CHAPTER VII.

THE HIGHER EDUCATION.[1]

[1] A discourse pronounced at the Third Plenary Council of Baltimore,

which, being enforced by the offer of three hundred thousand dollars by

Miss Caldwell, led to the founding of the University at Washington.

The subject which I have been asked to treat is the higher education of

priests; which, I suppose, is the highest education of man, since the

ideal of the Christian priest is the most exalted, his vocation the

most sublime, his office the most holy, his duties the most spiritual,

and his mission--whether we consider its relation to morality, which is

the basis of individual and social welfare, or to religion, which is

the promise and the secret of immortal and godlike life--is the most

important and the most sacred which can be assigned to a human being.

Religion and education--like religion and morality--are nearly related.

Pure religion, indeed, is more than right education; and yet it may be

said with truth that it is but a part of the best education, for it

co-operates with other forces--with climate, custom, social conditions,

and political institutions--to develop and fashion the complete man;

and the special instruction of teachers--which is the narrow meaning of

the word--is modified, and to a great extent controlled, by these

powers which work unseen, and are the vital agents that make possible

all conscious educational efforts.

The faith we hold, the laws we obey, the domestic and social customs to

which our thoughts and loves are harmonized, the climate we live in,

mould our characters and give to our souls a deeper and more lasting

tinge than any school, though it were the best.

My subject, however, does not demand that I consider these general and

silent agencies by which life is influenced, but leads me to the

discussion of the methods by which man, with conscious purpose, seeks

to form and instruct his fellow-man; to the discussion of the special

education which brings art to the aid of nature, and becomes the

auxiliary and guide of the other forces which contribute to the

development of our being.

In this age, when all who think at all turn their thoughts to questions

of education, it is needless to call attention to the interest of the

subject, which, like hope, is immortal, and fresh as the innocent face

of laughing childhood.

Is not the school for all men a shrine to which their pilgrim thoughts

return to catch again the glow and gladness of a world wherein they

lived by faith and hope and love when round the morning sun of life the

golden purple clouds were hanging, and earth lay hidden in mist,

beneath which the soul created a new paradise? To the opening mind all

things are young and fair; and to remember the delight that accompanied

the gradual dawn of knowledge upon our mental vision, sweet and

beautiful as the upglowing of day from the bosom of night, is to be

forever thankful for the gracious power of education. And is there not

in all hearts a deep and abiding yearning for great and noble men, and

therefore an imperishable interest in the power by which they are

moulded? When fathers and mothers look upon the fair blossoming

children that cling to them as the vine wraps its tendrils round the

spreading bough, and when their great love fills them with ineffable

longing to shield these tender souls from the blighting blasts of a

cold and stormy world, and little by little to prepare them to stand

alone and breast the gales of fortune, do they not instinctively put

their trust in the power of education?

When, at the beginning of the present century, Germany lay prostrate at

the feet of Napoleon, the wise and the patriotic among her children

yielded not to despondency, but turned with confidence to truer methods

and systems of education, and assiduous teaching and patient waiting

finally brought them to Sedan.

When, in the sixteenth century, heresy and schism seemed near to final

victory over the Church, Pope Julius III. declared that the evils and

abuses of the times were the outgrowth of the shameful ignorance of the

clergy, and that the chief hope of the dawning of a brighter day lay in

general and thorough ecclesiastical education. And the Catholic

leaders who finally turned back the advancing power of Protestantism,

re-established the Church in half the countries in which it had been

overthrown, and converted more souls in America and Asia than had been

lost in Europe, belonged to the greatest educational body the world has

ever seen. What is history but examples of success through knowledge

and righteousness, and of failure through lack of understanding and of

virtue?

Wherein lies the superiority of civilized races over barbarians if not

in their greater knowledge and superior strength of character? And

what but education has placed in the hands of man the thousand natural

forces which he holds as a charioteer his well-reined steeds, bidding

the winds carry him to distant lands, making steam his tireless,

ever-ready slave, and commanding the lightning to speak his words to

the ends of the earth? What else than this has taught him to map the

boundless heavens, to read the footprints of God in the crust of the

earth ages before human beings lived, to measure the speed of light, to

weigh the imperceptible atom, to split up all natural compounds, to

create innumerable artificial products with which he transforms the

world and with a grain of powder marches like a conquering god around

the globe?

What converts the meaningless babbling of the child into the stately

march of oratoric phrase or the rhythmic flow of poetic language? What

has developed the rude stone and bronze implements of savage and

barbarous hordes into the miraculous machinery which we use? By what

power has man been taught to carve the shapeless rock into an image of

ideal beauty, or with it to build his thought into a temple of God,

where the soul instinctively prostrates itself in adoration?

Is not all this, together with whatever else is excellent in human

works, the result of education, which gives to man a second nature with

more admirable endowments? And is not religion itself a kind of

celestial education, which trains the soul to godlike life?

No progress in things divine or human is made by man except through

effort, and effort is the power and the law of education. The maxim of

the spiritual writers that not to struggle upward and onward is to be

drawn downward, applies to every phase of our life. Whence do we

derive strength of soul but from the uplifting of the mind and heart to

God which we call prayer? To pray is to think, to attend, to hold the

mind lovingly to its object; and this is what we do when we study.

Hence prayer, which is the voice of religion, is a part of

education,--nay, its very soul, breathing on all the chords of life,

till their thousand dissonances meet in rhythmic harmony. What is the

pulpit but the holiest teacher's chair that has been placed upon the

earth?

And as the presence of a noble character is a more potent influence

than words, so sacramental communion with Christ is man's chief school

of faith, of hope, and love. There are worthy persons who turn, as

from an unholy thought, from the emphatic announcement of the need of

the best human qualities for the proper defence of the cause of God in

the world. Such speech seems to them to be vain and unreal; for God is

all in all, and man is nothing. But in our day it is easier to go

astray in the direction of self-annihilation than in that of

self-assertion; since the common tendency now of all false philosophies

is pantheistic, and issues in unconscious contempt of individual life.

