-pounders and sixty men, which, while

cruising on the coast of Malta, encountered an armed vessel of Genoa,

and, after much bloodshed, was taken, sword in hand. Eleven of the

unfortunate slaves, compelled to this unwelcome service in the cause

of a tyrannical master, were killed before the triumph of the Genoese

could deliver them from chains. Our countryman and the few remaining

alive were at once set at liberty, and, it is said, "treated with that

humanity which distinguishes the Christian from the barbarian."[99]

Such is the testimony.

[99] Boston Independent Chronicle, Oct. 16, 1788. History of the

War between the United States and Tripoli, pp. 59, 60.

This escape was followed the next year by others, achieved under

circumstances widely different. A ship from Philadelphia was captured

near the Western Islands and taken into Algiers. The crew of twenty-two

were doomed to bondage. The larger part were sent into the country

and chained to work with mules. Others were put on board a galley and

chained to the oars. The latter, tempted by facilities of position near

the sea, made attempts to escape, which, for a time, proved fruitless.

At last, love of freedom triumphing over suggestions of humanity, they

rose upon their overseers, killing some and confining others, then,

seizing a small galley of their masters, set sail for Gibraltar, where

in a few hours they landed as freemen.[100] Thus, by killing their

keepers and carrying off property not their own, did these fugitive

white slaves achieve their liberty.

[100] History of the War between the United States and Tripoli, pp.

62, 63. American Museum, 1790, Part II. Vol. VIII. Appendix IV. pp.

4, 5.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 02 (of 20) · 第 29 / 98 题