HORRORS OF VACCINATION EXPOSED AND ILLUSTRATED

HOW VACCINE VIRUS IS MADE AND HOW CATTLE AND MANKIND ARE DISEASED AND

KILLED BY IT

[Illustration: FIG. 1. How cattle are diseased and tortured and Vaccine

Virus produced.]

By referring to the cut on this page it will be seen that the living

calf or heifer is first bound down on a movable tilting table, and its

belly is shaved and on the clean, tender skin of a most tender part

one or two hundred cuts or scratches are then made, as shown, and into

these cuts or scratches is rubbed some “seed virus,” obtained directly

or indirectly from human smallpox, and other known or unknown human or

animal infections. But just what infections this “seed virus” contains

it seems impossible to find out, and it seems also that even the virus

makers themselves either do not know definitely what they are using

and making, or will not state. But they certainly should be compelled

by law to disclose fully the exact nature and origin of their viruses,

and to publish the same clearly and openly, and should also be rigidly

bonded to the State and the National Government for all damages to

animals or mankind caused by any disasters from their dangerous methods

and products.

We can all now imagine, however, looking at the picture, Fig. 1, what

must be the tortures and suffering of the vaccinated heifer with one

or two hundred festering wounds on its belly, when we recall the great

suffering often caused to a child with a single wound on its arm, and

we can also imagine what must be the effect on the entire system of the

heifer itself--the future milk giver--in being thus saturated by the

septic poison from these multiple wounds, pustules or ulcers, and what

may be the permanent constitutional effect on the animal in developing

or fixing in it, perhaps for life, some of our most dangerous diseases,

such as tuberculosis, to which the bovine species is most subject,

and which it has been demonstrated is chiefly transmitted to man

through the milk of the cow. See 25th Report of U. S. Bureau of Animal

Industry, 1908, page 109. Whatever the effects on the system of the

heifer may be, it must be obvious, however, that to be thus saturated

by the virus of most dangerous diseases in hundreds of wounds over a

large part of its body certainly cannot be good, and it is obviously

a most barbarous and revolting kind of medical art, to say the least,

which thinks it must resort to such a wholesale method of diseasing

domestic animals first and mankind afterwards with the idea of

promoting general health; and how any one can conceive anything more

barbarous or revolting and dangerous than this method, we fail to see.

Now after the calf has been inoculated as described, it is removed

from the table and allowed to stand on its feet in its stall securely

tied, and carefully fed and tended and allowed to remain thus for

about a week, with its one or two hundred festering wounds gradually

filling up with ulcerative or suppurative disease matter. At this

stage the calf is now again strapped on the table for the collection

of this accumulated disease matter. This fresh disease matter usually

contains the germs of many diseases known and unknown, including human

smallpox and cowpox or “vaccinia” and sometimes other germs even much

more dangerous and fatal than smallpox. This dangerous complex disease

matter is now squeezed and scraped out (imagine the torture of the

heifer as its one or two hundred wounds are successively scraped out!)

and this horrible material is then mixed with glycerine in order to

dilute it and make it go farther and more profitably, and also to kill

many dangerous germs which the complex virus is known to contain, and

to some of which, glycerine, in a certain percentage, is fatal, but

is not fatal to the germ of smallpox or vaccinia which it is aimed

to preserve in more or less virile condition. In addition to this

mixing with glycerine the virus is also subjected to a number of other

processes and tests, to endeavor to free it from all the dangerous and

fatal disease germs which it is known or is likely to contain, except

the smallpox germ, which is dangerous enough in itself. But it seems to

be impossible always to free the virus from such “foreign” germs, or to

guarantee that it will not produce at any time some dangerous or fatal

result when inoculated into the body of child or adult in the operation

of vaccination, as is proved by the two great epidemics of foot and

mouth disease in cattle, in 1902 and 1908, and the many human deaths

occurring after vaccinations reported every year throughout the country.

After the virus has been taken from the vaccinated calves, it has been

the custom, in some cases, to free the diseased calves and let them

mix with healthy herds, and in other cases the vaccinated calves have

been butchered and their carcasses sold for human food! Either of

these methods of disposal of the diseased calves is obviously highly

dangerous to animal and human health and life, but whether these

dangerous practices are still used by any vaccine manufacturers or by

any of our Health Departments having vaccine stables and laboratories

we do not know; but this point should be carefully investigated by the

Government and these dangerous practices suppressed wherever they still

exist.