If man is but a bubble, merging forth and re-absorbed, without past or

future, then indeed both he, and what he seems to do, sink into the

eternal flow of matter, and are undeserving of a thought. This

certainly is not the Christian view, to which man is revealed as a

lesser god, and co-worker with the Eternal, whose thought can reach the

infinite, and whose will can oppose that of the Omnipotent. In Christ,

God co-operates with man for the salvation of the world; and in the

Church, man co-operates with God to this same end. The more complete

the man, the more fit is he to work with God. Even bodily

disfigurement is looked upon as an obstacle; how much more, then, shall

lack of intelligence and want of heart render us unworthy of the divine

office? I certainly shall never deny that love, which the Apostle

exalts above faith and hope, is higher also than knowledge. The light

of the mind is as that of the moon--fair and soft and soothing, without

heat, without the power to call forth and nourish life; but the light

of the soul, which is love, is the sunlight, whose kiss, like a word of

God, makes the dead to live, and clothes the world in strength and

beauty. Character is more than intellect, love is more than knowledge,

religion is more than morality; and a great heart brings us closer to

God, nearer to all goodness, than a bright mind. Education is

essentially moral, and the intellectual qualities themselves, which we

seek to develop, derive their chief efficacy from underlying ethical

qualities upon which they rest and from which they receive their energy

and the power of self-control. Inequality of will is the great cause

of inequality of mind; and the will is strengthened by the practice of

virtue, as the body by food and exercise. If this is a general truth,

with what special force must it not apply to the ministers of a

religion the paramount and ceaseless aim of which is to make men holy,

so that at times it has almost seemed as though the Church were

indifferent as to whether they are learned or beautiful or strong? She

pronounces no man a doctor unless he be also a saint; and when I insist

that the priest shall possess the best mental culture of his age,--that

without this he fights with broken weapons, speaks with harsh voice a

language men will neither hear nor understand, teaches truths which,

having not the freshness and the glow of truth, neither kindle the

heart nor fire the imagination,--I do not forget that, without the

moral earnestness which is born of faith and purity of life, mere

cultivation of mind will not give him power to unseal the fountains of

living waters which refresh the garden of God. The universal harmony

is felt by a pure heart better than it can be perceived by a keen

intellect. To a sinless soul the darker side even of life and nature

is not wholly dark, and the mental difficulties which the existence of

evil involves in no way weaken the consciousness of the essential

goodness that lies at the heart of all things. In the religious, as in

the moral world, men trust to what we are rather than to what we say,

and the teacher of spiritual truth is never strong, unless his life and

character inspire a confidence which arguments alone do not create; for

in questions that reach beyond the sphere of sensation, we feel that

insight is better than reasons, and hence we instinctively prefer the

testimony of a god-like soul to the conclusions of a cultivated mind:

and indeed our Blessed Lord ever assumes that the obstacle to the

perception of divine truth is moral and not intellectual. The pure of

heart see God; the evil-doer loves darkness and shuns the light. St.

Paul goes even farther, and associates mental cultivation with a

tendency directly opposed to religious faith, which is humble.

"Knowledge puffeth up." But the words of the Apostle should not be

stretched beyond his purpose, which is to point to pride as a special

danger of the intellectual as sensuality is a danger of the ignorant.

For man to have aught is to run a risk, and hence to do as little as

possible is in the thought of the timid a mark of prudence. And

indeed, if fear be nearer to wisdom than courage, then should we fear

everything, for danger is everywhere. A breath may sow the seed of

death; a look may slay the soul. In knowledge, in ignorance, in

strength, in weakness, in wealth, in poverty, in genius, in stupidity,

in company, in solitude, in innocence itself, danger lurks. But God

does not abolish life that danger may cease to be; and they who put

their trust in Him will not seek to darken the mind lest knowledge lead

man astray, but will rather in a righteous cause make the venture of

all things, as St. Ignatius preferred the hope of saving others to the

certainty of his own salvation. And may we not maintain, since we hold

that there is no inappeasable conflict between God and Nature, between

the soul and matter, between revelation and science, that the apparent

antagonism lies in our apprehension, and not in things themselves, and

consequently that reconcilement is to be sought for through the help of

thoroughly trained minds? The poet speaks the truth, "A little

knowledge is a dangerous thing." They who know but little and

imperfectly, see but their knowledge, if so it may be called, and walk

in innocent unconsciousness of their infinite nescience. The narrower

the range of our mental vision, the greater the obstinacy with which we

cling to our opinions; and the half-educated, like the weak and the

incompetent, are often contentious, but whosoever is able to do his

work does it, and finds no time for dispute. He who possesses a

disciplined mind, and is familiar with the best thoughts that live in

the great literatures, will be the last to attach undue importance to

his own thinking. A sense of decency and a kind of holy shame will

keep him far from angry and unprofitable controversy; nor will he

mistake a crotchet for a panacea, nor imagine that irritation is

enlightenment. The blessings of a cultivated mind are akin to those of

religion. They are larger liberty, wider life, purer delights, and a

juster sense of the relative values of the means and ends which lie

within our reach. Knowledge, like religion, leads us away from what

appears to what is, from what passes to what remains, from what

flatters the senses to that which speaks to the soul. Wisdom and

religion converge, as love and knowledge meet in God; and to the wise

as to the religious man, no great evil can happen. Into prison they

both carry the sweet company of their thoughts, their faith and hope,

and are freer in chains than the great in palaces. In death they are

in the midst of life, for they see that what they know and love is

imperishable, nor subject even to atomic disintegration. He who lives

in the presence of truth yearns not for the company of men, but loves

retirement as a saint loves solitude; and in times like ours, when men

no longer choose the desert for a dwelling-place, the passionate desire

of intellectual excellence co-operates with religious faith to guard

them against dissipation and to lift them above the spirit of the age.

The thinker is never lonely, as he who lives with God is never unhappy.

Is not the love of excellence, which is the scholar's love, a part of

the love of goodness which makes the saint? And are not intellectual

delights akin to those religion brings? They are pure, they elevate,

they refine; time only increases their charm, and in the winter of age,

when the body is but the agent of pain, contemplation still remains

like the light of a higher world, to tinge with beauty the clouds that

gather around life's setting. How narrow and monotonous is sensation!

how wide and various is thought! They who live in the senses are

fettered and ill at ease; they who live in the soul are free and

joyful. And since the priest, unless he be a saint, must have, like

other men, some human joy, and since he dwells not in the sacred circle

of the love of wife and children, in which the multitudes find repose

and contentment, what solace, what refreshment, in the midst of cares

and labors, shall we offer him? If there be aught for him that is not

unworthy or dangerous, except the pleasures of the mind, to me it is

unknown; and though a well-trained intellect should do no more than to

enable us to take delight in pure and noble objects, it would be a

chief help to worthy life. And when the whole tendency of our social

existence is to draw men out of themselves and to make them seek the

good of life in what is external, as money, display, position, renown,

is it not a gain, if, while we open their minds to the charm of

intellectual beauty, we make them see that this eager striving for

wealth and place is a vulgar chase? And does not the spirit of

refinement in thought, in speech, in manner, add worth and fairness to

him whom it inspires, though the motive which preserves him from what

is low or gross be no higher than a fastidious delicacy and

self-respect?

To deny the moral influence of intellectual culture is as great an

error as to affirm that it alone is a sufficient safeguard of morality.

