OLD LAMPS FOR NEW ONES.

The Magician in “Aladdin” may possibly have neglected the study of men,

for the study of alchemical books; but it is certain that in spite of

his profession he was no conjuror. He knew nothing of human nature, or

the everlasting set of the current of human affairs. If, when he

fraudulently sought to obtain possession of the wonderful Lamp, and went

up and down, disguised, before the flying-palace, crying New Lamps for

Old ones, he had reversed his cry, and made it Old Lamps for New ones,

he would have been so far before his time as to have projected himself

into the nineteenth century of our Christian Era.

This age is so perverse, and is so very short of faith—in consequence,

as some suppose, of there having been a run on that bank for a few

generations—that a parallel and beautiful idea, generally known among

the ignorant as the Young England hallucination, unhappily expired

before it could run alone, to the great grief of a small but a very

select circle of mourners. There is something so fascinating, to a mind

capable of any serious reflection, in the notion of ignoring all that

has been done for the happiness and elevation of mankind during three or

four centuries of slow and dearly-bought amelioration, that we have

always thought it would tend soundly to the improvement of the general

public, if any tangible symbol, any outward and visible sign, expressive

of that admirable conception, could be held up before them. We are happy

to have found such a sign at last; and although it would make a very

indifferent sign, indeed, in the Licensed Victualling sense of the word,

and would probably be rejected with contempt and horror by any Christian

publican, it has our warmest philosophical appreciation.

In the fifteenth century, a certain feeble lamp of art arose in the

Italian town of Urbino. This poor light, Raphael Sanzio by name, better

known to a few miserably mistaken wretches in these later days, as

Raphael (another burned at the same time, called Titian), was fed with a

preposterous idea of Beauty—with a ridiculous power of etherealising,

and exalting to the very Heaven of Heavens, what was most sublime and

lovely in the expression of the human face divine on Earth—with the

truly contemptible conceit of finding in poor humanity the fallen

likeness of the angels of God, and raising it up again to their pure

spiritual condition. This very fantastic whim effected a low revolution

in Art, in this wise, that Beauty came to be regarded as one of its

indispensable elements. In this very poor delusion, Artists have

continued until this present nineteenth century, when it was reserved

for some bold aspirants to “put it down.”

The Pre-Raphael Brotherhood, Ladies and Gentlemen, is the dread Tribunal

which is to set this matter right. Walk up, walk up; and here,

conspicuous on the wall of the Royal Academy of Art in England, in the

eighty-second year of their annual exhibition, you shall see what this

new Holy Brotherhood, this terrible Police that is to disperse all

Post-Raphael offenders, has “been and done!”

You come—in this Royal Academy Exhibition, which is familiar with the

works of WILKIE, COLLINS, ETTY, EASTLAKE, MULREADY, LESLIE, MACLISE,

TURNER, STANFIELD, LANDSEER, ROBERTS, DANBY, CRESWICK, LEE, WEBSTER,

HERBERT, DYCE, COPE, and others who would have been renowned as great

masters in any age or country—you come, in this place, to the

contemplation of a Holy Family. You will have the goodness to discharge

from your minds all Post-Raphael ideas, all religious aspirations, all

elevating thoughts; all tender, awful, sorrowful, ennobling, sacred,

graceful, or beautiful associations; and to prepare yourselves, as

befits such a subject—Pre-Raphaelly considered—for the lowest depths of

what is mean, odious, repulsive, and revolting.

