POETRY OF AMERICA.

America abounds in the material of poetry. Its history, its scenery, the

structure of its social life, the thoughts which pervade its political

forms, the meaning which underlies its hot contests, are all capable

of being exhibited in a poetical aspect. Carlyle, in speaking of the

settlement of Plymouth by the Pilgrims, remarks that, if we had the open

sense of the Greeks, we should have “found a poem here; one of nature’s

own poems, such as she writes in broad facts over great continents.” If

we have a literature, it should be a national literature; no feeble or

sonorous echo of Germany or England, but essentially American in its tone

and object. No matter how meritorious a composition may be, as long as

any foreign nation can say that it has done the same thing better, so

long shall we be spoken of with contempt, or in a spirit of impertinent

patronage. We begin to sicken of the custom, now so common, of presenting

even our best poems to the attention of foreigners with a deprecating,

apologetic air; as if their acceptance of the offering, with a few soft

and silky compliments, would be an act of kindness demanding our warmest

acknowledgements. If the _Quarterly Review_ or _Blackwood’s Magazine_

speaks well of an American production, we think that we can praise it

ourselves, without incurring the reproach of bad taste. The folly we

yearly practice, of flying into a passion with some inferior English

writer, who caricatures our faults, and tells dull jokes about his tour

through the land, has only the effect to exalt an insignificant scribbler

into notoriety, and give a nominal value to his recorded impertinence. If

the mind and heart of the country had its due expression, if its life had

taken form in a literature worthy of itself, we should pay little regard

to the childish tattling of a pert coxcomb, who was discontented with our

taverns, or the execrations of some bluff sea-captain, who was shocked

with our manners. The uneasy sense we have of something in our national

existence which has not yet been fitly expressed, gives poignancy to

the least ridicule launched at faults and follies which lie on the

superficies of our life. Every person feels that a book which condemns

the country for its peculiarities of manners and customs does not pierce

into the heart of the matter, and is essentially worthless. If Bishop

Berkeley, when he visited Malebranche, had paid exclusive attention

to the habitation, raiment, and manners of the man, and neglected the

conversation of the metaphysician, and, when he returned to England, had

entertained Pope, Swift, Gay, and Arbuthnot, with satirical descriptions

of the “complement extern” of his eccentric host, he would have acted

just as wisely as many an English tourist, with whose malicious

pleasantry on our habits of chewing, spitting, and eating, we are silly

enough to quarrel. To the United States, in reference to the pop-gun

shots of foreign tourists, might be addressed the warning which Peter

Plymley thundered against Bonaparte, in reference to the Anti-Jacobin

jests of Canning: Tremble, oh thou land of many spitters and voters, “for

a _pleasant_ man has come out against thee, and thou shalt be laid low by

a joker of jokes, and he shall talk his pleasant talk to thee, and thou

shalt be no more!”

In order that America may take its due rank in the commonwealth of

nations, a literature is needed which shall be the exponent of its

higher life. We live in times of turbulence and change. There is a

general dissatisfaction, manifesting itself often in rude contests and

ruder speech, with the gulf which separates principles from actions.

Men are struggling to realize dim ideals of right and truth, and each

failure adds to the desperate earnestness of their efforts. Beneath

all the shrewdness and selfishness of the American character, there

is a smouldering enthusiasm which flames out at the first touch of

fire,—sometimes at the hot and hasty words of party, and sometimes at

the bidding of great thoughts and unselfish principles. The heart of

the nation is easily stirred to its depths; but those who rouse its

fiery impulses into action are often men compounded of ignorance and

wickedness, and wholly unfit to guide the passions which they are able to

excite. There is no country in the world which has nobler ideas embodied

in more worthless shapes. All our factions, fanaticisms, reforms,

parties, creeds, ridiculous or dangerous though they often appear, are

founded on some aspiration or reality which deserves a better form and

expression. There is a mighty power in great speech. If the sources of

what we call our fooleries and faults were rightly addressed, they would

echo more majestic and kindling truths. We want a poetry which shall

speak in clear, loud tones to the people; a poetry which shall make us

more in love with our native land, by converting its ennobling scenery

into the images of lofty thought; which shall give visible form and life

to the abstract ideas of our written constitutions; which shall confer

upon virtue all the strength of principle, and all the energy of passion;

which shall disentangle freedom from cant and senseless hyperbole, and

render it a thing of such loveliness and grandeur as to justify all

self-sacrifice; which shall make us love man by the new consecrations

it sheds on his life and destiny; which shall force through the thin

partitions of conventionalism and expediency; vindicate the majesty of

reason; give new power to the voice of conscience, and new vitality to

human affection; soften and elevate passion; guide enthusiasm in a right

direction, and speak out in the high language of men to a nation of

men.—_E. P. Whipple._

The Chautauquan, Vol. 04, June 1884, No. 9 · 第 24 / 101 题