Its tendency unquestionably is to make men gentle, amiable,

fair-minded, truthful, benevolent, modest, sober. It curbs ambition

and teaches resignation; chastens the imagination and mitigates

ferocity; dissuades from duelling because it is barbarous, and from war

because it is cruel, and from persecution because it trusts in the

prevalence of reason. It seeks to fit the mind and the character to

the world, to all possible circumstances, so that whatever happens we

remain ourselves,--calm, clear-seeing, able to do and to suffer. At

great heights, or in the presence of irresistible force, as of a mighty

waterfall, we grow dizzy; and in the same way, in the midst of

multitudes, in the eagerness of strife, in the whirlwind of passion,

equipoise is lost, and we cease to be ourselves, to become part of an

aggregate of forces that hurry us on, whither we know not. To be able

to stand in the presence of such power, and to feel its influence, and

yet not to lose self-possession, is to be strong; is, on proper

occasion, to be great. And the aim of the best education is to teach

us the secret and the method of this complete self-control; and in so

far it is not only moral, but also religious, though religion walks in

a more royal road, and bids us love God and trust so absolutely in Him

that life and death become equal, and all the ways and workings of men

as the storm to one who on lofty mountain peak, amid the blue heavens,

with the sunlight around him and the quiet breathing of the winds, sees

far below, as in another world, the black clouds and lurid lightning

flash and hears the roll of distant thunder.

It is far from my thought, it is needless to say, that mental

cultivation can be made to take the place or do the work of religion,

even in the case of the very few for whom the best discipline of mind

is possible. My aim is simply to show that the type of character which

it tends to create is not necessarily at variance with religious

principle and life, as is, for instance, that of the mere worldling;

but that it conspires with Christian faith to produce, if not the same,

at least similar virtues, though its ethical influence is comparatively

superficial, and the moral qualities which it produces lack consistency

and the power to withstand the fire of the passions. It is enough for

my purpose to point out that if intellectualism is often the foe of

religious truth, there is no good reason why it should not also be its

ally.

No excellence, as I conceive, of whatever kind, is rejected by Catholic

teaching, and the perfection of the mind is not less divine than the

perfection of the heart. It is good to know, as it is good to hope, to

believe, to love. A cultivated intellect, an open mind, a rich

imagination, with correctness of thought, flexibility of view, and

eloquent expression, are among the noblest endowments of man; and

though they should serve no other purpose than to embellish life, to

make it fairer and freer, they would nevertheless be possessions

without price, for the most nobly useful things are those which make

life good and beautiful. Like virtue they are their own reward, and

like mercy they bear a double blessing. It is the fashion with many to

affect contempt for men of superior culture, because they look upon

education as simply a means to tangible ends, and think knowledge

valuable only when it can be made to serve practical purposes. This is

a narrow and a false view; for all men need the noble and the

beautiful, and he who lives without an ideal is hardly a man. Our

material wants are not the most real for being the most sensible and

pressing, and they who create or preserve for us models of spiritual

and intellectual excellence are our greatest benefactors. Which were

the greater loss for England, to be without Wellington and Nelson, or

to be without Shakspeare and Milton? Whatever the answer be, in the

one case England would suffer, in the other the whole world would feel

the loss. Though a thoroughly trained intellect is less worthy of

admiration than a noble character, its power is immeasurably greater;

for, example can influence but a few and for a short time, but when a

truth or a sentiment has once found its best expression, it becomes a

part of literature, and like a proverb is current forevermore; and so

the kings of thought become immortal rulers, and without their help the

godlike deeds of saints and heroes would be buried in oblivion. "Words

pass," said Napoleon, "but deeds remain." The man of action

exaggerates the worth of action, but the philosopher knows that to act

is easy, to think, difficult; and that great deeds spring from great

thoughts. There are words that never grow silent, there are words that

have changed the face of the earth, and the warrior's wreath of victory

is entwined by the Muse's hand. The power of Athens is gone, her

temples are in ruins, the Acropolis is discrowned, and from Mars' Hill

no voice thunders now; but the words of Socrates, the great deliverer

of the mind, and the father of intellectual culture, still breathe in

the thoughts of every cultivated man on earth. The glory of Jerusalem

has departed, the broken stones of Solomon's Temple lie hard by the

graves that line the brook of Kedron, and from the minaret of Mount

Sion the misbeliever's melancholy call sounds like a wail over a lost

world; but the songs of David still rise from the whole earth in

heavenly concert, upbearing to the throne of God the faith and hope and

love of countless millions. And is not the Blessed Saviour the Eternal

Word? And is not the Bible God's word? And is not the Gospel the

Word, which, like an electric thrill, runs to the ends of the world?

"Currit verbum," says St. Paul. "Man lives not on bread alone, but on

every word that cometh forth from the mouth of God." Nay, there is

life in all the true and noble thoughts that have blossomed in the mind

of genius and filled the earth with fragrance and with fruit.

Shall I be told that the intellectual cultivation and discipline, which

gives to man control of his knowledge, the perfect use of his

faculties, justness of perception with ease and grace of expression,

cannot bring serviceable advocacy or defence to the cause of divine

truth? What does truth need but to be known? And since to reach the

mind and heart of man it must be clothed in words, what is so necessary

to it as the garb and vesture, the form and color, the warmth and life,

which shall so mark it that to be loved it needs but be seen? And who

shall so clothe it, if not he who has the freest, the most flexible,

the clearest, the best disciplined mind? In the apostolic age, when

the manifestations of miraculous power accompanied the announcement of

Christian doctrine, the lack of the persuasive words of human eloquence

was not felt. Let him who can drink poison and touch scorpions, and

not suffer harm, despise the aid of learning; but for us, who are not

so assisted, no cultivation of mind or preparation of heart can be too

great; and to appear in the garb of a savage were less unseemly than to

speak the holiest and the highest truths in the barbarous tongue of

ignorance.

Our way here cannot be doubtful. Either we must hold with certain

peculiar heretics that learning is a hindrance to the efficacious

teaching of religious truth, or, denying this, we must hold, since

mental culture is serviceable, that the best is most serviceable.

May we not take this for a principle,--to believe that God does

everything, and then to act as though He left everything for us to do?

Or this: Since grace supposes nature, the growth and strength of the

Church is not wholly independent of the natural endowments of her

ministers?

