CHAPTER VI

THE DECLINE OF LIFE

I have now sketched to its close the later period of Moore's literary

career; there remains to be set out the sad list of domestic troubles

under which his health and intellect finally gave way. But first, it is

pleasant to dwell upon some of the brighter circumstances which made

middle age for him not the least enjoyable period of a life rich in

enjoyment--and above all upon the indications, which he so highly

valued, of Ireland's growing enthusiasm for her own poet.

Moore liked always "digito monstrari et dicier, 'Hic est'"; and his

Journal abounds with records of his ingenuous satisfaction in such

tributes. Here is an agreeable passage, which brings not only the little

poet, but his very adoring (and adorable) wife, before us:--

"Oct. 15, 1829. To Bath with Bessy, to make purchases, carpets,

chimney pieces, etc., etc. In the carpet shop (in Milsom St.) where

I gave a cheque for the money, and my signature betrayed who I was,

a strong sensation evident through the whole establishment, to

Bessy's great amusement; and at last the master of the shop (a very

respectable-looking old person), after gazing earnestly at me for

some time, approached me and said, 'Mr. Moore, I cannot say how

much I feel honoured, etc., etc.,' and then requested that I would

allow him to have the satisfaction of shaking hands with one 'to

whom he was indebted for such etc., etc.' When we left the shop,

Bessy said, 'What a nice old man! I was very near asking him

whether he would like to shake hands with the poet's _wife_ too.'"

A far more conspicuous instance, however, of his "friendly fame" is

afforded by the narrative of his expedition to Scotland, in the autumn

of 1825, when the publication of his _Sheridan_ entitled him to a

holiday, and Bessy insisted that he should take one. The purpose of the

journey was to visit Sir Walter Scott, whom Moore had only once met,

some twenty years earlier. There was no other guest in the house at

Abbotsford, and Sir Walter, as Lockhart testified afterwards, enjoyed

having Moore to himself, and gave up his mornings, usually sacred to

work, in honour of the occasion. The liking between the two men was

immediate, but none the less profound; and on the third day, the Diary

notes that Scott said, "laying his hand cordially on my breast, 'Now, my

dear Moore, we are friends for life.'" Neither friend had ever power to

serve the other, but there is no passage in Moore's memoirs more

evidently sincere than that in which he expresses (only a few months

later) his "deep and painful sympathy" in the news of Scott's financial

misfortune:--"For poor devils like me (who have never known better) to

fag and to be pinched for means, becomes, as it were, a second nature;

but for Scott, whom I saw living in such luxurious comfort, and

dispensing such cordial hospitality, to be thus suddenly reduced to the

necessity of working his way, is too bad, and I grieve for him from my

heart."

But in 1825 all went gaily at Abbotsford, and Scott lionised his guest

with enthusiasm--Jeffrey helping. In the Law Courts at Edinburgh Moore

found himself "the greatest show of the place, and followed by crowds";

but the main demonstration took place when Scott conducted his guest to

the theatre, and the whole pit immediately rose at them. Moore was

compelled to bow his acknowledgments for two or three minutes, and the

orchestra played Irish melodies after each act; all this to the vast

delight of Scott, who, just fresh from cordialities in Ireland, was glad

to see his countrymen return the compliment.

But it was in Ireland itself that Moore found himself fêted and honoured

with a kind of welcome such as seldom has been accorded to any man of

letters. In 1830, the research for reminiscences of Lord Edward

Fitzgerald gave him a reason to cross to Dublin for a long visit, and

take his wife and boys to see his mother. Here, for the first and only

time, Moore made a public appearance before a gathering of his

countrymen assembled for a political purpose. A meeting had been called

to celebrate the recent Revolution in France, and the poet was set down

to second one of the resolutions. Eloquence was one of his

accomplishments, and he appears to have enjoyed the excitement of

feeling that "every word told on his auditory," who overwhelmed him with

applause.

The meeting had special significance, as marking a definite political

connection, which the character of his book on Lord Edward only

emphasised when it came to be published. He had been brought into close

touch with the leading Repealers, and expressed a general approbation of

their objects--though he thought O'Connell's agitation for Repeal both

premature and ill-judged. He was, in truth, hardly more in complete

sympathy with the Irish leader than with his Whig friends, who seemed to

display in office (which they now held) all the qualities which he had

disliked in their predecessors. In Ireland, however, there was every

disposition to minimise differences of opinion, and the public

enthusiasm for his character and achievements expressed itself, in 1832,

by an effort to induce him to enter Parliament.

Moore replied with a refusal, on the ground that his means were narrow

and precarious, and that he could not spare the time; as indeed he might

well say, for in this year he had been forced, not only to accept

Marryat's offer of £500 for contributions to a magazine, but even to

borrow (for the second time in his life) from a friend, Rogers.

