I give below an extract from Robert's estimate of Brahms and his work:

Ten years have passed away, as many as I formerly devoted to the

publication of this paper--since I have allowed myself to commit my

opinions to this soil so rich in memories. Often in spite of an

overstrained productive activity, I have felt moved to do so; many

new and remarkable talents have made their appearance, and a fresh

musical power seemed about to reveal itself among the many aspiring

artists of the day, even if their compositions were only known to

the few.

I thought to follow with interest the pathways of these elect;

there would--there must--after such a promise, suddenly appear one

who should utter the highest ideal expression of the times, who

should claim the mastership by no gradual development, but burst

upon us fully equipped, as Minerva sprang from the brain of

Jupiter. And he has come, this chosen youth, over whose cradle the

Graces and Heroes seem to have kept watch.

His name is Johannes Brahms; he comes from Hamburg, where he has

been working in quiet obscurity, instructed by an excellent,

enthusiastic teacher in the most difficult principles of his art,

and lately introduced to me by an honored and well-known master.

His mere outward appearance assures us that he is one of the

elect.

Seated at the piano, he disclosed wondrous regions. We were drawn

into an enchanted circle. Then came a moment of inspiration which

transformed the piano into an orchestra of wailing and jubilant

voices. There were sonatas, or rather veiled symphonies, songs

whose poetry revealed itself without the aid of words, while

throughout them all ran a vein of deep song-melody, several pieces

of a half-demoniacal character, but of charming form; then sonatas

for piano and violin, string quartets, and each of these creations

so different from the last that they appeared to flow from so many

different sources. Then, like an impetuous torrent, he seemed to

unite these streams into a foaming waterfall; over the tossing

waves the rainbow presently stretches its peaceful arch, while on

the banks butterflies flit to and fro, and the nightingale warbles

her song.

Whenever he bends his magic wand towards great works, and the

powers of orchestra and chorus lend him their aid, still more

wonderful glimpses of the ideal world will be revealed to us.

May the Highest Genius help him onward! Meanwhile another

genius--that of modesty--seems to dwell within him. His comrades

greet him at his first step in the world, where wounds may,

perhaps, await him, but the bay and the laurel also; we welcome

this valiant warrior!

Robert Schumann had been before the public as essayist, poet, pianist

and composer for twenty years. He had given himself without stint to

almost every musical enterprise of Germany, and his sympathy was ever on

tap for every needy and aspiring genius. You may give your purse--he

who takes it takes trash--but to give your life's blood and then hope

for a renewal of life's lease, is vain.

The public man owes to himself and to his Maker the duty of reserve.

The desert and mountain are very necessary to the individual who gives

himself to the public. That any man should so bestride the narrow world

like a colossus that the multitude must stop to gaze, and thousands feed

upon his words, is an abnormal condition. The only thing that can hold

the balance true is solitude. Relaxation is the first requirement of

strength. Watch the cat, the tiger or the lion asleep. See what complete

absence of intensity--what perfect relaxation! It is all a preparation

for the spring.

Schumann had not sought the mountain, nor abandoned himself to the woods

in old shoes, corduroys and a flannel shirt. Now he was paying the

penalty of publicity. Virtue had gone out of him; and in the article

just quoted, there are signs that he is clutching for something. He

hails this new star and proclaims him, because in some way he feels that

the ruddy, valiant and youthful Brahms is to consummate his work. Brahms

is an extension of himself. It is a part of that longing for

immortality--we perpetuate ourselves in our children and look for them

to accomplish what we have been unable to do.

Johannes Brahms was the spiritual son of Robert Schumann.

In less than a year after Brahms and Schumann first met, there were

ominous signs and evil portents in the air. "Why do you play so fast,

dear Johannes? I beg of you, be moderate!" cried Robert on one occasion.

Brahms turned, and his quick glance caught the ashy face and bloodshot

eyes of a sick man. His reply was a tear and a hand-grasp.

Soon, to Schumann, all music was going at a gallop, and in his ears

forever rang the sound of A. He could hear naught else. Tenderness,

patience, and even love were of no avail. Indeed, love is not exempt

from penalty--the law of compensation never rests. Nature forever

strives for a right adjustment.

The richness and intensity of Schumann's life were bought with a price.

The first year after his marriage he composed one hundred thirty-eight

songs. Sonatas, scherzos, symphonies and ballads followed fast, and in

it all his gifted wife had gloried.

But when, in Eighteen Hundred Fifty-four, Robert had, after sleepless

nights, in a fit of frenzy thrown himself into the Rhine, and had been

rescued, shattered, unable to recognize even his nearest friends--the

loyal and devoted wife saw where she herself had erred.

