CHAPTER XXX.

MAMMON DOMINATES THE NATIONS.

The debt habit has been diligently cultivated and encouraged, until

the nations are enslaved. Public bonds imply bondsmen, and the nations

are no longer free. There is a mortgage upon the inventive genius,

industry and productive energy of the world.

Usurers greatly prefer an organized government as a debtor. The

individual may die, but a nation's debts bind from age to age, are

bequeathed by the fathers to the children, and thus descend from

generation to generation. The bonds of no corporation, however great

and rich, can be so secure. They embrace special industries, while

national debts are a claim upon every industry and a mortgage upon

every foot of soil, and every dollar of present personal property, and

of all that may be produced in the whole realm.

If we express the world's indebtedness, the national debts, in the

terms of our currency, as nearly as we can reduce the currency of

other nations to such an expression, we find the national debts as

follows, in 1890:

Denmark $ 33,004,722

Great Britain 3,848,460,000

United States 915,962,112

Germany 1,956,217,017

Austria-Hungary $2,666,339,539

France 4,446,793,398

Russia 3,491,016,074

Italy 2,324,826,329

Spain 1,251,433,096

Netherlands 430,539,653

Belgium 360,504,099

Sweden 64,220,807

Norway 13,973,752

Portugal 490,493,599

Greece 107,306,518

Turkey 821,000,000

Switzerland 10,912,925

---------------

These debts aggregate $22,955,386,008

Hundreds of millions have been added to these national debts in the

last ten years. Nearly every nation has increased its indebtedness,

possibly no nation has decreased it, and others, like China, with its

recent great loan, and little Korea, with its twelve millions, must be

added to the list. The debts of the nations of Europe have been

increased until they now amount in the aggregate to twenty-three

billions. The debts of the nations of all the world have increased

one-half since 1890, and now aggregate thirty-three billions.

These great national debts are practically perpetual, and though they

may be at so low a rate of interest as three per cent., they absorb

the energies of the people, and, like a glacier grinding over the

earth, crush all beneath them.

Public debts are incurred to relieve the present wealth of the burden

of present duty. Debts place the whole burden on producers of the

future. They relieve those who hold the wealth now, but are a draft

upon those who make the wealth that is to be.

An individual incurring debt places a mortgage upon his productions;

by a pledge of future production he relieves himself of the strain of

the present.

A family incurs debt; a part of the members of the house are strong

and capable of productive labor, and a part are not; the whole burden

of the payment comes upon the productive members of the home. The weak

and helpless and the indolent, though strong, bear no part of the

burden. This family has a home, and a mortgage is placed upon it to

secure the present needs. The burden of paying the interest on this

mortgage, and the final payment of the principal, is wholly on the

capable and industrious members of the family.

National debts are incurred to relieve the present wealth of the

burden of present government calls and obligations, and to roll it

upon those who shall produce wealth in the future. So the debt of a

city, state, or nation is a present relief to property holders, by

placing the producers under future obligations.

A street in a city is to be paved; no additional tax is levied; but

bonds are issued running twenty years.

This relieves the present wealth of the burden, placing it upon those

who shall produce the wealth that shall be in twenty years.

The expenses of a great war must be met. Present taxes may be slightly

increased, but to meet the burden consols or public bonds are issued

to be paid at a distant date. This relieves the present wealth, but

binds it upon those who shall be the producers of wealth in the

generations to come. Hume says, "The practice of contracting debts

will almost invariably be abused by every government. It would

scarcely be more imprudent to give a prodigal son a credit with every

banker, than to empower statesmen to draw bills in this manner on

posterity."

These public bonds are the golden opportunity of the usurers. Not only

is their wealth relieved of all burden, but it affords an opportunity

of profitable investment with the best possible debtor. They can pose

as enterprising citizens, and urge great public improvements, and at

the same time gain a most sure and profitable investment. They can

pose as patriots in time of war, and urge that it be pressed with

energy at whatever cost of treasure and blood. It is not their blood

that is shed, nor their wealth that is wasted. It gives them the

opportunity of binding their burdens on the nation for the producers

of the coming generations to carry.

Usurers never wish public debts paid. They wish them issued for as

long time as possible, and then reissued, or the time extended before

they are due. This is done by the figment called refunding, as if it

were a concession and favor to a poor debtor. It is but a device to

keep the burden on the public back. It is not a financial feat and

triumph for the chancellor of the exchequer to refund a public debt.

