Perhaps this is a good time to review our impressions of that

wonderful creation of a strange genius, "Der Ring des Nibelungen."

Whatever else may be said of Wagner, it must always be admitted that

he was a genius. Something of the vanity of the child, the naïveté

that always dwells in the organization of the truly original artist,

is to be discerned in his every action, in his every utterance; and

it would be strange if it did not force itself upon our notice in his

works. There it discloses itself most frequently in a ludicrous error

of taking seriously things that can never be other than amusing to

the casual observer, and of missing the point of some of his own best

ideas.

Wagner has been much praised as a poet. Time was when the present

writer (who must be his own confessor), feeling the power and

beauty of the fundamental stuff in the music dramas, rather than

the adapter's cumbersome and rudely articulated Germanizing of it,

dreamed that Wagner had poetic craftsmanship of no mean order. But

he never fell into the error of regarding him as a brother of the

northern skalds, a bard chanting in full-blooded imagination. Wagner

was a dramatist, of an uncommonly high order, if you will, looking

always to the symbolism of musical investure for his stage pictures,

but just a dramatist and nothing more.

His truest drama, as it is his most finely wrought, is "Tristan und

Isolde," which rests upon the simplest of emotional propositions,

demonstrated in the most convincing of musical illustration. But

"Der Ring des Nibelungen" is his most ponderous conception, his

most elaborate structure, and withal second only to "Tristan und

Isolde" in the majestic heights of musical delineation to which it

triumphantly ascends.

Not a little of its musical glory grows out of its dramatic

difficulties. In its beginning it deals with gods, dwarfs, nixies

of the Rhine, and cumbersome giants, all fabulous, nebulous, in

some instances almost intangible figures, whose only force lies in

their simulation of humanity, and whose mastering weakness consists

in their unreality. Gradually these gods and goddesses fade away

and leave the picture occupied with purely human figures alone. The

last majestic burst of supernal majesty is the final scene of "Die

Walküre." In "Siegfried" a worn and weary wanderer, cherishing a

feeble hope, powerless to turn the flow of events, passes across the

canvas and dwindles out of sight before the dawn of human love.

The rest is pure humanity, except when in the end of

"Götterdämmerung" the imperial godhood of Brünnhilde enthrones itself

upon the wreck of worlds, and sings the death-warrant of the waning

Wotan and his wavering brood.

The futile and disappearing gods! These are the weird and enchanting

unrealities of Wagner's "Nibelungen" scheme. How they potter and

fumble with the machinery of the inevitable! How they falter and

fail in the presence of inscrutable Truth, which overcomes them like

a summer cloud! They parade before us in "Das Rheingold," clad in a

clarion of trumpets and trombones, made glorious with the radiance

of Wagner's blazing sunlight of sonorous chords; but they are none

the less futile. Save one,--Loge, the tempter, Loge, the spirit of

indomitable evil, who sows the seed of destruction in the beginning

and writes the plot of "Götterdämmerung" with a twist of his finger

toward the gleaming gold.

Of all Wagner's philosophic compositions, his psychological

conjurations out of the shadowy depths of his own fancy and the

equally cloudy shallows of Schopenhauer and Feuerbach, Loge is the

most intimately conceived and the most finely wrought. Disappearing,

indeed, he is, but by no means futile. The Mephistopheles of the

rock-ribbed north, the Lucifer of the hills, he unites all the

subtlety of the metropolitan conception of the sophisticated

Goethe with the breadth and spontaneity of the harp-strokes of the

storm-bred bard.

Wagner does not paint Loge so brilliantly in text as he does in

music. This Satanic tempter of the wise ones is an operatic character

raised to the seventh power. His words are unconvincing without his

music, which charges them and him with a boundless significance.

Never once in all his flickering career does he utter a single

sentence of such elemental majesty as that of Boito's Mefistofele:

"Son lo spirito che nega." That looming figure of the archlibrettist

of Tuscany spreads the shadow of contemporaneous sophistication

across the operatic firmament. Standing with his defiant gaze upon

the throne of the many-voiced invisible, he is a lyric reincarnation

of the epic Lucifer of Milton.

Loge is no such mighty spirit. He comes upon the scene whining

excuses for an ill-done errand. He slips, he slides, he wriggles

away. He is the aurora of casuistry, the embodiment of the elusive.