Curiously enough, a second proposal of the same kind came to him from a

very different quarter. Lord Anglesey, then Viceroy, conveyed through a

third person his wish that Moore should stand for Dublin University, and

promised him all the Government support. In declining this offer on the

same grounds as he had alleged to the Limerick electors, Moore added a

very plain statement that, with the views he entertained, he could not

enter parliament under the sanction of that Government. The Whigs had

resorted to coercion, and "As long," he wrote, "as the principle on

which Ireland is at present governed shall continue to be acted on, I

can never consent to couple my name, humble as it is, with theirs."

The matter dropped then, so far as Government was concerned. But the

Limerick constituency was not so easily put off, although Moore had

explained to O'Connell--who was anxious to have the poet's

support--that he should never think of entering parliament except as a

purely unfettered representative. Such was the eagerness, that a scheme

was formed of purchasing an estate worth £300 a year in the county, and

presenting it to the poet; and after this proposal had been communicated

by letter, Gerald Griffin, author of _The Collegians_, came, along with

his brother, in person to Sloperton to urge its acceptance.

Moore was not prepared for the visit, but welcomed his guests. Part of

Gerald Griffin's account may be cited as showing an exceedingly able

young Irishman's attitude of mind towards the poet (_the_ poet), and the

impression which Moore left on him:--

"Oh, my dear L----, I saw the poet! and I spoke to him and he spoke

to me, and it was not to bid me 'get out of his way,' as the King

of France did to the man who boasted that his majesty had spoken to

him; but it was to shake hands with me and to ask me 'How I did,

Mr. Griffin?' and to speak of 'my fame.' _My_ fame! Tom Moore talk

of my fame! Ah the rogue, he was humbugging, L----, I'm afraid. He

knew the soft side of an author's heart, and perhaps he had pity on

my long, melancholy-looking figure, and said to himself, 'I will

make this poor fellow feel pleasant if I can,' for which, with all

his roguery, who could help liking and being grateful to him?...

..."We found our hero in his study, a table before him, covered

with books and papers, a draw half opened and stuffed with letters,

a piano also open at a little distance; and the thief himself, a

little man, but full of spirits, with eyes, hands, feet, and frame

for ever in motion, looking as if it would be a feat for him to sit

for three minutes quiet in his chair. I am no great observer of

proportions, but he seemed to me to be a neat-made little fellow,

tidily buttoned up, young as fifteen at heart, though with hair

that reminded me of 'Alps in the sunset'; not handsome perhaps, but

something in the whole cut of him that pleased me; finished as an

actor, but without an actor's affectation; easy as a gentleman, but

without _some_ gentlemen's formality; in a word, as people say when

they find their brains begin to run aground at the fag-end of a

magnificent period, we found him a hospitable, warm-hearted

Irishman, as pleasant as could be himself, and disposed to make

others so."

Nothing but civilities resulted from the interview. We learn from

Moore's Diary that he gave them dinner, and told them his opinion of

Repeal--which was, that separation must be considered as its inevitable

consequence. This startled his guests, and they disclaimed "all thoughts

and apprehensions" of such a result. "What strange short-sightedness!"

Moore exclaims. It may be noted that Moore was always exaggerated in his

estimate of consequences, and foretold the most prodigious upheavals as

a result of the Reform Bill. It is also to be noted, that in his

opinion, "so hopeless appeared the fate of Ireland under English

government, whether of Whigs or Tories," that he "would be almost

inclined to run the risk of Repeal even with separation as its too

certain consequence, being convinced that Ireland must go through some

violent and convulsive process before the anomalies of her present

position can be got rid of, and thinking such riddance well worth the

price, however dreadful would be the pain of it." So far was Moore from

thinking that Catholic Emancipation settled Ireland's claims in full.

His refusal to represent an Irish constituency was however definitely

conveyed to the envoys in a letter, written for publication, which after

grateful acknowledgment of the honour done him, and of the kindness

which had proposed a national subscription to provide him with the

necessary qualification, ended as follows:--

"Were I obliged to choose which should be my direct paymaster, the

government or the people, I should say without hesitation, the

people; but I prefer holding on my free course, humble as it is,

unpurchased by either; nor shall I the less continue, as far as my

limited sphere of action extends, to devote such powers as God has

gifted me with to that cause which has always been uppermost in my

heart, which was my first inspiration, and shall be my last--the

cause of Irish freedom."

Moore's friends with one accord congratulated him not only on the taste

of his letter, but on his decision. And indeed, quite apart from

considerations of money, his position in Parliament would have been

impossible. In agreement neither with Whigs nor Tories, he was hardly

more in sympathy with O'Connell's party; and he gave strong expression

to his feelings in a remarkable lyric included in the tenth and last

number of the _Irish Melodies_, published in 1834:--

"The dream of those days when first I sung thee is o'er,

Thy triumph hath stain'd the charm thy sorrows then wore;

And ev'n of the light which Hope once shed o'er thy chains,

Alas, not a gleam to grace thy freedom remains.

