L. Take off the lid, then; gently.

FLORRIE (after peeping in, disappointed). There's only a great

ugly brown stone!

L. Not much more than that, certainly, Florrie, if people were

wise. But look, it is not a single stone; but a knot of pebbles

fastened together by gravel: and in the gravel, or compressed

sand, if you look close, you will see grains of gold glittering

everywhere, all through; and then, do you see these two white

beads, which shine, as if they had been covered with grease?

FLORRIE. May I touch them?

L. Yes; you will find they are not greasy, only very smooth. Well,

those are the fatal jewels; native here in their dust with gold,

so that you may see, cradled here together, the two great enemies

of mankind,--the strongest of all malignant physical powers that

have tormented our race.

SIBYL. Is that really so? I know they do great harm; but do they

not also do great good?

L. My dear child, what good? Was any woman, do you suppose, ever

the better for possessing diamonds? but how many have been made

base, frivolous, and miserable by desiring them? Was ever man the

better for having coffers full of gold? But who shall measure the

guilt that is incurred to fill them? Look into the history of any

civilized nations; analyze, with reference to this one cause of

crime and misery, the lives and thoughts of their nobles, priests,

merchants, and men of luxurious life. Every other temptation is at

last concentrated into this: pride, and lust, and envy, and anger

all give up their strength to avarice. The sin of the whole world

is essentially the sin of Judas. Men do not disbelieve their

Christ; but they sell Him.

SIBYL. But surely that is the fault of human nature? it is not

caused by the accident, as it were, of there being a pretty metal,

like gold, to be found by digging. If people could not find that,

would they not find something else, and quarrel for it instead?

L. No. Wherever legislators have succeeded in excluding, for a

time, jewels and precious metals from among national possessions,

the national spirit has remained healthy. Covetousness is not

natural to man--generosity is; but covetousness must be excited by

a special cause, as a given disease by a given miasma; and the

essential nature of a material for the excitement of covetousness

is, that it shall be a beautiful thing which can be retained

without a use. The moment we can use our possessions to any good

purpose ourselves, the instinct of communicating that use to

others rises side by side with our power. If you can read a book

rightly, you will want others to hear it; if you can enjoy a

picture rightly, you will want others to see it: learn how to

manage a horse, a plough, or a ship, and you will desire to make

your subordinates good horsemen, ploughmen, or sailors; you will

never be able to see the fine instrument you are master of,

abused; but, once fix your desire on anything useless, and all the

purest pride and folly in your heart will mix with the desire, and

make you at last wholly inhuman, a mere ugly lump of stomach and

suckers, like a cuttle-fish.

SIBYL. But surely, these two beautiful things, gold and diamonds,

must have been appointed to some good purpose?

L. Quite conceivably so, my dear: as also earthquakes and

pestilences; but of such ultimate purposes we can have no sight.

The practical, immediate office of the earthquake and pestilence

is to slay us, like moths; and, as moths, we shall be wise to live

out of their way. So, the practical, immediate office of gold and

diamonds is the multiplied destruction of souls (in whatever sense

you have been taught to understand that phrase); and the paralysis

of wholesome human effort and thought on the face of God's earth:

and a wise nation will live out of the way of them. The money

which the English habitually spend in cutting diamonds would, in

ten years, if it were applied to cutting rocks instead, leave no

dangerous reef nor difficult harbor round the whole island coast.

Great Britain would be a diamond worth cutting, indeed, a true

piece of regalia. (Leaves this to their thoughts for a little

while.) Then, also, we poor mineralogists might sometimes have the

chance of seeing a fine crystal of diamond unhacked by the

jeweler.

SIBYL. Would it be more beautiful uncut?

L. No; but of infinite interest. We might even come to know

something about the making of diamonds.

SIBYL. I thought the chemists could make them already?

L. In very small black crystals, yes; but no one knows how they

are formed where they are found; or if indeed they are formed

there at all. These, in my hand, look as if they had been swept

down with the gravel and gold; only we can trace the gravel and

gold to their native rocks, but not the diamonds. Read the account

given of the diamond in any good work on mineralogy;--you will

find nothing but lists of localities of gravel, or conglomerate

rock (which is only an old indurated gravel). Some say it was once

a vegetable gum; but it may have been charred wood; but what one

would like to know is, mainly, why charcoal should make itself

into diamonds in India, and only into black lead in Borrowdale.

SIBYL. Are they wholly the same, then?

L. There is a little iron mixed with our black lead; but nothing

to hinder its crystallization. Your pencils in fact are all

pointed with formless diamond, though they would be H H H pencils

to purpose, if it crystallized.

SIBYL. But what IS crystallization?

L. A pleasant question, when one's half asleep, and it has been

tea-time these two hours. What thoughtless things girls are!

SYBIL. Yes, we are; but we want to know, for all that.

The Ethics of the Dust · 第 38 / 142 题