Writing to Brahms she says: "I encouraged him in his work, and this

fired his ambition to do and to become. Oh! why did I not restrain that

intensity and send him away into the solitude to be a boy; to do nothing

but frolic and play and bathe in the sunshine, and eat and sleep? The

life of an artist is death. Kill ambition, my Brother!"

Activity and rest--both are needed. The idea of the "retreat" in the

Catholic Church is founded on stern, hygienic science. Wagner's forced

exile was not without its advantages, and the "retreats" of Paganini and

the "retirements" of Liszt were very useful factors in the devolution of

their art.

* * * * *

For the malady that beset Robert Schumann, there was no cure save death;

his only rest, the grave. When his spirit passed away in Eighteen

Hundred Fifty-six, his devoted wife and the loyal Brahms attended him.

Owing to the insidious creeping of the disease, Schumann's affairs had

got into bad shape; and it was now left to Brahms, more than all others,

to smooth the way of life for the stricken wife and her fatherless

brood.

The versatility and sturdy commonsense of Brahms were now in evidence.

In business affairs he was ready, decisive and systematic. And the

delicacy, tact and charming good-nature he ever showed, reveal the man

as a most extraordinary figure. Great talent is often bought at a

price--how well we know this, especially with musicians! But Brahms was

sane on all subjects. He could take care of his own affairs, lend a

needed hand with others, but never meddle--smile with that half-sardonic

grimace at all foolish little things, weep with the stricken when

calamity came; yet above it all the little man towered, carrying himself

like the giant that he was. And yet he never made the mistake of taking

himself too seriously. "I am trying to run opposition to Michelangelo's

'Moses,'" he once called to Dietrich, as he leaned out of the window in

the sunshine, and stroked his flowing beard. In his later years many

have testified to this Jovelike quality that Brahms diffused by his

presence. No one could come into his aura and fail to feel his sense of

power. Around such souls is a sacred circle--if you are allowed to come

within this boundary, it is only by sufferance; within this space only

the pure in heart can dwell.

* * * * *

Tolstoy in "Anna Karenina" speaks of that quiet and constant light to be

seen on the faces of those who are successful--those who know that their

success is acknowledged by the world.

Brahms was a successful man by temperament, for success (like East

Aurora) is a condition of mind. There is no tragedy for those who do not

accept tragedy; and the treatment we receive from others is only our own

reflected thought.

Brahms thought well of everybody, if he thought of any one at all. He

reveled in the sunshine, and everywhere made friends of children. "We

saw Brahms on the hotel veranda at Domodossola," wrote a young woman to

me in Eighteen Hundred Ninety-five, "and what do you think?--he was on

all fours, with three children on his back, riding him for a horse!"

For many years Brahms used to make an annual pilgrimage to Italy, and

often on these tours at fairs he would fall in with Gipsy bands. At such

times he would always stop and listen, and would lustily applaud the

performance. On one such occasion, Dietrich tells, the leader recognized

Brahms, and instantly rapped for silence. He was seen to pass the

whispered word along, and then the band struck up one of Brahms' pieces,

greatly to the delight of the composer.

He was a man of the people, and I am glad to know that he hated a table

d'hote, smiled a smile of derision at all dress-coats, had small

sympathy with pink teas, loved his friends, doted on babies, and was

never so happy as when in the country walking along grass-grown lanes in

the early summer morning, when the dew was on and the air was melodious

with the song of birds. He had a habit of going bareheaded, carrying his

hat in his hand; and on these country walks, always with bared head, he

would sing or whistle, and unconsciously in his mind the music would be

taking shape that was to be written out later in the quiet of his study.

Brahms knew the world--not simply one little part of it--he knew it as

thoroughly as any man can, and was interested in it all. He knew the

world of workers--the toilers and bearers of burdens. He knew the weak

and the vicious, and his heart went out to them in sympathy; for he knew

his own heart and realized the narrow margin that separates the

so-called "good" from the alleged "bad." He knew that sin is only a

wrong expression of life, and reacts to the terrible disadvantage of the

sinner.

He was interested in mechanics--bookbinding, printing, iron-working,

carpentry, and was well acquainted with all new inventions and

labor-saving devices. He knew the methods of farming, the different

breeds of cattle; he knew what soil would produce best a certain crop,

and understood "rotation." He could call the wild birds by name and

imitate their notes, and studied long their haunts and habits. That

excellent man and talented, George Herschel, in a letter to a friend

speaks of walking with Johannes Brahms along the highway, and Brahms

suddenly calling in alarm, "Look out! look out! you may kill it!"

It was only a tumblebug, but he shrank from putting foot on any living

thing. Brahms reverenced all life, and felt in his heart that he was

brother to that bug in the dust, to the birds that chirruped in the

hedgerows, and to the trees that lifted their outstretching branches to

the sun.