The flickering fire is his outward manifestation. He is mean. He is

a sneak. But he is the intellectual superior of the entire coterie

of futile gods, and he laughs at their infantile incapacity. Poor

old Wotan! He mumbles in his beard that he cannot do mental tricks

as Loge can. A simple-minded old god is he, who would gladly cheat

the lumbering giants out of their guerdon, but does not know how. So

he turns to Loge, who comes waving and caracoling upon the scene--to

what theme? That of the fire! A theme which is as elusive as his

nature, a theme which has neither beginning nor end, which wanders

along in the form of an indefinite decimal of harmony and never for

an instant establishes a definite tonality.

Every movement of Loge, every betrayal of a new thought formed in his

shifty mind, is accompanied by an utterance of this motive in the

orchestra. Not once in "Das Rheingold" does the theme rest itself

upon the firm foundations of a major triad. Chromatic in form, it

is chromatic, chameleon-like in color. It is the real Loge. It is a

musical triumph, because in terms of purely descriptive imitation it

expresses a psychologic study. The music is the shifting, flickering,

changeful, destroying fire; the fire is the soul of Loge and the

first fruit of perdition.

The theme returns in the last scene of "Die Walküre," when Wotan,

the helpless father, has put his best-beloved to sleep. He is to

surround her with a belt of guardian fire. Fire is the soul of

Loge, a lovely protector for unconscious virtue! Again we hear

the fire music, but only for fire. Loge, most subtle of the gods

of the field, has to all appearances been the most futile. He has

disappeared already. But now his fire, at any rate, returns and beams

beneficently from a base of diatonic major harmonies with tinkling of

blissful bells. Did Wagner realize the fathomless depths of his own

sarcasm here? Or is it all a beautiful chance?

In the last scene of "Siegfried" there is an echo of the Loge

theme, but it means almost nothing. The same echo is heard in

"Götterdämmerung," Act I. In Act III. of the same drama, when

Brünnhilde seizes the torch to fire the funeral pyre whose flames

shall set all Walhalla in a blaze, the Loge chromatics, together

with a gleam of the ring theme, flashes up, but it is as futile as

the almost-forgotten Loge. Here was Wagner's opportunity to tell the

truth about his own secret conception of this vast phantasmagoria of

fact and fable. At the very end of "Das Rheingold" the crafty one

says:

"A feverish fancy

Doth woo me to wander

Forth in flickering fire:

To burn and waste them

Who bound me erewhile.

Rather than be

Thus blindly engulfed,

Even were they of gods the most godlike."

No Walhalla for the free spirit of flame, but liberty and the

ultimate destruction of these pitiful children of the light. Wagner

might have let the glittering chromatics of the fire theme rise just

once into a peal of majestic power in the end of "Götterdämmerung,"

when Wotan and all his hosts sat helpless amid the blazing of

Walhalla. It is Loge's triumph, is it not? Oh, yes, of course, it is

the stupendous immolation of Brünnhilde, with the unutterable thought

behind it and the regeneration of the earth before it. But Loge would

have seen in it nothing but the victory of the eternal principle of

destruction, which Wagner epitomized even better than he knew in his

musical characterization of the fire-fiend.

What was really in Wagner's mind when he wrote that extraordinarily

beautiful passage of song for Loge in the first scene of "Das

Rheingold"?

"Where life ebbeth and floweth

In flood and earth and air,

All asked I,

Ever inquiring,

Where sinew doth reign,

And seedlings are rooted,

What well a man

Could mightier deem

Than woman's wonderful worth."

Again, it is not the text, but the marvellous burst of throbbing

melody that tells the thought in Wagner's mind. But does it tell all?

Study well the phrases in the score. Are they sincere, or does Wagner

shadow forth just a suspicion of the dishonesty which lurks in the

utterance? Loge knows that he has yet his trump card, the gold of the

Rhine, to play; and either he believes that will be a winning card,

or he is not the devil, after all.

What, then, becomes of this manifestation of Wagnerian philosophy,

this joyous tempter of wooden gods? At the end of "Das Rheingold"

his personal career ends. Henceforth only his soul hovers about us.

Like the genie who, according to the veracious chronicler of the

"Arabian Nights," had sinned against Solomon, he was shut up in a

box, the old earth itself. He fades out of sight to reappear only in

a materialistic exhibit of steam and red fire. A sad end, indeed, for

such a thoughtful representation of sophistry. "Two special powers,"

says M. Taine, "lead mankind,--impulse and idea." Loge was the

embodiment of idea. Farewell to thee, Idea. Henceforth let impulse

lead us onward to love and death. Yet shall not Idea, subtle, crafty,

remorseless, triumph at last?