You behold the interior of a carpenter’s shop. In the foreground of that

carpenter’s shop is a hideous, wry-necked, blubbering, red-headed boy,

in a bed-gown; who appears to have received a poke in the hand, from the

stick of another boy with whom he has been playing in an adjacent

gutter, and to be holding it up for the contemplation of a kneeling

woman, so horrible in her ugliness, that (supposing it were possible for

any human creature to exist for a moment with that dislocated throat)

she would stand out from the rest of the company as a Monster, in the

vilest cabaret in France, or the lowest gin-shop in England. Two almost

naked carpenters, master and journeyman, worthy companions of this

agreeable female, are working at their trade; a boy, with some small

flavor of humanity in him, is entering with a vessel of water; and

nobody is paying any attention to a snuffy old woman who seems to have

mistaken that shop for the tobacconist’s next door, and to be hopelessly

waiting at the counter to be served with half an ounce of her favourite

mixture. Wherever it is possible to express ugliness of feature, limb,

or attitude, you have it expressed. Such men as the carpenters might be

undressed in any hospital where dirty drunkards, in a high state of

varicose veins, are received. Their very toes have walked out of Saint

Giles’s.

This, in the nineteenth century, and in the eighty-second year of the

annual exhibition of the National Academy of Art, is the Pre-Raphael

representation to us, Ladies and Gentlemen, of the most solemn passage

which our minds can ever approach. This, in the nineteenth century, and

in the eighty-second year of the annual exhibition of the National

Academy of Art, is what Pre-Raphael Art can do to render reverence and

homage to the faith in which we live and die! Consider this picture

well. Consider the pleasure we should have in a similar Pre-Raphael

rendering of a favourite horse, or dog, or cat; and, coming fresh from a

pretty considerable turmoil about “desecration” in connexion with the

National Post Office, let us extol this great achievement, and commend

the National Academy!

In further considering this symbol of the great retrogressive principle,

it is particularly gratifying to observe that such objects as the

shavings which are strewn on the carpenter’s floor are admirably

painted; and that the Pre-Raphael Brother is indisputably accomplished

in the manipulation of his art. It is gratifying to observe this,

because the fact involves no low effort at notoriety; everybody knowing

that it is by no means easier to call attention to a very indifferent

pig with five legs, than to a symmetrical pig with four. Also, because

it is good to know that the National Academy thoroughly feels and

comprehends the high range and exalted purposes of Art; distinctly

perceives that Art includes something more than the faithful portraiture

of shavings, or the skilful colouring of drapery—imperatively requires,

in short, that it shall be informed with mind and sentiment; will on no

account reduce it to a narrow question of trade-juggling with a palette,

palette-knife, and paint-box. It is likewise pleasing to reflect that

the great educational establishment foresees the difficulty into which

it would be led, by attaching greater weight to mere handicraft, than to

any other consideration—even to considerations of common reverence or

decency; which absurd principle, in the event of a skilful painter of

the figure becoming a very little more perverted in his taste, than

certain skilful painters are just now, might place Her Gracious Majesty

in a very painful position, one of these fine Private View Days.

Would it were in our power to congratulate our readers on the hopeful

prospects of the great retrogressive principle, of which this thoughtful

picture is the sign and emblem! Would that we could give our readers

encouraging assurance of a healthy demand for Old Lamps in exchange for

New ones, and a steady improvement in the Old Lamp Market! The

perversity of mankind is such, and the untoward arrangements of

Providence are such, that we cannot lay that flattering unction to their

souls. We can only report what Brotherhoods, stimulated by this sign,

are forming; and what opportunities will be presented to the people, if

the people will but accept them.

In the first place, the Pre-Perspective Brotherhood will be presently

incorporated, for the subversion of all known rules and principles of

perspective. It is intended to swear every P. P. B. to a solemn

renunciation of the art of perspective on a soup-plate of the willow

pattern; and we may expect, on the occasion of the eighty-third Annual

Exhibition of the Royal Academy of Art in England, to see some pictures

by this pious Brotherhood, realising HOGARTH’S idea of a man on a

mountain several miles off, lighting his pipe at the upper window of a

house in the foreground. But we are informed that every brick in the

house will be a portrait; that the man’s boots will be copied with the

utmost fidelity from a pair of Bluchers, sent up out of Northamptonshire

for the purpose; and that the texture of his hands (including four

chilblains, a whitlow, and ten dirty nails) will be a triumph of the

Painter’s art.