He but yields himself as a tool to the usurers to continue their

loans. They resist the payment when due, but when an officer is found

willing to extend them before they are due all trouble is avoided and

the accretions of interest are not interrupted for a day.

Those who hold the bonds of a nation direct its destinies. The nation

borrowing is servant to the lender, just as an individual. The nation

compromises its freedom and becomes the slave of its bond-holders. The

usurers use their power for the advancement of their own material

interests, and hold all other purposes of government as inferior to

their own ends. This subordination of a people, to the creditors, is

fatal to republican and constitutional governments; the form may be

preserved for a time, but the substance of free government has

departed.

The concentration of wealth carries with it the concentration of

power, and is inimical to republican institutions. A proper

distribution of wealth and power must be preserved or popular

government is put in jeopardy.

The first bank of deposit and discount was the Bank of Venice, in the

republic of Venetia. It continued its existence for six hundred years,

until the government that gave it life itself perished. From its long

continuous business, and its success as a bank, it has been spoken of

in every work on banking as a model. It began its association with the

republic in 1171, and dominated it, sapping its life, and assuming

its functions, until the bank practically ruled the state, and when

one fell both perished in 1797. The usurers received their hold on the

state in a time of the greatest need. The republic had been

impoverished by the crusades, and was in dire financial straits.

Advantage was taken of this by the usurers to so bind the bank and

state together that when one lived the other must, or both must die

together. Stock in the bank was a loan to the state at four per cent.

annual interest. The union seemed to promise great prosperity for a

time, but really absorbed all the republic's vitality during the last

hundred years of their life.

Venetia was at the first a pure democracy. The Doge was elected by the

people and administered the government, himself being the responsible

head. He, later, chose advisers, or a cabinet, to be associated in the

responsible duties. After this, and about the time of the association

with the bank, a representative council was elected by the people, and

the government was administered by the Doge and this council. This was

gradually transformed from a government of the people to an oligarchy;

and as the years passed there were no steps taken toward a return, but

the authority and power was more and more centralized. The ruling

class was, in a hundred years, limited to those families enrolled in

the "Golden Book." In another hundred years the government was in

control of the "Council of Ten." Later the secret tribunal of three

was the terror of the people and the instrument of their oppression.

The republic was only such in name, the people were deprived of all

voice in the government, and the Doge became a puppet to obey the

ruling cabal.

Shakespeare went to Venice to find his typical usurer in Shylock the

Jew. He found there also his typical Christian, Antonio. Antonio was a

benevolent great soul, who loved his friends, supported all

benevolences, and hated the usurers. Shylock hated him because he

would lend without interest, and was constantly reproving him for his

usurious practice.

The contest between the usurers and the people of the Venetian

republic was a struggle for the life, but the usurers never relaxed

their hold. They dominated until the end.

Another great triumph of the usurers was in England at the time of

great need. William and Mary had been placed upon the throne by the

Protestants, but were in need of money to carry on the struggle for

its complete establishment. This was the usurers' opportunity. Former

kings, in like straits, had confiscated the wealth of the usurious

Jews, Lombards and Goldsmiths, and appropriated their property as a

penalty for their unchristian practice, but William and Mary entered

into a contract with them to gain their assistance, giving them

special privileges to secure a permanent loan. They were to loan the

crown 1,200,000 pounds sterling. This was never to be repaid, but

interest at the rate of eight per cent. per annum was to be paid

forever. This loan was a marvel of success. There was a great rush of

usurers to place their money with the crown as a perpetual loan at

that rate of increase. Their usuries, which had hitherto been counted

dishonest gain, were henceforth to be honorable, and they esteemed as

patriots.

Thus, the first Protestant power in the world was established in the

hands of usurers, and bound to continue associated with them forever.

The story, by Macauley, of the establishment of the Bank of England,

is familiar to all students of English history.

This bank is a great corporation; the Board of Directors is composed

of twenty-six members, who elect their own successors, and thus it is

entirely independent. It makes laws for its own direction in the name

of the people or defies their control. In 1797 it secured an order

from the privy council ordering itself to suspend specie payment. It

obeyed its own order promptly, and at the same time announced their

strength and that the order would be temporary; but for one excuse and

another it was continued for twenty-five years.