The foil to Loge is Wotan, foil and victim. What a sorrowful

spectacle is this unfortunate master of the gods, who takes up Loge

because that craftsman has brains, and yet cannot withstand the

temptations of his own devil! Jupiter did not need a devil to lead

him astray. A neatly turned ankle or a pair of melting eyes sufficed

to lure Zeus from Olympus. The world and the flesh were equal to

his undoing. But here is a primitive god, manufactured out of the

imagination of a wholly unsophisticated people, far removed from the

polish and culture of the Greeks, and he cannot sin in hot blood.

First of all, he must be tempted by a fiend, who lures him with the

promise of unlimited power. Zeus had his power ready-made.

Wotan was right. What was a god to do who was short of power?

Preposterous! He could not afford to allow some one else to get the

gold and make the ring. Alberich already had it. What was to be

done? Get it away from him, and so save the Walhalla dynasty from

being dethroned. Wise Wotan! It never occurred to him that Loge was

planning just that _coup_.

Here is a chief god whose power rests upon contracts, yet who does

not know how to make an advantageous bargain with two stupid giants!

Pity the sorrows of the one-eyed god! He is not omnipotent. He is

surrounded by enemies, and afar off looms the fathomless abyss of the

dusk of the gods, the pall of Ragnarok, the last battle. A fortress

must he have, and heroes culled by the aerial Valkyrs from the slain

of all the world to fight for Walhalla in the final hour.

Self-preservation is the selfish motive of Wotan's sin. He haggles

with Fafner and Fasolt for a haven of refuge, and offers a price he

knows he dare not pay. Without Freia, the goddess of youth, he must

wither. What does all this mean? Simply that Wotan was the subject

of a moral law outside of and above him. Was it strange that the

primitive mind could not conceive a god who was himself the law?

Not at all; for, after all, these children of the ages made deities

of human attributes,--power, knowledge, passion, beauty, swiftness.

They knew all these attributes were subject to the moral law, for the

blackest years of Egypt had not obscured the truth that the wages of

sin is death. In "Das Rheingold" Wotan falls a prey to the moral law

as interpreted to him by the giants. In "Die Walküre" he again makes

a foolish effort to dodge it, and the outraged majesty of Fricka

demands revenge. What a futile god!

The figure of Wotan is heroic only in "Die Walküre." Here we find

the old god at bay. In "Rheingold" he is a feeble plotter; in

"Walküre" he faces the inevitable and fights in the last ditch. In

"Siegfried" he has become a garrulous dotard, maundering about the

earth, impotent and puerile, quibbling in childish conundrums with a

shifty dwarf, pledging a head he would not sacrifice, waiting for the

defiant act of the youthful hero, and enacting the silly mummery of

opposing him with the spear which he knows the boy despises.

"In vain! I cannot hinder thee!" he tragically exclaims, as he

stalks off the stage and into the gallery of properties which Wagner

reserves for destruction in the last scene of all. And this is the

All-Father, the Thunderer of the Norse mythology, the supine creature

of moral laws which his pitiable nature cannot grasp and which he

feebly strives throughout the whole story to escape.

What music has Wagner evolved to body forth the traits and

accessories of this godless deity? The Walhall theme, which

identifies with the god the stone walls of his stronghold; the

spear motive, which speaks in splendid accents of the firmness of

sacred obligations, broken by Wotan in the very first scene of the

tragedy; Wotan's anger; Wotan's distress; Wotan the wanderer; Wotan's

bequest of the inheritance of the world. All these themes depict this

entangled god in the meshes of circumstance. There is not a single

motive setting forth any inherent grandeur of character, any great or

noble thought or passion blazing from his soul.

Walhall was Wotan's chapel of refuge. The spear's holy runes were

outside of his personality and greater than it. His anger was

awakened by the disobedience of a loving daughter who sought to be

what she had always been, the heart's wish of the god. The distress

was the fruit of a realization that the stern grip of the moral law

was strangling the whole coterie of Walhall because of its master's

sins.

Wotan the wanderer,--what a desolate succession of changing

tonalities, telling of a god without a local habitation or a name,

a god whose occupation was literally gone! The bequest theme tells

of this doddering deity's resignation of power in favor of youth

and love, two honest agencies much better fitted to carry on the

administration of a world than trickery and subterfuge.

