AMERICAN IN ENGLAND.

_The American in England. By the Author of "A Year in Spain." 2 vols.

New York. Harper and Brothers._

Lieutenant Slidell's very excellent book, "A Year in Spain," was in

some danger of being overlooked by his countrymen when a benignant

star directed Murray's attention to its merits. Fate and Regent Street

prevailed. Cockney octavos carried the day. A man is nothing if not

hot-pressed; and the clever young writer who was cut dead in his

Yankee-land habiliments, met with bows innumerable in the gala dress

of a London _imprimatur_. The "Year in Spain" well deserved the

popularity thus inauspiciously attained. It was the work of a man of

genius; and passing through several editions, prepared the public

attention for any subsequent production of its author. As regards "The

American in England," we have not only read it with deep interest from

beginning to end, but have been at the trouble of seeking out and

perusing a great variety of critical _dicta_ concerning it. Nearly all

of these are in its favor, and we are happy in being able to concur

heartily with the popular voice--if indeed these _dicta_ be its

echoes.

We have somewhere said--or we should have somewhere said--that the old

adage about "Truth in a well" (we mean the adage in its modern and

improper--not in its antique and proper acceptation) should be

swallowed _cum grano salis_ at times. To be profound is not always to

be sensible. The depth of an argument is not, necessarily, its

wisdom--this depth lying where Truth is sought more often than where

she is found. As the touches of a painting which, to minute

inspection, are 'confusion worse confounded' will not fail to start

boldly out to the cursory glance of a connoisseur--or as a star may be

seen more distinctly in a sidelong survey than in any direct gaze

however penetrating and {193} intense--so there are, not unfrequently,

times and methods, in which, and by means of which, a richer

philosophy may be gathered on the surface of things than can be drawn

up, even with great labor, _c profundis_. It appears to us that Mr.

Slidell has written a wiser book than his neighbors merely by not

disdaining to write a more superficial one.

The work is dedicated to John Duer, Esq. The Preface is a very

sensible and a sufficiently well-written performance, in which the

Lieutenant while "begging, at the outset, to be acquitted of any

injurious prejudices" still pleads guilty to "that ardent patriotism

which is the common attribute of Americans, a feeling of nationality

inherited with the laws, the language, and the manners of the country

from which we derive our origin, and which is sanctioned not less by

the comparison of the blessings we enjoy with those of other lands,

than by the promptings of good feeling, and the dictates of good

taste." It is in the body of the book, however, that we must seek, and

where we shall most assuredly find, strong indications of a genius not

the less rich, rare, and altogether estimable for the simplicity of

its _modus operandi_.

Commencing with his embarkation at New York, our author succeeds, at

once, in rivetting the attention of his readers by _a succession of

minute details_. But there is this vast difference between the details

of Mr. Slidell, and the details of many of his contemporaries.

They--the many--impressed, apparently, with the belief that mere

minuteness is sufficient to constitute force, and that to be accurate

is, of necessity, to be verisimilar--have not hesitated in putting in

upon their canvass all the _actual_ lines which might be discovered in

their subject. This Mr. Slidell has known better than to do. He has

felt that the apparent, not the real, is the province of a

painter--and that _to give_ (speaking technically) _the idea of any

desired object, the toning down, or the utter neglect of certain

portions of that object is absolutely necessary to the proper bringing

out of other portions--portions by whose sole instrumentality the idea

of the object is afforded_. With a fine eye then for the picturesque,

and with that strong sense of propriety which is inseparable from true

genius, our American has crossed the water, dallied a week in London,

and given us, as the result of his observations, a few masterly

sketches, with all the spirit, vigor, raciness and illusion of a

panorama.

Very rarely have we seen any thing of the kind superior to the

"American in England." The interest begins with the beginning of the

book, and abides with us, unabated, to the end. From the scenes in the

Yankee harbor, to the departure of the traveller from England, his

arrival in France, and installment among the comforts of the Hotel

Quillacq, all is terse, nervous, brilliant and original. The review of

the ship's company, in the initial chapter of the book is exceedingly

entertaining. The last character thus introduced is so peculiarly

sketched that we must copy what the author says about him. It will

serve to exemplify some of our own prior remarks.