As a matter of fact we Catholics are constantly speaking and acting

upon principles of this kind. We maintain that without a proper

education our children must lose the faith; and that without careful

moral and mental training no man is likely to become a good priest; and

all that I further insist upon is that if he is to do the best work, he

must have the best intellectual discipline. In an intellectual age, at

least, he cannot be the worthy minister of worship, unless he is also

the accomplished teacher of truth. In vain shall we clothe him in rich

symbolic vestments, place him in majestic temples, before marble

altars, in the midst of solemn music, in the dim sober-tinted light,

with the great and noble looking out upon him, as from a spirit

world,--in vain shall all this be, if when he himself speaks, his words

are felt to be but the echo of a coarse and empty mind. And hence our

enemies would gladly leave us the poetry of our worship, would even

enter our churches to be comforted, to be soothed, to seek the

elevation and enlargement of thought and sentiment which comes upon us

in the presence of what is vast, mysterious, and sublime, if we would

but confess that it is only poetry, good and beautiful only as art is

good and beautiful. The spirit of the time, in fact, it seems to me,

is more and more disposed to grant us everything except the possession

of intellectual truth. That the Catholic Church is a marvellous power;

that her triumphs have been so enduring and so unexpected that only the

foolish or the ignorant will predict her downfall; that she overcame

paganism; that she saved Christianity when Rome fell; that she

restrained the ferocity of the barbarians, protected the weak,

encouraged labor, preserved the classics, maintained the unity and

sanctity of marriage, defended the purity and dignity of woman,

espoused the cause of the oppressed, and in a lawless and ignorant age

proclaimed the supremacy of right and the worth of learning; that to

these signal services must be added her power to give ease and

pleasantness to the social relations of men, keeping them equally

remote from Puritan severity and pagan license; her eye for beauty and

grace, which has made her the foster-mother of all the arts; her love

of the excellent and the noble, which has enabled her to create types

of character that are immortal; her practical wisdom, giving her the

secret of dealing with every phase of life, so that her saints are

doctors, apostles, mystics, philanthropists, artists, poets, kings,

beggars, warriors, peasants, barbarians, philosophers,--all this, if I

mistake not, unbelievers even are more and more willing to concede.

Nor are they slow to express their admiration of the strength and

majesty of this single power amid the Christian nations, which reaches

back to the great civilizations that have perished, which has preserved

its organic unity intact amid the social revolutions of two thousand

years, and which is acknowledged still to be the greatest moral force

in the world. But, underlying all they say and think, is the

assumption that the foundations of this noble structure are crumbling;

that the world of faith and thought in which it was upbuilt is become a

desert where no flower blooms, no living soul is found; that the temple

is beautiful only as a ruin is beautiful, where owls hoot and bats flit

to and fro. "There is not a creed, we are told, which is not shaken,

nor an accredited dogma which is not shown to be questionable; not a

received tradition which does not threaten to dissolve."

The conquests of the human mind in the realms of nature have produced a

world-wide ferment of thought, an intellectual activity which is

without a parallel. They have increased the power of man to an almost

incredible degree, have given him control of the earth and the seas,

have placed within his grasp undreamed-of forces, have opened to his

view unsuspected mysteries; they have placed him on a new earth and

under new heavens, and thrown a light never seen before upon the

history of his race. As a part of this vast development new questions

have risen, new theories have been broached, new doubts have suggested

themselves; and because we have changed, all else seems to have changed

also. And since, underlying all questions, there is found a question

of religion, the discussion of religious and philosophic problems has,

in our day, become a social necessity, and the science of criticism,

together with the physical sciences, has driven the disputants upon new

and difficult ground, where the battle must be fought, and where

retreat is not possible.

As well imagine that society will again take on the form of feudalism,

as that the human mind will return to the point of view from which our

ancestors looked on nature.

And this world-view shapes and colors all our thinking, in theology as

in other sciences, so that truths which were latent have come to light,

and principles which have long been held find new and wider application.

Never has the defence of religion required so many and such excellent

qualities of intellect as in the present day. The early apologists who

contrasted the sublimity and purity of Christian faith with a corrupt

paganism had not a difficult task. In the Middle Age the intellect of

the world was on the side of Christ. The controversy which sprang up

with the advent of Protestantism was biblical and historical, and its

criticism was superficial. The anti-Christian schools of thought of

the eighteenth century were literary rather than philosophical, and the

objections they urged were founded chiefly upon political and social

considerations. In all these discussions the territory in dispute was

well defined and relatively small. But into what a different world are

not we thrown! These earlier explorers sailed upon rivers whose banks

were lined by firm-set rocky cliffs, by the overshadowing boughs of

primeval forests, with here and there pleasant slopes of green where

they might lie at rest amid the fragrance of wild flowers; but from our

Peter's bark we look out upon the dark unfathomed seas towards an

unknown world whose margin ever fades and recedes as we seem to draw

near the haven of our desire.

As in the beginning of the twelfth century the cry, "God wills it!"

rang through Europe, and from all her lands armies of mailed knights

sprang into battle-array and turned their faces towards the Holy City,

resolved to wrench from infidel hands the Sacred Tomb of Christ, so

now, from her thousand watch-towers, science sounds her clarion note

with quite other intent, urging on to the attack of the citadel of God

in the heart of man, renewing upon lower fields the war in which

immortal spirits contended with the Almighty "in dubious battle on the

plains of heaven, and shook his throne." As "he jests at scars that

never felt a wound," so here the lesser knowledge makes the bolder man.

Not that difficulties should create doubts, or that objections may not

be answered, or that it is necessary to refute each hypothesis that

appears and fades like a dissolving view, or to notice each

unwarrantable inference from unquestioned facts, or that it is worth

while to address ourselves to minds whose nebulous and shifting

opinions make it impossible that they should receive correct

impressions; but the field upon which attacks upon religion are now

made is so vast, the confusion of thought into which new discoveries

and speculations have thrown the minds of even educated men is so

bewildering, the methods for the ascertainment of truth are so tangled

and misapplied, the rushing on of multitudes to discuss problems which

have hitherto been left to philosophers, and which they alone can

rightly enunciate, is so stupefying, that those who have the clearest

perception of the mental state of the modern world, and who are able to

take the finest and most comprehensive view of the religious,

philosophic, and scientific controversies of the day, seem loath to

enter into a struggle where the ground continually changes, and where

victory at the best is only partial, and but leads to further contest.

It is well to remember, also, that in the intellectual arena to attack

is easier than to defend, and any shallow, incoherent talker or writer

can propose difficulties which the keenest thinker will find great

trouble to explain. Since we and our works fall to ruin and pass away,

we seem instinctively to take the side of those who seek to undermine

and overthrow systems of thought and belief which claim to be

indestructible, and the human heart is half a traitor to the Church

which declares that she is indefectible and infallible. Is there not

indeed, however we account for it, in all nature a kind of dread and

horror of the supernatural, such as one who hides within his bosom a

secret of dark guilt feels in the presence of the conscience of

mankind? And does not this make the world lean to the side of those

who would eliminate God from nature?

