BY MR. JAMES WIMSHURST.

I have the honor this evening of addressing a few remarks to you upon

the subject of influence machines, and the manner in which I propose

to treat the subject is to state as shortly as possible, first, the

historical portion, and afterward to point out the prominent

characteristics of the later and the more commonly known machines. The

diagrams upon the screen will assist the eye to the general form of

the typical machines, but I fear that want of time will prevent me

from explaining each of them.

In 1762 Wilcke described a simple apparatus which produced electrical

charges by influence, or induction, and following this the great

Italian scientist Alexander Volta in 1775 gave the electrophorus the

form which it retains to the present day. This apparatus may be viewed

as containing the germ of the principle of all influence machines yet

constructed.

Another step in the development was the invention of the doubler by

Bennet in 1786. He constructed metal plates which were thickly

varnished, and were supported by insulating handles, and which were

manipulated so as to increase a small initial charge. It may be better

for me to here explain the process of building up an increased charge

by electrical influence, for the same principle holds in all of the

many forms of influence machines.

This Volta electrophorus, and these three blackboards, will serve for

the purpose. I first excite the electrophorus in the usual manner, and

you see that it then influences a charge in its top plate; the charge

in the resinous compound is known as negative, while the charge

induced in its top plate is known as positive. I now show you by this

electroscope that these charges are unlike in character. Both charges

are, however, small, and Bennet used the following system to increase

them.

Let these three boards represent Bennet's three plates. To plate No. 1

he imparted a positive charge, and with it he induced a negative

charge in plate No. 2. Then with plate No. 2 he induced a positive

charge in plate No. 3. He then placed the plates Nos. 1 and 3

together, by which combination he had two positive charges within

practically the same space, and with these two charges he induced a

double charge in plate No. 2. This process was continued until the

desired degree of increase was obtained. I will not go through the

process of actually building up a charge by such means, for it would

take more time than I can spare.

In 1787 Carvallo discovered the very important fact that metal plates

when insulated always acquire slight charges of electricity; following

up those two important discoveries of Bennet and Carvallo, Nicholson

in 1788 constructed an apparatus having two disks of metal insulated

and fixed in the same plane. Then by means of a spindle and handle, a

third disk, also insulated, was made to revolve near to the two fixed

disks, metallic touches being fixed in suitable positions. With this

apparatus be found that small residual charges might readily be

increased. It is in this simple apparatus that we have the parent of

influence machines (see Fig. 1), and as it is now a hundred years

since Nicholson described this machine in the Phil. Trans., I think it

well worth showing a large sized Nicholson machine at work to-night

(see Fig. 11, above).

[Illustration: Figs. 1-9.]

In 1823 Ronalds described a machine in which the moving disk was

attached to and worked by the pendulum of a clock. It was a

modification of Nicholson's doubler, and he used it to supply

electricity for telegraph working. For some years after these machines

were invented no important advance appears to have been made, and I

think this may be attributed to the great discoveries in galvanic

electricity which were made about the commencement of this century by

Galvani and Volta, followed in 1831 to 1857 by the magnificent

discoveries of Faraday in electro-magnetism, electro-chemistry, and

electro-optics, and no real improvement was made in influence machines

till 1860, in which year Varley patented a form of machine shown in

Fig. 2. It also was designed for telegraph working.

In 1865 the subject was taken up with vigor in Germany by Toepler,

Holtz, and other eminent men. The most prominent of the machines made

by them are figured in the diagrams (Figs. 3 to 6), but time will not

admit of my giving an explanation of the many points of interest in

them; it being my wish to show you at work such of the machines as I

may be able, and to make some observations upon them.

In 1866 Bertsch invented a machine, but not of the multiplying type;

and in 1867 Sir William Thomson invented the form of machine shown in

Fig. 7, which, for the purpose of maintaining a constant potential in

a Leyden jar, is exceedingly useful.

The Carre machine was invented in 1868, and in 1880 the Voss machine

was introduced, since which time the latter has found a place in many

laboratories. It closely resembles the Varley machine in appearance,

and the Toepler machine in construction.

In condensing this part of my subject, I have had to omit many

prominent names and much interesting subject matter, but I must state

that in placing what I have before you, many of my scientific friends

have been ready to help and to contribute, and, as an instance of

this, I may mention that Prof. Sylvanus P. Thompson at once placed all

his literature and even his private notes of reference at my service.

I will now endeavor to point out the more prominent features of the

influence machines which I have present, and, in doing so, I must ask

a moment's leave from the subject of my lecture to show you a small

machine made by that eminent worker Faraday, which, apart from its

value as his handiwork, so closely brings us face to face with the

imperfect apparatus with which he and others of his day made their

valuable researches.

