The Humour of Homer and Other Essays

Introduction

By R. A. Streatfeild

The nucleus of this book is the collection of essays by Samuel

Butler, which was originally published by Mr. Grant Richards in 1904

under the title Essays on Life, Art and Science, and reissued by Mr.

Fifield in 1908. To these are now added another essay, entitled

"The Humour of Homer," a biographical sketch of the author kindly

contributed by Mr. Henry Festing Jones, which will add materially to

the value of the edition, and a portrait in photogravure from a

photograph taken in 1889--the period of the essays.

[Photograph of Samuel Butler. Caption reads: From a photograph

made by Pizzetta in Varallo in 1889. Emery Walker Ltd., ph. sc.

butler.jpg]

"The Humour of Homer" was originally delivered as a lecture at the

Working Men's College in Great Ormond Street on the 30th January,

1892, the day on which Butler first promulgated his theory of the

Trapanese origin of the Odyssey in a letter to the Athenaeum. Later

in the same year it was published with some additional matter by

Messrs. Metcalfe and Co. of Cambridge. For the next five years

Butler was engaged upon researches into the origin and authorship of

the Odyssey, the results of which are embodied in his book The

Authoress of the "Odyssey," originally published by Messrs. Longman

in 1897. Butler incorporated a good deal of "The Humour of Homer"

into The Authoress of the "Odyssey," but the section relating to the

Iliad naturally found no place in the later work. For the sake of

this alone "The Humour of Homer" deserves to be better known.

Written as it was for an artisan audience and professing to deal

only with one side of Homer's genius, "The Humour of Homer" must

not, of course, be taken as an exhaustive statement of Butler's

views upon Homeric questions. It touches but lightly on important

points, particularly regarding the origin and authorship of the

Odyssey, which are treated at much greater length in The Authoress

of the "Odyssey."

Nevertheless, "The Humour of Homer" appears to me to have a special

value as a kind of general introduction to Butler's more detailed

study of the Odyssey. His attitude towards the Homeric poems is

here expressed with extraordinary freshness and force. What that

attitude was is best explained by his own words: "If a person would

understand either the Odyssey or any other ancient work, he must

never look at the dead without seeing the living in them, nor at the

living without thinking of the dead. We are too fond of seeing the

ancients as one thing and the moderns as another." Butler did not

undervalue the philological and archaeological importance of the

Iliad and the Odyssey, but it was mainly as human documents that

they appealed to him. This, I am inclined to suspect, was the root

of the objection of academic critics to him and his theories. They

did not so much resent the suggestion that the author of the Odyssey

was a woman; they could not endure that he should be treated as a

human being.

Of the remaining essays two were originally delivered as lectures;

the others appeared first in The Universal Review in 1888, 1889 and

1890. I should perhaps explain why two other essays which also

appeared in The Universal Review are not included in this

collection. The first of these, entitled "L'Affaire Holbein-

Rippel," relates to a drawing of Holbein's "Danse des Paysans" in

the Basle Museum, which is usually described as a copy, but which

Butler believed to be the work of Holbein himself. This essay

requires to be illustrated in so elaborate a manner that it was

impossible to include it in a book of this size. The second essay,

which is a sketch of the career of the sculptor Tabachetti, was

published as the first section of an article, entitled "A Sculptor

and a Shrine," of which the second part is here given under the

title "The Sanctuary of Montrigone." The section devoted to the

sculptor contains all that Butler then knew about Tabachetti, but

since it was written various documents have come to light,

principally through the investigations of Cavaliere Francesco Negri,

of Casale Monferrato, which negative some of Butler's conclusions.

Had Butler lived, I do not doubt that he would have revised his

essay in the light of Cavaliere Negri's discoveries, the value of

which he fully recognized. As it stands the essay requires so much

revision that I have decided to omit it altogether and to postpone

giving English readers a full account of Tabachetti's career until a

second edition of Butler's "Ex Voto," in which Tabachetti's work is

discussed in detail, is required. Meanwhile I have given a brief

summary of the main facts of Tabachetti's life in a note (p. 195) to

the essay on "Art in the Valley of Saas." Anyone who desires

further details concerning the sculptor and his work will find them

in Cavaliere Negri's pamphlet "Il Santuario di Crea" (Alessandria,

1902).

The three essays grouped together under the title The Deadlock in

Darwinism may be regarded as a postscript to Butler's four books on

evolution, viz. Life and Habit, Evolution Old and New, Unconscious

Memory, and Luck or Cunning? When these essays were first published

in book form in 1904, I ventured to give a brief summary of Butler's

position with regard to the main problem of evolution. I need now

only refer readers to Mr. Festing Jones's biographical sketch and,

for fuller details, to the masterly introduction contributed by

Professor Marcus Hartog to the new edition of Unconscious Memory (A.

C. Fifield, 1910), and recently reprinted in his Problems of Life

and Reproduction (John Murray, 1913), in which Butler's work in the

field of biology and his share in the various controversies

connected with the study of evolution are discussed with the

authority of a specialist.

R. A. STREATFEILD. July, 1913.

Sketch of the Life of Samuel Butler

Author of Erewhon

(1835-1902)

by Henry Festing Jones

The Humour of Homer and Other Essays · 第 2 / 20 题