And yet, since man's heart is the home of contradictions, is it not

also true to say that he is naturally religious? His faith in God is

as deep and unwavering as his faith in the testimony of the senses; and

if there are atheists there are also men who hold that all things are

unreal and only appear to be; that the world is but a myriad-formed, a

myriad-tinted idea, the dream of a substanceless dreamer. Not only do

we believe in God and in the soul, but all that we love, all that we

hope for, all that gives to life charm, dignity, and sacredness, is

interpenetrated, perfumed, and illumined by this faith. If men could

be persuaded that the unconscious is the beginning and the end of all

things, what good would have been gained? The light of heaven would

fade away, and the soul's high faith be made a lie; the poor would have

no friend, and the rich no heart; the wicked would be without fear, and

the good without hope; success would be consecrated, and death alone

would remain as the refuge of the unfortunate. Even animal indulgence,

in sinking out of the moral order, would lose its human charm. If then

in our day there is wide-spread scepticism, a sort of vague feeling

that science is undermining religion and that the most sacred beliefs

are dissolving, the cause of this lies not so much in the natural

tendencies of the mind and heart, as in social conditions, in passing

phases of thought, in the shifting of the point of view from which men

have hitherto been accustomed to look on nature; and the continuance

and the progress of doubt, and consequently of indifference, is, to

some extent at least, to be ascribed also to the fact that the most

earnest believers in God and in Christianity have, for now more than a

century, been less eager to acquire the best philosophic and literary

cultivation of mind than others who, having lost faith in the

supernatural, seek for compensation in a wider and deeper knowledge of

nature, and in the mental culture which enables them to enjoy more

keenly the high thoughts and fair images which live in literature and

art. As a well-trained intellect, in argument with the unskilful,

easily makes the worse appear the better cause, so in an age or a

country where the best discipline of mind is found chiefly among those

who are not Christians, or at least not Catholics, public opinion will

drift away from the Church, until the view finally becomes general

that, whatever she may have been in other times, her day is past. Nor

will aught external, however fair or glorious, secure her against this

danger. How often in the history of nations and of religions is not

outward splendor the mark of inward decay? When Rome was free, a

simple life sufficed; but when liberty fled, marble palaces arose. The

monarch who built Versailles made the scaffold on which French royalty

perished; and so a dying faith, like the setting sun, may drape itself

in glory. The Kingdom of God is within; there is the source of life

and strength, without which nor numbers nor wealth, nor stately

edifices nor solemn rites, avail. Nor can we be certain of men's love

when we cease to have influence over their thoughts. The proper appeal

is to the heart through the mind; and even a mother loses half her

power when she ceases to be the intellectual superior of her children.

How then shall the heavenly Mother of the soul keep her place in the

world, if those who speak in her name mar by imperfect and ignorant

utterance the celestial harmony of her doctrines?

Ah! let us learn to see things as they are. In face of the modern

world, that which the Catholic priest most needs, after virtue, is the

best cultivation of mind, which issues in comprehensiveness of view, in

exactness of perception, in the clear discernment of the relations of

truths and of the limitations of scientific knowledge, in fairness and

flexibility of thought, in ease and grace of expression, in candor, in

reasonableness; the intellectual culture which brings the mind into

form gives it the control of its faculties, creates the habit of

attention, and develops firmness of grasp. The education of which I

speak is expansion and discipline of mind rather than learning; and its

tendency is not so much to form profound dogmatists, or erudite

canonists, or acute casuists, as to cultivate a habit of mind, which,

for want of a better word, may be called philosophical; to enlarge the

intellect, to strengthen and supple its faculties, to enable it to take

connected views of things and their relations, and to see clear amid

the mazes of human error and through the mists of human passion. I

speak of that perfection of the intellect, which, to use the words of

Cardinal Newman, "is the clear, calm, accurate vision and comprehension

of all things as far as the finite mind can embrace them, each in its

place and with its own characteristics upon it. It is almost prophetic

from its knowledge of history; it is almost heart-searching from its

knowledge of human nature; it has almost supernatural charity from its

freedom from littleness and prejudice; it has almost the repose of

faith because nothing can startle it; it has almost the beauty and

harmony of heavenly contemplation, so intimate is it with the eternal

order of things and the music of the spheres." This is, indeed, ideal;

but they who believe not in ideals were not born to know the real worth

of things:

"Spite of proudest boast

Reason, best reason is to imperfect man

An effort only and a noble aim,--

A crown, an attribute of sovereign power,

Still to be courted, never to be won."

It is plain that education of this kind aims at something quite

different from the mere imparting of useful knowledge. It takes the

view that it is good to know, even though knowledge should not be a

means to wealth or power or any other common aim of life. It regards

the mind as the organ of truth, and trains it for its own sake, without

reference to the exercise of a profession. Hence its distinguishing

characteristic is that it is liberal and not professional. It holds

cultivated faculties in higher esteem than learning, and it makes use

of knowledge to improve the intellect, rather than of the intellect to

acquire knowledge. Hence, one may be a skilful physician, a judicious

lawyer, a learned theologian, and yet be greatly lacking in mental

culture. It is a common experience to find that professional men are

apt to be narrow and one-sided. Their mind, like the dyer's hand, is

subdued to what it works in. They want comprehensiveness of view,

flexibility of thought, openness to light, and freedom of mental play.

They think in grooves, make the rules of their art the measure of

truth, and their own methods of inquiry the only valid laws of

reasoning. These same defects may be observed in those who are given

exclusively to the study of physical science. When they sweep the

heavens with the telescope and do not find God, they conclude that

there is no God. When the soul does not reveal itself under the

microscope, they argue it does not exist; and since there is no thought

without nervous movement, they claim that the brain thinks.

Now, if it is desirable that those who are charged with the teaching

and defence of divine truth should be free from this narrowness and

one-sidedness, this lack of openness to light and freedom of mental

play, the education of the priest must be more than a professional

education; and he must be sent to a school higher and broader than the

ecclesiastical seminary, which is simply a training college for the

practical work of the ministry. The purpose for which it was

instituted is to prepare young men for the worthy exercise of the

general functions of the priestly office, and the good it has done is

too great and too manifest to need commendation. But the

ecclesiastical seminary is not a school of intellectual culture, either

here in America or elsewhere, and to imagine that it can become the

instrument of intellectual culture is to cherish a delusion. It must

impart a certain amount of professional knowledge, fit its students to

become more or less expert catechists, rubricists, and casuists, and

its aim is to do this; and whatever mental improvement, if any, thence

results, is accidental. Hence its methods are not such as one would

choose who desires to open the mind, to give it breadth, flexibility,

strength, refinement, and grace. Its text-books are written often in a

barbarous style, the subjects are discussed in a dry and mechanical

way, and the professor, wholly intent upon giving instruction, is

frequently indifferent as to the manner in which it is imparted; or

else not possessing himself a really cultivated intellect, he holds in

slight esteem expansion and refinement of mind, looking upon it as at

the best a mere ornament. I am not offering a criticism upon the

ecclesiastical seminary, but am simply pointing to the plain fact that

it is not a school of intellectual culture, and consequently, if its

course were lengthened to five, to six, to eight, to ten years, its

students would go forth to their work with a more thorough professional

training, but not with more really cultivated minds. The test of

intellect is not so much what we know as the manner in which it is

known; just as in the moral world, the important consideration is not

what virtues we possess, but the completeness with which they are ours.