"Say, is it that slavery sunk so deep in thy heart,

That still the dark brand is there, though chainless thou art;

And Freedom's sweet fruit, for which thy spirit long burn'd,

Now, reaching at last thy lip, to ashes hath turn'd.

"Up Liberty's steep by Truth and Eloquence led,

With eyes on her temple fix'd, how proud was thy tread!

Ah, better thou ne'er hadst lived that summit to gain,

Or died in the porch, than thus dishonour the fane."

A footnote pointed the meaning in these words.

"Written in one of those moods of hopelessness and disgust which

come occasionally over the mind, in contemplating the present state

of Irish patriotism."

Not unnaturally, O'Connell was angry, and his friend Con Lyne wrote to

Moore, entreating "an alleviating word." Moore replied, the Journal

notes--

"that I was not surprised at O'Connell's feeling those verses, as I

had felt them deeply myself in writing them; but that they were

wrung from me by a desire to put on record (in the only work of

mine likely to reach after-times) that though going along, heart

and soul, with the great cause of Ireland, I by no means went with

the spirit or the manner in which that cause had been for a long

time conducted."

He admitted that, though the verses were addressed to Ireland, O'Connell

had a right to take them to himself, "as he is and has been for a long

time, to all public intents and purposes, Ireland." That was just what

Moore complained of. He disliked the removal of "all independent and

really public-spirited co-operators"; he regarded the position of this

"mighty unit of a legion of ciphers" as a threat to freedom, certain to

lead to an abuse of power. "Against such abuse of power, let it be

placed in what hands it might," he "had all his life revolted and would

to the last revolt." From the dignity of this really serious criticism

he detracted somewhat by adding that O'Connell's resolution against

duelling had done much "to lower the once high tone of feeling in

Ireland"; for he omitted to make the necessary observation that, when

O'Connell forswore duelling, he by no means forswore personal

vituperation. The letter contained no allusion to a feeling which

certainly was in Moore's mind when he wrote the verses--namely, his

dislike of the "annual stipend from the begging-box." But even without

this, it was an explanation ill calculated to alleviate, and Moore

thought that public feeling in Ireland might probably run strong against

him.

Ireland, however, was constant to her poet. In the next summer (1835) he

crossed to Dublin, when the British Association was meeting there, and

the demonstration when he was first seen in the theatre went beyond all

customary bounds and was not to be checked without a brief speech from

the box. But a more ceremonious ovation was to come. Moore decided to go

to Wexford to visit the home of his grand-parents, and he was to be the

guest of a Mr. Boyse who lived at Bannow. On the approach to this town

from Wexford--where Moore was met by his host--the party was encountered

by a cavalcade bearing green banners, and so escorted formally to a

series of triumphal arches, where a decorated car awaited the poet, with

Nine Muses ("some of them remarkably pretty girls") ready to place a

crown on his head. It had been arranged that the Muses should follow on

foot; but as the crowd pressed in, Moore made three of them get up on

the car. As they proceeded slowly along, with a band playing Irish

melodies, and the tune set to Byron's "Here's a health to thee, Tom

Moore," the hero turned to the pretty Muse behind him and said, "This is

a long journey for you." "'Oh, sir,' she exclaimed, with a sweetness and

kindness of look not to be found in more artificial life, 'I wish it was

more than three hundred miles.'"

Speeches followed, with dancing in the evening, and a green balloon

floated over the dancers, bearing to the skies, "Welcome, Tom Moore."

That evening there came an express from the Lady Superior of the

Presentation Convent at Wexford, begging for a visit to her community.

Thither accordingly Moore was taken next day, and, for a crowning

ceremony, planted with his own hands--"Oh Cupid, prince of gods and

men!"--a myrtle in the convent garden. No sooner was the plant in the

earth, than the gardener proclaimed, while filling up the hole, "This

will not be called _myrtle_ any longer, but the _Star of Airin_!" Well

may Moore ask, "Where is the English gardener chat would have been

capable of such a flight?"

Demonstrations of this organised character did not recur; but the

spontaneous outbursts of feeling manifested themselves, publicly and

privately, in ways often a little ridiculous, but not less often really

touching. When Moore next visited Ireland (in 1838) he went to the

theatre evidently with the purpose of making a speech, and the

opportunity was furnished with éclat: "There exists no title of honour

or distinction," he told them, "to which I could attach half so much

value as that of being called your poet--the poet of the people of

Ireland." Certainly the title was not grudged; and the people of Ireland

claimed a sort of proprietary right in their bard, as he found when he

embarked at Kingstown for his return.