The next machine which I take is a Holtz. It has one plate revolving,

the second plate being fixed. The fixed plate, as you see, is so much

cut away that it is very liable to breakage. Paper inductors are fixed

upon the back of it, while opposite the inductors, and in front of the

revolving plate, are combs. To work the machine (1) a specially dry

atmosphere is required; (2) an initial charge is necessary; (3) when

at work the amount of electricity passing through the terminals is

great; (4) the direction of the current is apt to reverse; (5) when

the terminals are opened beyond the sparking distance, the excitement

rapidly dies away; (6) it does not part with free electricity from

either of the terminals singly.

It has no metal on the revolving plates, nor any metal contacts; the

electricity is collected by combs which take the place of brushes, and

it is the break in the connection of this circuit which supplies a

current for external use. On this point I cannot do better than quote

an extract from page 339 of Sir William Thomson's "Papers on

Electrostatics and Magnetism," which runs: "Holtz's now celebrated

electric machine, which is closely analogous in principle to Varley's

of 1860, is, I believe, a descendant of Nicholson's. Its great power

depends upon the abolition by Holtz of metallic carriers and metallic

make-and-break-contacts. It differs from Varley's and mine by leaving

the inductors to themselves, and using the current in the connecting

arc."

In respect to the second form of Holtz machine (Fig. 4) I have very

little information, for since it was brought to my notice nearly six

years ago I have not been able to find either one of the machines or

any person who had seen one. As will be seen by the diagram, it has

two disks revolving in opposite directions, it has no metal sectors

and no metal contacts. The "connecting arc circuit" is used for the

terminal circuit. Altogether I can very well understand and fully

appreciate the statement made by Professor Holtz in _Uppenborn's

Journal_ of May, 1881, wherein he writes that "for the purpose of

demonstration I would rather be without such machines."

The first type of Holtz machine has now in many instances been made up

in multiple form, within suitably constructed glass cases, but when so

made up, great difficulty has been found in keeping each of the many

plates to a like excitement. When differently excited, the one set of

plates furnished positive electricity to the comb, while the next set

of plates gave negative electricity; as a consequence, no electricity

passed the terminal.

To overcome this objection, to dispense with the dangerously cut

plates, and also to better neutralize the revolving plate, throughout

its whole diameter, I made a large machine having twelve disks 2 ft. 7

in. in diameter, and in it I inserted plain rectangular slips of glass

between the disks, which might readily be removed; these slips carried

the paper inductors. To keep all the paper inductors on one side of

the machine to a like excitement, I connected them together by a metal

wire. The machine so made worked splendidly, and your late president,

Mr. Spottiswoode, sent on two occasions to take note of my successful

modifications. The machine is now ten years old, but still works

perfectly. I will show you a smaller sized one at work.

The next machine for observations is the Carre (Fig. 8). It consists

essentially or a disk of glass which is free to revolve without touch

or friction. At one end of a diameter it moves near to the excited

plate of a frictional machine, while at the opposite end of the

diameter is a strip of insulting material, opposite which, and also

opposite the excited amalgam plate, are combs for conducting the

induced charges, and to which the terminals are metallically

connected; the machine works well in ordinary atmosphere, and

certainly is in many ways to be preferred to the simple frictional

machine. In my experiments with it I found that the quantity of

electricity might be more than doubled by adding a segment of glass

between the amalgam cushions and the revolving plate. The current in

this type of machine is constant.

The Voss machine has one fixed plate and one revolving plate. Upon the

fixed plate are two inductors, while on the revolving plate are six

circular carriers. Two brushes receive the first portions of the

induced charges from the carriers, which portions are conveyed to the

inductors. The combs collect the remaining portion of the induced

charge for use as an outer circuit, while the metal rod with its two

brushes neutralizes the plate surface in a line of its diagonal

diameter. When at work it supplies a considerable amount of

electricity. It is self-exciting in ordinary dry atmosphere. It freely

parts with its electricity from either terminal, but when so used the

current frequently changes its direction, hence there is no certainty

that a full charge has been obtained, nor whether the charge is of

positive or negative electricity.

I next come to the type of machine with which I am more closely

associated, and I may preface my remarks by adding that the invention

sprang solely from my experience gained by constantly using and

experimenting with the many electrical machines which I possessed. It

was from these I formed a working hypothesis which led me to make my

first small machine. It excited itself when new with the first

revolution. It so fully satisfied me with its performance that I had

four others made, the first of which I presented to this Institution.

Its construction is of a simple character. The two disks of glass

revolve near to each other and in opposite directions. Each disk

carries metallic sectors; each disk has its two brushes supported by

metal rods, the rods to the two plates forming an angle of 90 deg.

with each other. The external circuit is independent of the brushes,

and is formed by the combs and terminals.

