Respecting this we further learn from Hutchins,--

"Tradition says, that one Arundell, steward to the Earl of

Pembroke, in the beginning of Queen Elizabeth's reign, built a

large house in the town for himself, out of the Abbey materials.

This seems to have been the same which Mr. Coker speaks of, when

he says, 'The greatest ornament of the town is a fair turretted

house of the Lord Arundell of Wardour.' But it is most probable

it was built by Sir Thomas Arundell, or his son Sir Matthew, out

of the ruins of the Abbey. It stands in Bymport Street, and has

been a public house, it is now almost pulled down. In 1747, on

the chimney piece were these arms,--1. ARUNDELL, _with crescent

for difference_.--2. Quarterly, 1 and 4, _Gules, four lozenges

ermine_ (DINHAM), 2 and 3, _Gules, three arches conjoined,

argent_ (DE ARCHES).--3. CHIDIOCK.--4. _Sable (azure), a bend,

with label of three points or, for difference_ (CARMINOW)."

This was not all the property Sir Thomas appears to have had assigned

him at the dissolution of religious houses. In 1547, Henry VIII.

granted him the house and site of the Priory (or College) of Slapton

in South Devon, "except all the lead upon the said College other than

the gutters, and the lead in the windows; except all the bells and

ornaments"--the rectory, also that of Loddiswell, and three other

manors in Devon, Somerset, and Cornwall. Although his wife's sister

Queen Katharine had been executed four years previously, he is

described as 'Chancellor' to her.

Associated with Sir Thomas Arundell at the Court of Henry VIII., and

also in his country possessions in the west, was his relative Henry

Daubeney, Earl of Bridgwater, a most unfortunate man. He was the son

of Giles, Lord Daubeney, K.G., a trusted servant and soldier to Henry

VII.; the old seat and possessions of the family being at

South-Petherton, and later at Barrington Court near that town. Lord

Daubeney married Elizabeth, sister of Sir Thomas Arundell, K.B., of

Lanherne,--the father of Sir John Arundell, who was the father of the

Sir Thomas of our narrative,--Henry Daubeney, Earl of Bridgwater, his

only son, would therefore be Sir John's cousin.

But not only by kinship on his father's side, but also by a similar

relationship on his wife's, was the Earl closely connected with Sir

Thomas. Lord Bridgwater married secondly, Katharine Howard, daughter

of Thomas, second Duke of Norfolk, by his second wife Agnes Tilney.

She was therefore aunt to Sir Thomas' wife, being her mother's

half-sister.

The Countess of Bridgwater was greatly persecuted during the trial of

her niece Queen Katharine Howard, and almost every means was resorted

to to implicate her with that unfortunate woman. The Earl, her

husband, plunged into the vortex of expensive frivolities that

surrounded the Court of Henry VIII., and it is related irretrievably

crippled, if not finally ruined himself by extravagant display at the

Field of the Cloth of Gold. He died without issue, in seclusion and

comparative penury at the little rural parish of South-Perrott, near

Crewkerne, and was there buried 12 April, 1548,--his wife survived

him, and was interred in the Norfolk Chantry in Lambeth church, 11

May, 1554.[42]

[42] For further account of this Earl, and his father Lord

Daubeney, see "_Memorials of the West_," pages 173-220.

[Illustration: REGAL HERALDRY, TEMP. HENRY VIII., COWIC, EXETER.]

It was this double tie of relationship that doubtless led to the

important transactions with regard to the sale or transfer of a large

portion of the Earl's landed possessions to Sir Thomas Arundell, when

from time to time he had necessity; or it may be by family arrangement

to protect himself and wife from forfeiture, in those days of peril

and consequent attainder and confiscation.

In 1536-8-9 Henry, Lord Daubeney, conveyed to his _nephew_, Sir Thomas

Arundell, his manors of Tollard-Royal, Farnham, Long-Crichell,

Kershall, Goorsley, and Hampreston, with advowsons, &c., and Shaston,

Wimborne-Minster, Gussage-All-Saints, Tarrant-Gunville, and

Stubhampton, in the counties of Wilts and Dorset, with a clause "that

if Henry, Lord Daubeney, should die without heirs to his body, the

same should remain to the use of the said Sir Thomas Arundell and his

heirs for ever." In 1542 the Earl conveyed the manor of

South-Petherton to him. This included the manor and park of

Barrington, and the forest of Roche (Neroche?) the advowson, Chantry,

and free Chapel of South-Petherton, and of the Hundred, and lands at

Yarcombe, &c.

And this leads us to his last and most important purchase, that of the

Castle and Park of Wardour, on 4 July, 1 Edward VI., 1547.

Wardour Castle and its olden inhabiters have a special interest

interwoven in our little narratives, three or four of the subjects of

them, having successively, either occupied or possessed it.

About the year 1495 the Earl of Ormond granted a lease of it to the

giant Sir John, afterward Lord Cheney, K.G.,--the "unhorsed at

Bosworth,"--and it is not at all improbable that he may have died

there, as he was buried at the not very far-distant cathedral of

Salisbury.

Then on the 4 July, 14 Henry VII., 1499, three years after Lord

Cheney's death, Thomas, Earl of Ormond, sold the Castle of Wardour to

Robert, the first Lord Willoughby de Broke, "our Steward of

Household," and according to one account, he is said to have died

there, although his monument is found and he is probably buried at

Callington, in far-distant Cornwall.