Carlyle in his "French Revolution" harps upon the end that was

contained in the beginning. "Cast forth thy act, thy word," again in

his "Sartor Resartus" he says, "into the ever working universe; it

is a seed grain that cannot die; unnoticed to-day (says one) it will

be found flourishing as a banyan grove (perhaps also as a hemlock

forest) after a thousand years." The Scripture has tersely summarized

the whole matter in the prophetic declaration that the wages of sin

is death.

Wotan's original sin in cheating the giants spreads itself into the

hemlock forest of a mighty tragedy, but for the god himself the

Biblical maxim stands in letters of fire. And here mark the awful

majesty of the Norse myth. Wotan and all his brood fall victims in

the end to the physical manifestation of the evil spirit, Loge.

They are burned in Walhalla. The flickering fire singes out the last

vestiges of this rotten dynasty. The spirit of temptation wreaks

its own vengeance upon the tempted. "Son lo spirito che nega." The

Mephistophelian principle of negation wipes the futile gods off

the firmament. Was there any touch of Schopenhauer or Buddha in

this? Not a whiff. It was pure, stern, primeval morality. It was

unsophisticated man's recognition of the inexorable justice of the

moral law.

How infinitely grander this conception is than the flimsy and

artificial doctrines of the seduction and spear cure in "Parsifal"!

In the consecrational festival play all is manufactured, all is

artificial. The entire external machinery of the thing is a cheap

theatrical pose. In "Der Ring des Nibelungen" the ethics are the

common sense of a people, nay, of whole races, sprung from the mystic

Aryan source and filtered through the anxious thought of a hundred

tribes that speculated under the inspiring stars across the valleys

and plains of all Europe.

How much of all this did Wagner perceive when he was constructing his

extraordinary drama in four plays? His scheme, according to his own

words, contemplated the representation of the gods as writhing in

helplessness under the burden imposed by their own transgression of

the law. This burden could be removed only by the action of a free

agent, a man, whose deeds were all his own. After Titanic preparation

Wagner places this man before us in the person of Siegfried.

His death is the vicarious sacrifice for the gods. In order to get

him killed Wagner writes a whole drama, a mighty one indeed, in which

this noble hero is made to commit a crime while under the influence

of enchantment. He is slain for that crime by Hagen, who knows that

he is innocent, and who contrived the whole plot simply to have an

excuse for killing him, in order to get back the Nibelungs' ring.

What evidence is there that Wagner perceived the full significance of

the final triumph of Loge over the erring Wotan? Not one jot. That

the idea occurred to him in its purely external and physical form is

proved by a passage in the final speech of Brünnhilde:

"Fly home, ye ravens!

Rede it in Walhalla

What here on the Rhine ye have heard!

To Brünnhilde's rock

Go round about.

Yet Loge burns there:

Walhall bid him revisit!

Draweth near in gloom

The dusk of the gods.

Thus, casting my torch,

I kindle Walhalla's towers."

And that is all. Yet the thought lurks always beneath the surface

of the tragedy. Wotan, the father and master of the futile and

disappearing gods, fell a victim to evil itself, to evil which in the

consuming power of flickering fire was its own executioner.

II.--THE WOMAN AND THE SERPENT

I will put enmity between thee and the serpent.

GENESIS iii. 15

Wagner's gallery of portraits of women has been much praised. Senta,

mooning by her idle spinning-wheel and waiting the time when she

might cast her pure spirit on the stained bosom of the ocean rover

and so save him another seven years' damnation; Elsa, wavering

between faith and doubt and finally rushing to destruction out of

sheer curiosity; the holy Elizabeth, praying for the life of him

who had committed against her the deadliest of all sins, gross

infidelity, the sanctified Elizabeth, sweetest, purest, most adorable

of all Wagner's heroines; the blazing torch of human passion, Isolde,

the primeval, unconventional woman; and Brünnhilde, the wish maid,

the sleeping beauty, the waking avenger and liberator,--all these

have been praised by learned commentators in divers tongues.

Wagner was a student of women. He married two, and there are also

many unpublished letters. He wrote "Tristan und Isolde" on the shores

of Lucerne, where Isolde's real name was Mathilde. In the end he was

dominated by a woman, but it may be doubted whether he ever really

comprehended the "ewig weibliche," of which he made such clever

theatrical use. There is not a very convincing feminine element in

"Das Rheingold." The first disclosure is of three Rhein daughters

sporting in the gauzy depths of their native element and singing in

a language all their own around a nugget of gold of which strange

lies are told. It is said that any person who makes a ring of that

gold will have power and dominion over the world. The truth is that

whosoever possesses that ring is bound to get into trouble, because a

filthy little black dwarf will place a freak's curse upon it.

