J. C. R.

_Poetaster_ (Vol. iv., p. 59.).--In reply to A BORDERER, I do not think

_poetaster_ to be a genuine Latin word, though where first used I do not

know. The French equivalent is _poetereau_; the Italian _poeterio_; both

formed according to the analogies of the respective languages.

_Poetaster_ seems to me to be formed upon the model of _oleaster_,

_pinaster_, &c., as though to indicate that the person to whom the name

is applied is as unlike a true poet as the wild olive to the true olive,

or the wild pine to the true pine. What then is the derivation of

_aster_ as a termination? Some punster will say, respecting _oleaster_,

that it is _olea sterilis_. Is it not [Greek: agrios]? or is it rather a

form cognate to the Greek termination [Greek: -azo], which generally

means the performance of some energy, or the exhibiting of some state,

implied in the substantive; as though the wild olive affected the

characteristics and condition of the genuine olive? I am fully aware of

many difficulties in the admission of these derivations. I would suggest

another. Does _aster_ signify that which affects or approaches the

characteristics of the substantive to which it is added, as the

terminations _-estis_ or _-estris_, whereby adjectives are formed; as

_agrestis_, _sylvestris_, _campestris_, at the same time that the forms

are allied, _-aster_, _-estris_, _-estis_?

Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 103, October 18, 1851 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 79 / 102 题