A Society, to be called the Pre-Newtonian Brotherhood, was lately

projected by a young gentleman, under articles to a Civil Engineer, who

objected to being considered bound to conduct himself according to the

laws of gravitation. But this young gentleman, being reproached by some

aspiring companions with the timidity of his conception, has abrogated

that idea in favour of a Pre-Galileo Brotherhood now flourishing, who

distinctly refuse to perform any annual revolution round the Sun, and

have arranged that the world shall not do so any more. The course to be

taken by the Royal Academy of Art in reference to this Brotherhood is

not yet decided upon; but it is whispered that some other large

Educational Institutions in the neighbourhood of Oxford are nearly ready

to pronounce in favour of it.

Several promising Students connected with the Royal College of Surgeons

have held a meeting, to protest against the circulation of the blood,

and to pledge themselves to treat all the patients they can get, on

principles condemnatory of that innovation. A Pre-Harvey-Brotherhood is

the result, from which a great deal may be expected—by the undertakers.

In literature, a very spirited effort has been made, which is no less

than the formation of a P. G. A. P. C. B., or Pre-Gower and

Pre-Chaucer-Brotherhood, for the restoration of the ancient English

style of spelling, and the weeding out from all libraries, public and

private, of those and all later pretenders, particularly a person of

loose character named SHAKESPEARE. It having been suggested, however,

that this happy idea could scarcely be considered complete while the art

of printing was permitted to remain unmolested, another society, under

the name of the Pre-Laurentius Brotherhood, has been established in

connexion with it, for the abolition of all but manuscript books. These

MR. PUGIN has engaged to supply, in characters that nobody on earth

shall be able to read. And it is confidently expected by those who have

seen the House of Lords, that he will faithfully redeem his pledge.

In Music, a retrogressive step, in which there is much hope, has been

taken. The P. A. B., or Pre-Agincourt Brotherhood has arisen, nobly

devoted to consign to oblivion Mozart, Beethoven, Handel, and every

other such ridiculous reputation, and to fix its Millennium (as its name

implies) before the date of the first regular musical composition known

to have been achieved in England. As this Institution has not yet

commenced active operations, it remains to be seen whether the Royal

Academy of Music will be a worthy sister of the Royal Academy of Art,

and admit this enterprising body to its orchestra. We have it on the

best authority, that its compositions will be quite as rough and

discordant as the real old original—that it will be, in a word, exactly

suited to the pictorial Art we have endeavoured to describe. We have

strong hopes, therefore, that the Royal Academy of Music, not wanting an

example, may not want courage.

The regulation of social matters, as separated from the Fine Arts, has

been undertaken by the Pre-Henry-the-Seventh Brotherhood, who date from

the same period as the Pre-Raphael Brotherhood. This society, as

cancelling all the advances of nearly four hundred years, and reverting

to one of the most disagreeable periods of English History, when the

Nation was yet very slowly emerging from barbarism, and when gentle

female foreigners, come over to be the wives of Scottish Kings, wept

bitterly (as well they might) at being left alone among the savage

Court, must be regarded with peculiar favour. As the time of ugly

religious caricatures (called mysteries), it is thoroughly Pre-Raphael

in its spirit; and may be deemed the twin brother to that great society.

We should be certain of the Plague among many other advantages, if this

Brotherhood were properly encouraged.

All these Brotherhoods, and any other society of the like kind, now in

being or yet to be, have at once a guiding star, and a reduction of

their great ideas to something palpable and obvious to the senses, in

the sign to which we take the liberty of directing their attention. We

understand that it is in the contemplation of each Society to become

possessed, with all convenient speed, of a collection of such pictures;

and that once, every year, to wit upon the first of April, the whole

intend to amalgamate in a high festival, to be called the Convocation of

Eternal Boobies.

Household Words, No. 12, June 15, 1850 · 第 3 / 26 题