Lord Willoughby de Broke and his descendants appear to have retained

possession of it until 1547, when his ultimate heiress Lady Elizabeth

Greville and her husband Sir Fulke disposed of it to Sir Thomas

Arundell.

Thus much, as a short notice of the principal landed possessions

acquired by Sir Thomas Arundell. Some by gift of his father, others by

arrangement with his uncle Lord Bridgwater, or by purchase from

different possessors, and a further large portion partly by

purchase,--if it may be so-called,--and partly probably by free grant

from the King, Henry VIII., the whole of which in the aggregate would

constitute Sir Thomas a wealthy man, and a west-country magnate of

leading position.

A curious circumstance becomes noticeable here. The sale and grants of

property acquired under Henry VIII. were the despoiled possessions of

the Church, the property of the suppressed and dismantled Abbey of

Shaftesbury, and dissolved Priory or College of Slapton. Yet the

Arundells (as also the Howards to whom they were so nearly allied)

were at the time, and still continue to be, specially distinguished by

their fealty to the Roman communion, the antient faith of their

fathers. This fact, however, does not seem to have hindered his

acceptance of what at the time, by common consent had been "set aside

for the Lord." To which it may be answered, if he had not acquired it,

many others were doubtless eagerly waiting for the chance; and it was

never likely to return to fulfil the original purpose of the donors.

Notwithstanding the dangers that surrounded the Court of Henry VIII.,

and the perilous proximity of relationship in which, by marriage, he

stood toward that monarch, specially amid the complications that arose

during the impeachments, trials, and sad deaths of the two Queens, his

wife's relatives; yet neither Sir Thomas, nor Lady Arundell, seems to

have been involved or suspected in any way, indeed, to the contrary,

as he appears subsequently to have experienced Henry's favour, it

being three years after Queen Katharine Howard's death, when he

received the grant of the Priory of Slapton from that king.

All this points to his being a prudent man, keeping aloof from the

dangerous intrigues continually arising, and he has been described as

a wise administrator. He was grandson of Cicely Bonville, the great

west-country heiress, and his mother Elizabeth names him as one of the

executors to her will, and therein describes him as "her trusty and

well-beloved son."

Before the reign of Henry VIII. closed, its last victim was led to the

scaffold, the accomplished Earl of Surrey, and nephew of Sir Thomas.

The Duke of Norfolk, his father, with cruel obduracy had presided over

the trial of his niece the unfortunate Queen Anne Boleyn, and now the

same fate had overtaken his son. The executioner was waiting for

himself also, but the unexpected death of Henry occurred just in time

to save him. The "Fair Geraldine" of the poet Earl was a cousin of Sir

Thomas on his mother's side, being the daughter of Gerald Fitzgerald,

Earl of Kildare, who married the Lady Eleanor, probably a younger

sister of the Lady Elizabeth Grey, mother of Sir Thomas.

With the conclusion of the reign of Henry VIII., the larger and

presumably, on the whole, happier portion of the life of Sir Thomas

Arundell may be said to have ended. The child-king, Edward VI., in

January, 1547, commenced his reign, and four short years only were

destined to pass before Sir Thomas was laid in a traitor's grave.

In 1549 a distinguished office was conferred on him, one that his

father had held before him, and of peculiar honour in his native

county, that of Receiver General of the Duchy of Cornwall.

This year, however, the first cloud appeared over his hitherto

fortunate career. Himself, with his brother Sir John Arundell of

Lanherne, were both suspected of being implicated in the rebellion of

their uncle Humphrey Arundell, Governor of St. Michael's Mount, "a man

well-esteemed for military services." This was the religious

insurrection, demanding the old ritual, and antagonistic to the

reformed service of the Church, which began in Cornwall, and gathering

strength as it advanced, laid ineffectual siege to Exeter, where,

however, the citizens, during their captivity, were reduced to great

straits. The insurgents then marched to meet Lord Russell, who was

stationed with some force at Honiton, but he defeated them with

considerable loss at Feniton (or Fenny) Bridges. They then retreated

to Clyst-Heath, near Exeter, where--

"they had brought with them a crucifix upon a cart, covered with

a canopy, and beset with crosses, tapers, banners, holy bread and

water, as a representation of those things for which they

fought."

At Clyst-Heath, Lord Gray with his troops, reinforced with those under

Lord Russell, dispersed the ignorant priest-led rustics with great

slaughter;--

"The dispersion of the insurgents was followed by the same

conduct on the part of the royal army, as if they had put to

route a foreign enemy in his own country, 'for the whole country

was then put to the spoil, and every soldier sought for his best

profit.'"

Sir Anthony Kingston, as Provost-Marshal of the king's army, was

commissioned to try and punish the delinquents, and his cruel and

brutal conduct was quite on an equality with that of the wretched

Jeffreys on a similar errand a century afterward;--

"Gibbets were set up in various places, on which great numbers of

the leaders of the rebellion were hanged. Others, and especially

Arundell, the chief captain, were carried to London, and there

executed. It was reckoned that about four thousand in all

perished by the sword or by the hands of the executioner, of

those engaged in this Devonshire (and Cornwall) insurrection."

Humphrey Arundell, their uncle, was conveyed to London and hanged at

Tyburn in January, 1549-50. And then it is recorded in the Council

book,--

"XXX. Jan., 1549-50. Sir Thomas Arundel, Knight, committed to the

Tower by order of the board."

The Strife of the Roses and Days of the Tudors in the West · 第 67 / 120 题