"The packet was full of people coming to see friends off, and

amongst others was a party of ladies, who, I should think, had

dined on board, and who, on my being made known to them, almost

devoured me with kindness, and at length proceeded so far as to

insist on, each of them, _kissing_ me. At this time I was beginning

to feel the first rudiments of coming _sickness_, and the effort

to respond to all this enthusiasm, in such a state of stomach, was

not a little awkward and trying. However, I kissed the whole party

(about five, I think) in succession, two or three of them being,

for my comfort, young and good-looking, and was most glad to get

away from them to my berth, which through the kindness of the

captain (Emerson) was in his own cabin. But I had hardly shut the

door, feeling very qualmish, and most glad to have got over this

osculatory operation, when there came a gentle tap at the door, and

an elderly lady made her appearance, who said that having heard of

all that had been going on, she could not rest easy without being

also kissed as well as the rest. So, in the most respectful manner

possible, I complied with the lady's request, and then betook

myself with a heaving stomach to my berth."

A more modest and less embarrassing act of homage was brought to Moore's

notice in London by Panizzi. Among the labourers at work on the

buildings of the British Museum was a poor Irishman, who, learning that

Moore was sometimes to be seen there, offered a pot of ale to any one

who would point him out. Accordingly, next time Moore came, the Irishman

was taken to where he could get a sight of the poet, as he sat reading.

Such was his pleasure at being able to say "I have seen," that he

doubled the pot of ale to his conductor. Again, in 1842 Moore was coming

away from a public dinner with Washington Irving, and they found rain

falling and themselves in sore need of cab or umbrella.

"As we were provided with neither," Moore writes, "our plight was

becoming serious, when a common cad ran up to me and said: 'Shall I

get you a cab, Mr. Moore? Sure, ain't _I_ the man that patronises

your Melodies?' He then ran off in search of a vehicle, while

Irving and I stood close up, like a pair of male Caryatides under

the very narrow projection of a hall door-ledge, and thought at

last that we were quite forgotten by my patron. But he came

faithfully back, and while putting me into the cab (without minding

at all the trifle that I gave him for his trouble) he said

confidentially in my ear: 'Now mind, whenever you want a cab,

Misthur Moore, just call for Tim Flaherty, I'm your man.' Now this

I call _fame_, and of somewhat a more agreeable kind than that of

Dante, when the women in the street found him out by the marks of

hellfire on his beard."

Green balloons, effusive elderly spinsters and the rest, all had their

ridiculous side, and Moore was not slow to see it. But, taking these

merely as symptoms of a very genuine affection, one may conclude that he

had a fair right to feel in his country's gratitude a deep source of

strength and consolation. For the rest, the pleasures of friendship and

of society never failed him so long as he was able to enjoy them; and

his English friends, in the time when he most needed it, did him a real

service.

We have seen that he neither liked the measures of the Whig

administration--which included two of his intimates, Lord Lansdowne and

Lord John Russell, with many others of his friends--nor was in the least

disposed to conceal his dislike of them. Lord John wrote to say that he

was glad of Moore's decision not to enter Parliament, as it would pain

him to find his friend going into the opposite lobby. But he was none

the less inclined to serve Moore, and his first step showed an extreme

anxiety to propitiate the poet's easily alarmed scruples. He approached

Lord Melbourne, then Premier, with a proposal to bestow a pension on

Moore's sons. Melbourne replied, with great justice, that to make a

small provision for young men was only an encouragement to idleness, and

that whatever was done, should be done for Moore himself. When the

administration was reconstructed in July 1835, Lord John offered his

friend a place in the State Paper Office, which was declined, and Lord

Lansdowne then wrote, approving this refusal, but urging in the

strongest terms Moore's acceptance of a pension, "which," he said, "no

human being can blame the government for giving or you for accepting.

The administration is one of a more popular character as respects your

Irish opinions than any which has existed or is likely to exist; and

your literary reputation is so established that there is not a country

under the sun where literary rewards or distinctions exist in which you

would not be recognised as the first and most deserving object of them."

To this Moore replied that he would trust himself entirely to Lord

Lansdowne's guidance, and accordingly a letter reached him in Dublin,

saying that a pension of £300 a year had been granted him--the first

granted by the Administration. On his return from the festivities in

Bannow, a letter from Bessy awaited him, which is copied in the

Journal:--

"My dearest Tom,--Can it _really_ be true that you have a pension

of £300 a year? Mrs., Mr., two Misses and young Longman were here

to-day, and tell me it is really the case, and that they have seen

it in two papers. Should it turn out true, I know not how we can be

thankful enough to those who gave it, or to a Higher Power. The

Longmans were very kind and nice and so was _I_, and I invited them

_all five_ to come at some future time. At present I can think of

nothing but £300 a year, and dear Russell jumps and claps his hands

for joy.... If the story is true of the £300, pray give dear Ellen

£20, and _insist_ on her drinking £5 worth of wine _yearly_ to be

paid out of the £300 a year.... Is it true? I am in a fear of hope

and anxiety and feel very oddly. No one to talk to but sweet Buss,

who says, 'Now, Papa will not have to work so hard, and will be

able to go out a little.' ... _N.B._--If this good news be true, it

will make a great difference in my _eating_. I shall then indulge

in butter to potatoes. _Mind_ you do not tell this piece of

gluttony to _any_ one."

