THE RIGHT TO FULL SECURITY.

And this is not a theoretical question. It is a practical problem for

the national economy of Russia every year, and introduces a factor

of uncertainty into Russia’s national trading which is profoundly

detrimental to her prosperity. As sovereign of the Straits, Turkey not

only possesses the technical right of closing the Straits to shipping;

she exercises it in an arbitrary fashion. Three times the Straits have

been closed by Turkey within the last half-dozen years—during her war

with Italy, during the war with the Balkan States, and after the outbreak

of the European war at a date previous to the intervention of Turkey

herself in the struggle. It is possibly arguable that the closing was

necessary in each of these cases from a military point of view, to

safeguard Turkey’s political ownership of these “territorial waters.” But

if so, that is in itself the strongest argument for taking out of the

hands of an independent, irresponsible government a highway of commerce

the proper regulation of which is essential to the economic well-being

of the Russian and Rumanian peoples. Even if Turkey were a friendly,

steady-going State, the situation would hardly be tolerable; but

actually, whether through fault or misfortune, she has been at war more

often during the last century than any other State in the world, and her

hostility has been directed principally against Russia, the country most

vitally affected by the disturbance of the traffic through the Straits.

The closing of the Straits in the last instance, when Russia was at war

with Germany and was in urgent need of the importation of supplies, can

hardly be interpreted otherwise than as a hostile act—an anticipation

of the open war which Turkey made on Russia within the next few weeks.

To leave this economic weapon in Turkey’s hands at the peace settlement

would be impossible. By closing the Straits in any given year at the

precise moment when the Russian harvest was shipped and ready to sail,

and when the Russian importers had made their annual foreign purchases

on credit up to the full prospective value which the harvest would

realise in the markets of the world, Turkey could threaten Russia with a

financial crisis verging on national bankruptcy. _Full security and free

economic development_ for Russia would have vanished beyond the horizon,

and not only for Russia but for the whole world, for with such a trump

card in their hands, Turkey and her German patrons could never resist the

temptation of waging an economic “war after the war,” which might bring

Russia to her knees and enable them to realise those ambitions against

her which they have been unable to realise by force of arms.

"The Murderous Tyranny of the Turks" · 第 16 / 23 题