WHAT VACCINATION REALLY IS AND HOW PUS INFECTION, LOCKJAW, AND OTHER

DISEASES WORK TOGETHER IN VACCINATION WITH FATAL EFFECTS

Every act of cowpox vaccination consists simply in making a wound,

scratch or puncture on the human body and then rubbing or injecting

into this wound a living or virulent disease virus of a more or less

complex nature, usually containing the actual virus of human smallpox

combined with animal cowpox and always the virus of pus infection or

septicemia in one or more of its many forms. Dr. M. J. Rosenau, one of

the best authorities in the country on vaccine virus, in his recent

work “Preventive Medicine and Hygiene” (1914), says on pages 6 and 7:

“Vaccine Virus always contains bacteria. There is no such thing as

aseptic virus. Staphylococci, streptococci, members of the hemorrhagic

septicemic group, and, in a few instances, tetanus spores and the gas

bacillus have been found in vaccine virus.”

In Bulletin 12 of the U. S. Hygienic Laboratory, issued 1903, on

“Impurities in Vaccine Virus,” Dr. Rosenau tells us that “Vaccinia is

a specific disease, the cause of which _has not been determined_. We

are therefore _working somewhat in the dark_. We are _compelled_ to

vaccinate our patients with a virus containing micro-organisms other

than those causing vaccinia.”

Listen to these most significant admissions by one of the highest

authorities on vaccine virus in the country--_working in the dark with

an undetermined disease_! _Compelled_ to vaccinate the people with

a virus containing many different disease germs other than the one

intended, which in itself is even yet _undetermined_ and in the _dark_!

Does this look much like known, safe, certain and scientific medicine,

or is it merely only dangerous experiment and guesswork with deadly

infections on the human body?

To show that vaccination is authoritatively recognized as essentially

equivalent to Pyæmia and Septicemia, I can cite the reports of the

Registrar General of England, which is the highest statistical

authority in the English-speaking world, which acknowledge many

vaccination deaths every year, and these deaths are now classified

under a subhead of Pyæmia-Septicemia which is numbered 20 in the

International List of Causes of Death, and the deaths under this

general head are divided and classified as follows: Pyæmia, No. 20A;

Septicemia, No. 20B; Vaccinia, No. 20C. Under this latter subhead, more

deaths of children are recorded from vaccination almost every year than

from smallpox itself! See pages 23-24. See also “Causes of Death,”

issued by U. S. Census Bureau, 1913, page 56, No. 20, where vaccination

is classed as a form of Purulent Infection and Septicemia.

[Illustration:

FIG. 2. Vaccination on the ninth day, showing a normal,

ordinary or mild type. Note here that both the central sore or

vaccine pustule and the surrounding inflammation or “areola”

present, even in this mild or ordinary form, clearly a case of

septicemic or pus infection or blood poisoning pure and simple.

]

In Fig. 2 annexed I now give a photograph of an ordinary “successful”

or normal vaccination on the ninth day after inoculation, showing

the fully developed or pustular stage of a “mild” or “safe” type of

vaccination from which no serious harm or “complication” is supposed

to result. It will be noted, however, that even this normal form of

vaccination is a perfectly typical case of pus infection, septicemia

or blood poisoning on a small or mild scale. The vaccination wound on

the arm, as will be seen, takes the typical form of a large irregular

pustule or small abscess about one inch in diameter, more or less,

with a depressed center and raised margin like a smallpox pustule, and

this pustule is full and tense with a collection of pus or suppurative

disease matter which, of course, always contains the germs of pus

infection, inflammation and suppuration in one or more varieties

which usually include, as Dr. Rosenau has stated, the two most common

and dangerous pus germs, known as the “staphylococcus” and the

“streptococcus.” You will also note that around the big pustule there

is a diffuse rash or inflammation known as the “areola” which goes

more or less deep in the flesh and extends more or less over the arm

according to the severity of the case, and is similar to or identical

with Erysipelas. The extent and severity of both the pustule and the

rash vary more or less in every case, but in strong and healthy persons

not very susceptible to the vaccine poison the pustule and areola

usually show no greater extent or severity than that seen in Fig. 2. I

will here state that this Fig. 2, as well as the following Figs. 3, 4

and 6, are all taken by permission from “Acute Contagious Diseases,” by

Drs. Welch and Schamberg of Philadelphia, published by Lea Brothers in

1905, which is a high authority on pro-vaccination, and one of the most

complete works on smallpox and vaccination published.

[Illustration: FIG. 3. Vaccinal Ulcer.]

In Fig. 3 is shown a bad case of vaccination which takes the form of

a spreading ulcer, showing a severe pus infection, being the exact

condition required for lockjaw to develop if its germ is already within

the body of the vaccinated person or if it gets into the wound in any

way whatever from the surroundings of the person or from the vaccine

virus itself. See on this point my special pamphlet “Vaccination and

Lockjaw”; see also page 104 in this Supplement.

[Illustration: FIG. 4. Multiple Vaccinations spread by finger-nails.]