It is pleasant to think of this climax to all the exultation of the

Wexford processions. Moore was entitled to say to himself that he had

done yeoman's service to the principles for which a Whig administration

then stood, and yet had shown his complete independence of persons. What

he received, no man could say had been gained by any compromise with his

convictions; and it came at a time when it was much needed, for his

power of literary production had largely spent itself. The comic

inspiration had not indeed wholly run dry, for in 1835 Moore published

_The Fudges in England_ (a work even more unworthy of its predecessor

than most sequels); and in 1836 he entered into an agreement to supply

the _Morning Chronicle_ with squibs--his _Times_ connection having long

dropped. But except for this, and the furbishing up in 1839 of

_Alciphron_, his first draft in verse of the Egyptian story, nothing

more appears to have been produced by him, except the volumes of his

_History of Ireland_, which appeared respectively in 1835, 1836, 1840,

and 1846.

In fact, within the last seventeen years of his existence, Moore wrote

little or nothing but these volumes of history, for which he appears to

have received £500 apiece. It will be seen how timely was the succour of

the pension.

One other resource, however, and a considerable one, was afforded by a

project on which Moore's heart had long been set, and which finally

matured in 1837--that of collecting his poetical works into a complete

edition. The copyrights of his early Poems had returned to him, but the

great bulk of his lyrics was held by Power's widow--for the little

publisher had died in 1836, not before disputed accounts had altered the

long and friendly relation between him and the author of the _Irish

Melodies_. Longmans now bought out her rights for £1000, and paid Moore

another thousand for the task of collecting and arranging the poems and

writing prefaces, many of which contain interesting biographic detail.

It was a long labour, but the edition was finally completed in 1841.

Unhappily in that year, he was in no case to be concerned for its

success or failure; the Diary hardly refers to this event, of such

importance in a man's literary life. Troubles, which had long been heavy

and insistent upon him, then fairly culminated.

* * * * *

In spite of his love and talent for society, Moore was essentially a

domestic animal; and, as he advanced in life, his home ties were

stronger and stronger. The welfare of his children and their health--for

they were all delicate--preoccupied him with a constant and painful

anxiety, which was, however, more than compensated by the pleasure which

he derived from them as they grew up.

He was indeed no baby-worshipper, and notes profanely after one birth:

"Bessy doing marvellously well, and the little fright, as all such young

things are, prospering also." The first death in his household, that of

an infant girl, Byron's goddaughter, affected him mainly as a cause of

grief to his wife; and even when he lost his eldest daughter in 1817,

truly and deeply though he sorrowed, it is evident enough that the

weight of the blow fell on Bessy rather than on him. He was then the one

of the two to take thought for the other; not perhaps that he cared

less, but that his temperament was then more natural and healthy.

Eight years later he notes the first symptom of what was doubtless a

growing infirmity. About a fortnight after his father's death he spent

the evening in Dublin with some old friends, and sang a good deal for

them.--"In singing 'There's a song of the Olden Time,' the feeling which

I had so long suppressed" (for he had been active in endeavouring to

keep up his mother's spirits) "broke out; I was obliged to leave the

room, and continued sobbing hysterically on the stairs for several

minutes." From this onward, the same proclivity manifested itself at

intervals with growing vehemence. After any stress of emotion, the

plangent quality of his own voice in singing tended to produce one of

these outbursts, when it seemed as if his chest must burst under the

strain. Yet he always fought against the weakness, and notes more than

once how, after a sudden collapse of this kind, he made an effort, and

returned to the piano, laughing at himself, while he rattled off gay

songs.

But the wrench which of all others seems to have done most to shatter

him, came not long after this first breakdown (which dates from the end

of 1826, his forty-seventh year); and it found a man strangely altered

from what he had been ten or twelve years earlier. His eldest girl's

death had left the second, Anastasia, to inherit a double share of

affection, and her chronic delicacy kept her parents continually

anxious. At last the beginning of the end came early in 1829, just at

the moment when Moore was receiving news that Catholic emancipation was

a certainty. "Could I ever have thought," he writes, "that such an event

would, under any circumstances, find me indifferent to it? Yet such is

almost the case at present." Even when he wrote this, he did not realise

the worst; the truth was not forced on him till his wife had been

"wasting away on the knowledge of it" for three weeks. We have his

detailed account of the last fortnight, during which the parents could

do nothing but make their child's last days as happy as they

could--spending the evenings together with the girl, playing little

games, reading aloud and so forth. His description of the end must be

quoted:--

"Next morning (Sunday 8th) I rose early, and, on approaching the

room, heard the dear child's voice as strong, I thought, as usual;

but on entering, I saw death plainly in her face. When I asked her

how she had slept, she said 'Pretty well,' in her usual courteous

manner; but her voice had a sort of hollow and distant softness,

not to be described. When I took her hand on leaving her, she said

(I thought significantly), 'Good-bye, papa.' I will not attempt to

tell what I felt at all this. I went occasionally to listen at the

door of the room, but did not go in, as Bessy, knowing what an

effect (through my whole future life) such a scene would have on

me, implored me not to be present at it.... In about three quarters

of an hour or less, she called for me, and I came and took her hand

for a few seconds, during which Bessy leaned down her head between

the poor dying child and me, that I might not see her countenance.