Sir Robert Peel, in 1844, having become convinced of the dangerous and

disastrous influence, expanding and contracting its loans, secured the

enactment of a law to regulate and limit its circulation. This law

was distasteful to the bank, and was, upon its enactment, defied by

open disobedience. It has not only dictated the laws for its own

regulation, but directed both the domestic and the foreign policy of

the government. It has subordinated the public weal to financial

profit. This corporation of usurers manage all the finances of the

kingdom, and has more influence than Crown and Parliament combined. As

a great uncrowned king it dictates the diplomatic policies of the

United Kingdom. Its influence has not been extended to promote

Protestant Christian faith, Jews are not zealous for any Christian

sect; nor for the purpose of lifting up the degraded and enlightening

them; nor in the east has it exercised its power to relieve human

suffering, but its diplomatic policy has been mercenary greed always.

It should be noted that the enlightened Christian people of the United

Kingdom are not the English government. There has been, for two

hundred years, a power behind the Throne, behind Parliament, behind

the people, essentially selfish and commercial. This has controlled

India for profit, while the benevolent people were anxious to

christianize and uplift. It has befriended the Turk while England wept

over the Turkish barbarities. It forced opium upon China while the

Christian people sent missionaries. The people of England love

freedom, yet the government has endeavored to crush it in the American

colonies and everywhere throughout the world, when in conflict with a

selfish commercial policy. The English people cry out against human

slavery, yet in the struggle in the United States, when slavery was in

the balance, the English government earnestly espoused the cause of

those who upheld slavery. The English people rejoiced that the slave

trade in Africa was abolished, yet the government enacted the hut tax,

and compels now the service of the young and vigorous blacks in the

mines, sending them back to their people when their strength declines.

In the establishment of the republic of the United States there was a

strong resistance to any debt or subordination to usurers. The history

of banks in the United States shows a struggle at the birth of the

nation between the usurers, who demanded the management of the

finances, and the people who resisted. This struggle continued for

half a century, when the people triumphed, and for thirty years there

was no hint of a purpose to overthrow what was regarded as the settled

policy of the nation.

The first bank was incorporated in 1791. Its establishment was

strongly resisted, but being urged by the Secretary of the Treasury, a

charter was granted for twenty years. When that charter expired by

limitation in 1811, there was a struggle by the usurers to secure its

renewal, but they were defeated. They did not, however, abandon their

effort. In 1816 they secured the charter of the second bank of the

United States. This charter was also limited to twenty years,

expiring in 1836. There was a tremendous struggle for its renewal, but

the chief executive, backed by a strong political party, so completely

defeated it that the usurers for the time yielded, and for thirty

years the settled policy of the government forbade the alliance with

usurers and the making of any public debt. Many of the leading

statesmen of that period were very pronounced in their opposition.

"The banking system concentrates and places the power in the hands of

those who control it.

"Never was an engine invented better calculated to place the destines

of the many in the hands of the few, or less favorable to that

equality and independence which lies at the bottom of our free

institutions."--J.C. Calhoun.

"I object to the continuance of this bank because its tendencies are

dangerous and pernicious to the government and the people. It tends to

aggravate the inequality of fortunes; to make the rich richer, and the

poor poorer; to multiply nabobs and paupers, and to deepen and widen

the gulf that separates Dives from Lazarus."--Thomas H. Benton.

"I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous

than standing armies. I am not among those who fear the people. They

and not the rich are our dependence for continued freedom. And to

preserve their independence, we must not let our rulers load us with

perpetual debts."--Thomas Jefferson.

"Events have satisfied my mind, and I think the minds of the American

people, that the mischief and dangers which flow from a national bank

far overbalance all its advantages."--Andrew Jackson.

The usurers were compelled to remain under public condemnation during

thirty years, as sentiment was strongly against them and conditions

were not in their favor, but they did not relax their watchful effort

nor abandon hope of ultimate success. When the nation was struggling

to prevent its dissolution in 1861-5, and unusual war measures seemed

necessary to meet the great emergency, the usurers saw their

opportunity and came forward, as they did in Venice and England; they

would loan the government the funds necessary to carry on the war, if

the government would comply with their conditions and grant them the

privileges demanded. They asked that their loan be perpetual, like the

English loan; that they should be freed from the burdens of the

government; that their loan should be free from taxation; that they

should receive their interest semi-annually, and not in the common

legal tender, but in coin; that they be permitted to issue their own

notes as currency to be loaned to their customers; that the government

discredit its own issues and endorse theirs; and that they be given a

monopoly by taxing out of existence all opposition.

These were great demands, and were regarded as extortionate and

oppressive. The struggle was severe, but the enemy in the field was

threatening the life of the nation, while the usurers were urgent and

posing as patriots, that they might accomplish their ends. True

patriots, anxious to defeat the enemy in arms, regarded these usurers

at home as equally the enemies of freedom. They were in a strait

betwixt two foes.