[Illustration: Fig. 10.]

The machine is self-exciting under all conditions of atmosphere, owing

probably to each plate being influenced by and influencing in turn its

neighbor, hence there is the minimum surface for leakage. When

excited, the direction of the current never changes; this circumstance

is due, probably, to the circuit of the metallic sectors and the make

and break contacts always being closed, while the combs and the

external circuit are supplemental, and for external use only. The

quantity of electricity is very large and the potential high. When

suitably arranged, the length of spark produced is equal to nearly the

radius of the disk. I have made them from 2 in. to 7 ft. in diameter,

with equally satisfactory results. The diagram, Fig. 9, shows the

distribution of the electricity upon the plate surfaces when the

machine is fully excited. The inner circle of signs corresponds with

the electricity upon the front surface of the disk. The two circles of

signs between the two black rings refer to the electricity between the

disks, while the outer circle of signs corresponds with the

electricity upon the outer surface of the back disk. The diagram is

the result of experiments which I cannot very well repeat here this

evening, but in support of the distribution shown on the diagram, I

will show you two disks at work made of a flexible material, which

when driven in one direction close together at the top and the bottom,

while in the horizontal diameter they are repelled. When driven in the

reverse direction, the opposite action takes place.

I have also experimented with the cylindrical form of the machine (see

Fig. 10). The first of these I made in 1882, and it is before you. The

cylinder gives inferior results to the simple disks, and is more

complicated to adjust. You notice I neither use nor recommend

vulcanite, and it is perhaps well to caution my hearers against the

use of that material for the purpose, for it warps with age, and when

left in the daylight it changes and becomes useless.

[Illustration: Figs. 11 & 12.]

I have now only to speak of the larger machines. They are in all

respects made up with the same plates, sectors, and brushes as were

used by me in the first experimental machines, but for convenience

sake they are fitted in numbers within a glass case. One machine has

eight plates of 2 ft. 4 in. diameter; it has been in the possession of

the Institution for about three years. A second, which has been made

for this lecture, has twelve disks, each 2 ft. 6 in. in diameter. The

length of spark from it is 13-5/8 in. (see Fig. 12). During the

construction of the machine every care was taken to avoid electrical

excitement in any of its parts, and after its completion several

friends were present to witness the fitting of the brushes and the

first start. When all was ready the terminals were connected to an

electroscope, and the handle was moved so slowly that it occupied

thirty seconds in moving one-half revolution, and at that point

violent excitement appeared.

The machine has now been standing with its handle secured for about

eight hours. No excitement is apparent, but still it may not be

absolutely inert. Of this each one present must judge, but I will

connect it with this electroscope (Figs. 13 and 14), and then move the

handle slowly, so that you may see when the excitement commences and

judge of its absolutely reliable behavior as an instrument for public

demonstration. I may say that I have never, under any condition, found

this type of machine to fail in its performance.

[Illustration: Fig. 13.]

[Illustration: Fig. 14.]

I now propose to show you the beautiful appearances of the discharge,

and then, in order that you may judge of the relative capabilities of

each of these three machines, we will work them all at the same time.

The large frictional machine which is in use for this comparison is so

well known by you that a better standard could not be desired.

In conclusion, I may be permitted to say that it is fortunate I had

not read the opinions of Sir William Thomson and Professor Holtz, as

quoted in the earlier part of my lecture, previous to my own practical

experiments. For had I read such opinions from such authorities, I

should probably have accepted them without putting them to practical

test. As the matter stands, I have done those things which they said I

ought not to have done, and I have left undone those which they said I

ought to have done, and by so doing I think you must freely admit that

I have produced an electric generating machine of great power, and

have placed in the hands of the physicist, for the purposes of public

demonstration or original research, an instrument more reliable than

anything hitherto produced.

* * * * *

VIOLET COPYING INK.--Dissolve 40 parts of extract of logwood, 5 of

oxalic acid and 30 parts of sulphate of aluminium, without heat, in

800 parts of distilled water and 10 parts of glycerine; let stand

twenty-four hours, then add a solution of 5 parts of bichromate of

potassium in 100 parts of distilled water, and again set aside for

twenty-four hours. Now raise the mixture once to boiling in a bright

copper boiler, mix with it, while hot, 50 parts of wood vinegar, and

when cold put into bottles. After a fortnight decant it from the

sediment. In thin layers this ink is reddish violet; it writes dark

violet and furnishes bluish violet copies.

* * * * *

Scientific American Supplement, No. 647, May 26, 1888 · 第 7 / 59 题