As I left the room, too, agonised as her own mind was, my sweet

thoughtful Bessy ran anxiously after me, and, giving me a

smelling-bottle, exclaimed, 'For God's sake, don't you get ill.' In

about a quarter of an hour afterwards, she came to me, and I saw

that all was over. I could no longer restrain myself; the feelings

I had been so long suppressing found vent, and a fit of loud

violent sobbing seized me, in which I felt as if my chest were

coming asunder."

Avoiding, after his habit, the actual sensations of horror, Moore took

his wife out for a drive while the funeral was going on. There is no

doubt, as I have said already, something unmasculine in all this

shrinking from the physical impression, and one may trace something of

the luxury of grief in the detailed recital. But the note with which it

closes has the true accent of tragedy:--

"And such is the end of so many years of fondness and of hope; and

nothing is left us but the dream (which may God in his mercy

realise), that we shall see our pure child again in a world more

worthy of her."

Gradually, however, time healed the rawness of the wound, and in June of

the same year, a new interest was added to Moore's London visits. His

eldest boy, Tom, was installed at the Charterhouse, on a nomination

secured through Lord Grey, and from this onward the Diary is full of

references to the boy's charming (but idle) ways. Moore records dinners

with Master Tom,--"who, bless the dear fellow, was more amusing than any

of the _beaux esprits_,"--compliments on his beauty, valued all the more

because a likeness was noted to his mother, and, in short, gives every

instance of parental fondness. We read less perhaps about the other boy,

Lord John Russell's godson and namesake, who entered the same school a

year or two later, Sir Robert Peel this time giving the nomination. But

of both his boys Moore was mighty fond and proud, and it was a moment of

great happiness in his life when, in 1830, he conveyed Bessy and the

pair of them to Dublin for a visit to his other home in Abbey Street.

"My sweet sister Nell, just the same gentle spirit as ever; both in

great delight with our boys; and my dear Bess never looked so

handsome as she did sitting by my mother, with a face bearing the

utmost sweetness and affection, all for my sake. Had a most happy

family dinner."

The happiness lasted through the visit of six weeks. It was fifteen

years since Bessy Moore had been in Ireland, and then she had not lived

in the same house with her husband's folk, who consequently knew her

mainly by report. "They have now, however," Moore writes, "had her with

them as one of themselves, and the result has been what I never could

doubt it would be."

Six months later an urgent summons from his sister prepared him for the

severing of the closest and oldest of all ties. But when he reached

Dublin he found his mother rallied, and her doctor (Crampton) quoting

Mother Hubbard at her. After three or four days her strength was so far

restored that he felt able to return. But her parting from her son was

that of one taking the last farewell. She told him--and indeed she had

good right to--that he had always done his duty, and more than his duty,

by her and hers. Twelve months later she died, and the news was

announced by letter. The effect upon Moore was not that of shock, but

rather of deep and saddening depression, which continued for some days

and seemed more to be a bodily indisposition than any mental affliction.

"To lose such a mother was," he said, "like a part of one's life going

out of one."

There was, however, one consolation for this great loss. Moore's sister,

Ellen, became a yearly visitor to the Sloperton household, and was drawn

fairly into the home circle. Meanwhile, the enthusiasm of his

countrymen, and the good help of the pension, brightened matters; and,

as the boys grew up, Moore's pleasure in their society increased

steadily.

He had procured, under the most distinguished auspices, their admission

to a first-rate school; and, fond as he was, he enforced in some matters

a standard of conduct more rigid than usual. He set his face against

their taking money from any one but their parents, and expressed

righteous indignation when Lord Holland defended to him the practice of

tipping. Still more indignant was he when the head master represented to

him that the elder boy could get an exhibition worth about £100 a year

to take him to college, and that Moore need only add an allowance of

£150! It seems, however, that exhortations against extravagance

prevailed less than the example of spending money freely, which was set

to the young Tom by those with whom his father led him to associate. The

younger son, Russell, was steadier in character, but decided, like his

brother, for the army; and Moore was accordingly put to the heavy

expense of outfitting both and launching them in this costly profession.

Once launched, however, he was sanguine enough to expect that they could

live on their pay.

