And now to continue:--

<g>After</g> Laurence, succeeded his sonne <g>John</g>, who, being taken prisoner by

the Spaniards in a battle at sea, and in the end ransomed, died in

France in the yeere 1375. The circumstances are these: “Having undergone

four years’ imprisonment in Spaine, with most inhumane usage, he sent to

Bertrand Clekyn, Constable of France, desiring that he would use some

means for his enlargement; who thereupon interceding for him to the

<g>Bastard</g> of Spaine, then calling himself King, obtained his liberty, in

consideration of part of that money due to himself: which being agreed

upon, he was brought to Paris. But after his coming thither, it was not

long ere he fell mortally sick of poysin, as some thought, given him by

the Spaniards, who were reputed to have such a special faculty in that

<g>art</g>, as that the potion should kill at what distance of time they

pleased. The French, therefore, seeing his death approaching, being

eager to get his ransom before he died, made haste to remove him to

<g>Calais</g>; but on his journey thitherward he departed this life, upon the

xvi. day of April, leaving his sonne and heire only two and a half years

old.”

Agreeably to the superstition of the time, all his misfortunes and death

were looked upon as judgments, for various alleged offences committed

against the Church revenues: recommending that the clergy should be

taxed more than the laity--for living an ungodly life--for “everything

that could render him hateful in the eyes of monks, whom he insulted and

exposed.”

After him followed his sonne <g>John</g>, second Earle of his line, who, in

running a tilt[377] at Woodstock, was slaine by Syr John <g>Saint John</g>,

casually, in the yeare 1397. And hereupon, for default of his issue,

there fell very many possessions and fair revenewes into the King’s

hands, as our lawiers use to speake: and the <g>Castle</g> of Penbrock was

granted unto Francis <g>At-Court</g>, a courtier in especiell great favour, who

commonly thereupon was called Lord Penbrock. Not long after, Humfrey,

sonne to King Henry the Fourth, before he was Duke of Gloucester,

received this title of his brother, King Henry the Fifth: and before his

death Henry the Sixth granted the same in reversion--a thing not before

heard of--to William <g>De la Pole</g>, Earle of Suffolk, after whose downfall

the said King, when he had enabled Edmund of <g>Wadham</g>, and Jasper of

<g>Hatfield</g>, the sonnes of Queen Katherine, his mother, to be his lawfull

half brethren, created <g>Jasper</g> Earle of Penbroke, and <g>Edmund</g> Earl of

Richmond, with pre-eminence to take place above all Earles--for Kings

have absolute authority in dispensing honours. But King Edward the

Fourth, depriving Jasper of all his honours by attainder and forfeiture,

gave the title of <g>Penbrok</g> to Syr William <g>Herbert</g>, for his good service

against Jasper in Wales;[378] but he shortly afterwards lost his life at

the battle of Banbury. Then succeeded his son, bearing the same name,

whome King Edward the Fourth, when he had recovered the kingdom,

invested in the Earldom of Huntingdon, and bestowed the title of

<g>Penbrok</g>, being surrendered, upon his eldest sonne and heire, <g>Edward</g>

Prince of Wales.--[Chronicle.]

Long after this period, “<g>Henry</g> the Eighth invested <g>Anne</g> Bollen, to whom

he was affianced, Marchioness of Penbroke, with a mantle and coronet, in

regard both of her nobility and also her virtues--for so runne the

wordes of the patent. At length King <g>Edward</g> the Sixth adorned Sir

William Herbert, lord of <g>Caerdiff</g>, with the title of Earl of Penbroke,

after whom succeeded his sonne Henry, who was Lord President of <g>Wales</g>

under Queen Elizabeth. And now”--says our old <g>King-at-arms</g>, speaking

courteously of his contemporaries--“his sonne, richly accomplished with

all laudable endowments of body and minde, enjoyeth the same title. And

this family of Herberts, he concludes, is honourable, and of great

antiquity in these parts of Wales, as lineally propagated from Henry

Fitz-Herbert, Chamberlayne to King Henry the First, who married the said

King’s <g>Paramour</g>, the mother of Reginald, Earle of Cornwall, as I was

first informed by Robert <g>Glover</g>, a man passing skilfull in the study of

genealogies, by whose untimely death that knowledge hath sustained a

great losse.”