Secretary McCullough said, "Hostility to the government has been as

decidedly manifested in the efforts that have been made in the

commercial metropolis of the nation to depreciate the currency as has

been by the enemy."

The opposition to the usurers was very strong and bitter, but the

conditions were in their favor and they gained a decided advantage. In

the Senate the vote stood twenty-three yeas to twenty-one nays. It was

carried only as a war measure. There was an effort to limit the

usurers' privileges to the war and one year after its close. This was

not successful, but their loan was confined to the war debt, and their

time to its payment, limited to twenty years.

This action caused great distress and dark forebodings of evil to many

of the thoughtful. It was setting aside the policy of the nation,

which had been generally acquiesced in as wise and judicious and safe

for many years. The old patriot Thadeus Stevens, in the opening of a

speech in a preliminary skirmish between patriotism and usurers,

said: "I approach the subject with more depression of spirits than I

ever before approached any question. No personal motive or feeling

influences me. I hope not, at least. I have a melancholy foreboding

that we are about to consummate a cunningly devised scheme, which will

carry great injury and great loss to all classes of people throughout

the Union, except one." Later he said, in excuse of the action, "We

had to yield, we did not yield until we found that the country must be

lost or the banks gratified, and we have sought to save the country in

spite of the cupidity of its wealthier classes."

The usurers have never relaxed the hold they secured by this victory,

and have since been continually increasing their power. They obtained

an extension or "refunding" of the war debt, and a renewal of their

charters by the general laws, so their hold is indefinitely extended.

Bonds are no longer limited to the covering of war expenses, but are

issued freely in times of peace. The traditions of the fathers have

been cast to the winds, and their fears derided and their policy

changed. The usurers have been firmly in the saddle for many years,

and have defeated every effort that has been made to unseat them.

The great debts of the nations have brought all mankind into

subjection to the usurers. Those who hold the bonds have the destinies

of the race in their hands. They pervert the ends of government; the

protection of life, liberty and the highest good of all the people;

they make governments their tools to gather and appropriate the

earnings of the many.

They have exalted Mammon upon the throne of the world, and scoff at

the God of heaven, who seeks the poor and needy, and who would in love

lift up every son and daughter of the whole race.

Milton presents Mammon as one of the devils cast out of heaven with

Satan, and as saying in the council of the demons, "What place can be

found for us within heaven's bound, unless heaven's Lord we

overpower?... How wearisome eternity so spent in worship paid, to one

we hate."

The reign of Mammon subordinates character and virtue and liberty and

human life to sordid gain, yet he holds the scepter of power.

He elects legislators and senators. He elects governors or directs

their arrest if they refuse to obey him. He elects presidents and

dictates their policies. He places kings on their thrones and holds

them there while they do his bidding. He strips a Khedive of power,

and yet retains him as a collector of revenue. He steadies the

Sultan's tottering throne, and compels six great Christian powers to

stand by in silence while humanity is outraged. The Armenian's blood

must be permitted to flow because the persecution is by a great

servant, the Sultan, who pays interest on bonds, and his victims are

only freemen. The murder of one hundred thousand Armenians meant

nothing to Mammon. But when the Cretans were persecuted by the same

Sultan, the suffering and bloodshed was soon ordered stopped by these

same six powers, at Mammon's command. The Cretans were servants of the

common master; the Cretan bonds were endangered. The cry of suffering

humanity came up to deaf ears, but the cry of endangered bonds was

heard from afar by this reigning god of wealth.

The little republics of Africa were freemen, and therefore Mammon sees

them strangled with indifference. Mammon gathers the civilized nations

around China and demands that she shall be enslaved by all the bonds

she can safely carry or submit to vivisection and distribution.

This enslavement of the race is not by the destroying of intelligence,

nor by denying the first principles of civil liberty, nor by crushing

the aspirations for freedom, but by producing conditions that make the

application of these principles and the exercise of freedom

impossible. Though the race may increase in intelligence and

theoretically have correct views of personal freedom and civil

liberty, yet the conditions produced necessarily by usury utterly

prevent their realization. The intelligence and aspirations of the

race never were higher than at present, their subjection and

subordination to material wealth was never more complete.

The scepter wherein lies Mammon's power to sway the nations is usury.

When bonds bear no increase his sovereignty is gone. All motive to

involve the nation in debt at once disappears, and the power to

control is lost. Moses' law was divinely wise that forbade interest,

that his people could not be enslaved and might remain a free people

forever.

Usury · 第 30 / 39 章