Tom was gazetted to the 22nd regiment in 1837, and was given six months

to study French in Paris, where his father established him under

pleasant conditions. Having joined his regiment in 1838 at Cork, he was

shortly transferred to Dublin, and here his presence was a pleasure to

his aunt, Moore's favourite sister; the news of this made a happy break

in the anxieties at Sloperton, where Bessy Moore, always delicate, had

just come through a severe illness. In the summer, Moore joined his son

and his sister, and was, as we have seen, enormously applauded by his

countrymen at the theatre. Next day the father and son were to have

dined with Lord Morpeth, the Irish Chief Secretary, but by one of the

lapses of memory which began to be habitual with Moore, they presented

themselves instead at the Vice-Regal Lodge and were half through dinner

before the guest realised what he had done, only to be overwhelmed with

expressions of delight at the mistake. It was no doubt a little

difficult for a young man with a father who was on such terms with both

the people and the rulers of Ireland to realise that he was only the son

of a needy and struggling worker, always at straits to make ends meet:

and probably Tom himself took the view, expressed to Moore by a friend

newly come from Ireland, that such an allowance should be made to the

young soldier as would enable him to "live like a gentleman." Moore was

angry, and it is easy to sympathise with his disappointment; easy also

to condemn his want of foresight.

Tom's regiment was ordered to India, and to India also went the younger

son, Russell, for whom a cadetship in the Company's Army had been

secured. The younger boy sailed in April 1840, and, although the

parting was a heartbreak (above all to the mother), Moore felt at every

turn what he calls gratefully "the value of a friendly fame like mine."

Directors of the Company, officers aboard ship, governors of provinces,

all vied with one another in services; and when the lad reached

Calcutta, Lord Auckland, then Governor-General, gave him a room in

Government House.

Little good came of all these good offices. Lord Auckland's sincere

kindness could only manifest itself in looking after an invalid and

writing cordial letters to the parents. Russell Moore's health was quite

unequal to the profession he had chosen, and eighteen months after he

had reached India, news came that he had been dangerously ill and was

ordered home.

In the meanwhile the other son, though keeping his health, was incurring

debts. There is a note from Bessy, copied into the Diary, surely as

heartbroken a cry as could come from a wife and mother. Enclosing a bill

for £120 drawn by Tom upon his father, she writes that she can hardly

bring herself to send it:--

"It has caused me tears and sad thoughts, but to _you_ it will

bring these and hard _hard_ work. Why do people sigh for children?

They know not what sorrow will come with them. How _can_ you

arrange for the payment? and what could have caused him to require

such a sum? Take care of yourself; and if you write to him, for

God's sake, let him know that it is the very last sum you will or

_can_ pay for him. My heart is sick when I think of you, and the

fatigue of mind and body you are always kept in. Let me know how

you think you can arrange this."

A second draft for £100 followed quick on it, and early in the next

year, still worse news. The young man had sold his commission and was on

his way home. £1500 in all had been spent in fitting him out and

purchasing, first an ensigncy, then a lieutenancy; and this was the

upshot of so much anxiety and outlay. And the second boy, who had done

all that could be hoped of him, was on his way home too, to a sad

meeting. "It seemed all but death," Moore writes, "when he stepped out

of the carriage exhausted with the journey, and wasted with lung

disease." There was a rally for a few months, during which Moore was

busy trying to shape some new future for the prodigal Tom, who was

remaining in France. Four hundred pounds would have preserved his

lieutenancy (being the money actually paid down out of the price of his

commission), but Moore refused to find it. He was already reduced to

borrowing from a friend, Mr. Boyse, his Wexford host; and though Rogers,

Lord Lansdowne, and probably many others would, as Lord John Russell

regretfully comments, have willingly advanced the larger sum, they heard

nothing of the need. Moore's own object was to secure his son a

commission in the Austrian service, but Tom himself wrote from France

suggesting the Légion Étrangère. Interest was quickly made with Soult

through Madame Adelaide, who received the prodigal and made much of him

for his father's sake--"a continuation of that spoiling process," Moore

writes sadly, "to which poor Tom (as my son) has been from his childhood

subjected." The thing was settled accordingly, not without another draft

for a hundred and odd pounds to enable the son to leave for Algiers. A

few days before he set out for the new dangers and hardships of Africa,

his brother had died peacefully at home. It was only the last straw in a

load of trouble that the one remaining child could not even get leave

for a farewell visit home, before he launched, under no good omens, into

a new career and clime.

The record of the nest year (1843) is short and uninteresting--notes of

engagements for the most part. One is characteristic enough to quote:--

"_March_ 23. Breakfasted at Rogers's to meet Jeffrey and Lord

John--two of the men I like best among my numerous friends.

Jeffrey's volubility (which was always superabundant) becomes even

more copious, I think, as he grows older. But I am ashamed of

myself for finding any fault with him."

_"Lenior et melior fit accedente senecta"_ is a phrase that has full

application to this veteran of letters. The year closed with a cruel

hoax (the crueller as it coincided with fresh demands from Tom). Some

one in Ireland wrote to inform Moore that £300 had been left him as a

testimony of regard. Moore had suspicions, but he adds:--

"There was an air of truth and reality which half lured my poor

Bess and myself into hailing it as a providential God-send.

