This was no more than speaking "in mitigation of damages."

Mr. Phunky made no speech, which was just as well, as he might have but

damaged the case, as no witnesses had been called on his side. For the

same reason, the Court had not the pleasure of hearing Skimpin, who would

no doubt have "torn the Defendant's case to tatters."

Bardell v. Pickwick · 第 18 / 23 题