So much for the Genealogy of the old lords of Pembroke. In this

department of history--the tracing of genealogies--in which the Cambrian

families are proverbially expert, but which others affect to ridicule,

we must not omit the defence of a learned Welshman: “That there have

been,” says he, “parasites in the art, must be acknowledged; and family

pride may sometimes have been flattered. However, upon the whole, much

credit is due to our ancient genealogists, who were appointed and

patronized by Royalty, and professed that art prior to their initiation

into the higher mysteries of <g>Bardism</g>. Their records are still extant,

and bear every mark of authenticity. A bard and a _genealogist_ were

synonymous; and though a bard can plead _licentia poetica_, yet fiction

was not allowed in recording the actions of their heroes,[379] nor in

registering the descent of families. The Welsh bards continued their

genealogical pursuits down to the reign of Elizabeth; therefore, as

Humphrey Lwyd, a learned antiquary and historian, observes: “Let such

disdainful heads as cant know their own grandfathers, leave their

scoffing and taunting of Welshmen for that thing that all other nations

in the world do glory in.” Yet, in justice to the ancient Saxons on this

point, it must be allowed that they themselves were not altogether

indifferent to the study of genealogy, since their deducing of their

King Ethelwulph from <g>Adam</g> is an instance of their _accuracy_ in the

art--

“Can Bourbon or Nassau go higher?”[380]

On the “Herbert genealogy,” Mr. Willatt relates the following

characteristic <g>Anecdote.</g>--About two miles from Abergavenny, says he, is

Handel--once a mansion of no less magnificence than antiquity; but in

the present day it is only interesting from its having been the cradle

of the ancient and numerous family of <g>Herbert</g>. Of the vast possessions

of this family, the inheritance of the last lineal descendant, who died

twenty years ago, had dwindled down to less than two hundred a year. But

however reduced in fortune, his pride of ancestry had lost nothing of

its strength or spirit by the change. Meeting a stranger one day near

his mansion, who took an interest in the local history and natural

beauties of the scenery, they entered into conversation.

“And pray, Sir,” inquired the stranger, “whose is that antique-looking

mansion before us?”

“That, Sir,” replied the last of the Herberts, “is Handel--a very

ancient house, for _out_ of it came the Earls of <g>Pembroke</g> of the first

line; and the Earls of Pembroke of the second line; the Lords Herbert of

Cherburg; the Herberts of Coldbrook, Rumney, Cardiff, and York; the

<g>Morgans</g> of Acton came _out_ of it; so also did the Earl of <g>Hunsdon</g>; the

<g>Joneses</g> of Treowen and Llanarth, and all the <g>Powells</g>. Out of this house

also, by the female line, came the Dukes of <g>Beaufort</g>!”

“And pray, Sir,” inquired the stranger, “who lives in it now?”

“I, Sir--I live in it,” was the answer.

“Then pardon me, Sir, if I presume to give you a little advice. Do not

lose sight of so many prudent examples, but come _out_ of it yourself,

or it will assuredly fall _in_ upon you, and crush you in its ruins!”

With this digression, suggested by the subject, we return to Pembroke.

<g>The Castle.</g>--In the words of Giraldus, already quoted in our motto, the

situation of the Castle of Pembroke is thus correctly described:--A

tongue of the sea, shooting forth of Milford-Haven, encloseth in the

forked end thereof the principal town of the whole country, and chief

place of Dimetia, seated on the ridge of a certain craggy and

long-shaped rock, from which circumstance the Britons gave it the name

of <g>Penbro</g>, which signifies a head of the sea. Arnulph Montgomery, so

often mentioned in the early portion of this work, was the first who

built a temporary fortress on this promontory--a very weak and slender

thing, God wot, says Giraldus--consisting of merely walls, held together

by stake and turf; and which, after returning into England, he delivered

unto Girald of <g>Windesor</g>, his constable and captain, to be kept with a

garrison of a few soldiers. The absence of Arnulph, however, was the

signal for immediate revolt; and the warlike inhabitants of South Wales

hastening to the spot, laid siege to the brittle fortress. But here they

met with such a hot reception and stubborn resistance from Girald and

his small garrison, that they were speedily disheartened and raised the

siege. This attack served as a warning for Girald to strengthen his

position; and he lost no time in fortifying the town and castle with

walls and towers, sufficient to maintain him in quiet possession of the

new territory. When this was accomplished, he began to retaliate; and

acting upon the aggressive, invaded the surrounding country far and

near. At length, finding himself at the head of a powerful garrison, yet

willing to conciliate the natives--and thereby preserve his own estates

and those of his followers free from the vexation of hostile

irruptions--he ingratiated himself with <g>Gruffin</g>, the prince of the

country, who gave him his sister, the beautiful <g>Nesta</g>,[381] in marriage;

and thus cemented a friendly alliance between the native Welsh and the

Anglo-Normans. Great prosperity followed this event, and the

Anglo-Normans--as Giraldus Cambrensis, who was a scion of the family,

informs us--not only maintained peace along the sea-coasts of South

Wales, but won also the “waulls of Ireland.”

The Giraldus de Windesor above mentioned was the first of that name; and

is considered as the great progenitor of the Fitzgeralds of the present

day--of whom the chief families are of Irish extraction, and familiar in

the pages of modern history.