Fig. 4 gives the picture of a nurse having several vaccine pustules

on the face caused by being scratched by a freshly vaccinated child,

showing the virulently infectious nature of vaccination as being

a septicemic or pus infection, pure and simple, which is not only

highly dangerous in itself but in which the terrible lockjaw and other

diseases find essential culture conditions for their deadly work when

acting as double or “mixed infections.”

[Illustration:

FIG. 5. Photograph of a little English baby two months old,

taken after death, killed by vaccination in thirty-six days.

This is a very severe and frequent form of fatal vaccination

known as “Generalized Vaccinia,” where the vaccine sore spreads

all over the body in a series of big confluent pustules very

like confluent smallpox, being thus clearly an aggravated case

of pus infection and septicemia.

]

Sometimes the vaccination sore spreads all over the body like a bad

case of confluent smallpox, as shown in Fig. 5, which shows the case

of a little English baby two months old who was killed, according to

death certificate, in thirty-six days after vaccination by this form

of general eruption which is known as “Generalized Vaccinia.” I have

obtained this photograph from the parents of the child through my

London Office, with the death certificate, and have been informed that

the eruption on the covered parts of the body was even worse and more

confluent than that on the exposed face and arm. The name of the child

was Mona Stevenson, daughter of William Stevenson of Burnley, England,

and the date of death was August 4, 1908.

[Illustration:

FIG. 6. Vaccination on the tenth day, showing a severe type

of infection in a little child. Note wide-spread inflammation

over the arm at the “areola” around the vaccine pustule and the

bad eruption on the face which sometimes spreads all over the

body. This is, of course, a clear case of pus infection and

septicemia in which lockjaw, meningitis, pneumonia, or other

diseases may find their essential conditions for producing

their deadly work in killing the child as a direct or indirect

result of the vaccination and the double infection caused by it.

]

In Fig. 6, also taken from the work of Drs. Welch and Schamberg, is

shown the photograph of a vaccinated boy, illustrating a severe form of

vaccination which is very common in susceptible children. In this case

the pustule is not much different from Fig. 2, but the areola is very

severe and like erysipelas and has spread over a large part of the arm

and up to the shoulder, indicating a severe infection of the system

with a more extensive and serious blood poisoning which is further

aggravated by a bad rash of pimples which has broken out upon the face

and about the mouth like the first form of the eruption in smallpox.

This eruption may be in the form of papules, vesicles or pustules, or

may go through the three forms successively, as in smallpox, or abort

at any of these stages; and these eruptions, either of the pimples

or the areola, may sometimes extend over a large part of or even over

the entire body and quickly kill the child by general blood poisoning

and exhaustion. Where the external or skin eruptions are not very

bad, however, the child usually recovers, with or without permanent

constitutional injury. The worst cases of vaccinal infection are

not, however, those which have external skin eruptions but in which

there is little or no indication externally of purulent infection,

except possibly at the sore itself, and in which the suppuration or

infection extends _inwardly_ and attacks one or more of the internal

organs and kills by general internal suppuration known as “Pyæmia” or

“Septicemia,” which may show itself by serious suppurations in lungs,

bronchi, pleura, heart, brain or spine, or in the digestive or other

organs. Thus by its very extensiveness this blood poisoning may give

to the falsifying vaccinator ample and plausible excuse to make a

false and deceptive report on the death of the vaccinated child and

to deny and conceal the primary responsibility of vaccination for the

infection and death by reporting in death certificate or autopsy that

the child died from one or other of the terminal diseases or results

of the vaccine infection, such as “Pneumonia,” “Broncho-Pneumonia,”

“Pleurisy,” “Meningitis” or “Endocarditis,” or even perhaps by some

form of intestinal inflammation and obstruction which, with a whole

series of other complications, may of course also result from the

vaccinal septicemia in its general riot of infection throughout the

whole system. And any one of these several consequent or terminal

diseases can be plausibly set down by the falsifying vaccinist as the

true and only cause of death, without any mention whatever of the

original cause in the primary infection of the vaccination, which

will thus be completely ignored and brazenly denied and concealed.

Such a death certificate or autopsy report concealing and denying the

original infection of vaccination is, sad to say, very common, and is,

of course, just about as true and honest and acceptable as if some

murderer should report on his own homicidal act that the bullet which

he shot into the victim’s body did not really kill the victim, but

that it was purely the stoppage of the man’s defective heart that

actually killed him! Or, to give another example, that it was the fatal

infection of lockjaw which the careless victim himself, or his careless

nurse, allowed to get into the harmless bullet wound, that was really

responsible for the death and not the innocent bullet that was fired

into the victim’s body!

Horrors of vaccination exposed and illustrated · 第 74 / 119 题