"Let me not forget to make honorable mention of the white-headed

little raggamuffin who was working his passage, and who, in this

capacity, had the decks to sweep, ropes to haul, chickens and pigs to

feed, the cow to milk, and the dishes to wash, as well as all other

jobs to do that belonged to no one in particular. As a proof of good

will, he had chopped off the tails of a dandy, velvet-collared, blue

coat, with the cook's axe, the very first day out. This was performed

at the windlass-bits, in full conclave of the crew, and I suspected at

the suggestion of a roguish man-of-war's-man, a shipmate of mine. The

tails were cut just below the pocket flaps, which gave them a sort of

razee look, and, in conjunction with the velvet collar, made the

oddest appearance in the world, as he would creep, stern first, out of

the long-boat after milking the cow. Blow high or blow low, the poor

boy had no time to be sea-sick. Sometimes he would get adrift in the

lee scuppers and roll over in the water, keeping fast hold of the

plates he was carying to the galley."

Some incidents at sea--such as the narrow escape from running down a

brig, and the imminent danger incurred by an English pilot--are told

with all the gusto of a seaman. Among other fine passages we may

particularize an account of British sailors on shore at Portsmouth--of

a family group on board a steamer--of the appearance of the Kentish

coast--of the dangers of the Thames--of the Dover coach--of some

groups in a London coffee-room--of a stand of hackney-coaches--of St.

James' Park--of a midnight scene in the streets--of the Strand--of

Temple-Bar--of St. Paul's and the view from the summit--of

Rothschild--of Barclay and Perkins' Brewery--of the Thames' Tunnel--of

the Tower--of the Zoological Gardens--of Robert Owen--of the habits of

retired citizens--and of the rural tastes of Englishmen. A parallel

between Regent Street and Broadway brings the two thoroughfares with

singular distinctness to the eye of the mind--and in the way of

animated and vivid description we can, at this moment, remember

nothing in the whole range of fact or fiction much superior to the

Lieutenant's narrative of his midnight entrance into London. Indeed we

can almost pardon a contemporary for speaking of this picture as

sublime. A small portion of it we copy--but no just idea of its total

effect can be thus gathered--an effect depending in a great measure

upon the gradual manner in which it is brought about.

"I know nothing more exhilirating than to be suddenly ushered in the

night into a populous quarter of a great city. My recollection readily

conjures up the impressions made upon me under similar circumstances

in entering Paris, Madrid, Brussels, Milan, or gay and lively Naples.

