JOSEPH HERGESHEIMER

I

It is with an uncommon feeling of gratification that I am able to begin

a paper on Hugh Walpole with the words, in their completest sense, an

appreciation. But this rises from no greater fact than a personal

difficulty in agreeing with the world at large about the most desirable

elements for a novel. Here it is possible to say that Mr. Walpole

possesses almost entirely the qualities which seem to me the base, the

absolute foundation, of a beauty without which creative writing is

empty. In him, to become as specific as possible, there is splendidly

joined the consciousness of both the inner and outer worlds.

And, for a particular purpose, I shall put my conviction about his

novels into an arbitrary arrangement with no reference to the actual

order of appearance of his dignified row of volumes. Such a choice

opens with a consideration of what is purely a story of inner pressures,

it continues to embrace books devoted principally to the visible world,

to London, and ends with a mingling of the seen and unseen in Russia.

Yet, to deny at once all pedantic pretense, it must be made clear that

my real concern is with the pleasure, the glow and sense of recognition,

to be had from his pages. The evoked emotions, which belong to the

heart rather than the head, are the great, the final, mark of the true

novelist. And they may be, perhaps, expressed in the single word,

magic. Anyone who is susceptible to this quality needs no explanation of

its power and importance, while it is almost impossible of description

to those upon whom it has no effect. It is quite enough to repeat it

... magic. At once a train of images, of memories of fine books, will

be set in motion. Among them the father of Peter Westcott will appear--a

grim evil in a decaying house heavy with the odor of rotten apples; and,

accompanying them, the mind will be flooded with the charmed moments of

Mr. Walpole's descriptions: Russian nights with frozen stars, rooms

swimming placid and strange in old mirrors, golden ballrooms and London

dusks, the pale quiver of spring, of vernal fragrance, under the high

sooty glass dome of a railroad station.

In this, at once, the remarkable delicacy of his perceptions is made

apparent: it is impossible, in thinking of these books, to separate what

occurs in the sphere of reality from the vivid pressures, the dim

forces, that, lying back of conscious existence, are always gathering

like portentous storms behind Mr. Walpole's stories. To have stated so

calmly his passionate belief in just these influences was, at the time

most of his books were written, an act of that courage he has so

persistently extolled. Yet the details of his fortitude belong properly

to the examination of individual novels.

Time, however, has altogether justified his spiritual preoccupations:

the literature of the surface of things, the sting of onions in a

glittering tin bowl, aesthetic boys--still the wistful ghost of Wilde,

the flaneur--dragged through the pages of Freud, unlimited sentences in

sociology hardly humanized by a tagging of proper names and mechanical

desires, have been swept into the dust-bin for temporary reactions and

fevers. Nothing can be gained by speculation about the future, it is

enough to realize that, in imaginative letters, the school of arrogant

materialism has been discredited; and that Mr. Walpole, because of his

steadiness in the face of skeptical and mocking devils, has easily,

securely, entirely, survived the most blasting and calamitous ordeal men

have had yet to meet.

His books, from the first to the last, have not become antiquated; they

are as fresh to-day as they were at any time through the past ten or

twelve years; the people in them, true in costume and speech to their

various moments, are equally true to that which in man is changeless.

They, the novels, are at once provincial, as the best novels invariably

are, and universal as any deep penetration of humanity, any considerable

artistry, must be. Never merely cosmopolitan, never merely smart--even

in his knowledge of smart people--they are sincere without being stupid,

serious without a touch of hypocrisy; and on the other hand, light

without vapidity, entertaining with never a compromise nor the least

descent from the most dignified of engagements.

All this, on the plane to which I am confined--the pleasure to be had

from accumulated words--is as rare as it is delightful. The world,

particularly the world of novel-writing, is choked with solemn

pretensions and sly lies; it, the latter, is the fertile field of all

the ignorances--the dogmatic, the degenerate, the hysterical, the venal.

And, unhappily, there seems to be very nearly a public for each;

unhappily the deeply bitten prejudices of men, the secretive hopes of

women, control to an amazing degree their opinions of the one

medium--the written story--that should be kept superior to all pettiness

as a resource solely of alleviation. Usually great creative

writers--gifted, together with pity, with clarity of vision--have dealt

in a mood of severity with life; they are largely barred, by their

covenant with truth, from the multitude; but Mr. Walpole, not lacking in

the final gesture of greatness, has yet the optimism that sees integrity

as the master of the terrors. Literature, different from painting and

music, serves beauty rather by the detestation of ugliness than in the

recording of lyrical felicities. But, again, Mr. Walpole has countless

passages of approval, of verbal loveliness, that must make him

acceptable not only to a few but to many.

In reading, for example, The Secret City, there is the satisfaction of

realizing that the consequent enjoyment rises from an unquestionably

pure source. It is a preoccupation to be followed with utter

security--for once an admirable thing, a fine thing, is altogether

pleasurable.

Hugh Walpole: An Appreciation · 第 4 / 20 题