G.I. Bill For Workers

So I challenge Congress to consolidate 70 overlapping, antiquated

job-training programs into a simple voucher worth $2,600 for unemployed or

underemployed workers to use as they please for community college tuition

or other training. This is a G.I. Bill for America's workers we should all

be able to agree on.

More and more Americans are working hard without a raise. Congress sets the

minimum wage. Within a year, the minimum wage will fall to a 40-year low in

purchasing power. Four dollars and 25 cents an hour is no longer a living

wage, but millions of Americans and their children are trying to live on

it. I challenge you to raise their minimum wage.

In 1993, Congress cut the taxes of 15 million hard-pressed working families

to make sure that no parents who work full-time would have to raise their

children in poverty, and to encourage people to move from welfare to work.

This expanded earned income tax credit is now worth about $1,800 a year to

a family of four living on $20,000. The budget bill I vetoed would have

reversed this achievement and raised taxes on nearly 8 million of these

people. We should not do that.

I also agree that the people who are helped under this initiative are not

all those in our country who are working hard to do a good job raising

their children and at work. I agree that we need a tax credit for working

families with children. That's one of the things most of us in this

Chamber, I hope, can agree on. I know it is strongly supported by the

Republican majority. And it should be part of any final budget agreement.

I want to challenge every business that can possibly afford it to provide

pensions for your employees. And I challenge Congress to pass a proposal

recommended by the White House Conference on Small Business that would make

it easier for small businesses and farmers to establish their own pension

plans. That is something we should all agree on.

We should also protect existing pension plans. Two years ago, with

bipartisan support that was almost unanimous on both sides of the aisle, we

moved to protect the pensions of 8 million working people and to stabilize

the pensions of 32 million more. Congress should not now let companies

endanger those workers' pension funds. I know the proposal to liberalize

the ability of employers to take money out of pension funds for other

purposes would raise money for the treasury. But I believe it is false

economy. I vetoed that proposal last year, and I would have to do so

again.

State of the Union Addresses(#5048) · 第 44 / 64 题