It is also written in the same documents, in regard to the tenure of

this castle and town, likewise of the “castle and town of Tenbigh, of

the Grange of Kingswood, of the Convent of Croytargath, and of the

manors of Castle-Martin and Tregoire, that Reginald Grey, at the

coronation of King Henry the Fourth, made suit to carry the second

sword, but in vain; for answer was made him, that those castles and

possessions were in the King’s hands, in the same manner as the town and

castle of Pembroke now are”--[that is, at the date of the present

extract.]

<g>The Siege.</g>--We now proceed to give a few details of Pembroke Castle, as

it figures in the chronicles of <g>Richard</g> the Third and <g>Charles</g> the First.

* * * * *

The more rational and less bigoted part of the nation regarded Henry,

Earl of Richmond, as the future deliverer of the kingdom, from the

thraldom it endured from the tyranny of the sanguinary King Richard; for

in Henry were to be united the pretensions of both the “Houses” of York

and Lancaster. The Earl was, meanwhile, resident in Brittany, and living

on good terms with the duke of that Province, who appeared to favour his

claims, and treated him with marked respect and hospitality. But the

circumstance that more immediately favoured his accession to the throne

of England was the following:--Morton, Bishop of Ely, was confined in

the Castle of Brecon, in custody of Henry, Duke of Buckingham, who had

been a minion of Richard, and a powerful instrument of his advancement

to the throne; but finding that his services in a bad cause were

forgotten, and that Richard refused to ratify his claims to the Bohun

estates and titles--to which he was heir--Buckingham entered warmly into

the plans concerted by Morton and others for the recall of Richmond, and

by his marriage with Elizabeth, daughter of Edward the Fourth, to

establish a double right to the throne. Dugdale assigns another reason

for Buckingham’s secession from the usurper: after asserting that he was

reinstated in those possessions which he claimed as a descendant of

Humphrey de Bohun, Earl of Hereford, and giving him an abstract of the

instrument that put him in possession, he adds his opinion on the

alteration which took place in his political sentiments, and ascribes it

either to a remorse of conscience for raising Richard to the throne,

after the murder of his nephews, or finding himself neglected by him:

but with this question we have nothing to do.[382] Having concerted the

plan of elevating Richmond to the throne, the secret was intrusted to

Sir Rhys-ap-Thomas, and Richard Kyffin, Dean of Bangor--both strenuous

friends of the House of Lancaster--who transmitted, by means of

fishing-boats, the necessary intelligence to the Earl of Richmond, with

assurance of all possible aid on his arrival in Wales. This was an

occasion too alluring for the Welsh Bards to continue silent; one of

whom, Dafydd ap Llwyd ap Llywelyn ap Dryffyd, lord of Mathafarn, an

illustrious poet and herald, rendered himself very serviceable in the

cause. His dark, mysterious, Pythonic prophecies, that a chieftain of

Wales would liberate the nation from Saxon bondage, so wrought upon the

valour of his countrymen, that many thousands enlisted under the banner

of Sir Rhys-ap-Thomas, who afterwards joined Richmond on his arrival at

Milford.

Apprized of the state and feeling of the country, and of the facilities

which were now presented to him of recovering his position and station,

Henry embraced the invitation as a message from Heaven; and, in the

month of August, 1485, set sail for England. For this enterprise the

Duke of Brétagne furnished him with a military force of two thousand

men; and, with these distributed in a small fleet, he landed at

Milford-Haven, where he was received with joy and acclamation by a vast

concourse of friends, who now openly espoused his cause and predicted

his triumph.

From Milford, Richmond proceeded to Dale and Haverfordwest, where he was

joined by the above-named Sir Rhys-ap-Thomas, Arnold Butler, Richard

Gryffydd, John Morgan, Sir George Talbot, with the young Earl of

Shrewsbury, his ward, Sir William Stanley, lord of Bromfield Yale and

Chirkland, Sir Thomas Burchier, and Sir Walter Hungerford.[383]

After a most hospitable reception at Carew Castle, it was agreed, in

order to prevent disputes between the armies, that in the march to

Shrewsbury, the Earl should shape his course to Cardigan, and Sir

Rhys-ap-Thomas by Carmarthen. In this march, Dafydd-ap-Ievan had the

honour of entertaining the illustrious Prince and his army at

Llwyn-Dafydd, Cardiganshire, for one night; and the following night he

was received with loyal enthusiasm at Wern-Newyd, by Einon-ap-Dafyd

Llwyd. To Dafydd-ap-Ievan the Earl presented a superb hirlas, or

drinking-horn, richly mounted on a silver stand, which was afterwards

presented to Richard, Earl of Carbery, and may still be seen[384] at

Golden Grove, the seat of Lord Cawdor, Carmarthen.