He was deeply religious--although he never knew it. All music is a hymn

of praise, a song of thanksgiving, a chant of faith. Music is a making

manifest to our dull ears the divine harmony of the universe, and thus

all music is sacred music, and all true musicians are priests, for by

their ministrations we are made to realize our Oneness with the Whole.

Through music we read the Universal.

Music is the only one of the arts that can not be prostituted to a base

use. We hear of bad books, of the "Index Expurgatorius," and in every

State there are laws against the publication of immoral books and

indecent pictures. We also hear of orders issued by the courts requiring

certain statues to be removed or veiled, but no indictment can be

brought against music. It is the only one of the arts that is always

pure.

Brahms realized this and felt the dignity of his office, holding high

the standard; and yet he knew that the toilers in the fields were doing

a service to humanity, just as necessary as his own. And possibly this

is why he uncovered, walking with bared head. All is holy, all is

good--it is all God's world, and all the men and women in it are His

children.

* * * * *

For forty-two years Brahms was the devoted friend of Clara Schumann. She

was thirteen years his senior, yet their spirits were as children

together. From the first he was to her, "Johannes," and she was "Clara"

to him. A few of their letters have been published in the "Revue des

deux Mondes," and this woman, who was a great-grandmother, and had sixty

years before captured a world, then in her seventy-fifth year, wrote to

her "Dear Johannes" with all the gentle fervor of a girl of twenty,

congratulating him on some recent success. In reply he writes back to

his "Dear Clara" in gracious banter; mentions rheumatism in his legs as

an excuse for bad penmanship; hopes she is keeping up her practise;

tells of a "Steinway Grand" that some one has sent him, and regrets that

she does not come to try it "four hands," as he has failed utterly to

get out of it alone the melody that he knows is there.

Brahms never married--the bond between himself and Clara was too sacred

to allow another to sever or share it. And yet the relationship was so

high, so frank, so openly avowed, that no breath of scandal has ever

smirched it.

The purity and excellence of it all has been its own apology, as love

ever should be its own excuse for being.

For about three months every year these two friends dwelt near each

other. Together they worked, composed, sang, read, wrote and roamed the

woods. "None of Madame Schumann's children is as young as she is,"

wrote Doctor Hanslick, when Clara was sixty and Johannes was

forty-seven. "With the hope of passing for her father, Brahms is

cultivating a patriarchal beard," continues Hanslick.

In his essay on "Friendship," Emerson speaks of the folly of forcing our

personal presence on the friend we love best, and of the faith that

ideality brings. Something of this thought is shown in the letters of

Madame Schumann to Brahms, and in his to her.

Often for six months they would not meet, he doing his work in his own

way, she doing hers, but each ever conscious of the life and love of the

other--feeding on the ideal--writing or not writing, but glorying in

each other's triumphs--lives linked first by the love of a third person,

cemented by dire calamity, and then fused by a oneness of hope and

aspiration.

Brahms' nature was too decidedly masculine, that is to say, one-sided,

to exist without the love of woman; Clara Schumann, gentle, generous,

motherly, plastic, needed Johannes no less than he needed her.

When Clara's spirit passed away, in May, Eighteen Hundred Ninety-six,

Brahms attended her funeral at Frankfort. Hero that he was in body and

spirit, the shock unnerved him. No rebound came--every bodily faculty

seemed to have lost its buoyancy. The doctors tried to cheer him by

telling him that he had no organic ailment, and that twenty years of

life and work were before him. He knew better, and told them so. Men do

not live any longer than they wish to. "Shall I live to see the

anniversary of her death?" asked Brahms of the doctor in March, Eighteen

Hundred Ninety-seven. "Oh, undoubtedly--you can live many years if you

only will to," was the answer. Three weeks later--on April Third--Max

Kalbrech telegraphed to Widmann, this message, "Brahms fell asleep early

this morning."

SO HERE ENDETH "LITTLE JOURNEYS TO THE HOMES OF GREAT MUSICIANS,"

BEING VOLUME FOURTEEN OF THE SERIES, AS WRITTEN BY ELBERT HUBBARD:

EDITED AND ARRANGED BY FRED BANN; BORDERS AND INITIALS BY ROYCROFT

ARTISTS, AND PRODUCED BY THE ROYCROFTERS, AT THEIR SHOPS, WHICH ARE

IN EAST AURORA, ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK, MCMXXII

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+

|Transcriber's note: The index covers the complete set of "Little |

|Journeys" books. |

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+

Little Journeys to the Homes of the Great - Volume 14 Little Journeys to the Homes of Great Musicians · 第 43 / 45 题