MARRIAGE OF ECCLESIASTICS.

(Vol. iv., pp. 57. 125. 193. 196.)

In the early ages, your correspondent H. WALTER assumes that the

primitive Christians knew "that their Scriptures said of marriage that

it was honourable in all" (Vol. iv., p. 193.). H. WALTER is under more

than one mistake with regard to the text of St. Paul (Heb. xiii. 4.) on

which he grounds his assertion. This whole chapter being full of

admonitions, the apostle, all through it, speaks mostly in the

imperative mood. He begins with, "Let brotherly love continue;" "Be not

forgetful," &c.; "Remember them that are in bonds," &c. Then he says:

[Greek: Timios ho gamos en pasi, kai he koite amiantos], that is: "Let

(the laws of) marriage be revered in all _things_, and the marriage bed

be undefiled;" and as a warning to those who might not heed such an

admonition, he adds, "whoremongers and adulterers God will judge." H.

WALTER mistakes the adjective feminine [Greek: en pasi] as meaning "all

men," whereas it signifies here, "in all things;" according to which

sense St. Paul uses the same form of speech in 2 Corinthians xi. 6. True

it is, the authorised version translates thus: "Marriage _is_ honourable

in all;" but the _is_ is an insertion of the translators, and therefore

printed in Italics. Parkhurst, however, in his _Lexicon_, at the word

[Greek: Gamos], says: "Wolfius has justly remarked, the imperatives

preceding and following show that we should rather understand [Greek:

esto] than [Greek: esti]. See also Hammond and Macknight; and observe

that the Alexandrian and two other MSS., for [Greek: de] in the

following sentence read [Greek: gar], and the Vulgate translates by

_enim_, "for."

I cannot but think that the makers of the authorized version advisedly

inserted _is_ instead of _let_, to forward their own new doctrines, as

this their rendering would seem to countenance the marriage of priests.

Curiously enough, when they had no interest in putting in the indicative

instead of the imperative mood, those same translators have of

themselves inserted, in the verse following, the latter, thus: "_Let_

your conversation _be_ without covetousness," &c. Moreover, in

translating [Greek: en pasi], in another passage of St. Paul, 2 Cor. xi.

6., they render it, "in all things;" in which same sense it is to be

understood in the above place, Heb. xi. 4.

Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 103, October 18, 1851 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 64 / 102 题