IV.

When Sophie Arnould retired from the stage, she took a house near the

Palais Royal, and extended as brilliant a hospitality as ever. She was

as celebrated for her practical jokes as for her witticisms, of which

the following freak is a good example: One evening in 1780 she gave a

grand supper, to which, among others, she invited M. Barthe, author of

"Les Fausses Infidélités," and many similar pieces. He was inflated

with vanity, though he was totally ignorant of everything away from the

theatre, and was, in fact, one of those individuals who actually seem

to court mystification and practical jokes. Mlle. Arnould instructed her

servant Jeannot, and had him announced pompously under the title of the

Chevalier de Médicis, giving M. Barthe to understand that the young man

was an illegitimate son of the house of Medici. The pretended nobleman

appeared to be treated with respect and distinction by the company, and

he spoke to the poet with much affability, professing great admiration

for his works. M. Barthe was enchanted. He was in a flutter of gratified

vanity, and, to show his delight at the condescension of the chevalier,

he proposed to write an epic poem in honor of his house. This farce

lasted during the evening. The assembled company were in convulsions of

suppressed laughter, which broke out when, at the moment of M. Barthe's

most ecstatic admiration and respect for his new patron, Sophie Arnould

lifted her glass, and, looking at the chevalier, said, in a clear voice,

"Your health, Jeannot!" The sensations of poor M. Barthe may readily be

imagined. The incident became the story of the day in all circles, and

the unlucky poet could not go anywhere for fear of being tormented about

"Jeannot."

At length she withdrew completely from the follies, passions, and

cares of the world, and bought an ancient monastic building, formerly

belonging to the monks of St. Francis, near Luzarches, eighteen or

twenty miles from Paris. This grim residence she decorated luxuriously

in its interior, and over the door inscribed the ecclesiastical motto,

"Ite missa est." Here she remained during the earlier storms of the

Revolution, though she occasionally went to Paris at the risk of her

head to gratify her curiosity about the republican management of opera,

which presented some very unique features. The reader will be interested

in some brief pictures of the revolutionary opera.

It was directed by four distinguished _sans culottes_--Henriot,

Chaumette, Le Rouxand, and Hébert. The nominal director, however, was

Francoeur, the same who first brought out Sophie Arnould in Louis XV.'s

time. Henriot, Danton, Hébert, and other chiefs of the Revolution would

hardly take a turn in the _coulisses_ or _foyer_ before they would say

to some actor or actress: "We are going to your room; see that we are

received properly." This of course meant a superb collation; and, after

emptying many bottles of the costliest wines, the virtuous republicans

would retire without troubling themselves on the score of expense. As

this was a nightly occurrence, and the poor actors had no money, the

expense fell on the restaurateur, who was compelled to console himself

by the reflection that it was in the cause of liberty. Oftentimes the

executioner, the dreaded Sanson, who as public official had the right of

entree, would stroll in and in a jocular tone emphasize his abilities as

a critic by saying to the singers that his opinion on the _execution_ of

the music ought to be respected.*

* So, too, the London hangman one night went into the pit of

her Majesty's Theatre to hear Jenny Lind sing, and remarked

with a sigh of professional longing, "Ah, what a throat to

scrag!"

Operatic kings and queens were suppressed, and the titles of royalty

were prohibited both on the stage and in the greenroom. It was

necessary, indeed, to use the old monarchical répertoire; but kings

were transformed into chiefs; princes and dukes became members of the

Convention or representatives of the people; seigneurs became mayors,

and substitutes were found for words like "crown," "scepter," "throne,"

etc. There was one great difficulty to overcome. This was met by placing

the scenes of the new operas in Italy, Portugal, etc.--anywhere but in

France, where it was indispensable from a political point of view, but

impossible from the poetic and musical, to make lovers address each

other as _citoyen, citoyenne_.

Hébert would frequently display proscriptive lists in the green-room,

including the names of many of the actors and other operatic employees,

and say, "I shall have to send you all to the guillotine some day, but

I have been prevented hitherto by the fact that you have conduced to

my amusement." The stratagem which saved them was to get the ferocious

Hébert drunk, for he loved wine as well as blood, and steal the fatal

document. However, this operatic _dilettante_ always appeared with

a fresh one next day. One bloodthirsty republican, Lefebvre, who was

ambitious for musical fame, insisted on singing first characters. He

appeared as _primo tenore_, and was hissed; he then tried his luck as

first bass, and was again hissed by his friends the _sans culottes_.

Enraged by the _fiasco_, he attributed it to the machinations of a

counter-revolution, and nearly persuaded Robespierre to give him a

platoon of musketeers to fire on the infamous emissaries of "Pitt and

Coburg." Yet, though the Reign of Terror was a fearful time for art

and artists, there were sixty-three theatres open, and they were always

crowded in spite of war, famine, and the guillotine.

It was fortunate for Sophie Arnould that her connection with the opera

had closed prior to this dreadful period. As stated previously, she

remained undisturbed during the early years of the Revolution. Only

once a band of _sans culottes_ invaded her retreat. To their suspicious

questions she answered by assurances of loving the republic devotedly.

Her unconsciously satirical smile aroused distrust, and they were about

hurrying her off to prison, when she pointed out a bust of Gluck, and

inquired if she would keep a bust of Marat if she were not loyal to

the republic. This satisfied her intelligent inquisitors, and they

retreated, saying, "She is a good _citoyenne_, after all," as they

saluted the marble. During this time she was still rich, having thirty

thousand livres a year. But misfortunes thickened, and in two years she

had lost nearly every franc. Obliged to go to Paris to try to save the

wreck of her estate, she found her hosts of friends dissipated like the

dew, all guillotined, shot, exiled, or imprisoned.

A gleam of sunshine came, however, in the kindness of Fouché, the

Minister of Police, an old lover. One morning the Minister received

the message of an unknown lady visitor. On receiving her he instantly

recognized the still beautiful and sparkling lineaments of the woman he

had once adored. Fouché, touched, heard her story, and by his powerful

intercession secured for her a pension of twenty-four hundred livres and

handsome apartments in the Hôtel D'Angevil-liers. Here she speedily drew

around her again the philosophers and fashionables, the poets and the

artists of the age; and the Sophie Arnould of the golden days of old

seemed resurrected in the vivacity and brilliancy of the talk from which

time and misfortune had taken nothing of its pungent salt. In 1803 she

died obscurely; and the same year there also passed out of the world

two other celebrated women, the great actress Clairon and the singer De

Beaumesnil, once Sophie's rival.

Lord Mount Edgcumbe, in his "Musical Reminiscences," speaks of Sophie

Arnould, whom he heard in ante-revolutionary days, as a woman of

entrancing beauty and very great dramatic genius. This connoisseur tells

us too that her voice, though limited in range and not very flexible,

was singularly rich, strong, and sweet, fitting her exceptionally for

the performance of the simple and noble arias of Gluck, which were

rather characterized by elevation and dramatic warmth than florid

ornamentation. Her place in art is, therefore, as the finest

contemporary interpreter of Wagner's greater predecessor.

Great Singers, First Series Faustina Bordoni To Henrietta Sontag · 第 33 / 56 题