When Aubrey visited the Chapel in 1669, he notes,--

"By the north aisle is a peculiar chappell of excellent worke,

the roof of wood curiously carved. I guesse the worke to be about

temp: Henry VI. about which time this kind of Gothique

architecture was at the height. This was as noble a Chapelle as

any in the county, now, in the windowe, like a great bay windowe

is only one scutcheon left entire; viz: Stafford,--_Or, a chevron

gules._ Another was quarterley, _now broken_: another thus

Stafford, imp: Beville. At the bottom thereof is a flatt

gravestone of freestone well worked, lineally with the figure of

a lady in a Gothique niche. In the limbe thereof this inscription

"=Hic jacet d'na Emma, &c=."

The old antiquary gives the inscription fairly correct as it now is

found, but at the end he adds these further words,--"=O Deus trina me

John conserva ruina=,"--(_O triune God, save me, John, from

perdition_). But such never could have existed on the face of the

gravestone, as the inscription, without this addition completely fills

the ledger-line around its edge. Probably he saw it in one of the

windows. He then goes on to say,--

"In the limbe of the windowe are these fragments "=Emme matris

d... d'ni Joh'is Archiep...r...dicti=." In the top of this

windowe, and also of the other, in scrolls,--"=Gnothi seauton:

Nosce te ipsum.=" The other windowe is all broken, but the scrolls

aforesaid: only the picture of the archbishop, except his head,

remains, of curious painted glass, he in his formalities, with

pall, crozier, &c., in a cope of sky colour. In a limbe of this

windowe "=hujus capelle ... Archiepi Cantuar=." In the carved wood

work of the roofe are several little hunting figures, as of men

carrying a deer, shooting a deer in the wood. One scutcheon of

Hungerford in wood. This chapell is built outside the church, as

Hungerfords at Sarum, but the scutcheons of stone are not

charged."

A review of the circumstances attending the origin and career of John

Stafford, Archbishop of Canterbury, furnishes a subject of peculiar

interest. Born, as we have observed, outside the legal pale, and as a

consequence, subject to all its worldly disadvantages, this drawback

appears to have found no hindrance to his advancement on the path of

life, which ultimately led--short of sovereignty--to the highest

station it had to offer. This result exhibits another striking

instance of those marvellous careers, that have so often waited upon

these natural children of mankind, who bearing down all obstacles in

their way, and contemptuous of the goody-goody frowns and askant

glances of their more piously-bred neighbours, by the force of their

character, and the self-reliance engendered by what is termed

misfortune of birth, have achieved the position of standing among the

leaders and rulers of their race.

Examined by the light of common sense, the cause of this innate

distinction is perhaps not far to seek. In its highest and truest

sense, such have received their being under the strongest impulses

that animate the human heart, knit by the influence of attachment

often so powerful, that no present consequence, or after consideration

received at the time a moment's parley, and Nature in the result

asserts the aristocracy of her lineage; whereof the life of the

Archbishop is a notable example. Proscribed doubtless, then as now, by

the social world from assuming equality with them, and unable

therefore to pursue any of the usual worldly professions with equal

chances of success, it is refreshing to find the highest human

vocation, the office of the Christian minister, was at his

acceptance,--the Church opened her door to the human waif,--who was

destined afterward to become her chief pastor. From his presumed

father--as usual--he received scant help, but five years before his

death, Sir Humphrey bestowed on him a costless gift, by presenting the

future Archbishop to the family living of Farnboro', in the diocese of

Bath and Wells,--a See he afterward presided over.

The close affection also that evidently existed between the Archbishop

and his mother, cemented doubtless by the circumstances of his birth,

and her consequent comparative isolation from society, is a delightful

trait in his character; and it may be fully surmised caused him to

take her to Canterbury, there to become a Sister of the religious

house, of which fraternity he was a Brother, in order that she might

be well cared for, and be near him, and where she probably passed the

last twenty years of her life. She lived long enough to see her

distinguished son ascend the Archiepiscopal throne, and as Lord

Chancellor also to the reigning sovereign, King Henry VI., become at

once the first citizen of his native land, both in Church and State; a

remarkable privilege, that few mothers indeed,--no matter what

distinction of birth or station they inherited,--have been destined to

witness.

At her death in 1446, the Archbishop had her body conveyed back to

North-Bradley, of which place she presumably was a native, and where

probably her son was born. There he deposited her remains in the

mortuary chapel attached to the parish church he had specially built

to receive them, under a tomb whereon he caused her form to be

depicted, and surrounded it with the simple inscription that still

remains to bear witness of his filial affection.

It is noticeable that some intimacy must have sprung up between his

father's family and himself, for although Sir Humphrey does not

mention him in his will, yet his second wife Elizabeth D'Aumarle does

so in hers. This intercourse probably ripened toward the end of his

life, for his legally-born half-brother, Sir Humphrey "_with the

Silver Hand_," who died ten years before the Archbishop, bequeaths him

some silver plate, and constitutes him one of his executors. This

acknowledgment would be quite in accordance with the ordinary ways

of the world, Sir Humphrey doubtless properly felt that the honour

of the friendship had now passed to the side of his presumed

half-brother,--the stray off-shoot of the Stafford blood, had outgrown

and overshadowed in position and fame, all the other branches of the

family tree, and consequent on this, as a matter of course, his

kinship was not disowned, and the Archbishop became the "_frater meo_"

of the Knight "_with the Silver Hand_."

But, strange irony of this world's remembrance,--in death, if not in

life their memory was to be avenged,--not a fragment of a memorial,

nor the trace of an inscription remains to any direct member of the

influential family of Stafford of Suthwyke and Hooke. Eschewing the

humble precincts of the churches of the parishes in which their homes

in Wilts and Dorset were situate as a place of burial, they caused

their dust to be carried many miles away to the grand Abbey Church of

Abbotsbury, and deposited in a Chantry they had founded therein, with

its attendant priest to supplicate unceasingly for the welfare of

their souls. Not very long after the last member of their race was

laid within it, ruthless hands razed the great fabric to the ground,

when all the memorials to the dead it contained were destroyed, and

with such completeness, that even the position of their sepulchres may

not at present be discerned, so that now, the tomb of the mother of

the Archbishop alone remains in these western parts, to bear indirect

witness of their former existence.

The Archbishop appears to have died at Maidstone on the sixth of July,

1452, and was buried in the "Transept of the Martyrdom" in Canterbury

Cathedral.

He lies under an immense (Purbeck?) marble stone, perhaps the very

largest in the cathedral, eleven feet five inches in length, by four

feet six inches in breadth. On this was originally a magnificent

brass, almost entirely filling the stone, but only the indent, now

also much frayed, remains.

The outline shews us the effigy of the Archbishop _in pontificalibus_,

with mitre and pastoral staff. He stands under a rich canopy with

pinnacles and finials, supported on long buttresses that extend down

to the base of the composition. Below his feet there was evidently a

square panel which probably contained the "confabulatorie epitaph"

seen and copied by Weever. Around the edge of the stone is a

ledger-line, that probably had the emblems of the Evangelists at the

angles.

The Archbishop's gravestone has shared the common fate accorded to all

the brass-inlaid stones, that doubtless formerly thickly adorned the

pavement of the cathedral, but of which not a single undespoiled

example now remains.

On a boss in the vaulting immediately above, are the prelate's arms,

being those of the See of Canterbury, impaling, _Or, on a chevron

gules, a mitre argent, within a bordure engrailed sable_ (STAFFORD OF

SUTHWYKE, _with difference_).

The Strife of the Roses and Days of the Tudors in the West · 第 62 / 120 题