The lower classes, with their good humor, their quaint drollery and

sprightliness, there offer the most agreeable objects of

contemplation. Here, however, there was in the corresponding classes

nothing pleasing, or even picturesque. All seemed in search of food,

of the means of intemperance, and of gratifying low and brutal

passions. The idea of amusement had evidently no place. The streets

swarmed with abandoned women, filthy in their dress, open, brutal, and

indecent in their advances. In the places of the guitar, the serenade,

the musical cries of chesnut-women, lemonade-sellers, and watermen,

the sounds here were harsh and grating: uttered in words ill

pronounced and nasally prolonged, or in an unintelligible and

discordant slang which I no longer recognized as belonging to my own

language. In the place of skilful musicians performing the favorite

airs of Mozart or Rossini, or the witty colloquies of the sententious

Punchinello, the poor were invited, in the nasal twang of clamorous

mountebanks to amuse themselves by a sight of the latest cases of

seduction, murder, suicide, and hanging, represented in the shadows of

the camera obscura. The dark masses of dwelling-houses had a confined,

narrow, gloomy, and lugubrious aspect. They were of brick, without

window-sills of marble or other colored stone; unpainted, and

unenlivened by blinds. They were closely shut, and the glimpses of

cheerfulness and domestic comfort {194} exhibited in our streets were

here unseen. All the shops were open to the weather: Many of them

having the whole front removed, and gas-lights blazing and streaming

like great torches, rather than with the puny and flickering

illumination seen in ours. The articles were completely exposed to

view at the side of the street; clothing, provisions, crockery,

hardware; whatever is necessary to the wants of man. The druggists,

with their variegated vases, as with us, cast the Iris hues of their

nauseous mixtures into the street. Sellers of cheap goods exposed them

in the windows, with their price labelled. The butchers hung out beef,

pork, sausages, and enormous coarse sheep, in a nearly whole state,

with sometimes the price affixed to the inferior portions, in order

that the poor might judge whether the price they had received for

their day's labor, would compass a meal of meat; or whether they

should seek a diet more suited to their means, of a neighboring

potato-merchant: or whether to turn in despair, as many of the most

wretched seemed to do, to accept the flattering invitation of the

magnificent gin-palace at the corner. It was the most splendid

building in the neighborhood; built with some little architectural

elegance, whose effect was magnified by the unadorned character and

gloomy air of the surrounding edifices. A beautiful gas-light, in a

richly ornamented lamp, stood as an inviting beacon, visible in many

diverging directions. The windows were glazed with costly plate-glass,

bearing inscribed, in illuminated letters, the words--gin at

three-pence--generous wines hot-spiced;--and the door surrounded by

stained panes of rich dye, having rosettes, bunches of grapes, and gay

devices."

There are some few _niaiseries_ in the work before us, which, although

insufficient to affect its character as a whole, yet constitute a weak

point in what otherwise is beautiful, and cause us to regret

sincerely, the accidents which have admitted them. We may mention, in

especial, the too frequent introduction of the monosyllable "_how_,"

in such sentences as "they told how"--"it was related how"--"I was

informed how," &c. Mr. Slidell will find, upon self-scrutiny, that he

has fallen into this habit through the sin of imitation. The

Lieutenant, too, suffers his work to savor far too strongly of the

ship, and lets slip him no opportunity of thrusting upon the public

attention the fact of his particular vocation--insisting, indeed, upon

this matter with a pertinacity even ludicrous--a pertinacity which

will be exemplified in the following passage:

"_Unaccustomed as I had been in the larger vessels, in which I had

sailed of late_, to be thus unceremoniously boarded _on the hallowed

region of the quarter-deck_, this seemed to me quite a superfluous

piece of impertinence. The remains of my sentiment were at once washed

away, and _not minding a little honest salt-water_, I betook myself

forthwith to the substantial comfortings of the repast, which I found

smoking on the cabin table. Dinner was over: tea and conversation had

followed; the evening was already far advanced, and I began to yield

to the sleepy sensation _which the familiar roll of the sea inspired_.

Before turning in I ascended to the companionway to breathe the fresh

air, and see what progress we were making. _Familiar as I was with the

sight of ships in every possible situation_, I was much struck with

the beauty of the scene."

Again. Although the author evinces, in theory, a very laudable

contempt for that silly vanity so often inducing men to blazon forth

their intimacy with the distinguished; and although, in the volumes

now before us, he more than once directs the arrows of his satire at

the infirmity--still he is found not altogether free from it himself;

and, in one especial instance, is even awkwardly uneasy, lest we

should remain ignorant of his acquaintance with Washington Irving. "I

thought," quoth the Lieutenant, when there was no necessity for

thinking about any such matter, "I thought of the 'spectral box-coats'

of my inimitable friend Geoffrey Crayon; and would have given the

world in that moment of despondency, for one of his quiet unwritten

jokes, or one friendly pressure of his hand."

Upon Mr. Slidell's mechanical style we cannot bring ourselves to look

with favor. Indeed while running over, with some astonishment, a few

of his singularly ill-constructed sentences, we begin to think that

the sentiments expressed in the conclusion of his Preface are not, as

we at first suspected, merely the common cant of the _literateur_, and

that his book is actually, as he represents it to be, "the result of

an up-hill journey," and "a work which he regards with a feeling of

aversion." What else than great tedium and utter weariness with his

labor, could have induced our author to trust such passages as the

following to the critical eye of the public?

"The absence of intellectual and moral culture, in occupations which

rendered it unnecessary for those who worked only to administer food

to themselves and profit or luxury to the class of masters, could only

account for the absence of forehead, of the ornamental parts of that

face which was moulded after a divine model."

