L. What is it to be alive?

DORA. There now; you're going to be provoking, I know.

L. I do not see why it should be provoking to be asked what it is

to be alive. Do you think you don't know whether you are alive or

not?

(ISABEL skips to the end of the room and back.)

L. Yes, Isabel, that's all very fine; and you and I may call that

being alive: but a modern philosopher calls it being in a "mode of

motion." It requires a certain quantity of heat to take you to the

sideboard; and exactly the same quantity to bring you back again.

That's all.

ISABEL. No, it isn't. And besides, I'm not hot.

L. I am, sometimes, at the way they talk. However, you know,

Isabel, you might have been a particle of a mineral, and yet have

been carried round the room, or anywhere else, by chemical forces,

in the liveliest way.

ISABEL. Yes; but I wasn't carried: I carried myself.

L. The fact is, mousie, the difficulty is not so much to say what

makes a thing alive, as what makes it a Self. As soon as you are

shut off from the rest of the universe into a Self, you begin to

be alive.

VIOLET (indignant). Oh, surely--surely that cannot be so. Is not

all the life of the soul in communion, not separation?

L. There can be no communion where there is no distinction. But we

shall be in an abyss of metaphysics presently, if we don't look

out; and besides, we must not be too grand, to-day, for the

younger children. We'll be grand, some day, by ourselves, if we

must. (The younger children are not pleased, and prepare to

remonstrate; but, knowing by experience, that all conversations in

which the word "communion" occurs, are unintelligible, think

better of it.) Meantime, for broad answer about the atoms. I do

not think we should use the word "life," of any energy which does

not belong to a given form. A seed, or an egg, or a young animal,

are properly called "alive" with respect to the force belonging to

those forms, which consistently develops that form, and no other.

But the force which crystallizes a mineral appears to be chiefly

external, and it does not produce an entirely determinate and

individual form, limited in size, but only an aggregation, in

which some limiting laws must be observed.

MARY. But I do not see much difference, that way, between a

crystal and a tree.

L. Add, then, that the mode of the energy in a living thing

implies a continual change in its elements; and a period for its

end. So you may define life by its attached negative, death; and

still more by its attached positive, birth. But I won't be plagued

any more about this, just now; if you choose to think the crystals

alive, do, and welcome. Rocks have always been called "living" in

their native place.

MARY. There's one question more; then I've done.

The Ethics of the Dust · 第 51 / 142 题