THE CRIME OF INATTENTION

“When the germ of egotism is discovered,” said the Curmudgeon

Philosopher, “it will be readily recognized. The cholera germ is

sometimes called the ‘comma bacillus,’ from its resemblance to the

printer’s comma; the bacillus of egotism does not look like a capital

I, as you would naturally suppose, but like the note of admiration.

In order to discover it you have only to shed the gore of the first

man you meet (who is sure to be a bore and deserve it) and put a drop

under the microscope. True, you may have defective eyesight from long

contemplation of your dazzling self, and so miss it, but it is there as

plain as the nose on an elephant’s face.”

The Timorous Reporter ventured to suggest that when the note of

admiration was named, to admire meant, not to esteem, but to

wonder—that Milton so uses it in relating the meeting of Satan and

Death at the gates of Hell. There was no reason, he said, why the germ

of egotism or self-esteem should have the shape of that point.

“Having discovered and isolated the germ of egotism,” continued the

Curmudgeon Philosopher, apparently addressing some exalted intelligence

behind the Timorous Reporter, “the physicians will naturally cast about

for a serum that will be powerful enough to beat it.”

The Curmudgeon Philosopher had the condescension to darken his

environment with a smile.

“I should suppose that this might be made from the blood of a whale, a

rhinoceros, a tiger and an anaconda, all, of course, duly inoculated

with the germ till silly. If a few gallons of this mighty medicament

were injected into the veins of a patient not more than two years of

age it might so check his self-esteem that on growing up he would

emblazon the violet on his coat of arms.”

The Curmudgeon Philosopher manifested his sense of his own distinction

as a wit by a gesture singularly and appropriately elephantine. He had

the goodness to continue: “A few years ago, before a just appreciation

of the dignity of my position as a philosopher had compelled my

withdrawal from the clubs and taverns, I used to observe that of a

half-dozen men sitting about a table and engaged in the characteristic

industry of smoking and drinking, four were commonly talking of

themselves, one, with an impediment in his enterprise, was endeavoring

to ‘get the floor’ in order to talk about _him_self, and the other

(I trust it is needless to name him) was vainly asking attention to

matters of interest and importance.

“It was customary among these gentlemen to interrupt one another in the

middle of a sentence by ordering drinks or entering into a colloquy

with the waiter, or addressing a trivial question to another of the

party. Habitually the person speaking had the mortification to see his

interlocutor turn squarely away from him and himself begin a monologue,

only to be disregarded in his turn. There is something singularly

pathetic in the spectacle of a man with an unfinished discourse turning

to the only one of the party that has the civility to hear him out. It

is one of the minor tragedies of social life, demanding an infinite

compassion. Sometimes the sufferer would signify a just resentment by

abruptly rising and leaving the table, but the rebuke was never even

observed.

“Not the monologist alone was ignored in this unmannerly way; the

nimble epigrammatist fared no better. The brightest sallies of wit,

the oddest ventures in paradox, the most delicious bits of humor and

the finest turns of wisdom—all met the same fate, all alike fell upon

the stony soil of inattention. Remember that I speak, not of ordinary

dullards, but of the so-called choice spirits of clubland, ‘gentlemen

of wit and pleasure about town.’”

With a sidewise movement toward the door the Timorous Reporter

cautiously advanced the notion that possibly something in the quality

of the Curmudgeon Philosopher’s wit may not have had the good fortune

to commend itself to his auditors.

“Selected from Apuleius, from Rabelais, Pascal, Rochefoucauld, Pope,

and boldly worked into the conversation, they always passed without

recognition of either their source or their wit. The company was simply

unaware that anything out of the common had been said. Egotism has a

bale of cotton in each ear.”

The Curmudgeon Philosopher paused to note the effect of his epigram.

Seeing that safety meant either applause or absence the Timorous

Reporter deemed it expedient to withdraw by way of an open window.

The Collected Works of Ambrose Bierce, Volume 10 The Opinionator · 第 57 / 73 题