He who really believes in God, serves Him, loves Him, is a hero, a

saint; whereas he who half believes may have a thousand good qualities,

but not a great character. Knowledge is not education any more than

food is nutrition; and as one may eat voraciously, and yet remain

without bodily health or strength, so one may have great learning, and

yet be almost wholly lacking in intellectual cultivation. His learning

may only oppress and confuse him, be felt as a load, and not as a vital

principle, which upraises, illumines, and beautifies the mind; mentally

he may still be a boy, in whom memory predominates, and whose intellect

is only a receptacle of facts. Memory is the least noble of the

intellectual faculties, and the nearest to animal intelligence; and to

know well is, in the eyes of a true educator, of quite other importance

than to know much. But a memory, more or less well-stored, is nearly

all a youth carries with him from the college to the seminary, and here

he enters, as I have already pointed out, upon a course not of

intellectual discipline, but of professional studies, whose object is

not "to open the mind, to correct it, to refine it, to enable it to

know, and to digest, master, rule, and use its knowledge, to give it

power over its own faculties, application, flexibility, method,

critical exactness, sagacity, resource, eloquent expression," but

simply to impart the requisite skill for the ordinary exercise of the

holy ministry. Hence it is not surprising that priests who are

zealous, earnest, self-sacrificing, who to piety join discretion and

good sense, rarely possess the intellectual culture of which I am

speaking, for the simple reason that a university and not a seminary is

the school in which this kind of education is received. That the

absence of such trained intellects is a most serious obstacle to the

progress of the Catholic faith, no thoughtful man will doubt or deny.

Since the mind is a power, in religion, as in every sphere of thought

and life, the discipline which best develops and perfects its faculties

will fit it to do its work, whatever it may be, in the most effective

manner. Hence, though the education of which I speak does not directly

aim at being useful, it is in fact the most useful, and prepares better

than any other for the business of life. It enables a man to master a

subject with ease, to fill an office with honor; and whatever he does,

the mark of completeness and finish will be found upon his work. He

sees more clearly, judges more calmly, reasons more pertinently, speaks

more seasonably than other men. The free and full possession of his

faculties gives him power to turn himself to whatever may be demanded

of him, whether it be to govern wisely, or to counsel judiciously, or

to write gracefully, or to plead eloquently. Whatever course in life

he may take, whatever line of thought or investigation he may pursue,

his intellectual culture will give him superiority over men who, with

equal or greater talents, lack his education; and he possesses withal

resources within himself, which in a measure make him independent of

fortune, and which, when failure comes and the world abandons him,

remain, like faith, or hope, or a friend, to make him forget his

misfortunes.

Of the English universities, with all their shortcomings, Cardinal

Newman says: "At least they can boast of a succession of heroes and

statesmen, of literary men and philosophers, of men conspicuous for

great natural virtues, for habits of business, for knowledge of life,

for practical judgment, for cultivated tastes, for accomplishments, who

have made England what it is,--able to subdue the earth, able to

domineer over Catholics." It is only in a university that all the

sciences are brought together, their relations adjusted, their

provinces assigned. There natural science is limited by metaphysics;

morality is studied in the light of history; language and literature

are viewed from the standpoint of ethnology; the criticism which seeks

beauty and not deformity, which in the gardens of the mind takes the

honey and leaves the poison, is applied to the study of eloquence and

poetry; and over all religion throws the warmth and life of faith and

hope, like a ray from heaven. The mind thus lives in an atmosphere in

which the comparison of ideas and truths with one an other is

inevitable; and so it grows, is strengthened, enlarged, refined, made

pliant, candid, open, equitable.

When numbers of priests will be able to bring this cultivation of

intellect to the treatment of religious subjects, then will Catholic

theology again come forth from its isolation in the modern world; then

will Catholic truth again irradiate and perfume the thoughts and

opinions of men; then will Catholic doctrines again sink into their

hearts, and not remain loose in the mind to be thrown aside, as one

casts away the outworn vesture of the body; then will it be felt that

the fascination of Christian faith is still fresh, supreme, as far

above the charm of science as the joy of a poet's soul is above the

pleasures of sense. The religious view of life must forever remain the

true view, since no other explains our longings and aspirations, or

justifies hope and enthusiasm; and the worship of God in spirit and in

truth, which Christ has revealed to the world, the religion not of an

age or a people, but of all time and of the human race, must eternally

prevail when brought home to us in a language which we understand; for

we place the testimony of reason above that of the senses. To the eye

the sun rises and sets, to the mind it is stationary; and we accept,

not what is seen, but what is known. Is there need of stronger

evidence that the power within, which is our real self, is spiritual?

And is it not enough to see clearly, to perceive that in the struggle

of mind with matter, which is the essential form of the conflict of

spiritualism with materialism, of religion with science, the soul, in

the end, will be victorious, and rest in the real world of faith and

intuition, and not in the pictured world of the senses?

Religion, indeed, like morality, is in the nature of things, and

Catholic faith is Una's Red Cross Knight, on whose shield are old dints

of deep wounds and cruel marks of many a bloody field, who is assailed

by all the powers of earth and of the nether world, armed with whatever

weapons may hurt the mind or corrupt the heart, but whom heavenly

Providence rescues from the jaws of monsters and leads on to victory.

But what true believer thinks himself excused from effort, because

Christ has declared that the gates of hell shall not prevail against

His Church? Does he not know that though, when we consider her whole

course through the world, she has triumphed, so as to have become the

miracle of history, yet has she at many points suffered disastrous

defeat? Hence, those who love her must be vigilant, and stand prepared

for battle. And in an age when persecution has either died away or

lost its harshness, when crying abuses have disappeared, when heresy

has run its course, and the struggle of the world with the Church has

become almost wholly intellectual, it is not possible, assuredly, that

her ministers should have too great power of intellect. And

consequently it is not possible that the bishops, in whose hands the

education of priests is placed, should have too great a care that they

receive the best mental culture. And if this is a general truth, with

what pertinency does it not come home to us here in America, who are

the descendants of men who, on account of their faith, have for

centuries been oppressed and thrust back from opportunities of

education, and who, when persecution and robbery had reduced them to

ignorance and poverty, were forced to hear their religion reproached

with the crimes of her foes? And now, when at length a fairer day has

dawned for us in this new world, what can be more natural than our

eager desire to move out from the valleys of darkness towards the hills

and mountain tops that are bathed in sunlight? What more praiseworthy

than the fixed resolve to prove that not our faith, but our misfortunes

made and kept us inferior. And, since we live in the midst of millions

who have indeed good will towards us, but who still bear the yoke of

inherited prejudices, and who, because for three hundred years real

cultivation of mind was denied to Catholics who spoke English, conclude

that Protestantism is the source of enlightenment, and the Church the

mother of ignorance, do not all generous impulses urge us to make this

reproach henceforth meaningless? And in what way shall we best

accomplish this task? Surely not by writing or speaking about what the

influence of the Church is, or by pointing to what she has done in

other ages, but by becoming what we claim her spirit tends to make us.