Already, indeed, her generous heart was apportioning out the

different presents it would enable her to make to my sister, to the

poor H----s, etc. Alas! alas! I wish no worse to the ingenious

gentleman who penned the letter than an exactly similar

disappointment."

I shall add the next entry in the Diary, Moore's farewell to the year

1843:--

"A strange life mine; but the best as well as pleasantest part of

it lies _at home_. I told my dear Bessy, this morning, that while I

stood at my study window, looking out at her, as she crossed the

field, I sent a blessing after her. 'Thank you, bird,' she replied,

'that's better than money'; and so it is. Bird is a pet name she

gave me in our younger days, and was suggested by Hamlet's words,

'Hillo, ho, ho, boy! come, bird, come'; being the call, it seems,

which falconers use to their hawk in the air, when they would have

him come down to them."

What one feels on reading these passages, and contrasting them with many

earlier ones, is perhaps best expressed by assenting to the view of Miss

Berry, recorded in the Diary. Moore had taken the liberty of an old

friend in going unasked to one of her famous _soirées_, and on his

saying something of this:--

"She reverted in her odd way to the early days of our acquaintance,

and said, 'I didn't so much like you in those days. You were

too-too--what shall I say?' 'Too brisk and airy perhaps,' said I.

'Yes,' she replied, taking hold of one of my grizzly locks, 'I like

you better since you have got these.' I could then overhear her,

after I left her, say to the person with whom I had found her

speaking, 'That's as good a creature as ever lived!'"

The light and buoyant nature, which had been so sorely battered,

received its final shock soon after the date to which I have brought

this story. 1844 was spent in scriving over the _History_,--Moore

repelling now the friendly advances even of his Bowood neighbours, yet

with difficulty repelling them. The task was finished at last in the

spring of 1845, but there remained the need of a preface, and Moore

records that after various endeavours he left this, "in utter despair,"

to the publishers to provide. Later in the year, the annual visit from

his sister Ellen made a brightness in the house, now so quiet; and after

she had gone, there came letters from Tom asking for money for a trip

home. It was sent, and he wrote back rejoicing at the prospect, but

explaining that he should not come before spring owing to a cough which

he had contracted. The words were ominous, and both his parents almost

made up their minds that they were never to see him again.

The foreboding was only too well justified. But the first blow which

fell was one little looked for. Ellen Moore died suddenly in her bed. A

month later came from Africa "a strange and ominous-looking letter which

we opened with trembling hands, and it told us that my son Tom was

dead." I add one last quotation from the Diary.

"The last of our five children now are gone and I am left desolate

and alone. Not a single relative have I now left in the world."

That is practically the end of Moore's life. A severe illness followed,

and "when he recovered," says Lord John Russell, "he was a different

man." "Nothing seemed to rest upon his mind," and, with his memory, his

wit had gone also. He made an excursion to town in 1846 to superintend

the production of the last volume of his history, and one year later

still, to be the guest of Rogers, who was to Moore, at any rate, a most

considerate, loyal, helpful, and constant friend. But what he wrote to

this friend from Sloperton was true: "I am sinking here into a mere

vegetable." So, peacefully at the last, after five years of mere

breathing, in which neither joy nor sorrow touched him, he faded out of

life; watched over to the last by the woman who had grown more necessary

to him with every year.

He left her unprovided with money, yet not without provision. The

Memoirs which he, himself a great lover and reader of such literature,

had scrupulously kept for a period of close on thirty years, were always

designed to be a posthumous resource; and he had confided them by a will

made many years earlier to the care of Lord John Russell. Had he

foreseen that the friend of whom he asked this office would be charged

with the cares of an Administration, when it fell to be accomplished,

the request would probably not have been made; but being made, it was

duly honoured, and Moore, who had always liked impressive auspices for

his children at the font,[1] had himself a Prime Minister for his

biographer.

The work might perhaps have been better done by a man less fully

occupied, but the purpose for which the Memoirs were written could not

have been more fully served. The Longmans offered £3000 for the Memoirs,

if Lord John would edit them, and it was found that for this sum an

annuity could be bought, equal to the pension which had for the last

part of Moore's life been the sole resource of the household. Bessy

Moore lived and died in Sloperton, and was laid in the churchyard beside

her husband and her children; and old men in the little Wiltshire hamlet

remember her and her good works--the only one of her lifelong pleasures

and occupations which was left to this good woman, whom it is impossible

to think of as lonely. The record of her life and her husband's--for the

two are inseparable--may close with as touching a little attention as

was ever paid by an elderly man to his elderly wife. In 1839, when

money was no way plenty with him, Moore sent five pounds to a friend,

which the friend was to forward anonymously to Bessy for her poor--thus

giving her the pleasure which he judged she would most value, without

the distress of thinking that he must labour more to make up the little

outlay.

[1] Lady Donegal, Byron, Lord Lansdowne, Lord John Russell, and Dr. Parr

were among the sponsors.

Thomas Moore · 第 6 / 7 章