TO N.B.

There is a double mail to answer this week and only two days to do it

in, so this may be rather hurried.

I do get the _Round Table_. I don't think it suggests a World State as

practical politics, but merely as the only ideal with which the mind

can be satisfied as an ultimate end. If you believe in a duty to all

humanity, logic won't stop short of a political brotherhood of the

world, since national loyalty implies in the last resort a denial of

your duty to everyone outside your nation. But in fact, of course, men

are influenced by sentiment and not logic: and I agree that, for ages

to come at least, a World State wouldn't inspire loyalty. I don't even

think the British Empire would for long, if it relied only on the

sentiment of the Mother Country as home. The loyalty of each Dominion

to the Empire in future generations will be largely rooted in its own

distinctive nationalism, paradoxical as that sounds: at least so I

believe.

Please don't refrain from comments on passing events for fear they

will be stale. They aren't, because my _Times's_ are contemporary with

your letters: and the amount of news we get by Reuter's is negligible.

Indeed Reuter's chiefly enlighten us as to events in Mesopotamia. Last

night we heard that Chamberlain had announced in the House that the

Turks lost 2,000 and the Arabs 1,000 in the attack on Kut on December

12th: that was absolutely the first we'd heard of it, though Kut is

only ninety miles as the crow flies, and my Company is there! All we

hear is their casualties, thrice a week. They now total 2 killed and

11 wounded out of 180: nearly all my Company and 3 of my draft

wounded.

I want to be there very much, to look after them, poor dears: but I

must say that T.A's view that a place like Kut is desirable to be in

_per se_ never fails to amaze me, familiar though it now is. I had

another instance of it last night. About twelve of my draft were left

behind on various duties when the Coy. went up-river in such a hurry.

Hearing that my knee was so much better they sent me a deputy to ask

me to make every effort to take them with me if I went up-river. I

agreed, of course, but what, as usual, struck me was that the motives

I can understand--that one's duty is with the Coy. when there's

trouble around, or even that it's nicer to be with one's pals at Kut

than lonely at Amarah--didn't appear at all. The two things he kept

harping on were (1) it's so dull to miss a "scrap" and (2) there may

be a special clasp given for Kut, and we don't want to miss it. They

evidently regard the Coy. at Kut as lucky dogs having a treat: the

"treat" when analysed (which they don't) consisting of 20lb. kits in

December, half-rations, more or less regular bombardment, no proper

billets, no shops, no letters, and very hard work!

My leg is very decidedly better now. I can walk half-a-mile without

feeling any aches, and soon hope to do a mile. There is an obstinate

little puffy patch which won't disappear just beside the knee-cap: but

the M.O. says I may increase my walk each day up to the point where it

begins to ache.

We have had no rain here for nearly a month; but there are light

clouds about which make the most gorgeous sunsets I ever saw.

* * * * *

Letters from Mesopotamia in 1915 and January, 1916 From Robert Palmer, who was killed in the Battle of Um El Hannah, June 21, 1916, aged 27 years · 第 63 / 103 题