Here, if anywhere, the proverb is applicable--_verba movent, exempla

trahunt_. As the devotion of American Catholics to this country and

its free institutions, as shown not on battle-fields alone, but in our

whole bearing and conduct, convinces all but the unreasonable of the

depth and sincerity of our patriotism, so when our zeal for

intellectual excellence shall have raised up men who will take place

among the first writers and thinkers of their day their very presence

will become the most persuasive of arguments to teach the world that no

best gift is at war with the spirit of Catholic faith, and that, while

the humblest mind may feel its force, the lofty genius of Augustine, of

Dante, and of Bossuet is upborne and strengthened by the splendor of

its truth. But if we are to be intellectually the equals of others, we

must have with them equal advantages of education; and so long as we

look rather to the multiplying of schools and seminaries than to the

creation of a real university, our progress will be slow and uncertain,

because a university is the great ordinary means to the best

cultivation of mind. The fact that the growth of the Church here, like

that of the country itself, is chiefly external, a growth in wealth and

in numbers, makes it the more necessary that we bring the most

strenuous efforts to improve the gifts of the soul. The whole tendency

of our social life insures the increase of churches, convents, schools,

hospitals, and asylums; our advance in population and in wealth will be

counted from decade to decade by millions, and our worship will

approach more and more to the pomp and splendor of the full ritual; but

this very growth makes such demands upon our energies, that we are in

danger of forgetting higher things, or at least of thinking them less

urgent. Few men are at once thoughtful and active. The man of deeds

dwells in the world around him; the thinker lives within his mind.

Contemplation, in widening the view, makes us feel that what even the

strongest can do is lost in the limitless expanse of space and time;

and the soul is tempted to fall back upon itself and to gaze passively

upon the course of the world, as though the general stream of human

events were as little subject to man's control as the procession of the

seasons. Busy workers, on the other hand, having little taste or time

for reflection, see but the present and what lies close to them, and

the energy of their doing circumscribes their thinking.

But the Church needs both the men who act and the men who think; and

since with us everything pushes to action, wisdom demands that we

cultivate rather the powers of reflection. And this is the duty alike

of true patriots and of faithful Catholics. All are working to develop

our boundless material resources; let a few at least labor to develop

man. The millions are building cities, reclaiming wildernesses, and

bringing forth from the earth its buried treasures; let at least a

remnant cherish the ideal, cultivate the beautiful, and seek to inspire

the love of moral and intellectual excellence. And since we believe

that the Church which points to heaven is able also to lead the nations

in the way of civilization and of progress, why should we not desire to

see her become a beneficent and ennobling influence in the public life

of our country? She can have no higher temporal mission than to be the

friend of this great republic, which is God's best earthly gift to His

children. If, as English critics complain, our style is inflated, it

is because we feel the promise of a destiny which transcends our powers

of expression. Whatever fault men may find with us, let them not doubt

the world-wide significance of our life. If we keep ourselves strong

and pure, all the peoples of the earth shall yet be free; if we fulfil

our providential mission, national hatred shall give place to the

spirit of generous rivalry, the people shall become wiser and stronger,

society shall grow more merciful and just, and the cry of distress

shall be felt, like the throb of a brother's heart, to the ends of the

world. Where is the man who does not feel a kind of religious

gratitude as he looks upon the rise and progress of this nation? Above

all, where is the Catholic whose heart is not enlarged by such

contemplation? Here, almost for the first time in her history, the

Church is really free. Her worldly position does not overshadow her

spiritual office, and the State recognizes her autonomy. The monuments

of her past glory, wrenched from her control, stand not here to point,

like mocking fingers, to what she has lost. She renews her youth, and

lifts her brow, as one who, not unmindful of the solemn mighty past,

yet looks with undimmed eye and unfaltering heart to a still more

glorious future. Who in such a presence, can abate hope, or give heed

to despondent counsel, or send regretful thoughts to other days and

lands? Whoever at any time, in any place, might have been sage, saint,

or hero, may be so here and now; and though he had the heart of

Francis, and the mind of Augustine, and the courage of Hildebrand, here

is work for him to do.

In whatsoever direction we turn our thoughts, arguments rush in to show

the pressing need for us of a centre of life and light such as a

Catholic university would be. Without this we can have no hope of

entering as a determining force into the living controversies of the

age; without this it must be an accident if we are represented at all

in the literature of our country; without this we shall lack a point of

union to gather up, harmonize, and intensify our scattered forces;

without this our bishops must remain separated, and continue to work in

random ways; without this the noblest souls will look in vain for

something larger and broader than a local charity to make appeal to

their generous hearts; without this we shall be able to offer but

feeble resistance to the false theories and systems of education which

deny to the Church a place in the school; without this the sons of

wealthy Catholics will, in ever increasing numbers, be sent to

institutions where their faith is undermined; without this we shall

vainly hope for such treatment of religious questions and their

relations to the issues and needs of the day, as shall arrest public

attention and induce Catholics themselves to take at least some little

notice of the writings of Catholics; without this in struggles for

reform and contests for rights we shall lack the wisdom of best counsel

and the courage which skilful leaders inspire. We are a small minority

in the presence of a vast majority; we still bear the disfigurements

and weaknesses of centuries of persecution and suffering; we cling to

an ancient faith in an age when new sciences, discoveries, and theories

fascinate the minds of men, and turn their thoughts away from the past

to the future; we preach a spiritual religion to a people whose

prodigious wealth and rapid triumphs over nature have caused them to

exaggerate the value of material progress; we teach the duty of

self-denial to a refined and intellectual generation, who regard

whatever is painful as evil, whatever is difficult as omissible; we

insist upon religious obedience to the Church in face of a society

where children are ceasing to reverence and obey even their

parents;--if in spite of all this we are to hold our own, not to speak

of larger hopes, it is plain that we may neglect nothing which will

help us to put forth our full strength.

I do not, of course, pretend that this higher education is all that we

need, or that, of itself, it is sufficient; but what I claim is that it

would be a source of strength for us who are in want of help. God

works in many ways, through many agencies, and I bow in homage to the

humblest effort in a righteous cause of the lowliest human being.

