Concerning this, Hall observes,--

"'Without arraignment or judgment, he was, in the open

Market-place on a new scaffold, beheaded and put to death. His

death he received at the hands of king Richard, whom he had

before, in his affairs, purposes, enterprises, holden, sustained,

and set forward, above all God's forbode."

And this account is corroborated by documents in the _Stafford MSS._,

quoted by the historian of Shrewsbury. The passage on the subject is

as follows:--

"And so all the gentlemen of Harrefordshire weare send for by

Privy Seale to King Richard to _Salisburie_, and by that time

Duke Henry of Buckingham, was brought by Sir James Tyler, the

third daye, wheare he was pittifullie murdered by the said Kinge,

for raisinge power to bring in King Henrie the Seventh."

The Duke having been thus summarily disposed of, what became of the

wretch that betrayed him? One account narrates,--

"Banister and his whole family were destroyed by the surprizing

judgments of the Almighty. The Usurper refused to pay him the

thousand pounds promised in the Proclamation, saying, 'He that

would betray so good a Master, would be false to any other.'"

But according to another, and truer version, the informer received his

reward, and,--

"with the king's commendation of his service in his letters

patent; for he gave him the Manour and Lordship of Ealding in

Kent, late belonging to the Duke of Buckingham. So the letters

ran,--'RICHARD &c.,--_to al and singular the Officers, &c.,--Wit

ye, that in consideration of the true and faithful service which

our well beloved servant Rauf Banistre Esq, now late hath done

unto us, for and about the taking and bringing of our said great

Rebel into our hands, we have given unto the said Rauf, and to

his heirs male, the said Manour for ever._'"

Both giver and receiver a congenial pair, and the gift that passed a

characteristic one, being a portion of the spoil of their victim. Of

such men it may be said,--

"Shame and Desolation sit

By their graves ever."

But where was Buckingham buried, after he had been thus "condemned and

executed in such summary way, on a new scaffold erected in the

Market-place of Salisbury." A tomb to his memory is erected in

Britford church, about a mile and a half distant from that city,

but it is a cenotaph only, his body was not interred there; where then

was its final resting-place, after his troublous life had found such

disastrous extinction? Still further ignominy appears to have remained

to be meted out to the inanimate form, after man had wreaked his last

vengeance on the life.

[Illustration: DISCOVERY MADE IN THE KITCHEN OF THE SARACEN'S

HEAD INN, SALISBURY.

_From the Saturday Magazine, 6 April, 1839._]

From an article in the _Saturday Magazine_, 6 April, 1839, we gather

the following,--

"Tradition assigns the court-yard of the Blue Boar Inn, as the

scene of this bloody tragedy; but great uncertainty seems always

to have prevailed as to the spot where the mutilated remains of

this unfortunate nobleman were finally deposited. The

frontispiece which is presented to our readers, gives a view of

the kitchen of an inn (the Saracen's Head) in Salisbury, in

which, while some repairs and alterations were being made, a

skeleton, in the condition shewn in the picture, was discovered

beneath the floor of the apartment, which is on a level with the

ground. A view of the appearance of the figure, together with the

apartment, was made and published by Mr. J. M. Cullam--of which

view, with his permission we have taken a copy. These human

remains, are with good reason, supposed to have belonged to that

Duke of Buckingham.

"It is supposed that the head and right arm, after having been

submitted to the personal inspection of the King, then resident

in "the King's house," in the Close, were sent to London to be

affixed to Temple Bar, or exposed on Tower Hill, as was commonly

used to be done in those times. A tomb in the north chantry of

St. Thomas's church, Salisbury, was once supposed to contain the

remains of Buckingham, and another in Britford church, near

Salisbury, obtained a similar reputation; but sufficient evidence

has been found to shew these were only _monuments_ to his memory,

and no indications, leading to probability, have ever appeared,

to point out the place of the sepulture of the Duke of

Buckingham, till the discovery took place represented in our

frontispiece.

"The Saracen's Head Inn (owing to the peculiar contiguity of the

two places) is supposed to have once formed part of the premises

attached to those of the Blue Boar. The grave, therefore, of the

Duke, was probably made only a few yards, possibly feet, from the

spot where he suffered decapitation. The skeleton was found about

eight inches below the surface of the soil; the spinal column

appeared imbedded in the clay, and on taking up some of the

detached vertebrae, they crumbled to dust in the hands. All the

remains were in a like friable condition."

The Strife of the Roses and Days of the Tudors in the West · 第 51 / 120 题