Were We To Use the Same Procedure

There is no doubt that even under the Spanish regime we already knew

of the existence in the Philippines of criminals condemned to death

and imprisonment for murder, theft, rape, sacrilege, and all kinds

of crimes, and that the corruption of customs was neither unknown

nor rare. Since under the entire period of Spanish domination,

instruction was under the exclusive care of the friars of the Roman

Church, if we utilize the same procedure of the above-mentioned

prelate, we could also accuse all the priests of having instructed

the Filipinos, thru their education, in murder and in theft, and that

the corruption of customs was "all the seasoned fruit of the Catholic

schools." I do not propose such an accusation; I only content myself

with presenting it as a logical consequence which could be deduced

following the method used by the prelate in speaking to no less than

his priests in a circular designed to orient the mentality of his

clergy and of his parishioners. Pondering over the accusation of the

Bishop, it occurred to me that it would be beneficial to recall the

public instruction that was formerly given in the Philippines by the

"godly schools" and consider the results obtained. Confident in the

respectable character, and, to many, the sacred character of the

priests, I must resort to their testimony to know what that education

was and what results it gave to the Filipino people.

We should not conceal the truth when the truth portrays things that

may not be pleasing to us. None like those who are dedicated to

instruction have such an interest in knowing the mentality of the

society in which they live and which it is their duty to educate. An

exact knowledge of the moral, intellectual, and physical defects

of a people is the most important factor to orient its education,

and it would be absurd to close one's eyes to what is bad, because

the principle of correcting a certain thing is to know if it is a

mistake or not. One cannot correct an evil of which he is ignorant.

The Legacy of Ignorantism · 第 14 / 43 题