There are diversities of graces, but the same spirit; diversities of

ministries, but the same Lord. _Numquid omnes doctores?_ asks St.

Paul. But since he places teachers by the side of apostles and

prophets, surely they will teach to best purpose who to the humility of

faith add the luminousness of knowledge. To those who reject the idea

of human co-operation in things divine I speak not; but we who believe

that we are co-operators with Christ cannot think that it is possible

to bring to this godlike work either too great preparation of heart or

too great cultivation of mind. Nor must we think lightly even of

refinement of thought and speech and behavior, for we know that manners

come of morals, and that morals in turn are born of manners, as the

ocean breathes forth the clouds and the clouds fill the ocean.

Let there be then an American Catholic university, where our young men,

in the atmosphere of faith and purity, of high thinking and plain

living, shall become more intimately conscious of the truth of their

religion and of the genius of their country; where they shall learn the

repose and dignity which belong to their ancient Catholic descent, and

yet not lose the fire which glows in the blood of a new people; to

which from every part of the land our eyes may turn for guidance and

encouragement, seeking light and self-confidence from men in whom

intellectual power is not separate from moral purpose, who look to God

and His universe from bending knees of prayer, who uphold--

"The cause of Christ and civil liberty

As one, and moving to one glorious end."

Should such an intellectual centre serve no other purpose than to bring

together a number of eager-hearted, truth-loving youths, what light and

heat would not leap forth from the shock of mind with mind; what

generous rivalries would not spring up; what intellectual sympathies,

resting on the breast of faith, would not become manifest, grouping

souls like atoms, to form the substance and beauty of a world?

O solemn groves that lie close to Louvain and to Freiburg, whose air is

balm and whose murmuring winds sound like the voices of saints and

sages whispering down the galleries of time, what words have ye not

heard bursting forth from the strong hearts of keen-witted youths, who,

Titan-like, believed they might storm the citadel of God's truth! How

many a one, heavy and despondent, in the narrow, lonesome path of duty,

has remembered you, and moved again in unseen worlds, upheld by faith

and hope! Who has listened to the words of your teachers and not felt

the truth of the saying of Pope Pius II.,--that the world holds nothing

more precious or more beautiful than a cultivated intellect? The

presence of such men invigorates like mountain air, and their speech is

as refreshing as clear-flowing fountains. To know them is to be

forever their debtor. The company of a saint is the school of saints;

a strong character develops strength in others, and a noble mind makes

all around him luminous.

Why may not eight million Catholics upbuild a home for great teachers,

for men who, to real learning and cultivation of mind, shall add the

persuasiveness of easy and eloquent diction; whose manifest and

indisputable superiority shall put to shame the self-conceit of

American young men, our most familiar intellectual bane, and an

insuperable obstacle to all improvement,--self-conceit, which is the

beatitude of vulgar characters and shallow minds? If our students

should find in such an institution but one man, who, like Socrates,

with ironic questioning might make for them the discovery of the new

world of their own ignorance, the gain would be great enough.

Why may we not have a centre of light and truth which will raise up

before us standards of intellectual excellence; which will enable us to

see that our so-called educated men are as far from being scholars as

the makers of our horrible show-bills are from being artists; which

will teach us that it is not only false but vulgar to call things by

pretentious names,--as, for instance, to call a politician a statesman,

a declaimer an orator, or a Latin school a university.

Ah! surely as to whether an American Catholic university is desirable

there cannot be two opinions among enlightened men. But is it

feasible? A true university is one of the noblest foundations of the

great Catholic ages, when faith rose almost to the height of creative

power, and it were folly in me to maintain that such an undertaking is

not surrounded by many and great difficulties. To begin with the

material for foundation, money is necessary, and this, I am persuaded,

we may have. A noble cause will find or make generous hearts. Men

above all we need, for every kind of existence propagates itself only

by itself. But let us bear in mind that the best teacher is not

necessarily or often he who knows the most, but he who has most power

to determine the student to self-activity; for in the end the mind

educates itself. As distrust is the mark of a narrow intellect or a

bad heart, so a readiness to believe in the ability of others is not

only a characteristic of able men, but it is also the secret charm

which calls around them helpers and followers. Hence, a strong man who

loves his work is a better educator than a half-hearted professor who

carries whole libraries in his head.

To bring together in familiar and daily life a number of young men,

chosen for the brightness of their minds and an eager yearning for

knowledge, is to create an atmosphere of intellectual warmth and light,

which invigorates and inspires the master, while it stimulates his

disciples. In such company it will not be difficult to form teachers.

But will it be possible to find young men who will consent, when after

years of study they have finally reached the priesthood, to continue in

a higher institution the arduous and confining labors to the end of

which they have looked as to the beginning of a new life? In other

lands such students are found, and if with us there is a tendency to

rush with precipitancy and insufficient preparation to whatever work we

may have chosen, this is but a proof of the need of special efforts to

restrain an ardor which springs from weakness and not from strength.

Haste is a mark of immaturity. He who is certain of himself and master

of his tools, knows that he is able, and neither hurries nor worries,

but works and waits. The rank weed shoots up in a day and as quickly

dies; but the long-growing olive-tree stands from century to century,

and drops from its gently waving boughs ripe fruit through the quiet

autumn air. The Church endures forever; and we American Catholics, in

the midst of our rapidly-moving and ever-changing society, should be

the first to learn to temper energy with the patient strength which

gives the courage to toil and wait through a long life, if so we make

ourselves worthy to speak some fit word or do some needful deed. And

to whom shall this lesson first be taught if not to the clerics, whose

natural endowments single them out as future leaders of Catholic

thought and enterprise; and where can this lesson so well be learned as

in a school whose standard of intellectual excellence shall be the

highest?

While we look, therefore, to the founding of a true university, we will

begin, as the university of Paris began in the twelfth century, and as

the present university of Louvain began fifty years ago, with a

national school of philosophy and theology, which will form the central

faculty of a complete educational organism. Around this, the other

faculties will take their places, in due course of time; and so the

beginning which we make will grow, until like the seed planted in the

earth, it shall wear the bloomy crown of its own development.

And though the event be less than our hope, though even failure be the

outcome, is it not better to fail than not to attempt a worthy work

which might be ours? Only they who do nothing derive comfort from the

mistakes of others; and the saying that a blunder is worse than a crime

is doubtless true for those who have no other measure of worth and

success than the conventional standards of a superficial public

opinion. We at least know--

"There lives a Judge

To whose all-pondering mind a noble aim

Faithfully kept is as a noble deed;

In whose pure sight all virtue doth succeed."

THE END.

End of Project Gutenberg's Means and Ends of Education, by J. L. Spalding

Means and Ends of Education · 第 7 / 7 章