THE GOLDEN RULE AND THE DECLARATION OF RIGHTS COMPARED

It may be worth while to consider here for a moment what is perhaps

the best version of the “Golden Rule,” viz., the version of Plato in

Plato’s Laws, Book XI, Prof. Jowett’s translation, which is in these

words, dated about 360 B.C.:

“Thou shalt not touch that which is mine, if thou canst help,

or remove the least thing which belongs to me without my

consent: and may I, being of sound mind, do to others as I

would that they should do to me.”

This is surely a most righteous ethical code, clear, broad

and simple, and in moral and logical effect it is nearer like our

American Declaration of Rights than any other formula, particularly as

regards the recognition of the sacred personal rights of the individual

which is equivalent to the principle of “unalienable rights” in the

Declaration. The phrase, “Thou shalt not touch that which is mine or

remove the least thing which belongs to me without my consent,” is

certainly a most righteous rule of human honesty, sanctity, justice

and security which surely condemns everything like compulsory medicine

which touches and violates the body with inflicted disease, without

consent of the patient, and removes and destroys the most sacred

possession of the individual, viz., bodily sanctity, health and life.

Horrors of vaccination exposed and illustrated · 第 54 / 119 题