These three fish-tailed maidens, frisking in the sallow glare

of the shaded spot-light, youthful of aspect, ebullient of

manner, irreproachable in morals, so far as one can judge from

their treatment of the winsome Alberich, outlive the futile and

disappearing gods. They come to the surface in the final scene of

"Götterdämmerung," and wrest back their ring from the hands of Hagen,

whom they incontinently drown in their dotted Swiss habitation. There

must be a deep moral lesson somewhere in this. What is it? Possibly

it signifies that good girls are always triumphant in the end. At any

rate, it accentuates the pitiable feebleness of the mighty ones of

Walhall.

Another feminine figure in the foreword of the trilogy is the

excellent Erda. This portentous poser in green light and veiling

makes two appearances in the course of the tragedy. The first is in

"Rheingold" and the second in "Siegfried." She occupies a position

somewhat similar to that of a Greek chorus. She helps the audience to

a comprehension of what the rather incomprehensible gods are doing.

She always comes to the surface when Wotan is "stumped."

The first time she comes when he is about to commit an act of

folly. She tells him to get rid of the ring which he had employed

so much strategy to procure. He promptly obeys her, although he has

never seen her before, and was pretty thoroughly astonished by her

unexpected appearance. The second time she discloses herself when

Wotan is sorely in need of more sound advice. We now learn that

Wotan, who in "Rheingold" had declared that he intended to know

more of the lady, has not wasted his time in idle prating. The nine

Valkyrs are the living proofs of this. Erda is plainly not at all

pleased to meet her old friend again. She gives him another dark and

dismal warning, and leaves him to chew the cud of his own cheerful

reflection.

Freia, the charming young woman for whom the giants wrangle, is a

mere figure in "Rheingold." She might as well be a piece of stage

property. She counts for nothing else. She has no more dramatic

significance than the lumps of gold which the dwarfs lug upon

their straining shoulders. She belongs to the same category as the

delectable Donner and Froh, who stand about in odd corners and try

desperately to look as if they were Vulcan and Apollo, whereas they

are neither.

One feminine character stands alone in "Rheingold." The virtuous

Fricka, type of that species of amiable wife who regards all mortal

desire as utterly depraved and who would joy to wrap herself in a

spotless mantle of _noli me tangere_ and let her husband worship her

on bended knees outside the portals of her holy temple,--she is the

woman with a mission in this splendid tragedy of futile gods and

fumbling mortals.

But Fricka is right, after all. If Wotan had listened to her

advice, he would have come out of all his difficulties much better.

The fount of misfortune, as far as Fricka is concerned, was her

failure to brush the dust off her own garments in the day of the

first temptation. Loge knew where to touch the quick of her woman's

weakness. "Will the gold make pretty ornaments for women?" she asked;

and Loge, who, being the spirit of evil, well knew the root, declared

that there was nothing which it could do better than that. And so

Fricka stood actionless while Wotan went down to Niebelheim to rape

the gold from Alberich.

Short-sighted Fricka! Mean-spirited Fricka! True woman Fricka!

When she has tacitly consented to the theft of the gold, what does

she? Seeing her poor old one-eyed husband struggling to escape the

consequences of his guilt by creating a race of free agents to make

the atonement for him, she pounces upon him with a stern demand that

Siegmund shall die for violating her standards of virtue. But who

ever expected to find a consistent logic in the mind of fair woman,

even a resident of high Olympus?

Having turned upon the hand that sought to benefit her, what does

she? She joins the procession of the futile and disappearing gods.

Fricka mounts her ram-hauled chariot and slides away into the past,

only to reappear in the chaste and general conflagration of the last

great scene. She has served her purpose. She has made the drama of

"Siegfried" imperatively necessary.

Siegmund being slain in answer to her inexorable demand, Brünnhilde

must be punished for trying to carry out Wotan's original plot. Of

course that is well enough. If Brünnhilde had had her way, there

never would have been any drama of "Siegfried" and consequently

no "Götterdämmerung." But without Siegfried things cannot go on.

Sieglinde must hie her to the dark forest in the east, there to sob

out her sweet but shadowed young life, and leave to the whining Mime

the nursery task of rearing the youthful Volsung.

Modern Musical Drift · 第 2 / 11 段