“Pride of feasts, profound and blue,

Of the ninth wave’s azure hue;

The drink of heroes formed to hold,

With art enriched and lid of gold.”--_Hoare’s Gir._

From his hospitable quarters in Cardiganshire, Richmond sallied forth to

meet the usurper; and marching through Shrewsbury, Newport, Stafford,

and Lichfield, encountered him at Bosworth--

“What, ho! young Richmond, ho! ’tis Richard calls thee!

I hate thee, Harry, for thy blood of Lancaster!

Now, if thou dost not hide thee from my sword,

Now, while the angry trumpet sounds alarms

And dying groans transpierce the wounded air;

Richmond, I say, come forth and singly face me!

Richard is hoarse with daring thee to arms!”

The fate of that day is so familiar in the page of Shakspeare, that we

close this part of our subject, and proceed to other particulars:--

<g>Anecdote.</g>--Of one of Richmond’s adherents, the following is told by

Turner in his “History of Remarkable Providences:”--Mr. Henry Wyatt, a

gentleman of Kent, was a confederate in the plan, and intrusted with the

correspondence between the friends of the Earl, which he conducted with

great personal risk, but the greatest fidelity, being the bearer of

several dispatches to and from the parties at home and abroad. But at

last his conduct being suspected, he was arrested, examined, and

discharged for want of conclusive evidence. But on a second charge being

brought against him, he was committed to the Tower, and there put to the

torture; but such were his fortitude and resolution, that nothing could

be drawn from him either to prove his own participation in the designs

laid to his charge, or to incriminate others. Finding threats, tortures,

and fair promises alike unavailing, he was cast into a dungeon, fed upon

bread and water, and thus continued until the question of supremacy was

decided by the battle of Bosworth Field. The pittance, it is said, to

which he was condemned, would have been quite inadequate to support

nature, _had not a cat brought him food daily_. He lived to be made a

baronet, in compliment to his unflinching loyalty, and served in the

Privy Council of Henry VII.-VIII.

A picture is said to be still preserved in the family, in which a cat is

represented creeping in at a grate--having a pigeon in its mouth--with

these lines:--

Hunc. macrum. rigidum. mæstum. fame. frigore. cura

Pavi. fovi. acui. carne. calore. joco.

<g>Cromwell</g>, before marching against the Scottish army, thought it

advisable to suppress the returning loyalty of South Wales, which had

recently defeated the Parliamentary forces. The town and castle of

Pembroke had been consigned by Parliament to the government and defence

of Colonel Poyer; but on his declaring for the King, the “gallant

conduct of himself and the garrison afforded a brilliant example of

devotion to the Royal cause.” The defence was continued with so much

obstinacy and resolution, that the presence of Cromwell himself was

necessary for the reduction of the castle: while the garrison, having

suffered for some time from great deficiency of provisions, was at

last--owing, as we shall see, to Lord Jermyn’s total neglect of his

engagements--reduced to the verge of absolute famine.

Cromwell, in the meantime, was quite unaware of the real position of

affairs within the walls; and thinking, from the resistance already

offered, that the place might hold out much longer than would be

consistent with his other plans, was on the point of raising the siege.

But while this question was agitating his mind, a deserter from the

Royalist camp brought him intelligence that, owing to the pressure of

famine, it was impossible that Poyer and his companions could maintain

their post beyond twenty-four hours. This unexpected news determined him

to continue the siege; but however much he prized his timely

information, he determined to express his abhorrence of the “informer;”

and--as a salutary warning to all traitors--he ordered him to be hanged.

It has been doubted, however, whether, in his “military capacity,”

Cromwell was ever in this part of Wales--though Mr. Yorke allows that he

might have made a friendly visit there; for in an old house at Kinmael,

that once belonged to the Llwyds, of the tribe of Maredudd--but at that

period to Colonel Carter, an officer in his favour--there is a room

called <g>Cromwell’s parlour</g>; and, with other circumstances taken into

consideration, little doubt, he thinks, can be entertained of Cromwell’s

having in person conducted the siege of Pembroke.[385]

But the following documents, written by Oliver Cromwell himself, are

conclusive:--

“To Major Thomas Saunders, at Brecknock, these:

“Before PEMBROKE, 17th June, 1648.

“SIR,--I send you this enclosed by itself, because it’s of greater

moment. The other you may communicate to Mr. Ramsey, as far as you

think fit, and I have written. I would not have him and other

honest men be discouraged that I think it not fit, at present, to

enter into contests. It will be good to yield a little for public

advantage; and truly that is my end: wherein I desire you to

satisfy them. I have sent, as my letter mentions, to have you

remove out of Brecknockshire; indeed, into that part of

Glamorganshire which lieth next Monmouthshire. For this end: We

have plain discoveries that Sir Trevor Williams of Llangibby,” &c.,

[is suspected, and must be _secured_. See “Raglan,” page 178.]

The castles and abbeys of England; Vol. 2 of 2 from the national records, early chronicles, and other standard authors · 第 80 / 114 题