We perused this sentence more than once before we could fathom its

meaning. Mr. Slidell wishes to say, that _narrowness of forehead in

the rabble is owing to want of mental exercise--they being laborers

not thinkers_. But from the words of our author we are led to conclude

that some occupations (certainly very strange ones) rendered it

unnecessary for those who worked, to administer food to

themselves--that is, to eat. The pronoun "_it_," however, will be

found, upon examination, to refer to "moral culture." The repetition

of the word "only" is also disagreeable, and the entire passage is

overloaded with verbiage. A rigid scrutiny will show that all

essential portions of the intended idea are embodied in the lines

Italicised. In the original sentence are _fifty-four_ words--in our

own _eighteen_--or precisely one third. It follows, that if all the

Lieutenant's sentences had been abridged in a similar manner--a

process which would have redounded greatly to their advantage--we

might have been spared much trouble, and the public much time,

trouble, and expense--the "American in England" making its appearance

in a duodecimo of one hundred and ninety-two pages, rather than in two

octavos of five hundred and seventy-six.

At page 122, vol. I, we have what follows.

"My situation here was uncomfortable enough; if I were softly

cushioned on one side, this only tended, by the contrast, to increase

the obduracy of a small iron rod, which served as a parapet to protect

me from falling off the precipice, over which I hung toppling, and

against which I was forced with a pressure proportioned to the

circumstances of my being compressed into a space somewhat narrower

than myself; the seat having doubtless been contrived to accommodate

five men, and there being no greater anatomical mistake than to

suppose there would be more room because four of them were women."

'_If I were_,' in this sentence, is not English--but there are few

persons who will believe that "_if_" does not in _all_ instances

require the subjunctive. In the words "_a small iron rod which served

as a parapet to protect me from falling off the precipice over which I

hung, and against which I was forced," &c._ let us say nothing of the

{195} injudicious use of the word _parapet_ as applied to _a small

iron rod_. Passing over this, it is evident, that the second relative

pronoun "_which_," has for its antecedent, in strict syntactical

arrangement, the same noun as the first relative pronoun

"_which_"--that is to say, it has the word "_precipice_" for its

antecedent. The sentence would thus imply that Mr. Slidell was forced

against the precipice. But the actual meaning (at which we arrive by

guessing) is, that Mr. Slidell was forced against the iron rod. In the

words "_I was forced with a pressure proportioned to the circumstances

of my being compressed into a space," &c._ let us again be indulgent,

and say as little as possible of the tautology in "_pressure_" and

"_compressed_." But we ask where are the _circumstances_ spoken of?

There is only _one_ circumstance--the circumstance of being

compressed. In the conclusion of the passage where the Lieutenant

speaks of "a seat having doubtless been contrived to accommodate five

men, and there being no greater anatomical mistake than to suppose

there would be more room because four of them were women," it is quite

unnecessary to point out the "bull egregious"--a bull which could have

been readily avoided by the simple substitute of "_persons_" for

"_men_."

We must be pardoned for copying yet another sentence. We will do so

with the single remark that it is one of the most ludicrously

ill-arranged, and altogether ungainly pieces of composition which it

has ever been our ill fortune to encounter.

"I was not long in discovering that the different personages scattered

about the room in such an unsocial and misanthropic manner, instead of

being collected about the same board, as in France or my own country,

and, in the spirit of good fellowship and of boon companions,

relieving each other of their mutual ennuis, though they did not speak

a word to each other, by which they might hereafter be compromised and

socially ruined, by discovering that they had made the acquaintance of

an individual several grades below them in the scale of rank, or haply

as disagreeably undeceived by the abstraction of a pocket-book, still

kept up a certain interchange of sentiment, by occasional glances and

mutual observation."

Such passages as the foregoing may be discovered _passim_ in "The

American in England." Yet we have heard Mr. Slidell's English called

equal to the English of Mr. Irving--than which nothing can be more

improbable. The Lieutenant's book is an excellent book--but then it is

excellent _in spite of its style_. So great are the triumphs of

genius!

The southern literary messenger, Vol. II., No. 3, February, 1836 · 第 58 / 117 题