THE PANIC OF ’61—A VIRGINIA VACATION—MUTTERINGS OF COMING STORM

BAYARD TAYLOR said to me once of a publishing house, “An honest firm,

but one that has an incorrigible habit of _failing_!”

The habit was epidemic in the first half of 1861. Among others who

caught the trick were my publishers. Like a thunderbolt came the

announcement, when I was expecting my February semi-annual remittance

of fat royalties: “We regret to inform you that we have been compelled

to succumb to the stringency of the times.”

The political heavens were black with storm-clouds, and, as was

inevitable then, and is now, the monetary market shut its jaws tightly

upon everything within reach. We could not reasonably have expected

immunity, but we had. We had never known the pinch of financial

“difficulties.” Prudent salaried men are the last to feel hard times,

if their wage is paid regularly. I had three books in the hands of the

“failing” firm. All were “good sellers,” and I had come to look upon

royalties as my husband regarded his salary, as a sure and certain

source of revenue.

We had other and what appeared to us graver anxieties. My sister Alice

had passed the winter with us, and the climate had told unhappily upon

her throat. My husband had not escaped injury from the pernicious

sea-fogs and the malarial marshes, over which the breath of the

Atlantic flowed in upon us. He had a bronchial cough that defied

medical treatment; and March, the worst month of the twelve for tender

throats and susceptible lungs, would soon be upon us. His physician,

a warm personal friend, ordered him South, and the church seconded

the advice by a formal grant of an out-of-season vacation. We did not

change our main plan in consequence of the disappointment as to funds.

Nor did we noise our loss abroad. Somehow, the truth leaked out. Not a

word of condolence was breathed to us. But on the afternoon of the day

but one before that set for our departure, the daughter of a neighborly

parishioner dropped in to leave a basket of flowers, and to say that

her father and mother “would like to call that evening, if we were

to be at home.” I answered that we should be glad to see them, and

notified my husband of the impending call. The expected couple appeared

at eight o’clock, and by nine the parlors were thronged with guests

who “dropped in, in passing, to say ‘Good-bye.’” None stayed late, and

before any took leave, there was the presentation of a parcel, through

the hands of Edgar Farmer, a member of the Consistory, who, in days to

come, was to be to my husband as David to Jonathan. He was young then,

and of a goodly presence, with bright, kind eyes and a happy gift of

speech. Neither Mr. Terhune nor I had any misgivings of what was in

prospect, when he was asked to step forward and face the spokesman

deputed to wish us _Bon voyage_ and recovery of health in our old home.

Mr. Farmer said this felicitously, and with genuine feeling. Then he

asked the pastor’s acceptance of a parcel “containing reading-matter

for the journey.”

The reading-matter was bank-bills, the amount of which made us open

our eyes wide when the company had dispersed and we undid the ribbons

binding the “literature.”

That was their way of doing things in the “Old First.” A way they never

lost. In a dozen-and-a-half years we should have become used to it, but

we never did. Each new manifestation of the esteem in which they held

their leader, and of the royally generous spirit that interfused the

whole church, as it might the body and soul of one man, remained to the

last a fresh and delicious surprise.

Ten days out of the six weeks of our vacation were spent in Charlotte.

Mr. Terhune’s successor was Rev. Henry C. Alexander, one of a family

of notable divines whose praise is in all the Presbyterian churches.

He was a bachelor, and the “nest among the oaks” was rented to an

acquaintance. I did not enter it then, or ever again. I even looked

the other way when we drove or walked past the gate and grove. To let

this weakness be seen would have been ungracious, in the face of the

hospitalities enlapping us during every hour of our stay. We dined with

one family, supped with another, spent the night and breakfasted with

a third, and there was ever a houseful of old friends to meet us. My

husband wrote to his father:

“Swinging around the circle at a rate that would turn

steadier heads. And talk of the fat of the land and groaning

tables! These tables fairly _shriek_, and the fat flows like

a river. Heaven send we may live through it! We _like_ it,

all the same!”

And enjoyed every hour, albeit senses less agreeably preoccupied might

have detected the smell of gunpowder in the air.

I am often asked if we were not uneasy for the safety of the Union,

while in the thick of sectional wordy strife, and how it was possible

to enjoy visits when much of the talk must have jarred upon the

sensibilities of loyal lovers of that Union.

The truth is that I had been used to political wrangling from my youth

up. The fact that South Carolina and six other States had seceded

in name from the control of the Federal government; that, in every

county and “Cross-Roads” hamlet, from the Gulf of Mexico to Chesapeake

Bay, bands of volunteers were drilling daily and nightly, and that

cargoes of arms were arriving from the North and in distribution among

the enlisted militiamen; that the Southern papers sounded the tocsin

of war to the death, and “Death in the last ditch!” and “Down with

the Yankees!” with every red-hot issue; that a convention had been

solemnly summoned to meet in Richmond to decide upon the action of the

Old Dominion at the supreme moment of the nation’s destiny—weighed

marvellously little against the settled conviction, well-nigh sublime

in its fatuousness, that the right must prevail, and that such furious

folly must die ignominiously before the steadfast front maintained by

the Union men of the infected section.

To my apprehension, so much that we heard was sheer gasconade, amusing

for a time from its very unreason and illogical conclusions, and often

indicative of such blatant ignorance of the spirit and the resources of

the Federal government, that I failed to attach to it the importance

the magnitude of the mischief deserved to have.

I refused stubbornly to let the clear joy of my holiday be clouded by

the smoke from blank cartridges. So light was my spirit that I made

capital for fun of bombastic threats and gloomy predictions, touching

the stabling of Confederate cavalry in Faneuil Hall inside of three

months from the day of the inauguration of the “Springfield Ape” at

Washington. The Vice-President was a full-blooded negro, or, at the

least, a mulatto, I was assured over and over. Wasn’t his name damning

evidence of the disgraceful fact? What white man ever called his child

“Hannibal”?

Marion Harland's Autobiography: The Story of a Long Life · 第 80 / 109 题